Month: July 2005

  • Bret Easton Ellis

    We must be closing in on peak carrying capacity for the planet, because it seems that authors are increasingly having a difficult time making up new names. Writers like Jonathan Safran Foer and our own Shannon Olson are giving their characters names that are really easy to remember–their own. Now Bret Easton Ellis has a book about a guy named Bret Easton Ellis, and it’s not a memoir. But it does draw upon Ellis’ life and previous novels for material, sometimes to highly creepy effect, as when a literary psychopath tries to act out the violent plot of the author’s American Psycho. This ghost story, set in a decaying and drug-addled suburbia, seems to find an older and wiser Ellis regretful about the topics (drugs, violence) his earlier works romanticized.

  • John Berger

    Berger is on the doorstep of eighty now, and for decades he has been one of the most elegant writers in the English language. He’s a master of the elegy and the vignette, and whether in the form of fiction or essay, his work has always had the long-view precision of a satellite photo. Berger’s enduring themes have been the power and pull of memory, the tangled messes and miracles of history, and human relationships. His latest, Here Is Where We Meet, which is described as “a fiction,” combines semi-autobiographical reveries and affectionate portraits of a diverse cast of characters from history and the authorÕs still-vivid imagination. Berger’s narrator spends a good deal of time meditating on a lavish dinner preparation for friends, and ranges across Europe and Asia in search of the dead that “don’t stay where they’re buried.”

  • Eric Brende

    Now that even the Boundary Waters is full of cell phones and GPS units–there’s probably even a laptop in a dry bag up there somewhere–it seems there’s no escaping technology. MIT student Eric Brende started to question his addiction to this higher power source, and decided the only way to escape technology’s grip was to really get away. He and his wife moved to an off-grid community of Amish-like people he calls the “Minimites,” who use no electric machines and run a barter society exchanging homegrown food and goods. Better Off: Flipping the Switch on Technology chronicles the eighteen months Brende and his wife lived in the community. Apparently, they missed a few things; he now lives in St. Louis, where he works as a rickshaw driver. Coffman Memorial Union, 300 Washington Ave. S., Minneapolis; 612-625-6564; www.bookstores.umn.edu

  • The Knitters, featuring X

    X may have emerged from the trash-strewn bowels of L.A., but it always had its finger on America’s rural music traditions. In fact, this offshoot of the legendary punk band excavated those roots long before MTV Unplugged and O Brother Where Art Thou made it cool to strum acoustic instruments and act like a hick. The Knitters’ 1985 album “Poor Little Critter on the Road” not only had a great title; it also made a bunch of hipsters think twice before trashing any tune with a banjo or accordion in it. Twenty years hence, the Knitters are back with a new album and returning to the road (like most all bands from twenty years ago, it seems, including their “parent” band). If X’s recent shows are any indication, these players haven’t lost any of their fire, and, in many ways, have only gotten better.

  • Elvis Costello and the Imposters

    With his snarky stage name, a voice you’ve got to learn to love, and a maddening compulsion for jumping genres, Declan McManus has become a pop music icon almost in spite of himself. Why? Because his songcraft, when it jells just right, has yielded some of the best pop of the last several decades. From organ-driven dance numbers like “Pump It Up” to smoldering ballads like “Alison” and the best antiwar anthem ever, “(What’s So Funny ‘Bout) Peace, Love and Understanding,” Costello’s top-drawer tunes are simply unforgettable. His most recent album, the roots-tinged “The Delivery Man,” is an up-and-down affair with fewer instant classics than we hoped for. But hey, at least it’s not another collaboration with a string quartet or Burt Bacharach. 2004 Randolph Ave., St. Paul; 651-690-6700, www.stkate.edu/oshaughnessy

  • Iris DeMent

    A couple of years ago, a scorching bit of celebrity gossip shocked the MPR-listening, granola-eating, prairie grass-planting fans of the contemporary folk scene: Singer-songwriters Greg Brown and Iris DeMent had secretly married. The couple keep their relationship strictly off the record (although once when we called Brown’s Iowa farmhouse, DeMent answered the phone, and we could hear breakfast cooking in the background), but the pairing is picture-perfect. Like Brown, DeMent writes smart, knowing, sometimes political, sometimes achingly personal songs set to warm country-folk music. We love her incomparable voice, and we’re hoping to hear it paired with Brown’s rumble sometime after they own up to their connubial affiliation. 651-290-1221, www.fitzgeraldtheater.org

  • Nine Nights of Music

    The best wedding bands don’t even know the chicken dance, or anything by the Village People. In conjunction with the Minnesota History Center’s “Happily Ever After” exhibit, this year’s outdoor Nine Nights of Music series showcases dream wedding bands playing music from around the world. August’s lineup opens with Piper’s Crow (above), a local Celtic group that reels off tunes from Irish, Scottish, and Cape Breton traditions. As August unfolds, we’ll hear how other cultures accompany their nuptials. Tarang, a Bhangra band, plays traditional Hindi celebration songs (August 9), Cafe Accordion Orchestra offers heady European airs (August 16), and the Bulgarian Orkestar Bez Ime closes the series with the moody romance numbers of the Balkans (August 30). 345 W. Kellogg Blvd., St. Paul; 651-296-6126; www.mnhs.org

  • Where's Donald Segretti when we need him?

    segretti (Custom) (3).jpg
    All I did was order a few pizzas. Really!

    Last week I was in a place with no TV news or newspapers, so it was a blissful time free of worry about bombings in London or the rattish morality of Karl Rove. I got back on Saturday, though, just in time to read about the bombings of candy grabbing school children and market place gas tankers in Iraq. Two loud bangs and there were more dead Iraqis in two days than Londoners or Madrilenos in the past two years.

    Who do we blame for this? It might be a good idea to look at what’s behind all this Rove/Cooper/Wilson stuff to find an answer.

    In case you haven’t been paying attention, (and the fact that calls for a certain President’s impeachment haven’t yet reached the level engendered by a stained blue dress indicates you haven’t,) the whole mess was ultimately precipitated by Joseph Wilson writing an op-ed piece for the NY Times saying that the administration’s claims that Iraq was on the verge of making nuclear (or nucular, if you’re the village idiot of Crawford, Texas) weapons was unsubstantiated.

    Now, those idiots don’t much like being called idiots, so they got right after Wilson by outing his wife as a CIA agent. Now whether you believe that revelation broke the letter of the law or not, you still gotta admit that’s pretty low, at best. And if there’s one thing that’s certain about Rove, it’s that there is nothing too low for him. (As one person said, the only reason he can’t get any further into the mud is that his shirt buttons are in the way.)

    But what is important to keep in mind is not that Rove actually set out to get Wilson and his wife, but rather the mindset that Bush’s people can do anything they damn well please, up to and including lying to the country to start a war. That, and that anyone who tries to stop them will, at best, be dismissed as ineffectual, and at worst, end up with ruined lives or ruined political careers. If you have a short memory, look up what was done to John McCain in South Carolina in the 2000 primary or Ann Richards in the Texas governor’s race in 1994. (OK, you don’t remember, but McCain’s wife is nuts and had a mixed race child, and Richards was a lesbian, according to their opposition.) That’s just for starters, though. Read Bush’s Brain if you want real nightmares.

    So here’s how I read the whole Rove thing: it’s just part of the most insidious government we’ve had in this country in my lifetime. Nixon’s boys were complete amateurs when it came to dirty tricks. Donald Segretti went to jail for much less than what Rove does daily as a matter of course.

    And that’s why children and shopkeepers get incinerated in Iraq.

  • Webbed Feet

    One of the problems with reading the news online is that it’s more difficult to effectively browse a newspaper’s content. Aside from the odd phenomena of online editors screwing with headlines and decks to make them shorter or hipper or whatever it is they’re trying to do, a web page just doesn’t offer the same facilities for easy browsing. We haven’t looked deeply into it, but the general paradigm seems to be this: The architecture of information online tends to be suited to search and recovery. Generally, that means the best web pages are designed to facilitate you finding something you know or suspect is already there. (Corollary: general interest, web-only “magazines” died slow, uninteresting deaths when the tech-bubble burst five years ago. Slate and Salon are the exceptions that prove the rule.)

    The impression we take away from having cancelled our home subscription two years ago to the Newspaper of the Twin Cities, is a troubling one. If you only take your news from the web, you begin to have an indistinct sense of scale on news stories, a random congeries of anecdotal stories driven by momentary impulses and obsessions, a sort of roadmap of links that trace the circuits of your own prejudices, preconceived notions, and moral politics (link, incidentally, a result of browsing our way through the real-world Sunday Times, one paper that still decorates our doorstep. Still, reducing the input by one daily newspaper has saved our back considerably. Recycling is a bitch; we save the Times to start the grill.) The more or less organic structure of content, dictated mostly by chronology, creates the impression that all stories are created equal.

    Like we say, online editors probably should bear some of the blame for thinking too literally about information equations. (Everything is just a link away! A shallow, instantly “drillable” website is also a flat website, with no peaks or valleys.) But there is something about the newspaper itself that encourages a general sense of purpose and direction, a heirarchy of information, a page-to-page path through the garden. Websites are not–maybe cannot be–nearly as inviting or as favorable to browsing. As a result, even a crappy paper is better than a great website. When we have more time and feel less fragmented, maybe we’ll consider this more closely. Maybe not. Maybe we’ll just keep paddling blindly around in the little backwater that results fom our own particular trickle valve.

  • Muddling Through

    We have all been expelled from the Garden, but the ones who suffer most in exile are those who are still permitted to dream of perfection.

    –Stanley Kunitz, “Reflections”

    black square.jpg black square.jpg

    black square.jpg black square.jpg

    [assez]

    [assez dit]

    [pas assez bon]

    [pas suffisant]

    [de trop]

    [arrete!]

    [shhhhhhh…]