Month: May 2005

  • The Worthlessness of Things

    In the photo, he’s twenty-five or so. Quite obviously, the picture was taken in the early 1970s. He is wearing loud plaid pants, a shiny pink shirt with ruffles down the front and at the cuffs, and a huge bowtie and vest. His afro is cropped, but not too close, and he’s smiling, one of those big, open-mouthed smiles that shows the gap in his front teeth. But there’s something off in the man’s expression, too. It’s in the eyes. They look hollow and sad, as though deep down the man is missing something. Something he’s never had and will never get.

    The picture is a little wrinkled and stained, as if it had gotten wet, and set crookedly in a frame that’s much too large. It dangles haphazardly from a nail on a basement wall in a suburban Minneapolis rambler. It’s one of thousands of things left behind by this man with the smile—piles and boxes and suitcases full of stuff, which are being pawed through by a crowd of bargain hunters. Whatever goes unsold will wind up in an enormous black trash bin that stands out front, menacingly, under the picture window.

    This sale was different from a typical estate sale, which is different from a typical garage sale. While a garage sale represents a thinning out, the happy prospect of making room for a den or a sauna or a new season of dresses, an estate sale represents obliteration—the end of a life, or at least a life in a particular home. Usually, the endless array of items, which range from lamps to pantyhose, are neatly tagged and arranged throughout the house by a relative, or by a company that takes a cut. Everybody wants a cut. But this particular sale was chaotic, the fallout from some ongoing disaster.
    Because the arrangements are normally so logical, with their displays and tidy categorizations, it’s easy for browsers to trace the arc of a person’s existence. You can see that when they were young they traveled, went to Mexico a couple of times or Greece. There may even be Spanish language textbooks, or books on reading Latin. Reading habits are generally more ambitious in youth; there’s often a focus on modern literature and classics (which may themselves have been modern when purchased) like Fitzgerald, Hemingway, or even Rimbaud. Or there is evidence of curiosity in science or nature or philosophy. But as life progresses, ambitions dissipate or are sacrificed and the books get more modest and practical: mysteries, romance novels, true crime, and exercise guides like Stretching for Seniors. Often the newest books describe how to go on without a spouse, cook for one, cope with diabetes, or beat lung cancer. Books on diseases present significant clues. So do stacks of old TV Guides and matchbooks from Treasure Island casino. At some point, it seems, living becomes simply a matter of passing time.

    Clothing choices evolve, too, of course. Sizes generally increase as the wearer ages; the fabrics become more uniformly polyester and rayon. Wash and wear. And there are more cardigans with wadded tissue in the pockets. With shoes, women’s heels get lower and the styles wider, to accommodate foot problems that result from a life of moving around.

    In all, visiting an estate sale is like going on an archeological expedition through the ruins of somebody’s life; you, the explorer, make guesses and assumptions based on the evidence at hand. An abundance of holiday decorations usually means grandchildren. Lots of hammers and tools mean a handyman—someone who had no children to inherit them or had children who went to law school. And if, when you go into the bathroom, you see bars of soap and cans of half-used shaving cream and hairspray, all for fifty cents each, well then you have to face facts. The people who lived in the house are dead.

    At those moments, you feel like a vulture picking at a sun-dried carcass by the side of the highway. But, hey, this stuff has to go somewhere, you think. Maybe it’ll help pay for the funeral. And you reassure yourself that at least you’re not part of the network of hardcore collectors who stand outside a house at seven for an eight o’clock sale. Those are the true vampires, hoping to snap up the dishes, records, antique bureaus, nineteenth-century silver spoons, and anything else that might objectively be worth something. That might be sold on eBay for a profit. These shoppers rush from table to table with poker faces and pockets full of cash, laughing to themselves—these people don’t know what they have. Me, I go late, on the last day of a sale usually, which is often bag day. That means you can have as much junk as you can stuff into a paper sack for one or two dollars. What I look for are the sentimental items, which some might say makes me the worst type of vampire of all. I want those things that, while worth next to nothing monetarily, were special to whomever owned them. A homemade painting of a frowning poodle. A crocheted pillow that reads, “World’s Greatest Postman.” Photographs from birthday parties and Thanksgivings. Men smiling in shiny pink shirts.

    It’s an attempt, I suppose, to gather sentimentality all in one place. I’m a glutton for meaning, even somebody else’s meaning. And so my own collection of stuff is largely made up of items that once made somebody else laugh or cry, trinkets and keepsakes that were stowed in drawers and albums and chests, propped on kitchen windowsills. They are idyllic farm scenes embroidered quite obviously without patterns and little houses fashioned from matchsticks, examined and perfected as much as the builder’s talents allowed. Part of the appeal is that that these items, sitting on the “bargain” table on the last day of a sale, seem orphaned. I’m consistently surprised that nobody wants them, for they, more so than the Tiffany lamp or the ruby pendant, carry on the spirit of their former owner. Perhaps that’s why people don’t want them—nobody likes to think about the past, it seems, only tomorrow. Except for people like me. My house is full of ghosts.

    Our things speak for us, especially when we are gone. They do this both by their specificity and their context. I think about my own home: What will somebody, someday, make of my collection of other people’s poorly executed art projects, photos of unrelated relatives, and a video library that includes Ikiru and Road House? Will someone get excited about the dress in which I was married, the one my husband bought at a garage sale, and will she wear it proudly to a cocktail party in the twenty-second century? Or will it be cut up and made into sofa pillows? Or, worse, will it go directly into the big black trash bin that will be waiting under my picture window? It’s a disconcerting notion, that the fate of my possessions is out of my hands. I might choose to bequeath some things, but, really, I don’t have much that’s worth bequeathing. I won’t be around to tell the stories, funny and sad, that make my things meaningful—to describe the spot where I found the rock that looks like Abe Lincoln’s head, or relate how a napkin comes from a bar where I was served free drinks by an eighty-five-year-old birthday boy. I won’t be able to define my own history. It will be defined by estate-sale shoppers, just as I attempt to define the history of the smiling, gap-toothed man.

    ***

    The man’s suburban home was stuffed with clues, but they were muddled, confusing—they didn’t add up. Items weren’t organized or labeled. They sat in slowly rotting piles, abandoned, perhaps suddenly, reminding me of those Robert Polidori shots of Chernobyl where dingy stuffing spills from forgotten teddy bears and paint peels from walls in blisters. The man’s cupboards still contained cans of food and jars of pickles. The paper towel holder held paper towels. There were albums full of photos—the man next to a gravestone, him with a circle of kids completing some sort of craft project, him on a sofa with his arm around a pretty woman in a red dress—and a selection of African artifacts: drums, masks, and carvings, all a
    little beat up. But they’d certainly taken effort to collect. These were not the kinds of things you leave behind unless you have to.

    The most striking thing about this estate sale, however, was the sheer, surreal volume of what the man had accumulated. One room was floor-to-ceiling electronics. There were maybe thirty telephones, some working, some not; fifty or more radios of various types and sizes; an impressive collection of small televisions; and a couple of electric organs. Two children were banging on the organs. Nobody told them to stop. What difference did it make? Desperation breeds disrespect. And, besides, it was bag day. Everything had to go. Everywhere in the house, there was clothing—piled up along the walls, flowing out of half-crushed boxes, covering floors like torn wrapping paper on Christmas morning. Aside from what was plainly visible, in room after room there stood towering piles of suitcases stuffed tight with clothing—men’s, women’s, children’s, from all eras. Some rooms you simply couldn’t go into, as there was nowhere to begin. People threw up their hands. Flicked off the lights. Walked away.

    Sales like this one are always rife with gossip. Pickers wondered aloud what had happened, and stories were circulating. Those running the sale, white people, not too friendly, seemed to be disgusted with the gap-toothed man. He’d been evicted, they explained. Couldn’t say why. But what about all the radios, the suitcases, the institutional cans of refried beans? Were these the remains of a garbage house or what? A paunchy man in a white Vikings sweatshirt carrying a receipt pad said he wasn’t sure. He scratched his head. He thought the man had been African and that he had been gathering materials and goods for a relief effort. So the man, at least in his own mind, had intended one day to send all this stuff to wherever in Africa he came from. This was evidence of best laid plans not just gone awry, but exploded.

    I walked into a side room, where there was a small book collection on a shelf. I picked out two dictionaries and placed them in my paper sack, next to a carved, cracked wooden statue of a man with his head in his hands, and the photos. Browsing the rest, I spotted a book about living with schizophrenia. So there was that.

    The picture of the man in the shiny pink shirt haunted me. I put it away when I got home. Then I took it out again. And then I pinned it above my desk. What had happened to him? I opened his dictionaries and found a name inscribed meticulously inside, along with dates and origins: “November 10, 1997—Diggers.” It was an African name. I started searching. First, I drove back by the house, which had gone up for sale. I called the listing real estate agent, who was abrasive about the inquiry, probably because he, for whatever reason, had been the one who evicted the man. No doubt, he must have been a handful, but the one-man-relief-effort also couldn’t have been all bad. Regarding the motive behind the many mounds of stuff, the agent said, “I believe he was going to ship it off, but he wasn’t very good with follow-through.” Most of what remained at the end of bag day wound up in the big black trash bin. Now it was officially garbage. The agent verified the man’s name, said he was around fifty years old. He wouldn’t put me in touch with the owner of the house, couldn’t tell me how long the man had lived there, didn’t know where he had gone. “As far as I’m concerned,” the agent said via cell phone, busy, on his way to a showing, “he fell off the face of the earth.”

    Google came next. There were a couple of people in the Midwest with the man’s last name, a doctor in Wisconsin and a yoga instructor who had just moved from Minnesota to California. I left messages for them both, and for the property owner, whom I found through Hennepin County tax records. No one returned my calls. My curiosity growing, I phoned people at local homeless shelters, but they aren’t allowed to say who stays where, for privacy reasons. I even performed one of those online background searches that cost fifty dollars, which turned up a couple of scrapes with the law, a drug possession charge, another for domestic abuse. Some nonpayment of taxes.

    Finally, a phone message came from the doctor in Wisconsin. He spoke with a heavy accent. “Yes, he is my older brother,” he said. “If you have any questions you can call me at my office. He is still in Minneapolis.” I, of course, did call his office. Several times. But I didn’t hear another word from the doctor in Wisconsin. I only know that his brother is alive somewhere in the city. Who he is, what happened, why things fell apart, remains a mystery. And maybe, in the end, the details of his life are none of my business anyway. I will simply enjoy the items that were once his—the wooden statue, a bowl, a pickax with a loose head. I will imbue these items with my own meanings, create a truth for them based on the thinnest of clues, just as somebody, someday, will do again after I am dead or gone.

  • Rebel Riders

    Lowriding isn’t about how close your Impala sits to the concrete. It’s
    about flexing your muscles, gritting your teeth, and shining your wheel
    covers. At least that’s what we came away thinking after the “Hydraulic
    Showdown” event, which was part of last month’s Cinco de Mayo festival
    in St. Paul. But the art of lowriding was not lost on us—not with all
    that horsepower on display, and all those eye-popping paint jobs,
    ornate mags, painstakingly detailed decals and astonishing tattoos. The
    owners of these automotive masterpieces smiled mischievously from
    behind goatees and dark glasses. Then they hopped into their rides,
    cranked the tunes (a lowrider’s nothing without massive subwoofers),
    and rolled ever so slowly by the honeys.

  • Cue The Meatloaf

    “Two Out of Three Ain’t Bad” would be an appropriate, if obnoxious, theme song for Ron Gardenhire’s Twins, for this or any season. The mantra in the Minnesota clubhouse during Gardenhire’s tenure has always been, “We’re just trying to win each series. The rest will take care of itself.”

    That’s a decent, ambitious goal for a baseball team. A .660 winning percentage should be more than enough to easily win any division. The 2004 Cardinals played .648 ball and led the majors with 105 wins. The White Sox, of course, are playing at an unreal .707 clip so far this year, and no one really expects them to be able to keep that up. The Twins current .590 winning percentage is better than they finished last year, and would have been good enough to win three divisions in ’04; still, barring a complete Chicago collapse they’ll probably have to crank it up a notch, or at the very least keep rolling at their present pace to close ground on the Sox.

    Thanks once again to the weird schedule, Minnesota and Chicago won’t meet again until August, and the two teams will play their remaining thirteen games against each other in the season’s final two months (including seven games in September).

    The last couple games of the Toronto series were encouraging on all sorts of levels. The team bounced back from Johan Santana’s discouraging (and almost shocking) outing on Tuesday, and got a decent start from Kyle Lohse on Wednesday, and a spectacular start out of Joe Mays today. Juan Rincon and Joe Nathan appear to have suffered no lingering effects from their shaky outings in last Friday’s eleven-inning train wreck against Texas.

    Michael Cuddyer continued his May resurrection, going four-for-seven with three RBIs in the last couple games (and raising his batting average to .274). Two of those RBIs came on his bases-loaded double off Gustavo Chacin in the sixth inning of today’s 4-0 victory in the series finale. The thirteen-pitch battle that resulted in that double was one of the great at-bats you’ll ever see (Cuddyer fouled off eight two-strike pitches, including one long, high blast that just hooked foul down the leftfield line), and was all the more significant given the Twins futility with the bases loaded so far this year.

    “I saw all of his pitches in that at-bat,” Cuddyer said afterwards. “I saw some of them several times, in fact. I was just trying to stay back, get a good swing, and try to drive the ball. In an at-bat like that, after a while you stop trying to guess and just try to see each pitch. In the back of my mind, though, I knew he’d thrown me a change-up my previous time up, and I hadn’t seen it yet. It turned out that was the pitch I eventually hit, but by then, of course, I was no longer really looking for it.”

    Finally, to return to Meatloaf for a moment, I’d like to give you a heads up that I’ve started to assemble my All-Time Fat Bastard team, and I welcome early suggestions for worthy candidates.

  • The Fairer Sex

    When I login at home, I use the equvialent of the old wooden, crank-up party line—my dial-up America Online account. I have to admit that I always wait enthusiastically for the slow emergence of today’s headlines, like tea leaves swirling in the digital kettle. There are usually three main “news” headlines that rotate in a rudimentary server push on AOL’s homepage. These are the most distilled, highest-proof example you’ll ever find of Time-Warner’s idea of what captures the most eyeballs in the least amount of time. (Technically speaking, they are normally breathtaking in their brevity. I doubt whether AOL editors ever waste more than twenty-five characters on a story head; anyone who has ever tried to fit headlines to space knows what a special talent this requires.)

    The breakdown of the rotation goes something like this: First, the hard news story, preferably with heavy overtones of partisan positioning. (That way, you can salt in two or three reader surveys as an additional enticement.) Second, there is usually a celebrity story of one kind or another, most often having to do with a current scandal or A&E release. Third comes the highly solicitious reader service—Are you too fat? Having enough sex? Working too hard? Is your spouse having an affair? How much would you spend to save your dog’s life? Where will you vacation this summer? Is there a cocktail in your near future? (AOL’s homepage on the web expands this formula to five items—two celebrity bits and two service bits.)

    Anyway, this morning’s hard news bit was this: “Should Women Serve?” (Paired with a photo of a female GI in fatigues with an M-16, it did not function quite like the double or triple entendre it does here.) This struck me as provocative, although I resisted the urge to click through to the story. Clicking through is usually a disappointment—AOL’s news stories are almost always stripped down wire items with no teeth or boots. The brevity and concision of that smart headline is most often linked to a story that would barely pass muster in almost any high-school newspaper in the land.

    But it did get me thinking. I’ve been saying for months that Democrats would be insane to propose Hillary Clinton for prez in 2008—largely because of entrenched, genteel misogyny. You think Americans are uncomfortable with the idea of gay marriage? Wait until you start push-polling them on whether the US can withstand a woman as commander in chief. That’s why we say only under ONE condition should the Dems put Billary on the ticket: They must also get a referendum on as many ballots as possible to eliminate the vote for women. It would totally work.

  • Crapping on the Koran, part 2

    Will wonders never cease? The conservative columnist of the NY Times, David Brooks, came to the defense of Newsweek today.

    Brooks takes note of the fact that radical Islamists hardly need a short item in an American magazine with an excellent reputation to incite them to senseless violence against almost everyone.

    He doesn’t actually put it in so many words, but, he suggests we ask Muslim clerics, “Where is the Koran, if not in the toilet, when you are encouraging children to blow themselves up to kill fellow Muslims in Afganistan?”

    Now I’ve never incited Muslims to violence by, for example, calling for a “crusade” or invading their country, unlike a certain President I know. And I’ve never pissed off Hindus by calling them devil worshipers, like a certain Christian leader.

    But, I have written some fairly inflammatory things about right wing Christians in this space, and so far no one has walked in here ringed with C4. Of course, I’m not an “activist” judge either. Maybe the Christian bombers are saving themselves for when it really counts.

  • Those Godless Television Geniuses, Always Doing Satan's Work

    CBS tinkers with the magic formula, and the youth of America burn in Hell: “Joan of Arcadia” is out; Jennifer Love Hewitt talking to dead people is in.

    “I think talking to ghosts may skew younger than talking to God,” Moonves said.

  • A Hard Pat on the Backside

    We were a little pressed for time yesterday, since our presence was requested at Minnesota Magazine Day. This is an annual to-do over at the Hyatt, hosted graciously by the Minnesota Ad Federation. It consists of a “magazine grab”—basically a shopping spree for most major titles from Hearst, Fairchild, Conde Nast, and the other big nationals. (Also any locals you haven’t already seen.) If you’ve paid the admission fee, you grab as many magazines as you can manage to carry—which is great for doing research, we’ve found.

    Then there is lunch and a little motivational speech or two. Yesterday’s speakers included an executive from the Magazine Publishers of America, and the keynote came from People Magazine publisher Paul Caine. The usual bromides were uncapped. The song was upbeat, in the key of heavy flattery. National magazine professionals love to come to Minneapolis to compliment us on our terrific advertising climate. Indeed, this is a great town for a lot of reasons, not the least of which is the presence of some of the nation’s best advertising houses, some of the nation’s most solvent ad-buyers, and not a few enthusiastic readers of magazines. We’re getting a little tired of hearing how great we are, actually. While the local publishing scene gets some respect—smart people here not only read magazines and buy ads in them, they also happen to make a few good titles, too—we think it’s not quite sufficient to our desserts.

    Each year, the pep talk rarely diverges from the same script. It’s almost comical to hear about how healthy and vital and beloved magazines are, coming from the mouths of people who sell national advertising in them. And yet, the rule doesn’t usually apply in the opposite direction. You should buy an ad in an Advance Publications property, but Advance Publications isn’t all that interested in returning the favor.

    What we mean by this is that the national publishing and advertising communities basically syphon off our money and our creativity without a lot of direct local inputs. Anecdotally and scientifically, it has been proven many times over that good local publications have emotional value to local readers that a national cannot touch. Despite the brilliant local print environment, national advertisers count the Twin Cities outside the top-ten advertising markets in the nation, and therefore do not buy ads in magazines or newspapers here. (Virtually none. They may occasionally make a buy in a title that is part of larger national pool, like Village Voice Media.) Take a look at Boston, San Francisco, Chicago, even Seattle—there are numerous terrible publications in those cities that sell national advertising like it’s going out of style.

    It is frustrating that so many ad-buyers still make their decisions on the most artificial bases—a periodical’s reach in terms of raw circulation numbers. The magazine industry is allegedly trying to gather its eggs into one basket in order to promote all magazines—rather like the Milk Board pushing milk. But these sorts of campaigns will disproportionately benefit the largest publishers as long as ad-buyers look no further than the top line of the ABC Audit.

    Yesterday, we took note—but not advantage—of the Audit Bureau of Circulation’s traditional donation to the festivities. It is a cash bar. They are happy to offer all the usual medicines, for a nominal fee of course. You’ll forgive us for saying that this begins to look like the equivalent of a “kick me” sign pasted on the ass of an entire industry, but maybe especially the local yokels.

  • Freedom of Information

    maonixon.jpg
    Can you give me some advice on how to deal with Woodward and Bernstein?

    I had the opportunity to have lunch with an editor of the Beijing English language daily newspaper China Daily on Sunday. He was in town as part of an exchange program for Asian journalists to see how we do it over here.

    In preparation for our meeting, he’d read the May issue of the Rake, and noticed an ad for the Friends of the Minneapolis Library which featured a little blurb about Mao Ze Dong, and compared him in unflattering terms to American librarians, who are guardians of our free access to information. I asked him what he thought of that, and he just smiled.

    In journalistic, if not terribly polite fashion, I pursued the theme a bit. “Does the government closely monitor what you publish in your newspaper?” I asked. “Yes,” he replied.

    “Is there someone in the government who assures what you write conforms with the story the government wants to tell?” I continued. Again, “Yes.”

    “Who does that for your newspaper?”

    “I do.”

    “Oh…How do you like your sandwich?”

    I thought back on this in the context of the blowup over the Newsweek flap over the report on whether some copies of the Koran were finding their way into Guantanamo toilets. The Bush version of the Maoist Censorship Society has certainly had its jollies being righteously indignant about the story that a Pentagon report contained the information about the crapped-on Korans. (Note please that the story has been reported before on several occasions and that the Pentagon was shown the story and didn’t deny it before it ran. It’s also worth mention that the reporter, Michael Isikoff, was a lot more popular with Republicans when he broke the Monica Lewinsky story.)

    But those troublesome facts have nothing to do with what’s going on here. What this flap is about is a concerted effort to discredit the press at every opportunity–with the hoped-for result of limiting the press’s desire to do the sort of investigative reporting that revealed the official sanction and practice of torture by Bush and his decorated Myrmidons.

    Mao didn’t have a troublesome First Amendment to deal with, so his methods of information control didn’t have to suffer any intermediate hurdles to get his message across. But given the obstacles Bushies face, don’t you agree they are doing a great job of making sure America gets the news they want?

  • Human, All Too Human

    Okay, let’s add one more to that list of truths we hold self-evident: keep the fraggin’ ball in the damn park.

    I suppose it was inevitable that Johan Santana would eventually run into a little patch like this, but what’s been sort of disturbing is how hard he’s getting hit. The Blue Jays had four doubles and two home runs tonight, and though you’ll read and hear all sorts of quotes about command and location tomorrow, take that stuff with a grain of salt. Those are just the standard lines after a lousy game.

    Granted, Santana was obviously getting his fastball up in the first inning, but in the past he’s consistently shown he can get away with that as long as he has his other pitches (particularly that change-up) in his back pocket and can keep the hitters guessing. They’re obviously doing a pretty good job of guessing of late, and I think this may be a little case of over-confidence on Santana’s part. When you’re essentially bulletproof for as long as he was, it’s easy to think you can get away with aggressive pitching. He’s a smart guy, though, and just as long as he’s not dealing with a tired arm or something more bothersome, I’ve no doubt he’ll make the necessary adjustments and figure out what opposing hitters have figured out about him, which is really, of course, what pitching boils down to.

    Though only a
    couple particularly meddlesome and odious characters have been brazen (or cruel) enough to call it to my attention, don’t think for a minute I’m not well aware of what has happened to Jacque Jones –for the second year in a row, I might add– since I came to the conclusion –for the second year in a row, I might add– that he had finally turned the corner.

    You can scroll down to the April 27th entry and see for yourself. On that date Jones was batting .393, with all sorts of unexpected peripheral production. In the seventeen games since I once again crawled out on a limb and handed Jones a saw, he has gone 11-for-55 and his average has dropped to .295.

    I swear some of these guys like nothing better than to make me look like a complete fool. And, believe me, I’m fully aware that I don’t much need their help.

  • Talkin' Weatherman Blues

    As Mike Mosedale mentions here, not everything is tea, sugar, and circulation growth over at the Newspaper of the Twin Cities. For the cilvilian, the finer points of newspaper Guild-speak are often hard to understand. (You mean professional writers have actually stopped sniping at each other long enough to form a working labor union? My gawd, when did that happen!) But this is a quick overview of the sitch: Editor Anders Gyllenhaal, like so many before him, is a huge admirer of prodigal meteorologist Paul Douglas. Mostly, we assume Gyllenahaal admires Paul’s Q-rating and his cross-media ubiquity , the better to cultivate McClatchy’s long-range plan of making the newspaper just as accessible as possible to the junior high-school students of Minnesota. (Personally, we like the rosy-cheeked and sporty Belinda Jensen better.) Anyway, using Paul Douglas to write a daily weather report is a blatant violation of the Strib’s contract with the guild, which pledges not to use non-guild writers in its news sections, even if they are “experts” in their fields. Despite losing the case already (after “insisting” on “binding arbitration”), Strib management has filed a federal lawsuit in hopes of continuing to violate their contract with the guild. They apparently didn’t get the message the first time, and need to be spanked by Dad when he gets home.

    Is the Paul Douglas really worth all of this fuss? We know Minnesotans love to talk about the weather, but this seems like a willful exercise of managerial muscle to no particular end other than aggravating the good people of the newsroom. Why, for god’s sake, can’t Douglas go on promoting himself safely tucked away in the Variety section? How about putting his daily ditty on that Post-it Note behind which they are forever hiding their flag? Better yet, put Paul on the Op-Ed page. No one knows better than he that the weatherman peddles one of the most entertaining, least reliable opinions around.