Month: February 2007

  • Dedicated Followers of Fashion

    What a fabulous idea! Leave it to The Rake to figure out that men have a pretty good fashion sense when it comes to their ladies by sending four of them on a shopping trip [“Guys and Paper Dolls,” February]. My husband has this same knack. I think it works for guys who are especially attuned to their ladies because they know what their ladies like, but also what they’d like to see them in. Kudos to the guys for picking these outfits!

    Mary Warner, Minneapolis

  • Nothing But Love

    With all due respect, your “raking” over of the Strib [“Go Down Moses,” February] doesn’t resonate with me, a Strib subscriber. Au contraire, I’m of the opinion that the Strib is actually turning out a much-improved product since the takeover. I have no other conflict of interest in coming to the aid of the Strib. Also, we in the Twin Cities do not have a lack of other significant news sources, especially with the availability of the Internet and other media resources. I think it’s a bunch of bunk that media law apparently still considers concentration of newsprint sources as a competitive factor! It’s ludicrous!
    By the way, I believe that The Rake is a superior journalistic publication. I also read City Pages and sometimes local immigrant/foreign-oriented publications (e.g., Chinese, Vietnamese, Hmong, Latino, for a contrasting viewpoint). It’s very interesting how our primarily Scandinavian culture has become transformed by other cultures, leading to cultural diversity.

    Alan Harris, Eden Prairie

  • But Wait! Did He Read the Same Piece as that Last Guy?

    It’s rewarding to see Brian Lambert back in print once again. Despite being a failed newspaper columnist and a fired radio talk-show host, Lambert’s hiring by The Rake must be complimented. By employing him—“an embalmed white man”—to “sneer about” Katherine Kersten. The Rake displays both its hostility to conservative viewpoints and selective devotion to diversity.

    Mark Arnold, St. Paul

  • A Careful Reading of the Facts

    In his profile of Katherine Kersten, Brian Lambert states: “nor does she stoop to … cynical mangling of facts…” You can argue about her cynicism, but as I recall when she was writing occasional policy pieces for the Star Trib op-ed page, those pieces were usually followed by letters to the editor stating where she got her facts wrong. As for Central America, she says that “in particular [her] experience with Central America” was very important. Nowhere in this piece does she say anything about the death squads and massacres. Brian Lambert doesn’t raise the question either. You can do better.

    Richard Jacobi, Minneapolis

  • Springfield, Illinois

    David Speers of Madison, Wisconsin and Nancy Miller of St. Paul recently called upon the Lincoln Family at the new Lincoln Museum in Honest Abe’s hometown of Springfield, Illinois.

    They had along The Rake’s October 2006 all-music issue, and it inspired some fairly solid verse. Writes Miller:

    In these times of war and strife,
    Lincoln led a similar life.
    So we decided to stop and see
    Just how this country came to be.
    Here we are at the Springfield place,
    Where Lincoln’s history can be traced.
    What tunes today would Lincoln deem
    Worthy of the local music scene?

    Nancy Miller, St. Paul

  • What is a Conservative, Exactly?

    I have a new respect for the lady [Katherine Kersten, as profiled in “The One-Woman Solution,” February]. Does the Star Tribune know that they have readers in out-state Minnesota that may be conservative? What is your definition of “neo-con”? That word is thrown around and many people have no clue what it is. I think that Kersten is intelligent and has a desire to dig into subjects. It could be that she is far above the other Tribune writers and they are jealous. I’m not sure why the writer of this article doesn’t think she would appeal to redneck conservatives. The rednecks that I know in Brainerd are Democratic-leaning in their voting. I think the Tribune and possibly the writer of this article don’t know what a conservative is.

    Gwen Kienholz, Minneapolis

  • Less Hannity. More Lewis.

    To the surprise of no one who can read a ratings book, my former employers at KTLK have at long last spared Twin Cities radio listeners a third hour of Sean Hannity. The downside of course is that that same audience will get a third hour of Jason Lewis. … Oh, come on. That’s a joke.

    As has been reported previously, based on the most recent Arbitron ratings, Clear Channel’s expensive, heavily promoted experiment with FM talk in the Twin Cities has not been going well. Explanations for the station’s brutal under-performance all fall under the heading of, “Your guess is as good as mine.”

    The Top Three: (1). On Day One the idiots put Lambert on the air. (2). The underlying psychology of right-wing talk is heavily dependent on associations with a “winning team”. Team Conservative has badly screwed the pooch over the past six years, and as a consequence fewer and fewer listeners are eager for its’ company. (3). The KTLK line-up was monotonous. The same talking points at the same pitch hour after hour.

    The “Hannity factor” plays big in that last one. No one cares if I call Hannity a dim bulb. But, to put it kindly, the guy brings nothing new to the table. Ever. Worse, he really is a performer who appears to have no concern at all for the accuracy of his “information”. Nevertheless, Clear Channel and KTLK were stuck with him via his syndication deal. (They made Hannity and Hannity’s people big promises to run him both live and at full length when they yanked him away from KSTP-AM.)

    Like most businesses radio runs on leverage, so the assumption is that Hannity’s godawful performance meant leverage slipped from him to KTLK’s management, and in turn they felt brave enough to screw him.

    It is known that Lewis has been campaigning for that third hour, the 4 to 5 p.m. slot — a warm-up before prime-time drive-time. Now, beginning March 5, he has it.

  • Driving

    yellowstone river-2.jpg

    I’m got the car loaded with music, my dog, and blankets, and am headed west into the teeth of a blizzard. I’m preparing to be erased by the endless range and big sky. Wish me luck. I’ll be back in a week, and if I figure out how to use the technology I might post from the road.

    If you feel like it, send me some poems, stories, or reading suggestions while I’m gone. I’m in a serious inspiration drought.

    Please be well.

  • How Theater, Music, and a Little Love Toppled the Empire

    livesofothers1.gif

    Das Leben der Anderen (The Lives of Others)
    , 2006. Written and Directed by Florian Hanckel von Donnersmarck. Starring Ulrich Muhe, Sebastian Koch, Christa-Maria Sieland, Ulrich Tukur, Thomas Thieme, Hans-Uew Bauer, and Volkmar Kleinert.

    Now showing exclusively at the Uptown Theatre.

    Legend has it that Lenin, upon encountering Beethoven’s Appassionata Sonata, claimed that he could not bear to hear it anymore, for it made him want to stroke the heads of men… as opposed to smashing them in, which is what he felt he needed to do to get his revolution off the ground. Filmmaker Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck wondered to himself, “Was it possible to construct a situation in whcih Lenin would be forced to listen to the Appasionata?” In the Lives of Others a man, a functionary who has submerged all of his humanity in pursuit of a perfect state, is forced to listen. And he becomes real.

    The Lives of Others begins in an interrogation room, with a poor man accused of… something. We are never sure what, and what doesn’t matter. What are sure of, however, is that this is a paranoid country, East Germany, and the Stasi, the secret police of said country, is powerful. The man is shoved into a chair, told to place his hands beneath his thighs, and the questioning begins.

    This guy has no chance, as the state has men like Gerd Weisler (the great Ulrich Muhe) working diligently for them. This opening is brilliant–told in flashback, as Weisler is teaching other young hopefuls the art of wrecking the spirit of their countrymen. Weisler is perfect at his job, betraying only the slightest pride in a job well done, making notes to watch the student who wonders about the morality of some of his techniques. Weisler is almost a machine–he has the patience of a metronome ticking away through a long evening. He will do what it takes to make his prisoners confess, never questioning their guilt. For if they are in the chair in front of him, there can be no question.

    His former classmate and now superior, the merrily ambitious Grubitz (Ulrich Tukur), asks his pal Weisler to come to a night of theater. Grubitz is interested in his friend’s opinion of the playwright, Georg Dreyman (Sebastien Koch). Dreyman is the darling of the state, and a man who truly believes in the cause of the GDP. It’s not enough–we know, deep down, that it is never enough. “I would watch him,” Weisler says. And so the man too good to be spied up is spied upon.

    Of course, it is Weisler who will spy on Dreyman, and to the snoop’s surprise, he will begin to fall in love. Not with Dreyman’s lover, the actress Christa-Maria (Martina Gedek), not with Georg, but with the ideas of love and art and honesty. By listening to the lives of others, Weisler comes to understand that they are quite alike.

    Weisler’s fall, if you can call it that, begins slowly. He is punctual and not to be undone by emotion. But as he listens, he is forced to hear the sounds of two people truly in love, people in love with their plays, with Bertolt Brecht, with their friends, and, in the case of Georg, in love with the idea of the state. This is the film’s great conceit: Weisler and Georg are two halves of the same coin–passionate for what they do, ideal citizens, taking to heart what the country is supposed to mean–brotherhood and all its trimmings. Weisler comes to understand that they are more alike, in fact, than his superiors, one of whom is fucking Christa-Maria because he knows a secret that would get her kicked off the stage forever–she is a drug user. Weisler’s soon discovers, too, that his friend is simply a pencil-pushing beaurocrat who only wants to move up in the world–he has no qualms ruining the life of a young man simply telling a joke, or ignoring warnings of sabotage if it will hurt his career. Weisler comes to see that it is his subjects who are true to the state, not the party functionaries.

    Slowly we come to care for this Weisler, who steals a copy of Brecht, who listens to the music emanating from the apartment below, and who eavesdrops on their lovemaking not as a peeping tom in search of a cheap thrill, but as a poet in search of inspiration, hoping to find love in his own dark heart.

    So Weisler intervenes, hiding information and trying to protect his charges, which leads to disastrous results. The Lives of Others is a remarkable film, for its tension, which locks upon you like a vice, forcing you at times to root for the wrong people (such as when Weisler has to bug Georg’s building), and its nearly unbearable emotional charge. The film is funny in spots, humane, its plot, worthy of Hitchcock, never getting in the way of rich character development. We come to know every one of these people, and even the tiniest character is shown ground up by the state–and later freed, when the wall comes down.

    The jokes in the film offer welcome relief of an almost unbearable tension, but also drive home what this whole world is about, and how disastrous and dehumanizing it was. At one point, Weisler elicits the services of a prositute who, in one of the films many damning jokes, is as much on a schedule as he is in his spy work. Life in the GDP is too comparmentalized to allow for love.

    The Lives of Others has two endings. The first is expected, not predictable, but we know good things will not happen. And then the director surprises us, and time moves on, the wall comes down, and there is a brief moment of justice. After years of paranoia, of devouring souls and wrecking lives, the state is broken, and the individual is allowed to flourish. Left nearly broken, our hero, Wiesler, will grab at the small taste of love, poetry, and freedom.

    livesofothers2.gif

  • Cinnalove

    roll2.JPG

    It’s my Megan’s day to bring breakfast treats for her 1st hour English class. Is there something wrong with me that I can’t settle for the donuts at SuperAmerica? Krispy Kremes are too predictable, and over-rated besides, and bringing cereal and milk would feel like a sad surrender.

    Of course we hauled our keesters to Isles Bun & Coffee this morning for what is arguably the greatest breakfast treat in the known universe: the Isles cinnamon bun. Roughly the size of a dodge ball, the warm buns are all doughy-love on the inside and flaky buttery cinna-swirl on the outside. Slathered with gooey white icing, it is the perfect sweet bomb for a class of high-school juniors.

    It might have been cheaper to buy 30 pastries from Lunds, and it definitely would have been easier not driving all the way to Uptown and back by 7:30am. But how many of those stuck-in-the-suburbs kids have ever seen an Isles bun? How many even understand the wonders that exist beyond Toaster Struedel? When I moved 20+ minutes out of the city, I adopted a mantra: good food is always worth the drive.

    I think of it as community service, expanding young minds and palates through artful cinnamon.