Year: 2007

  • Once Again, Much Ado About Nothing

    Step right up, everybody: it’s Oscar time once again. Early this morning, probably far too early for an actor or actress with late-night tendencies, the Academy’s stuffed shirts (and Selma Hayek) made their announcements to a quivering world. I’m sure that Baghdad is quiet now, if only to reflect on Dreamgirls getting the shaft. I haven’t seen Dreamgirls, but know this: the Academy doesn’t typically bestow Best Picture status on just anything, especially well-made musicals (or conventional films, for that matter) about African-Americans. Especially when they can give the nod to a white family on a road trip, the brilliantly marketed Little Miss Sunshine.

    Surely the blogs and airwaves and television entertainment shows are all agog with the news: no Dreamgirls Best Picture, certainly this will be Scorsese’s year, who’s going to win it all, will Eddie Murphy win an Oscar, and so on. Will the Academy give Borat Best Original Screenplay (intriguing, as it was mostly improvised) just to see what that saucy Brit would say?

    Do not ever forget that the Oscars are marketing. They are the Super Bowl advertisements, Valentines and Sweetest Day, only with arrogant celebrities.

    Which leads one to wonder what all the fuss is about: the greatest movies never get nominated (this year, see Children of Men), the best performances ignored. Forest Whitaker and Helen Mirren are incredible actors. But their performances were hardly even their best–and they were mimicry (Whitaker’s was a bit better). Clive Owen, Ivana Baquero (Pan’s Labyrinth), Ray Winstone (The Proposition), Charlotte Gainsbourgh (The Science of Sleep), and Toby Jones incredible performance in Infamous… all ignored in favor of Will Smith and Meryl Streep.

    And this question: Martin Scorsese, having seen his great pictures snubbed so that awards could go to John G. Avildsen (for Rocky, when he made Taxi Driver), Robert Redford (for Ordinary People, in the year of Raging Bull), and Kevin Costner (for Dances With Wolves when GoodFellas was begging for the nod), is likely going to steal his statuette from Paul Greengrass for the superior United 93. And I wonder if it bothers his cinematic soul to see politics reward him and take the prize from a young, edgier artist… just as it happened to Scorsese years ago?

    This list of great actors and actresses and directors denied their Oscar glory only gets longer, while the mediocre fill the Academy’s coffers, as usual. You would be hard pressed to find anyone who really believes that Babel and Little Miss Sunshine are better pictures than Children of Men or Borat or even Talladega Nights. But they’re better marketed. And that’s all that counts.

  • Perry Exits City Pages

    Steve Perry, the talented and reliably caustic editor of City Pages handed in his resignation Monday, ending 13 years, in two separate shifts, as the alternative weekly’s ruddering hand.

    Perry cited more or less predictable philosophical differences with City Pages’ new(ish) corporate management, a recognition that journalism is moving on-line and that now was his time to bust a move in that direction. He offered praise to City Pages’ current publisher, Mark Bartel, (brother of Rake publisher, Tom Bartel).

    The stories of writers and subjects getting bleeding rashes from Perry’s not-exactly warm and maternal personality are legendary, and pretty damned funny. But after making the obligatory rip on Perry’s prickly ‘tude, even the most offended conceded he was an unusually talented editor. Moreover, to political progressives so often dismayed at the compromised reporting/thinking of the mainstream media, Perry’s indignation was both timely and articulate. I’d like to think we’ll see his kind again soon. But I doubt it.

  • Come on! We're Talking Sid Hartman!

    The mice were snickering Monday. Within the Star Tribune there was much chatter about Kate Parry v. Sid Hartman, Round Two. Or is it three? Or four? Maybe you caught Parry’s ombudsman column Sunday criticizing Hartman — Sid Friggin’ Hartman! — for appearing in an ad for Sun Country airlines, (with Ex-KSTP sports anchor, Joe Schmit). As I read it, I detected Parry’s displeasure both with Hartman’s appearance in the ad AND the fact he did not notify his, uh, superiors and ask for permission.

    Parry frets that Hartman’s appearance might lead readers/viewers to perceive a conflict of interest, as in, I guess … “I saw Sid do an ad for Sun Country. So how do I know the Strib isn’t lying the next time they say Sun Country had a lousy third quarter?” Do you know anyone who thinks like that?

    If you haven’t seen the spot, Sid appears from behind a copy of the Star Tribune and tells Schmit, who is yammering about Sun Country, to pipe down, because he’s reading, “the greatest newspaper in the world”. (Sid may be the only person capable of making that claim with a straight face. But to his credit as the ultimate homer, he said it). Hartman says nothing one way or another about Sun Country. But obviously his appearance is a tacit endorsement. (Hartman tells Parry he’s donating the free plane tickets he received as compensation, and I’m inclined to believe him. Believe me, Sid himself could take the Strib private. He does NOT need two Sun Country Super Savers to Cancun.)

    But it was the other worldly loftiness of Parry’s concern that set off the snickering. The gist of the joke being … WHO, i.e. what possible reader, would ever connect Sid Hartman doing his patented Sid shtick in an ad with the grand ethics of the Star Tribune as a whole? In the interests of further full disclosure let me be among those who urge Parry to print the mail she gets on the topic, in particular the best case any outraged reader/ethics expert makes for how Sid on a Plane undermines the integrity of the work of hundreds of others.

    I’m sorry, newspapers have a longstanding problem with the double standard that grants all sorts of latitude, in terms of outside compensation, to sports writers while keeping a very tight rein on most everybody else. Anybody in newspapers sees that all over the place. But lets not pretend anyone outside a 10′ radius of some pedantic editor’s office gives a damn. This kind of hand-wringing just doesn’t register with the general public. Nor should it. It just doesn’t matter.

    As far as I can tell, the slice of the public that is hip enough to big media’s myriad failings is a hell of a lot more upset about a major newspaper’s errors of omission — like keeping their heads down and voices low as a President with killer poll numbers gins up a fraudulent war — than whether some sports columnist plugs a local airline.

    As for 85 year-old Sid Hartman getting permission from his superiors … don’t make me laugh.

  • 34

    Last fall, in conjunction with that music issue we did, there was an Up The Charts poll on our website which asked: Who is your all time favorite Minnesota band/musician? Well, weren’t we surprised to see Tina and the B-Sides fans come out in full-force, taking away top honors. (This was probably due to an email solicitation to the band’s fan list, but ah well.) Hoping there’s still Tina fans lingering about our humble site, I toss to thee a bone: Tina’s playing the T-Rock tonight, this as part of Rock For Roe, or celebrating the anniversary of the Roe v. Wade.

  • Jason Lewis & Talk Theory

    I’ve been cautioned to be careful with this. Schadenfreude, though a lovely sounding word, is unseemly. Its supposedly beneath a responsible adult. But what the hell is a media blogger supposed to do when confronted with the train wreck ratings for KTLK-FM (100.3), where I very briefly co-hosted a show? I mean, come on kids, this is news!

    KTLK is one of gargantuan media empire Clear Channel’s experiments with FM talk. The way it was supposed to go was Clear Channel would steal Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity away from rival local stations, in this case KSTP-AM, (Clear Channel owns Limbaugh’s syndicator, Premiere Radio Network), and build a kind of instant dynasty in what the radio industry blithely refers to as “news-talk”. In reality of course these stations provide very little in the way of news, (Fox News is a punch line, not a news service), they do precious little original local reporting, and 95% of the talk is pretty much of the hard-right, mostly bullshit vein we’ve all heard for years and years ad nauseum.

    In a very significant gamble, Twin Cities Clear Channel managers negotiated a deal, rumored to be worth $300k/per year for five years, to bring Jason Lewis, once a solid performer for KSTP-AM, back from exile in Charlotte, NC. Tragically, this meant tossing my partner, Sarah Janecek and myself out on the streets.

    So what happens? More specifically, what happens through October, November and December 2006? Through the teeth and aftermath of another hotly contested election? With endless opportunities for impugning the patriotism, sanity and toilet training of liberals?

    According to the quarterly Arbitron ratings report, KTLK, home of Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Jason Lewis and various bizarre, late night Fox News fungal species, delivered an anemic 2.1 share of the Twin Cities radio market, good enough for … 18th place among adults 25-54 listening from 3pm to 7 pm. (The station is 13th with a 2.6 share through Limbaugh’s midday shift — virtually tied with Air America on AM 950, and 21st, with a microscopic 0.9 share through morning drive.)

    It would be a monumental understatement to say that expectations for both the station and Lewis were much higher. Now in fact, the hourly breakdown of these ratings won’t be available for another couple days, which means KTLK may argue that the abysmal ratings for 3-to-7, which is two hours of Sean Hannity (3-to-5) and two hours of Lewis, (5-to-7), is all Hannity’s fault. And maybe that is so. But, bad as I am with math, it seems to me Hannity would pretty much have had to turn off the mike and play dead air in order for Lewis’s audience to “lift” them to a 2.1 share.

    By the way, that 2.1 share/18th ranking puts KTLK in a tie with MPR’s “classical music service” on KSJN, and two notches BELOW, “The Lori & Julia Show” on FM 107.1, (a.k.a. “The Chick Station”). Meanwhile, MPR’s “news service” ranked 8th with a 5.0 share, and Clear Channel’s country station, K102, led the pack in afternoon drive, with a 7.2 share.

    Now, I make jokes about the Arbitron diary keeping process. In the radio business people are often heard saying how all it takes is, “two drunks in a trailer court”, to skew the numbers all over the place. So yes, everything could change when the current quarter’s numbers come out in April. But KTLK’s audience appeal has remained more or less constant since the station debuted in January ’06, replacing Smooth Jazz. It is beginning to look like a 2-to-3 share is pretty much reality … for a radio property that has been the beneficiary of a wholly unprecedented year-long billboard campaign valued at nearly $1 million. (KTLK’s parent company, Clear Channel, owns the billboards you see all over town, which means they don’t have to pay rent on them, but I’m just talking value here … and those billboards will most likely disappear once Clear Channel goes private and cleaves off its’ outdoor advertising arm).

    Because the fate of KTLK will be a fascinating story to watch over the next few months, I’ll spare you my deep analysis of what has happened so far. But I ask, what do YOU think is going on when the established, franchise lions of fog and spin generate so little business through an election season? Is the audience for run-of-the-mill “news/talk”, (i.e. “Fox News”/ludicrous spin), abandoning it just as average Republicans have abandoned George W. Bush’s failed presidency? Does that mean, as some of us have long said, that the fundamental emotional appeal of “news/talk’s” bloviating gurus is their delivery of bullshit triumphalism? And that people have had enough bullshit? Or has the rancid partisanship of the past dozen years — goosed in large part by Limbaugh et al and “hot talk” — finally turned off the public, leaving only the delusional core?

    I don’t know. But when a proven act like Lewis comes back to town, with a hefty paycheck and more road signage than I-35 and his audience is so small he’s two rungs down the ladder from “The Current” (MPR’s eclectic pop act, at 89.3), something significant is going on.

    Here’s the rankings for afternoon drive, adults 25-54, Oct.-Dec. ’06.

    1. K102 7.2
    2. KSTP-FM 6.1
    3. KTIS-FM 5.5
    4. KQRS 5.5
    5. WLTE 5.4
    6. KSTP-AM 5.2
    7. Jack FM 5.2
    8. KNOW 5.0
    9. Cities97 4.9
    10 KFAN 4.9
    11 KOOL108 4.5
    12 93X 4.1
    13 WCCO 3.6
    14 KDWB 3.1
    15 “Current”2.4
    16 FM107 2.4
    17 B96 2.2
    18 KTLK 2.1
    19 KSJN-FM 2.1
    20 AM950 1.8

  • Snobbery

    I recently suffered through a wine and cheese party at Lutsen. I met two investment bankers (I have nothing against investment bankers) who had just turned 40. Our conversation immediately focused on lines and distinctions. The talk centered upon Denver, where one of the bankers had grown up. I mentioned where I have my office and he tried to discern (not ask) exactly where it was located. I never thought about this much, till he pestered me for landmarks. The dude was nice enough, but his questioning had a subtle pugnacity that made me flinch.

    I quickly turned the conversation away from Denver and inquired about his office in Minneapolis (as I had heard he worked downtown). His office, he informed me, was in the building previously called the First Bank Tower, “designed by I.M. Pei,” he added.

    I recalled that that I.M. Pei had indeed designed this tower and that to me it remains a forgettable work, with marble the color of a Don Johnson blazer from Miami Vice days (first season). He also said something about only “3 buildings” in Minneapolis being worthy of a successful enterprise. His yardstick of architectural worthiness seemed to center on height.

    Needless to say I did not bring up the Japanese-penned masterpiece that is the old Northwestern National Life building.

    And, being the uttter snob that he was, I refused to talk about cars.

  • Cold Dish

    empty_plate.jpg

    So by now you know that Five has closed its doors permanently. So has Levain. Two foodie institutions gone, but why?

    Some people might take this opportunity to wax rhapsodic on the state of the scene, and apply huge, sweeping generalizations about what society is up to, just so that they can be The Expert, the One Who Gets It.

    But that bugs me. Because there’s so much more than a quick bite going on here.

    To say that people are still eating out but “avoiding the trendy and the tres innovative” and then list a few recent closings is like licking the icing off a cupcake and then denouncing it for having no substance.

    In at least four of the five restaurants listed after the above statement, there were some SERIOUS leadership issues that largely contributed to their demise. The people running the restaurant, not the people eating in the restaurant are the ones to blame when it closes. Why can’t people get that through their head?

    There are plenty of people in these cities who look for the trendy and the innovative, but yes, you have to actually WORK at making sure they return!

    The restaurant business is a cycle, the ones who have a good sense of self (leadership) and an even better sense of the guest (service) are the ones who will survive the dips. The ones who care mostly for their reputations or their personal cash-flow have lost sight of being humble in the eyes of the eater, and thereby successful.

  • The real nice clambake!

    Ce weekend, la: Nautilus Music-Theater’s production of Carousel opens at the Southern, and I wouldn’t even be mentioning the silly clambake song or the slap that “felt like a kiss” if not for the standup crew involved in putting this thing together–not just Nautilus mastermind Ben Krywosz, but also great local singers like Bradley Greenwald and Jennifer Baldwin Peden. Also, over at Creative Electric Studios there’s an exhibit that at first sounds kind of pointless, but pulls on the heartstrings of this shopper-on-a-budget no less: Wyatt Mcdill’s Past Lives: Thrift Store Ephemera, in which the photographer highlights all the second-hand crap he bought over the years. (The opening reception’s tomorrow between 6:30 and 11 p.m.) And the rest of the weekend, as far as I’m concerned, is silence…

  • Two Busted Kings and A Little Princess

    Old Joy and Pan’s Labyrinth

    oldjoy2.gif

    Old Joy, 2006. Directed by Kelly Reichardt, written by Reichardt and Jonathan Raymond. Starring Daniel London and Will Oldham.

    Now showing at the Oak Street Cinema.

    Old Joy begins with a phone call between friends. Mark (Daniel London) is seen talking with his old college pal Kurt (Will Oldham) about a last minute camping trip. The conversation is awkward, a discussion between two people whose relationship, you already notice, is on the wane. Mark wants to take the trip, but why? Well, perhaps it is because he needs a break–a hiatus from his pregnant wife (who wonders about this mysterious friend from her husband’s past), from his job, from his life. Mark is a man about to take a very important journey into fatherhood. He is lost, and needs to get grounded again.

    Old Joy is about nothing more than a camping trip between two friends, a pair of men who met in college and had an intense friendship, of long talks and shared observation, and have since watched, baffled, as their lives divided on the road to adulthood. In the hands of Kelly Reichardt, Old Joy is a quiet, ruminative film, a small blessing for those of us battered by CGI and Big Events on the big screen, soundtracks blaring and actors strutting. Here, you walk with her characters through the Oregon forests, you listen to their quiet admissions, stare at the trees and the sky. Like a hike with a good friend, you come away refreshed, and perhaps a bit frustrated that life is not always this calm.

    Kurt promises his friend Mark that there is a hot spring nestled in one of the old growth forests in rural Oregon. They drive. Along the way, they talk, just as old friends do. And Reichardt subtly, so subtly, gives us the details of these two friends: Kurt is a wanderer, utterly confused about the world he lives in, trying to figure out how to survive. He wants life to reflect the beliefs he developed in college. Mark has embraced the rush to adulthood. He has a child on the way, political talk radio fills his car–and he is the one who has the house, who has the car that runs, whose possessions don’t fill an old beaten-up van.

    Kurt has lost his way literally at first, missing an overgrown path that leads to the spring. Mark shows his frustration, calling his wife, complaining to her and lying to Kurt about his anger. Unable to find the springs, they spend their first night sleeping on an old abandoned couch in the woods, watching the embers from their fire climb into the clear night sky. They talk–about nothing, and about everything.

    Next morning, over breakfast, another call home, some reassurance, and then they light out and actually find the springs. Here, Kurt is in complete control, in his element, and the scenes are just beautiful, and moving. Reichardt’s camera is never intrusive, low to the ground, weighing down these scenes with a sweet gravity that we’ve all enjoyed on trips with close friends. The men relax, profoundly, and Kurt massages his friend’s shoulders, in a scene so fraught with tension–and it’s really not sexual–you’ll find yourself reeling.

    Old Joy might try your patience. If you dislike the characters, you won’t like the movie at all. But if you can embrace them, as I did, recognizing yourself and your friends in both, then you will be rewarded with a powerful experience. Neither character is given short shrift here–Kurt eventually finds the springs, and he was right, they are a transcendent experience. Mark has his feet more firmly planted on the ground, and in the city, at the end, we see that he is right back in control. Kurt is lost. He will always be lost.

    And perhaps that is the most heartbreaking thing about this movie, the inevitable loss of this friendship. Undoubtedly, these two will attempt to keep in touch, but they will drift. They have different lives, utterly different, and they need one another desperately. Mark’s more button-down world must have the release a trip with Kurt provides. And Kurt needs someone to help him maneuver the modern world. But these never last. Who among us doesn’t have that friend who seems to be a bit wild, too lost in this world, who won’t settle down? We travel down our road, and eventually stop seeing the landscape, the stars, or the water that rushes beneath the bridge. We scoff at those who stare, just as those who stare and wonder scoff at us for continuing to struggle, making a living and settling down. Reichardt understands there is magic in both worlds, and the division between the two is a matter of pure heartbreak.


    El Laberinto del Fauno (Pan’s Labyrinth), 2006. Written and directed by Guillermo del Toro. Starring Ivana Baquero, Adriana Gil, Sergi Lopez, Maribel Verdu, Alex Angulo, and Doug Jones.

    Now showing at the Uptown Theater.

    Briefly: If your children can endure a couple of scenes of violence, then Pan’s Labyrinth is an almost perfect fable for the young ones. This is the story of a little girl, Ofelia (Ivana Baquero, simply marvelous) who is shuffled off to a remote military outpost, where her pregnant mother Carmen (Adriana Gil) who is newly married to the vicious Capitan Vidal (Sergi Lopez–as complexly evil as Ralph Fiennes was in Schindler’s List). The girl falls deeply into a fantasy world, where she must perform three dangerous tasks in order to return as the princess of the underworld.

    A friend told me that one of his colleagues was disappointed in the lack of magic in this film. Unfortunately, what was meant was that there is a lack of Narnia overkill–Pan’s is not the ticket for the hordes of fantasy fans everywhere seeking monsters and battles and fairy dust. True, Pan’s Labyrinth, like Del Toro’s Devil’s Backbone before it, has little CGI–you get most of it in the previews!–but it is rich with characters, plot, and metaphor. And it is sad, and hardly triumphant. But it will make you think; it will make your children think. Perhaps they will emerge shaken, and have bad dreams. And you might just have to talk them through this, have to use this little story to help them to understand this big, often cruel and beautiful world. You will have to wrestle with their curiosity, and their difficult questions. Is that so bad?

    panslabyrinth.gif

  • Top Chef 2

    Top_Chef_211_Scrapbook_14[1].jpg

    I’ve been watching the second season of Top Chef, but I haven’t had that much to comment about. Last year I felt I could defend Tiffani because I’d met her, but this year I don’t really care about anybody.

    Maybe that’s the problem, I don’t seem to have a favorite, no one to root for. Hunky Sam is cute and all, but kinda doofy and his food hasn’t been all that impressive. I liked Ilan in the beginning, but he turned out to be arrogant with little backing it up. Elia is just plain odd, which could be a winning quality, but she keeps throwing her hands up and quitting. Marcel is annoying, yes, but I could suffer it if his food was astounding. Mostly, he’s just really green.

    I guess, if I had to put down a sawbuck, I’d bet on Sam. The fact that he didn’t take part in the meathead shenanigans of head shaving and that he seems more serious than the others gives him the advantage. He, of the remaining four, seems to know what is truly at stake.

    The hunkiness, like a nice fondant, just makes great TV.