Tag: Target

  • The Emperor Has Underwear. . . and Maybe a Pair of Socks

    What you drink from matters. No question.

    Good coffee will be ruined by a Styrofoam, waxed, or plastic vessel (and here, I include all those plastiform travel mugs distributed by SA). Water leaches toxins from petroleum-based bottles. Anything out of an aluminum can tastes like. . . .aluminum can. Chunky little Chinese bowl cups somehow make tea taste better. Wide cappuccino mugs with plenty of room for foam are a must. And decent wine glasses do improve the wine drinking experience.

    To a point.

    Take it from me, a woman who sat through most of a demonstration staged last night at Solera, by the legendary stemware producer Georg Riedel (pronounced REE-dle, rhymes with needle). I left early — truth — because I had a conference for one of my kids. But I was glad to go. For 45 minutes, we’d been swirling, pouring, sniffing, and experimenting with three nice wines and five different "glasses" (explanation of quotes below) and I was rather tired of the process. It was a little Montessori and, frankly, sucked every ounce of enjoyment from the experience of simply drinking the wine.

    Georg is the 10th generation principal of his family’s Austrian glass-blowing business. They actually started, back in the mid-1700’s, making windows. But after World War 2, the Riedel family was forced out of their native Bohemia (now the Czech Republic). And in 1957, Georg’s father, Claus, had an opportunity to buy a business that made high-quality stemware. But rather than just carry on in the tradition of the company — making glasses that were aesthetically pleasing or in keeping with current decor — Claus came up with a whole new paradigm.

    He developed what his son — Georg — calls "the concept." Simply put: that the size and shape of a glass matter when it comes to drinking wine.

    I don’t know about Claus, but Georg is a born salesman. And by this I mean, he can make it seem imperative that you have what he sells. He’s canny. Self deprecating. He talks about how he "complicates" the lives of the people he meets by alerting them to their need for better wine glasses. How clever is that? He cops to the fact that he is adding a layer of cost and effort onto what is for most of us a simple, pleasant pursuit. And yet, he manages to make this sound like a gift!

    During yesterday’s presentation, Riedel the 10th was suave in a very European high-buttoned coat. He warned us charmingly (he nearly won me over with this) about the volume of wine we were about to drink and cautioned drivers against over-indulging. He talked about the rising alcohol content of wines and the unfortunate practice of chaptalizing (adding sugar during fermentation) that has become standard because modern drinkers seem to want ever bolder and bigger wines.

    He told us that the word "flavor" actually means the combination of smell and taste. This is only marginally accurate. It is one definition (third on the list in most dictionaries). But I’m willing to give him credit, given that the sensory experiences (smell and taste) certainly are connected where wine is concerned. And I, for instance, am a person more reliant upon the former than the latter.

    "In every handmade glass is the breath of a human being," Georg said. And I have to admit, I swooned.

    But then, we were led through a complicated dance that involved tasting white wine from a Riedel Chardonnay glass, then from a plastic cup, and then from a cheap, wide-mouthed glass. And this is where Georg lost me.

    Of course, the wine tasted awful from the plastic cup. There were, to my mind, many reasons. Plastic has an odor, even a distinct taste. It’s flimsy and unsatisfying to hold. I associate it with keg parties and hospital water jugs. However, Georg Riedel insisted the only problem with the plastic cup was that its mouth was too narrow to allow for proper aromatics.

    Once we’d poured the wine into the wide-mouthed glass, we were instructed to sip again. And here, he told us there was just too MUCH aroma escaping, it wasn’t being funneled to the nose properly. This, too, he said, ruined the wine. All around me, I saw heads nodding.

    But I was thinking, Balderdash. (Actually, I was thinking something else, but this is a word more in keeping with the refinement of Riedel.)

    After the white wine had been swirled, poured, and disposed of, we started in on the red. This was served in a Riedel Burgundy glass — a beautiful, bulbous thing (in the middle above) that Georg told us is large enough to hold a bottle and a half. Now, put aside the risks inherent in giving people glasses so large that a moderate serving of wine looks like a pathetic dribble. The fact is, we drank a lovely French pinot noir from the Burgundy glass and it was very nice.

    Then, we were told to pour our Burgundy into the Chardonnay glass — which Georg told us is similar to many other manufacturers’ red wine glasses — and take a sip. "Do you taste that? It’s too acidic!" Georg cried out, and the people around me were nearly weeping with gratitude as if someone had finally confirmed what they always knew. Stemware really does matter! Hallelujah!!

    I, on the other hand, drank my Burgundy from the wrong glass and I thought it was just fine. . . .except for the little bit of white wine residue.

    There are many things I love about Riedel stemware. It is lovely and stately and makes a thrilling sound when you clink in toast. I’ve no doubt it improves wine marginally (marginally!) to be able to stick one’s entire nose in the glass. It’s on sale at Target, for God’s sake, where you can get two bottom-of-the-line glasses for $25-30, which is not, actually a bad deal. But I do not believe, nor have I seen any evidence, that the average wine drinker must buy a different shaped glass for every varietal he or she may drink.

    As I said, a master salesman is someone who comes up with a product and convinces you that you absolutely must have it. He is the emperor who convinces you he is well dressed when he appears stark naked. Or, in the case of Georg Riedel — who has some very good points to make among all the flim-flam and twirling fire — a pair of boxers and maybe a couple woolen socks.

  • Jovovich-Hawk for Target

    p.s. I heart these looks from the latest Go International
    designer, Jovovich-Hawk. These will hit Target stores on March 2 or thereabouts.

     

     

  • The Idiot's Guide to Ending Hunger

    I haven’t a clue how to fix most of our huge national scourges. Global warming, gang violence, reality TV. These issues are just too big and ghastly and amorphous. What’s one person to do?

    But hunger. Now there’s a solvable problem. People are hungry, you feed them. Even tiny efforts make a difference. And every single person who has enough to eat can help.

    It’s been an era of wretched news from the nation’s food banks. Need is way, way up; donations are way, way down. In some states, homeless shelters simply don’t have the raw materials it takes to feed all the cold, hungry, ill, and marginalized people streaming through their doors.

    Luckily, that’s not the situation here in Minnesota, where being homeless in winter is a genuinely lethal prospect, and eating a decent meal can be the difference between weathering the cold and freezing to death. The organizations that feed our most vulnerable brethren actually do have enough in the coffers and cupboards to get by.

    But according to Heidi Stennes, director of communications for Second Harvest Heartland Food Bank, an organization that distributes food to 950 agencies and programs serving the poor, demand is going up among low-income working people. And that’s a need the current system can’t quite meet.

    "Half of the people using Minnesota food shelves have a child at home; half have a job," says Stennes. "Why is this happening? The price of gas is up. The price of groceries is up. A lot of folks are losing their homes. People get to the end of the month and after paying the heat bill and the rent and child care bills, they’re going to food shelves just to try to make ends meet."

    And the situation is getting worse. . .as it does each January. Shoppers tend to be happy and generous throughout the holidays, tossing coins into bell ringers’ buckets and volunteering at soup kitchens Christmas week. But come the long icy stretch of early year and a lot of that goodwill dries up. Suddenly, no one’s showing up to wear a frilly apron and ladle out chicken salad. Everyone who can afford to be is worried about taxes. Food donations slow.

    But there is something you can do.

    Second Harvest accepts already-prepared food from restaurants and suppliers (currently Leeann Chin and Target Greatland delis are among their top donors) and donations of both money and food from individuals and corporations. Workers there sort and box items appropriately — putting ingredients together with boxed meals, for instance, so the meat and/or butter a family might need to make a noodle dish come at once. The organization even has a $400,000 two-year grant from the state exclusively to buy milk. That’s a lot of milk. . . .

    But what gets me is, any one of us can do some good by spending an extra $2.59 on a can of beef stew or a box of whole wheat pasta. Throw it into the bin at Lund’s or collect a few shoppings trips’ worth and take them to a drop-off location. That’s it. This genuinely is a case where a little bit goes a long way.

    And if I can put my own little plug in here: the poorest people in our community consume far too much salt, sugar, fat, and preservatives, because that’s what’s in the food available to them in their local stores and through nonprofit agencies. If you can pay the extra dollar to donate something that’s organic, whole grain, or (at least) contains no MSG, artificial dyes, additives, high-fructose corn syrup, or synthetic sweeteners, all the better.

    The items most needed by Minnesota’s food shelves include:

    • canned fish (tuna) and meat
    • hearty soups and stews
    • complete boxed dinners
    • pasta, rice, cereal, crackers
    • peanut and other nut butters
    • canned or dried fruit

    Now I have to admit, I’m feeling all mawkish and chipper and Tiny Tim-like here. But dammit, it’s true. Feeding people — when done right, with respect and a sense of equity — not only sustains their lives, it preserves their dignity. And if we have the time and resources to debate restaurants, chefs, and gourmet ingredients, I think it’s the least we can do.