Thankful For: Good Design!

We were chatting yesterday with an editor at the New Yorker,
and the conversation turned on the role of design in modern magazines.
The New Yorker, of course, is an old-fashioned magazine that has not
changed in any major way for more than seventy-five years. To be sure,
there were some dramatic touches added under Tina Brown in the late
nineties—photography appeared for the first time, bylines went to the
tops of stories, a table of contents and letters to the editor were
published for the first time. But these were dramatic only in context.
Compared to all other magazines, the New Yorker remained an
intransigent old-timer that persisted in its jazz-age stylings. Most of
us still thank God for that.

Now
it was the view of my New Yorker friend that readers simply do not care
about design the way editors, publishers, artists, and designers do—in
other words, it’s only people in the publishing industry who care about
something so frivolous as page layout. I’m not sure I agree completely
with that view.

It’s easy to say there is little interest in
design when your magazine is the gold standard of narrative journalism
and cartoons, and when the design has not changed in three-quarters of
a century. My friend and I agreed, though, that design that is used to
cover up a lack of substance in a story is a bad thing. But I think it
should be possible to do both at the same time. (There are magazines,
like ESPN, for example, that are emphatically about image rather than
text— ESPN magazine was, after all, modelled on its television
namesake. They play by different rules, of course, or create their own.
Personally, I read Playboy for the articles, but I can see how some
people might look more to the art.)

In most magazines, there is
a rough balance between words and pictures. Good design is what marries
a good story to good art. You can’t just plop down on the page a big,
full-color photo, and then flow a story around it in whatever space
remains and expect it to “work.” It is a careful, exacting thing—more
art than science, surely—to make text and image play nicely and
complement each other. Even at a place like The New Yorker, where text
is king, there are still very serious design quandries every issue.

Their
particular cross to bear is that they don’t fit stories to space, but
vice versa. In other words, a story is written at whatever length it
takes to tell the story properly, and then the space on the page is
fitted to the words. All those clever little postage-stamp drawings?
They are called “space shims” to make a story end at the bottom of a
page, and not some other random place in the magazine. Carmine Peppe
was the legendary layout-editor at the New Yorker , one of its great
unsung heroes. For more than fifty years, he was responsible for the
incredibly delicate craft of space shimming, not unlike a master
carpenter.

So. Even when you think design doesn’t matter, design still matters.—The Editor in Cheese


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.