Year: 2005

  • Cue the really cool synthesizer music

    miami (Custom).jpeg
    Style beats substance every time

    Gee where do I start on the Strib’s redesign/repositioning?

    First, I guess anyone who’s been paying attention has heard the Strib was undergoing a redesign. It debuted today, and I must say I find the use of the pastel colors in the flag the most striking use of pastels since Crockett and Tubbs cleaned up Miami in 1984. I know that’s what the kids want in their newspaper, the signature colors from 21 years ago.

    Ok, let’s forget that and go on to the “substance” of the makeover. I was completely bowled over by “one-minute strib”, not only because I think the Strib is now officially calling itself what everyone else has been calling it for years, but also because I am so impressed that they noticed that the Wall Street Journal has been doing a digest of their paper on the front page ever since any of us could read, and the Strib finally ripped off the idea. Of course, the Strib improved on it by moving the digest off page one onto page three, where they spent almost half of the column telling you what was on page one. Yeah, that page one–the one you had to turn over to get to page three.

    Wait, I forgot I was talking about “substance”. Where might one expect to find such substance–and even news that might differentiate a newspaper from, say, a TV station? The front page, perhaps? No such luck. Today, we get the same stuff we got last night from Cyndy (If It Bleeds, It Leads) Brucato over at Channel 5. Did you hear about the kids who killed their parents? And how about them crazy Vikings? Yup, just what I care about, two stories that have nothing to do with me and about people I couldn’t care less about–Vikings players and the kids who have them as role models.

    I was especially happy to see, though, right there at the top of the front page, where some newspapers put news, that I could turn to page five of the sports section to see how I could run into my local gas or grocery and pick up my Viking medallion of the day. Personally, I think it would be more fun to have the kids fill a scrap book of Strib-sponsored Vikings mug shots. Now that would sell papers.

    On to the Opinion Exchange, which is what they’re now calling Op-Ex. Aside from the seeming obligatory column from yesterday’s NY Times which I’ve already read, we now have a feature called The Street. In this feature the Strib allows us to exchange opinions with idiots we wouldn’t give the time of day if they were living in our own basement. Today we have a guy from Orono who thinks we can solve the energy crisis in our country by pumping more oil out of Texas. Well here’s my exchange for him: “You’re a moron.”

    Another bit of substance that I really like is the short summaries of the articles that appear above any article longer than a couple hundred words. My favorite was the summary of editorial page editor susan albright’s fervent introductory column: “Opinion Exchange expresses our desire that this page and the Sunday opinion section connect readers with a wide range of perspectives on issues of the day.”

    Ok, first, what happened to capitalizing Op-Ex bylines? Who’s writing these pieces, e.e. cummings?

    Second, if the readers really need a summary of Op-Ex pieces, why not just go all the way? Here’s an idea: “In today’s column, Molly Ivins says President Bush is an asshole.” We don’t really need much more information than that, do we?

    Finally, (I could go on, but according to Strib research, you don’t like to read too many words,) do you remember when newspapers used to have Obituaries? Not any more. We now have “remembering”. I was surprised to see, however, that the individual death notices didn’t have their top line summaries. Wouldn’t they be fun to write? “Dorothy Smith got old and died.”

    Or, in a few years we could read this one about the Strib itself: “This poor excuse for a newspaper died from repeatedly shooting itself in the foot by underestimating its readers.”

  • E.L.: April 4, 1961-October 12, 1988

    cross moon.jpg

    Odd shard, the moon.

    Last call.

    He lugs his iron

    head through the

    brass-clanging

    days.

    The dull trash-can

    gong of winter, a throbbing

    that starts in his

    fillings and swells clear up

    straining

    against the black

    cap of his

    underskull.

    Snow swept, dead silence,

    dead Saturday folding

    into Sunday morning.

    What is fog and what is

    what he feels?

    Why are you possessed of such

    a thirst while others

    walk upright and

    clean? Drawn to three

    a.m., drifting

    the dark roads

    beyond the last

    lights of the

    Hy Vee.

    The night behind him

    a roller coaster,

    a teeth breaker,

    an empty bag,

    a broken broom

    stick.

    His mother sleeping,

    or awake, her head

    full of her own

    confusion, his broken

    promise.

    He can’t see her

    crouched

    in her old robe,

    folded hands asking

    once more for no’s

    overthrow. Respite: her

    one boy asleep

    in his own bed,

    in dreams,

    one man sleeping

    like all the

    others, not

    clipped and limping

    along the roads

    outside of town,

    his blood running

    with black bulls

    and head roaring

    with mineral spirits

    and automobile primer,

    his face

    a shimmering mask of

    silver from the

    bridge of his nose

    to his chin.

    Not a howling ghost

    broken by boots

    and broomsticks

    and bones,

    stripped

    of the last sixteen

    dollars in his

    pockets and bound

    with rope.

    A trail in the

    snow led back

    into the darkness

    behind an

    abandoned

    farmhouse.

    They dragged him back there by his heels.

    There was an old well

    there, and they

    stuffed him

    in the well.

    He showed his broken

    teeth to the moon,

    and it sat calmly

    upon his silver mask.

    Snow swept,

    dead silence,

    dead Saturday

    folding silently

    into Sunday

    morning.

    wolf2.jpg

  • Your World, Your Life, In My Tiny Hands

    photolab.jpg

    This one guy, every couple weeks it’s these amazing places you can’t even believe, mountains and him standing in water or strung up on a cliff and hanging from ropes. He’ll bring in ten or twenty rolls of film at a time, and it’s gotten so that I look forward to seeing him come through the door. You see the whole world, is how my boss put it when he was training me in. This job is a privilege, he’d say. These people are trusting us with their most private moments.

    I’ve always been one of those guys who isn’t much for going places –going places, actually, doesn’t bother me; it’s the being there that I have a problem with. But it is interesting for me to see these other places and to imagine, you know, my own versions of the stories these pictures struggle to tell. One time this guy brought in a roll of film and it was nothing but pictures of dead cows –seven dead cows sprawled around in the dirt. There wasn’t a single person in any of the photos, just the dead cows, and somebody had taken pink paint and outlined their bodies in the dirt, just like they’d been murdered in the movies. And of course you get the pictures of women in bathing suits, and people on the toilet –I’ve seen hundreds of those– and occasionally some actual bare breasts, although we’re not supposed to develop anything that’s “too far over the line,” as my boss says. But I have to admit that in five years we’ve never refused to process a single roll of film that I’m aware of.

    My own family never took photographs. I don’t think I ever saw a camera in either of my parents’ hands. These people would come around at school to take photos of the students and I remember bringing home a little packet of those every year but I’m not even sure what my mother would do with them. They didn’t go up on the refrigerator like they did at other kids’ houses, I know that much. My mother didn’t put anything on the refrigerator.

    I’m sure people would be horrified to think that we look through their photos, but they must know. It’s human nature, my boss says. I think one thing that happens so often is that people will find an old roll of film still in a camera or laying around the house somewhere –in a kitchen drawer or in the glove compartment of their car– and they’ll have completely forgotten what’s on there and curiosity gets the best of them so they bring them in to be developed. They bring them in because they want to know, and I think that’s when you get some surprises.

    People always ask, what’s the strangest thing you’ve ever seen looking at all these photos day after day? And, to be honest with you, that’s not an easy question to answer. I’ve seen so many strange and I guess disturbing things mixed in with the birthday parties and the picnics and parades. More than one person with a gun in their mouth. A dead dog laid out on a kitchen table with a flower in its teeth. This one guy we called the Sign Man, who would take photographs of himself holding hand-lettered signs that said things like, “Tammi, I am not a part of your experiment anymore,” or “I am sick and tired of being taken apart with nothing to show for it.” Unsurprisingly, the Sign Man eventually turned in a roll of film with a photo of himself with a gun in his mouth.

    I have seen so many babies being born that it is no longer strange. I have seen a hundred families or more standing in front of Mount Rushmore or shaking Mickey Mouse’s hand. Young couples in formal wear, of course, getting ready to go to a dance or get married. Little children crouched next to their beds with folded hands, saying their prayers. People in coffins and carnival rides and tombstones. Christmas trees, obviously, and kids pointing guns at the camera.

    People also take a lot of pictures of food, color photos of turkeys and hams. You see everything, really, pretty much anything you could imagine.

    Personally, I like the stuff in the margins, the mistakes and unintentional shots that show what goes on outside the world of what people think of as a picture. I like to study the people who are just standing in the background, looking puzzled and unaware. I couldn’t tell you, really, what staring into those pictures makes me feel. Captured, sort of, I guess, the way I feel when I stand far enough outside myself sometimes that I can see how small I am.

    It’s sad when people wish, my mother always said. She’d say, You pray that when you get to a ripe old age you can look back and count the number of really sad days on one hand. Maybe that’s why she didn’t like photos around, because they were like reminders of wishes that never quite managed to turn out like you hoped or expected.

    organscout.jpg

  • Tania, In Another Lifetime

    stars.jpg

    Long, long ago, in the sweltering twilight of an August night roaring with cicadas and the vacuum hum of a lazy small town in retreat from the heat and the falling darkness, the yards and sidewalks abandoned for living rooms and television sets (the wobbling blue screens of which we could see through the dark, otherwise blank window frames and the gauzy, fluttering filter of curtains), I bucked you across town through the empty streets on my stingray bike.

    We were hunched together on my sparkling blue banana seat; I was peddling furiously and you were clinging to the sissy bar. I wished you had been clinging to me, wished you would put your arms around my chest, but it was nice to feel you there behind me all the same, nice to hear your laughter (all the wonderful variations of your wonderful laugh) ringing out over the silent neighborhoods and your voice at my ear and your breath in my hair.

    I don’t know, can’t remember, where we were going. We weren’t, though, going to the Dairy Queen, where the moths were in full swirling frenzy around the streetlamps in the parking lot. We were headed, I’m sure, elsewhere.

    We had darkness in mind, I think, the place where the futile over-light of that shitty little town gave way suddenly to a great stretch of emptiness, where the pavement turned to gravel, where there were fields rolling away into the distance, and where there was a muddy creek and there were railroad tracks and trains (which sounded, you said, like iron waterfalls, and which I’ve always said sound like something heavy being carried away) crawling off into the night, out into an America we could only then imagine.

    But which we did imagine, together, breathlessly, with ridiculous hope and optimism. That place was where we knew we would eventually have to go to make our escape, to complete the process of becoming, to find ourselves even as we lost each other.

    That was also the place, the place beyond our close little world whose secrets and sadnesses we felt certain we had already divined, where we would one day, through exactly the sort of occasional miracle this world is still capable of delivering, find each other again.

    I am still, every day, my sister, my old friend, stunned by this miracle, still gratefully puzzled by my bounty of blessings entirely undeserved. And now it always seems to be that same magic dusk I remember, and I find myself once again in the position of trying to talk you onto the back of my stingray bike, trying to convince you to ride with me out beyond the false, feeble light of that low town, away from and out from under the people we have allowed ourselves to become; trying to get you to slow down and to listen again to the roaring silence and the moving water and the watch-winding racket of insects throbbing from the ditches, and to lie on your back with me marveling at the stars and the heat lightning trembling down the dark sky across the fields.

    moon and stars.jpg

  • The dumbest person in the room

    dumbanddumber.jpg
    Dumb and Dumber

    A very smart friend of mine…and I mean VERY smart…once said to me when I asked her how she’d accomplished so much at her very young age, “I always try to be the dumbest person in the room.”

    Now that was damn near impossible for her, I thought. But, she continued, “That’s no BS. A smart person gets smarter by always trying to surround herself with smarter people. It rubs off.”

    Today in Maureen Dowd’s column in The NY Times we have this: “David Frum, the former White House speechwriter and conservative commentator, reported on his blog that Ms. Miers once told him that W. was the most brilliant man she knew.”

    Come again?

    There are a few inferences we can draw from this: Miers has never met Antonin Scalia, (or, for that matter, Forrest Gump); Miers is a lying kiss up to her boss; Miers should have no trouble being the dumbest person in the room if she makes it to the Supreme Court chambers.

  • Seeing Red

    Sorta busy this wet morning, but I couldn’t help myself from weighing in on the Strib redesign, over at MNSpeak, so rather than fritter away more time, I’ll do the really gauche thing, and quote myself:

    Everyone can agree that newspapers are losing readership, but the basic problem is believing that management can think (or focus-group) their way out of the mess. It seems to me that media managers are too busy looking at other media–TV, web, radio–and too covetous of form.

    Reporters and others on the front-line of journalism have been losing the battle of form over content for some time, and it is demoralizing, I think, to look at the results of the Readership Institute study, which seem to suggest that readers need to be pandered to. That every story must have some service-related lede that immediately tells a reader how she can USE this information in her own life. Just another step toward all-consuming narcissism. The thing is, it turns out readers tend to get bored with being spoon fed precisely what they think they want and expect from their media. It’s like having a jukebox (Or an iPod playlist) that never gets updated.

    If newspapers begin to be run like commercial radio–i.e. strictly a number-crunching science about “what most people want”– then that leaves very little to the imagination of editors OR reporters.

    I have a vested interest in the “art” of print media, so I’m biased. If you want to be cynical about, you could ask how many new members The Current REALLY has– how many serious music-heads willing to put their money where their REV-105 was.

    My problem with what I see of the Strib’s redesign is a) the page-layout editors have won, and are effectively running the newsroom; b) how many outer-ring soccer moms do they need to add to the circ, and are there that many more of them than traditional, old-fart readers who actually enjoy and appreciate a newspaper with some hard news in it? Do they not run the risk of alienating their most loyal customers–if they haven;t already lost them? (Good reason to believe this is already the case, judging by the number of “media professionals” I know in this town who admit to glancing at the Strib maybe once a week or so.)

    On a positive note, I’m really looking forward to the online redesign, since that’s really the only way I read the paper anymore. It has been a bit of a mess for a long time, and it could be so much better about equating better with the paper version. When you read the NY Times in paper everyday, as I do, then glance at the website, there is almost perfect parity, and I find that reassuring. The Strib is the opposite of this, in my view.

    ALSO: I just read over at Romenesko that the Chicago Sun Times is considering shutting down their tabloid newspaper the Red Eye Streak, now that the Chicago Tribune has decided to make the Red Streak Eye free. I was a little taken aback at publisher John Cruikshank’s bald cynicism–he has no qualms about saying the whole thing was merely a financial play, a counter-check to the Red Streak Eye. And he wonders why it didn’t gel with readers. No, I guess he doesn’t. It is certainly his perogative to protect market share, and if that means launching a facade (like the fake desert town they built in Blazing Saddles), I guess the conclusion is that you can pay people to do just about anything. Cruickshank says Red Eye Streak succeeded, because it was only supposed to prevent Red Streak Eye from gaining paid circulation. Right-oh. I thought the idea was to capture young readers, to develop the next generation of newspapers, to get out there on the bleeding edge of print media where you might get a glimpse of the future (if any)–but no. See, here’s the basic problem: no real editorial insights, just desperation in the marketplace. What the real goal might have been, one should think, would have been to simply make more money by capturing new advertisers, and on this score Cruickshank is, under his breath, conceeding to the Red Streak Eye– which HAS succeeded in lining up plenty of advertising.

    UPDATE: D’Oh! Katie McCollow writes to say, “Maybe readership is down because journalists can’t be bothered to get simple facts straight.The Chic Trib puts out the RedEye. The Sun Times puts out the Red Streak.” Duly noted and corrected. Never could keep these papers straight. Strike that Streak, Eye Eye! (11/23)

    For what it’s worth, it is (to my mind) a significant leap of vision and faith to convert to controlled circulation. In a world where the New York Times is free (more or less) to anyone in any cafe in the country, where many of the classics of Western literature are available through Google, do people really equate price with quality? Did they ever? Is Lucky magazine better than the New Yorker, because it costs more? Do you seriously think Minneapolis.St.Paul magazine is a better and more substantive read than City Pages? If you do, y’know, I hear there’s a bridge for sale in Brooklyn…

  • I Smell Sneakers And…And…The Lusty Odors Of Earth And Cattle

    tintin-teeth 2.jpg

    I have two options when, as now, the Muse deserts me (and this has so often been the case of late, and over, say, the last dozen years).

    Well, actually, I suppose I do have more than two options. I could recognize, for instance, that anyone who uses the phrase “the Muse deserts me,” or even just “the Muse,” deserves his desolation.

    I could simply stop.

    But I do not like to stop.

    Or I could keep going, Muse-less and muddling, which is, of course, the usual routine around here. If there’s one thing I’ve pretty much figured out how to do, it’s how to keep going. I can keep going with the best of them, just so long as we can agree that by ‘keep going’ we really mean ‘keep saying.’

    I could also repeat myself, which I’m more than happy to do in a pinch. Sometimes, I swear, I don’t even know I’m doing it. There are words all around me, stuffed in books and in the pockets of jackets and pants, scrawled on index cards, scraps of paper, napkins, ATM receipts, and Post-It notes. There are shelves of black, lined journals that are also full of words, words that stretch back now over a decade. Those books are a loose –very loose– chronicle of my long nights, an inventory of the conscripted words that march across my skull in the wee hours.

    Sometimes, out of desperation, and out of that frankly terrifying and inexplicable impulse to keep going, I just grab whatever words are at hand and force them to flee through my fingers a second time. In the process they are occasionally transformed, often (well, not often) in surprising ways. Most commonly, in fact, they are entirely unchanged from the day they were born –homely, in other words, and entirely lacking in sense.

    When I’m truly strapped for inspiration, though, I turn to Jean Kent’s The Professional Writer’s Phrase Book, an essential tool for any struggling writer. Don’t be daunted by that title; you don’t have to be a pro to use Kent’s book. Even a fledgling scribe will find “thousands of descriptive tags that put pizzazz in any copy.”

    It says so right on the book’s cover, and the professional writer who wrote those words wasn’t kidding. I have no idea anymore where the book is (things tend to get lost and buried around here, or it’s entirely possible I loaned it out to a professional writer colleague and never got it back), but I did, once upon a time, jot down some handy examples in a notebook. I’m sure you’ll agree that just about anybody could write a professional-quality story using almost nothing but these phrases and a few simple words of their own.

    Take a crack at it and see if I’m not right.

    ANGER

    time to bring out the heavy artillery

    the words were sudden and raw and very angry

    feisty as hell

    she gave him a most unladylike dustup

    the rage in him was a living thing

    their eyes traded strings of malevolence

    like an awakening giant

    if I hold it in any longer, I’ll blow out my teeth

    LIMBS

    hooked her thumb in her panties and cocked her hip

    he swatted her behind

    raising the tea cup to his heavily mustached lips

    kissed his bunched up fingers…MNYEH!

    a moth-wind flutter of her hand

    rotates a finger near his temple

    HEAD

    he twisted a benzedrine inhaler up a hairy nostril

    and took a somewhat beery breath of fresh air

    she pushed her hair back, the better to glare at him

    BODY IN MOTION

    all his gestures were outside and violent

    grabbing up her gown for the run to the kitchen

    she slapped her sleeves to get rid of the crumbs

    grasped his tightly rolled umbrella like a sword

    she ditted around past all the channels

    he sat on the porch and waved away the flies

    a body so supple it twanged

    he moved like a slug

    the slow-spitting and squatting men watched her covetously

    standing at the lip of a hole

    she walks like a construction worker

    he moved with the sure grace of a forest creature

    a nudge here, a hip there, and an occasional light shove

    left the room like a scolded hound

    still beavering away

    taking on that ‘Let’s be reasonable’ slouch

    BODY MOTIONLESS

    a thin old man, frozen on the edge of the fallow fields forever

    huddled in the water

    standing there with an indolent, tomcat grace

    TRADE TAGS

    bronzed and beautiful

    the massive chest of a body builder

    a tropical tan even where it doesn’t show

    foundation training in the iron game

    highly visible in an alluring bikini

    with great stability in the shoulder girdle

    BUILDINGS–EXTERIOR

    a small, nasty shed with a furtive look

    a security system that had everything but a moat filled with alligators

    it wasn’t an ordinary building but a home

    a suspect motel named El Ranko

    the sort of railroad flat you find in the ghettos

    INTERIOR

    sat at a table about as big as a diaper

    a husky oak table

    the walls started to sweat

    the room smelled of dust, mildew, and old love

    rancid grease hung in the air like a wet sheet

    CRIME AND FIGHTING

    a man doesn’t become an investigator without a capacity for cruelty

    a man who didn’t think but let his sinews rumble him to oblivion

    his first foray into thrilldom

    and then came a moment of atavistic horror

    he was covered with blood and vomit

    the pain in the testicles streaked up to his stomach

    the velvet trap of easy living and hard drugs

    the code of the vendetta was absolute

    an animal instinct told him all was not well

    no gun racks in the pickup truck

    he ran like unleashed hell

    my goal is to stay out of the morgue drawer

    DEPRESSION

    in the twilight world of the half alive

    restless, seeking

    hoping the wind and rain would take away the brooding hurt

    he stood in the burning lake of himself, unable to escape

    slumped into morose musings

    pain and loneliness walked with him in the dark

    a life which daily negated all her dreams

    FACES–DESCRIPTIONS

    the upper-echelon mafioso type

    his nose looked like a wedge of cheddar

    perspiration on her forehead, like water beads on good butter

    a nose that could slice cheese

    he looked something like a hawk with mumps

    he had a face like a benediction

    HAPPINESS

    a few crocuses of hope poked through the surface

    the feeling of happiness rising wonderfully inside you

    beer commercial joviality

    when I feel this delicious, I laugh at practically anything, sometimes nothing at all

    Enjoy!

    INNER THOUGHTS

    he took the world by the nose

    I still believe happiness can be worked out. I am a fool.

    there’s nothing worse than a hero out of work

    you could catch it and kill it and pin it down, but then it wasn’t a butterfly anymore

    The world was a jungle. Only the strong survived.

    Bastard! she whispered behind his back.

    yet deep, deep inside he still burned with his love for her

    preoccupied with matters of nomenclature

    you can’t fall off the floor

    love was a weed that flourished in the dark

    as bad as being told God dislikes you


    PHILOSOPHY

    I live in a silent movie

    a satisfying influx of Mexicans

    not everything was cotton candy

    two nice people made for each other

    when you walk among women, do not forget your whip

    Who knows where terrific things begin?

    SMELLS

    I smell sneakers

    I could smell her light, warm femininity

    the lusty odors of earth and cattle

    See what I mean? Wow! What you have here are the raw materials to make a writer out of the drabbest, most tongue-tied closet dreamer. And I haven’t even made it to the phrases related to lovemaking (he took a look down her decollete). I’ll buy lunch for the person who can send me a reasonably coherent story –or, what the hell, an entirely incoherent story– that makes judicious use of the largest number of these helpful phrases, and I’ll also post the story for at least twenty-five other people to see! So start beavering away! And send those entries to zellar at rakemag dot com.

    miles city-C.jpg

  • I'm sure Harriet is very nice, but…

    hruska.jpg
    Roman Hruska: until now, the patron saint of government mediocrity

    You know you may be in trouble when you are a “Conservative” President and the the house organ of the American Fascist Party, the Wall Street Journal’s Editorial Page, takes you to task for the nomination of Harriet Miers.

    Actually, in one of the few times I’ve ever felt myself agreeing with Mein Kampf, Jr., I couldn’t help but admiring Randy Barnett for citing Federalist Paper 76 in his argument against cronyism in the appointment of Miers. According to Barnett’s reading, and mine, of Federalist 76, the very reason the Senate has approval power of Presidential appointments is to prevent exactly a case like Bush’s annointment of Harriet Miers.

    Let’s face it, the only qualifications Bush could come up with in his ridiculous nomination speech yesterday was Miers’ church membership and her tenure as head of the Texas Lottery Commission…and the long association with him. Just what I want in someone who has a lifetime appointment to decide how we’re all going to live–another evangelical who runs an immoral scheme to rip off the poor.

    Sheesh, even Michael Brown had some judging experience, even if it was only Arabian Horse Shows.

    So, with all the eminently qualified jurists in this land, with all the brilliant thinkers now sitting in our courts and in our law schools, the best Bush can come up with is someone he’s known for years and who once defended him in a boundary dispute at one of his vacation homes. Yup, she’s just who I want applying herself to the basic questions of privacy rights, abortion, torture of prisoners, and affirmative action.

    I’m reminded of Roman Hruska, the Republican senator from Nebraska, who commented after the Senate’s rejection of G. Harrold Carswell for the Supreme Court on the basis of his “mediocrity”, “There are a lot of mediocre judges and people and lawyers. They are entitled to a little representation, aren’t they?”

    Well, as long as we have Bush in the White House, and nominees like Miers headed for the Supreme Court, there’s no danger Hruska’s wish won’t be fulfilled.

  • It's The Middle Of The Night And Dude Here's Gettin' All Heavy On Ya

    angel trio 2.jpg

    There are surfaces you can’t get a look under. You see just a flat line, for instance, or a face, or the horizon, but that doesn’t mean there’s not something beneath or beyond them.

    It never means that. There’s something behind or under everything, depths and layers and distance, and it’s a rare thing that’s simple enough, small enough, or that will hold still long enough for you to properly dig around and pin down what’s really under the surface.

    Face value truly is the currency of our understanding, and of our trust and our faith. Human depths we infer from art or action or speech or behavior; we take people at their word, choose to believe in their sincerity or in the truth of how they present themselves or the stories they tell about who they are.

    We learn all the time to our great disappointment (and disenchantment) how flimsy and unjustified this faith is; we are lied to and betrayed and deceived hundreds of times every day, and yet still we continue to believe and to embrace the idea of depth, and to wrong-headedly confuse this notion, somehow, with virtue, as if depths were not just as often roiling with darkness and ugliness and contradictions and mystery and even evil; as if one of the primary functions of surface and depth were not to conceal.

    A wall is a surface, as is a facade, a trap door, a mirror, a mask, a voice.

    Most of the time –an overwhelming majority of the time– we are left to wholly imagine what is beneath a surface, and this gives the imagination its incredible freedom, even as it serves as an open invitation to our basest insecurities and fears.

    This is what gives our heart its hope, and allows it to dream and to love and to tell stories. And this is also how our heart gets trampled and broken and then put back together, again and again and again.

    panda clown.jpg

    Do you think it’s easy,

    not biting

    the one you love?

    Try loving someone so much

    your mouth is only at home

    in the place where your teeth

    meet the flesh

    of your beloved. Try

    not tasting the flesh,

    not taking in your mouth

    the beloved, not

    going all the way.

    Jim Moore, “Teaching the Dog Not to Nip”

    pelican.jpg

  • A Break From Our Regularly Scheduled Agnosticism

    I try to avoid these sorts of political ramblings, but sometimes it just becomes unbearable–the sin of silence, we call it, during Yom Kippur. It is marginally related to media criticism, so spot me one here.

    The tone has become noticeably conciliatory over at Power Line these days. True, the local detachment of the 42nd Fighting Keyboarders long ago perfected that dulcet melody of false reason, the perfectly balanced timbre of the thoughtful populist who won’t insist, but would appreciate it if, at some time in the future, when it’s convenient, of course, their traitorous liberal friends stopped beating their wives. (Anti-war activism is ipso facto anti-Americanism; intelligent design is a “controversy among scientists;” Bush didn’t, y’know, cause Katrina or Rita, are you stoopid?)

    They are too clever by half. The nation’s number one bloggers probably see the writing on the wall, and do not wish to be splattered by the manure lagoon presently being emptied on the heads of their party. Despite the brilliant repartee over there, particularly when it comes to legal issues and to Israel, they tend to avoid stories that aren’t amendable to their worldview. Thus begins the prelude to a long, long period of commentary from the trenches of a party that has willed itself into permanent minority status. Watch how in about one year dissent will suddenly become a virtue again.

    Today, though, they could not help themselves from lapdogging for Tom DeLay, which might be a mistake (as Republicans are saying to themselves everywhere, I suppose.) I don’t have a lot to add to this, other than to say that media outlets that stick strictly to the facts–House Majority Leader Tom DeLay has been indicted on a single felonious count of conspiracy, period–get merits, and those who waste a lot of ink on DeLay’s public excuses, whining, and ad hominem get demerits. I used to wonder why it was so important to all Republicans at all times to rush to the defense of each other, to argue the facts and the media long after the spin cycle is over and done and the public has made up its mind and moved on. (Sheesh, some of them STILL argue not just about Blanco and Nagin, but Vietnam and Richard Nixon. Guys, your team lost one or two or three. No one ever accused Republicans of being good sports, and there’s nothing worse than a sore winner.) But one technical point in the flap about DeLay: What I cannot understand is how the most brilliant, idle legal minds of their generation seem to willfully ignore the fact that it is not just DA Ronnie Earle who has indicted their idol, it is a Texas grand jury. I know these love-the-company-of-men bloggers are smart, and they’re underemployed lawyers and all that, but I suspect that grand jury down in Texas knows a thing or two about the law and the facts in this case. If they can’t argue the point intelligently, then one would really expect Power Line to more graciously fall into lockstep with the Grand Poobah, President Bush, when he says hold your tongue and let the legal process take its course. Trust, people! Gotta work on that–you could start by trusting your Commander in Chief, at least on this point.

    In the Times yesterday, David Brooks mused on this form of groupthink, and formulated his own sort of lukewarm apology for Tom “The Hammer” DeLay. Brooks said,

    “He’s actually a modest, decent and considerate man. But he is willing to sacrifice all else for the team.”

    Now, one could certainly argue that, in private, Tom DeLay is the Great Pumpkin. But there is one thing that is exactly wrong about Brooks’s statement. There is one thing DeLay won’t sacrifice–himself. And “the team” may well suffer for it. Here is why: Like so many of his colleagues, DeLay has become expert at weaponizing language (you know, the whole “framing” thing–brazen profiteering and selfishness, pronounced “tax relief”). But the one argument he is never going to win no matter how he frames it is that someone attacking him is doing so for strictly partisan reasons. No one will ever take seriously a man who has made an uninterrupted career of putting his party before all else, including the welfare of Americans. (His PAC, Texans for a Republican Majority–the name says it all. Priorities!) To charge the Texas grand jury and DA with partisanship strains credulity and patience, and the Gods are getting angry. You know, pride–fall–and so on. Americans do not longer want to hear what the pot thinks of the kettle.

    I do love how David Brooks pulls his punches, only to make a below-the-belt grab. DeLay’s “team loyalty” is a misguided virtue; when Democrats indulge in it, it is “deaniac hyperpartisanship.” This is classic, fuzzy-logic Brooks. The intense partisanship that resulted in the impeachment of a president for getting his stuff puffed in the Oval Office, followed by six years of ruthless hubris and violence–that was all well and good, but that time is past. The rules have changed. Lefties who want a piece of that action are exhibiting a dysfunctional “need to rigidly hew to orthodoxy.” This is self-evident heresy when it is conducted by the wrong party.

    As I’ve grown fond of saying, there aren’t a lot of deathbed conversions of liberals who wished they’d been more selfish, less sympathetic, who wished they’d spent more time saving money and hating the less fortunate and arguing for war and the elimination of social supports and building the federal deficit and devaluing the dollar and erasing the nation’s diplomatic credibility.

    The only person I can think of like that is Sen. Norm Coleman.