Author: Craig Cox

  • Managing to Win

    About a year ago, after Minneapolis Mayor R. T. Rybak had celebrated his rout of Peter McLaughlin by diving off the stage into the arms of his supporters, I noticed John Blackshaw wandering through the crowd of well-wishers, a slight smirk on his lips and a look of satisfied exhaustion in his eyes.

    Blackshaw had rescued the Rybak campaign after a near debacle at the city DFL convention in May, and now, six months later, he was ready to move on to the next campaign. I congratulated him and asked a couple of well-worn questions about turning points and challenges—queries he artfully dodged.

    Few voters would recognize Blackshaw or any of the dozens of campaign operatives who ply their trade each election cycle in the Twin Cities and beyond. They are, for the most part, passionate political animals with an almost neurotic attraction to candidates and campaigns. Only a select few earn a paycheck from their political work, and those who do aren’t boasting about the hourly wage. It’s work that, as one of Blackshaw’s peers puts it, “can suck up your life.”

    But there always seems to be enough political intrigue, adrenaline-pumping events, and social-change potential to keep most of them coming back—year after year, campaign after campaign. “Besides serving in the military, working in politics is the most patriotic thing you can do,” said Blackshaw, who most recently piloted the Becky Lourey gubernatorial campaign. “It’s the essence of government.”

    In the following profiles, we’ll meet a half-dozen political operatives who are directing or have directed major campaigns at the local or state level. They are deeply attached to the democratic process, brutally candid about the inadequacies of most candidates and their handlers, and surprisingly idealistic about the future of American politics.

    The Natural
    On a recent Friday afternoon, Ben Goldfarb, the architect behind Amy Klobuchar’s U.S. Senate campaign, was in a meeting, as usual. The white-cubicled Klobuchar headquarters on University Avenue in Southeast Minneapolis was mostly quiet. A colorful paper “countdown chain” was looped over one of the nearby cube walls, and a makeshift “Welcome Volunteers!” sign greeted everyone who stepped off the elevator. A bicycle leaned against a far wall. A young woman took calls at the front desk, her ancient computer monitor sitting on a couple of phone books. A single cigarette and lighter lay poised on the desk in preparation for her next smoke break.

    “The candidate,” as her manager always calls Klobuchar, was in Detroit Lakes. Goldfarb was conferring with new recruits; a rush of new volunteers had recently arrived, and he had to find the right role for each of them and brief them on their job descriptions and the campaign’s goals, schedules, and general operations.

    Goldfarb would call me later, the antsy receptionist said, ignoring my request to poke about the premises to look for a little color in the sterile office. Such a preoccupation with security was not surprising, though. The race against Mark Kennedy for Mark Dayton’s open Senate seat had long ago assumed the blistering intensity of a blood sport, with both campaigns running attack ads and challenging any utterance with a salvo of contradictory claims.

    A couple of weeks earlier, Goldfarb had been forced to fire his communications director after he learned she had peeked at a Kennedy ad sent by a partisan hacker. The revelation sparked a media feeding frenzy and put Goldfarb and Klobuchar on the defensive for one of the few times this election season. It was, he said later, in his typically low-key style, “a difficult situation.”

    When we finally connect that evening, twelve hours into his work day, Goldfarb apologizes for his inaccessibility, explaining that when he’s not in a meeting, he’s on the phone. It’s all part of “keeping the ship moving forward.”

    On a normal day, he’ll arrive at the office about seven a.m. to do a series of check-ins with staff on the morning’s headlines and discuss the communications needs for the day. Then he’ll get on the phone with the candidate (Klobuchar seldom shows up at the office; she’s almost constantly on the road) to talk about her schedule for the day. The job, Goldfarb said, is similar to running a small start-up company (he’s been there). There’s a pure management role, as well as finance, research, communications, and policy duties. “You sort of spread your arms and push the whole thing forward,” he said.

    A high-profile Senate campaign operates at an insanely accelerated pace and features daily, sometimes hourly, attacks from the opposition. Every day, Goldfarb said, he has to deal with “incoming” from the Kennedy campaign and ensure that the media are covering those salvos—and his candidate’s responses—in a way that’s favorable to the campaign. “A lot of time is spent thinking about communicating the right thing,” he explained.

    Since late September, Kennedy has been blasting away at Klobuchar’s performance as Hennepin County’s attorney, alleging that she’s giving out too many plea bargains—a soft-on-crime accusation designed to appeal to both Republicans and blue-collar Democrats. An earlier Kennedy ad slammed Klobuchar for her stances against lobbyists, special interests, Big Oil, and the pharmaceutical industry, noting that she was a registered lobbyist herself, that she took money from a “far left” special-interest group, and that she held personal investments in oil and pharmaceutical companies.

    But little of this has stuck, as Goldfarb and his media staff have moved quickly to rebut allegations, cranking out hundreds of media releases to set the record straight. Much of this work is done by the candidate herself while on the stump. In an October 9 campaign stop in Wabasha, Klobuchar lashed out at Kennedy’s campaign ads and vowed to fight back. “They are smearing us. They are swiftboating us,” she said. “I predicted it in June. It’s their strategy, and we won’t let them get away with it.”

    After Kennedy’s soft-on-crime ad, Klobuchar countered with one that used personal testimony from three crime victims to demonstrate her effectiveness in dealing with everything from identity theft to murder. The parents of Tyesha Edwards told how Klobuchar promised them she’d put the gangsters responsible for their daughter’s death behind bars—and then did it. The spot responds directly to Kennedy’s allegations, with Edwards’ mother telling Kennedy he “should be ashamed.”

    That rebuttal is a perfect example of how Goldfarb and his crew have refused to make the mistakes that sank the Kerry campaign. The lesson: Hit back hard, and hit back fast.
    Klobuchar has been running against Kennedy from the beginning of the campaign, despite the DFL endorsement challenge from Ford Bell, and the campaign has been resolute in painting its Republican opponent as too radical for mainstream Minnesotans, too tied to the failed Bush administration, and too ruthless to be embraced by voters who want solutions, not dogma. Despite Kennedy’s attempts to portray himself as an independent voice (and a nice guy) in his ads, he is in some ways still feeling the fallout from his nasty reelection campaign against Patty Wetterling two years ago, during which he did everything but call Wetterling a terrorist. Goldfarb has picked up on that vibe and worked hard to position Kennedy as an attack dog willing to do anything to keep his Washington job.

    Klobuchar, meanwhile, slid through the DFL endorsement battle and is on the verge of a victory by leaning constantly toward the center. In a Star Tribune profile less than a month before the election, she called herself “my own kind of Democrat”—meaning someone to the right of Senator Mark Dayton, the Republicans’ favorite whipping boy.

    That position infuriated DFL progressives who rallied behind Bell’s endorsement bid, but Goldfarb clearly understood that, in these partisan times, DFLers ought to be more interested in winning elections than in making a statement—especially when control of the Senate could hinge on their votes in the Klobuchar-Kennedy race.

    That climate has allowed Klobuchar to dance around many of the issues in the campaign. She refused to take the bait from Bell, who challenged her repeatedly to call for the immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. Instead, she remains committed to a phased withdrawal with a vague timeline. She’s also stayed away from the universal health care mantra and focused instead on “fiscal responsibility” in Washington, a tried-and-true campaign tool as nebulous as it is bulletproof.

    It’s not that this has been an error-free campaign for Goldfarb and his crew. He said he’s had to deal with plenty of emergencies. But none was as serious as when word got out that his communications director looked at a Kennedy campaign ad sent her by a Klobuchar supporter. The news made headlines for a couple days before Goldfarb announced he’d fired the staffer and turned over evidence to the FBI for investigation.

    The story quickly died, and later attempts by the Kennedy campaign to revive it have gone nowhere.

    Goldfarb declined to comment on the Kennedy-ad debacle except to say it was the “biggest fire” he’d had to put out. He said he responded to the dustup the way he responds to any campaign emergency. “I take a little bit of time and be quiet and think about it, and not rush to immediate judgment,” he said. “Then I bring in the senior circle of folks to talk about what we want to do. Then we make quick decisions and go.”

    At the age of twenty-nine, Goldfarb is no newcomer to the political scene, having run Jay Benanav’s unsuccessful St. Paul mayoral campaign in 2001 and coordinated John Kerry’s get-out-the-vote drive in 2004. But few political insiders could have predicted his role in one of the nation’s highest-profile Senate races.

    The New York native cut his organizing teeth doing Saul Alinsky–style community work while taking a semester of urban studies classes in Chicago. He came to Minnesota to study at Macalester College, where he graduated in 1999 with a degree in urban studies. The following year, he ran the St. Paul schools referendum campaign, and he later worked for AFSCME and Progressive Minnesota.

    Goldfarb was working in the private sector when Klobuchar called last February. Part of a Minneapolis-based media distribution start-up called InRadio at the time, he was newly married and negotiating deals with artists and their record labels in New York, where his wife, Nora Whalen, was attending graduate school. “I was enjoying life a lot,” he recalls, and though he was flattered by Klobuchar’s offer (noting “there’s lots of great people who do this stuff”), he actually wasn’t all that keen to come back to the Midwest.

    Whalen wouldn’t finish grad school until May, and Goldfarb admitted that the prospect of being separated from her for several months was not particularly appealing. “It wasn’t like a no-brainer,” he said of the decision. “I took a little bit of convincing.”

    But he and Klobuchar clicked from the beginning. They agreed that the campaign would rely more on grassroots organizing than on massive media ad buys and direct mail. And Goldfarb knew how to build a campaign from the ground up. “We see things very similarly,” he said of himself and Klobuchar.

    Still, Goldfarb hesitated until Whalen weighed in on the matter, and she was fairly blunt: “She thought I was an idiot to consider not doing it,” he says.

    As election day nears, Goldfarb said he doesn’t regret the decision. He’s learned a lot and has had the opportunity to work with some “incredible” people. The schedule is brutal, but he still finds time to play soccer once a week, spend time with his wife, eat periodically (“You’ve got to remember to make time for food,” he advised), and sleep as much as possible. “I’ve had to reduce all the other components of my life.”

    As intense a job as it is, Goldfarb pushes on each day with the knowledge that what he’s doing is really important. “It’s a sense of purpose [driven by the fact] that our elected officials make really important decisions that affect all of our lives,” he said.

    So there’s no sense that this job—especially if your candidate wins—might add a little luster to your résumé?

    “I really only do this because I think it’s important. I have no interest in being a candidate or being in the legislative system or running other campaigns. It’s just the most important thing I could do this year,” he said. “After this, I’m going to do something else.”

    Following the election, Goldfarb will spend “a couple of weeks” closing down the campaign operation before heading off to New York for Thanksgiving and then taking an extended vacation with his wife.

    Any particular destination?

    Not really, he said. “Just a quiet time in a place where there are no Blackberrys.”

    The Pro
    John Blackshaw’s first campaign-organizing effort landed him in the office of his school-district superintendent. He and a fellow freshman at his Pasadena, California, high school wanted to know who the best teachers were. Because there was no other way to obtain evaluations, they conducted a survey among their classmates.

    “We were really serious about it,” he recalled. “But the teachers went nuts.”

    Blackshaw and his pal were summoned to the superintendent’s office, various attorneys were called in, and eventually, the impromptu survey was permitted (with some compromises). Blackshaw later headed a two-person ticket for president and vice-president of the student body—the first time that approach had ever been considered at the school—and won.
    Such leadership aspirations came pretty naturally to Blackshaw. The son of active California Democrats, he had volunteered for Bobby Kennedy’s presidential campaign in 1968 and still vividly recalls watching on television that June evening as his candidate was shot and killed after having essentially secured the Democratic nomination with his California-primary victory.

    But rather than giving up on the political process, Blackshaw dove in. He took his political science degree from the University of California– Santa Barbara to Washington, DC, where he interned for U.S. Senator Harrison Williams during the Abscam scandal, which cost the New Jersey politian his seat in 1982. After law school, Blackshaw rose to the upper echelons of the doomed 1988 Michael Dukakis presidential campaign.

    Two years later, Pat Forceia asked him to come to Minnesota to work on the long-shot U.S. Senate campaign of a Carleton College political science professor named Paul Wellstone. Blackshaw ended up running that campaign and finding a new life in the political arena.

    Blackshaw stayed on as Wellstone’s chief of staff for a year before wandering away from non-stop politics and building his marketing, communications, and public relations résumé. He spent some time with Forceia and the Minnesota North Stars, did some consulting with the Minneapolis-based Tunheim Partners, and headed up ad guru Bill Hillsman’s company for a couple years.

    Blackshaw never completely left the political world, though. Like many campaign operatives, he continued to advise candidates even as he maintained a full-time consulting business. In the end, it’s all about sales. “We’re not selling a product, but many of the same principles apply,” he explained. “We’re selling ideas, selling personality, selling a vision.”

    These days, Blackshaw’s marketing and communications skills, honed inside and outside the world of politics over the past two decades, allow him, like any well-connected consultant, to slide into and out of any political campaign that’s smart enough to call. He was part of the Howard Dean phenomenon in 2004 before getting a call from Rybak last spring.

    The Minneapolis mayor, Blackshaw said, was “very coachable” about ideas and style but had trouble articulating his vision—especially around the issue of public safety. It was clear early on in the campaign that his opponent, Hennepin County Commissioner Peter McLaughlin, was going to hammer him on crime. Blackshaw recalls how long it took Rybak and his staff to grasp the importance of the issue. At a meeting, he told them they needed to put more cops on the street or Rybak could lose the election. “The staff kept saying, ‘We can’t do that. There’s no money,’ ” he recalled.

    “Turn off some streetlights,” Blackshaw suggested.

    After much wrangling, the staff came back with a proposal to hire three more officers. “They were really congratulating themselves for that, and I’m saying, ‘Three?’ ”

    Rybak eventually found the money to hire sixty officers. “He finally got it,” Blackshaw said.

    For all its ups and downs, last year’s Rybak campaign was easy compared to the Lourey contest. Blackshaw came on board early in the game as a comanager, along with longtime local political strategist Joe Barisonzi, and the team soon had the scrappy state senator in a position to win the DFL nomination at the state convention in June. But when Blackshaw arrived in Rochester the first day of the convention, the Lourey operation was in a shambles. “The campaign just imploded,” he said.

    Lourey staffers were obsessed with persuading party officials to remove the Mike Hatch signs that covered the walls of the convention hall, taking away energy and staff from the floor operation, which is so critical to counting and swaying delegates. Distracted by the sign issue, Lourey forces lost valuable ground to both Hatch and Steve Kelley, and wound up finishing a disappointing third.

    “The campaign was decimated after the convention,” Blackshaw said. “We had to rebuild it.” But he couldn’t. In the September primary, Hatch buried Lourey by a margin of almost three to one.

    Just another campaign? Maybe, but Blackshaw moves on knowing that the game has changed. Campaigns are getting more expensive, meaner, and more personal, he said, pointing particularly to the attacks on congressional candidate Keith Ellison. “It’s more of a blood sport.”

    The Rookie
    Running a political campaign, especially a “bottom-of-the-ballot” contest like the race for Hennepin County attorney, is not a glamorous job. At this level, the campaign manager has to do everything: coordinate volunteers, communicate with the media, schedule events, and coach the candidate. But for Gia Vitali, who’s running Andy Luger’s bid to succeed Amy Klobuchar, it’s just part of a larger learning process.

    “Everybody comes to you,” said the thirty-year-old Little Canada native. “You have to prioritize things every day, every hour.”

    The former aide to U.S. Representative Bruce Vento and U.S. Representative Betty McCollum is running her first campaign, and it’s proving to be a test not only of her perseverance and organizing abilities but of her long-term interest in serious campaign work. Vitali, seen by some local politicos as a rising star, admits that she’d love to make this a career even as she wonders how she’s going to survive through Election Day.

    “You don’t get into this business for the money or the job security,” she said. “You’ve got to love it.”

    And to hear Vitali tell it, you have to be in it to win.

    Unlike many of the campaign managers I talked to for this story, Vitali has little interest in the underdog campaign—the principled candidate who’s running primarily to raise a set of issues or to make a certain point about the process. She says she understands that perspective, but she’d avoid such a campaign.

    “If I was going to put everything into this and the candidate was going to put everything into this, you ought to get something out of it,” she said. “There has to be a reality check.”

    Vitali hasn’t always been that competitive; helping to get out the vote for Kerry in 2004 may have lit a fire. When Luger asked her to run his campaign more than a year ago, she agreed only to meet with him and see if he was a serious candidate. “I asked him, ‘Do you know what you’re getting into, and do you really want to work that hard?’ ”

    That’s tough talk from a woman who was entering kindergarten when her candidate graduated from college. But Vitali wanted to be sure Luger was serious before she committed to the eighteen months of grinding campaign work that would be required to place an unknown local attorney in a position to challenge Mike Freeman.

    As the campaign moves into its final days, Vitali has done just that. Luger won the DFL endorsement and is likely to prevail on November 7. But as Vitali noted early on, nothing comes easy. To win, you must surround yourself with committed people who have different perspectives, you must be able to communicate effectively, and you have to work hard—really hard.

    “There’s tons of pressure,” Vitali admitted, but she does her best to maintain a little balance by running twice a week, setting aside some time for family, and remembering that there is a finish line to this and every election. “There are seven more weeks to work for this goal,” she said. “I can do anything for seven weeks.”

    And if your candidate loses?

    “I’m not going to lose,” she snapped. “I don’t think about losing. If you think about losing, you open the door to losing.”

    Vitali’s also trying not to think about what her life will be like on November 8. If Luger wins, there will be transition-team work as he readies himself for office, but beyond that, she really doesn’t know what’s next.

    “I’m not sure I’ll be working another campaign after this,” Vitali said, noting that she has some interest in marketing, lobbying, and the labor movement, but despite the long hours, the anonymity, and the utter inevitability of that first loss somewhere down the road, she’s not sure she wouldn’t dive back in. “There’s a piece of me that fears that if I’m not a part of this, I’ll be missing something.”

    The Captain

    By his own count, Michael Guest has worked on about twenty campaigns over the past decade. He’s been instrumental in guiding underdog city council candidates to victory (including Don Samuels’ hard-fought win over incumbent Natalie Johnson Lee last November) and helped deliver the DFL endorsement to Keith Ellison.

    In fact, it’s not uncommon to find Guest working in the background of several campaigns simultaneously. “I like to shape the dynamics,” he admitted.

    And while the thirty-nine-year-old strategist has been known to characterize his political activity as part public service, part addiction (he says he’s been trying to retire since 2004), he remains one of the area’s most sought-after consultants.

    In January, when her campaign was faltering, Lourey called on Guest to help rebuild morale. “They ended up calling me ‘Captain,’ ” he recalled.

    Not that such demand necessarily translates into a living wage. Over the years, Guest has parlayed his skills and network into a series of political organizing and lobbying contracts on the local, regional, and national scenes. It gives him the flexibility he needs to maintain his connections to local politics while paying the mortgage on his South Minneapolis home.

    His diversity of experience has prompted Guest to forge some concrete opinions about what can make or break a campaign. Chief among these is that too many candidates spew messages that never reach beyond their own inner circle of advisers. “It’s not what resonates with you, it’s what resonates with the public,” Guest said. “And most people don’t spend five minutes a month thinking about politics.”

    That’s what happened in the Samuels-Johnson Lee race, he explained. Four years earlier, Johnson Lee pulled a shocking upset of then City Council President Jackie Cherryhomes. But that was an anti-incumbent year. In 2005, there was no such sentiment, but Johnson Lee still ran as an outsider. “It was a casebook example of not knowing what got her elected,” he said.

    Samuels, on the other hand, turned out to be one of Guest’s favorite candidates. “He understood his shortcomings and took advice.”

    So the message needs to be simple, practical, and relevant to voters. But even when you craft an effective message, it doesn’t guarantee success.

    At least that’s the lesson Guest learned from his own city council run in 2001, when he challenged incumbent Kathy Thurber. That challenge ultimately convinced Thurber not to run for reelection, Guest argues, but it wasn’t enough to win him the DFL endorsement, which went to Gary Schiff—with Thurber’s support.

    Guest doesn’t lose much sleep over the setback. “I like selling other people. I’m not effective selling myself,” he said.

    Besides, there’s a clear upside to being outside of the city hall power structure. A Samuels supporter tiled Guest’s basement floor in thanks for his work on the campaign. And State Representative Tim Mahoney of St. Paul trades plumbing work for Guest’s speechwriting and other services.

    “I can never run for office, because I’d have to give up all the free work,” he said.

    Forrest Gump
    At the 1988 DFL caucuses, Sonja Dahl was standing alone in her Nuclear Freeze/Skip Humphrey subcaucus, wondering whether there were any other principled DFL peaceniks in the hall, when a handsome young man approached her and indicated his support for her cause. It was Norm Coleman.

    This is only one of the many ironies this Minneapolis veteran of the political wars can point to when she recalls her more than twenty-year career as an activist, volunteer, and campaign manager. Dahl was purged, along with most of the campaign staff, during State Senator John Marty’s run for governor in 1994, dispatched to Willmar to work for Congressman David Minge, and helped elect Paul Wellstone to the U.S. Senate only to have him die on her birthday.

    “I’m the person who knows everybody,” Dahl said. Indeed, Rybak once compared her to Forrest Gump. Given that she’s been a fixture on nearly every significant political campaign since the early 1980s, it’s probably an accurate description. Still, the forty-eight-year-old Dahl is more the prototypical campaign worker than the high-octane political strategist. She’s the one who knows how to get your signs up in the best location in a convention hall, the one who knows how to represent your campaign in the ballot-counting process, and the one who can get your phone banks working for those last-minute get-out-the-vote drives.

    Dahl’s résumé ranges from stints at Clean Water Action and the Nuclear Weapon Freeze Campaign to statewide campaigns for Wellstone, Marty, Tom Daschle, and Tom Harkin, a congressional race for Minge, and innumerable local contests. She recalls Marty firing almost his entire campaign about three weeks before the 1994 gubernatorial election despite the fact that his fundraising operation was so effective that he “couldn’t spend the money fast enough” in the days leading up to the election.

    Then there was the Minge race in 1992, when the campaign manager tabbed her to travel to Willmar and organize Kandiyohi County in the two weeks before the election. “We had no volunteers, no phone banks,” she said. “My volunteers were a high school kid and an eighty-year-old farmer.”

    Minge won the election by a mere 500 votes, but he carried Dahl’s county by 2,500 votes. “I really felt like I made a difference,” she said.

    For delivering Kandiyohi County, Dahl was paid $500.

    Dahl can handle the modest compensation; what bothers her is how people look at campaigns and assume the tide turns on some isolated issue rather than on the grueling labor of the campaign workers. The 1990 Wellstone victory is a case in point. Conventional wisdom suggests that incumbent senator Rudy Boschwitz lost the election because he circulated a letter to Jewish supporters claiming that he was a “better Jew” than Wellstone. Dahl points out that the groundwork for that upset was laid weeks beforehand, recalling the moment she first noticed that there were more volunteers for the phone banks than they could use. “The energy and momentum were just palpable,” she said.

    The Insider
    When he was five years old, Peter Wagenius met Walter Mondale, and soon after, he was doing literature drops for his mother’s campaign and making lawn signs out of plywood. He’s not one to idealize politics.

    Wagenius, the son of longtime State Representative Jean Wagenius, now works as a senior policy aide for Mayor Rybak and has worked on more campaigns than he can remember. Yet he’s managed to maintain a reasonable perspective on the process. “If you want to change the world or your community, political activism is the way to do it,” he said.

    Which is not to say that “the carnival of politics,” as Wagenius called it, doesn’t get a bit bizarre at times. After all, those who are most attracted to politics tend to be people who want something either for themselves or for their community, people with too much time on their hands, or people who like to be close to power. This can lead to odd behavior, long meetings, poor candidates, or all three.

    Wagenius recalls his first state convention, in 1990, when convention officials dealt with a bomb threat by debating the pros and cons of evacuating the hall—never deviating from Robert’s Rules of Order. And he remembers without much fondness when the new manager of the John Marty campaign fired the whole fundraising department before realizing that it was the only aspect of the campaign having any success. The manager then tried to keep the newly-fireds from leaving by promising them jobs, when everyone on the staff knew Marty was going to be buried by Arne Carlson.

    Wagenius later helped State Representative Phil Carruthers oust longtime Speaker of the House Irv Anderson. When news of the vote was reported on the radio, Wagenius had to pull over. “I was screaming in my car,” he recalled. “When I got home, I was literally congratulating the furniture.”

    If that sounds pathological, Wagenius wouldn’t disagree. “In order to clock the hours, you need to believe you have history in your hands. You need to believe you can control the outcome if you work hard enough,” he said.

    Those beliefs can lead to heartbreak and “complete and utter helplessness,” of course, as Wagenius learned firsthand when Skip Humphrey “got his clock cleaned” by Jesse Ventura. But it can also bring you the kind of joy he felt when Rybak beat two-term incumbent mayor Sharon Sayles Belton in 2001.

    All of Wagenius’ coworkers thought he was insane to work for Rybak, but he says he was convinced Rybak was going to win. So, as he had done with John Marty and Phil Carruthers, he set out to prove them all wrong—and succeeded.

    “I knew,” he said, with more wonderment than hubris. “Do you know how good that feels?”

  • Politics at the Piano Bar

    Somewhere in the archives at the Richard M. Nixon museum in Yorba Linda, California, is a photograph of Nixon playing the piano in the White House with his wife, Pat, sitting in the foreground, clapping and singing along to some popular show tune.

    I was reminded of this scene recently while sitting stage right at the Varsity Theater in Dinkytown, listening to Alan Fine entertain a standing-room-only crowd with his own piano compositions as part of an evening of “Piano and Policy.” No, Fine’s wife wasn’t singing along. But Fine is an old-school Republican, like Nixon, and apparently a man of some intellectual depth.

    In the lobby before the show, Fine campaign workers were hawking his book, an impressive-looking hardcover called Empower Your Self: A Framework for Personal Success.

    But the Republican faithful who filled Jason McLean’s cabaret weren’t there for the reading—or for the policy discussion that would follow the concert. They were intrigued by the notion of a political candidate doing something other than campaigning.

    “I love anything that’s different and out of the box,” said Barry Hickethier, a Northeast Minneapolis Republican who took a break from his own campaign against State Rep. Diane Loeffler to stop by. “Besides, if you have special talent, you might as well show it.”

    Hickethier was one of an army of young Republicans who showed up for the gig, a turnout that seemed to indicate something of a resurgence in the city’s long-dormant GOP. When I asked McLean whether the event might cast aspersions on his own political leanings, he suggested that any assumptions would be futile. “I think I’m a Republican, but I just don’t understand Republicans,” he said.

    He does seem to understand—and maybe even admire—Fine, whose daughter attends the same swimming class as McLean’s. “My first meeting with him was in a Speedo,” he noted.

    You or him or both?

    “He was in the Speedo. I’m more modest.”

    How did he look?

    “He was ripped.”

    Fine does look pretty trim for a 44-year-old business consultant and college lecturer. He got a nice intro from one of his campaign workers, and made his way through the crowd like a president making his way down the aisle in the House of Representatives to give the State of the Union address.

    But once at the piano, the maestro turned out to be less formal than the setting. “Don’t you feel like we’re on a music set?” he asked, as he surveyed the crowd.

    But he quickly launched into “God Bless America” (this is a bunch of Republicans, after all) before sitting down at the keyboard and warming up with a little “Chopsticks” and a bar or two of “An American in Paris.”

    “I didn’t write that,” he quipped.

    By way of explanation, Fine said he’d had a dream last December in which his late father asked him why he hadn’t been playing piano. The incident sparked a series of compositions. “It was kind of an eerie feeling, a conversation between me and my dad,” he admitted.

    The three short études that followed were parlor pieces, the sort of easy-listening classical music designed to produce a pleasant grogginess after a couple of glasses of wine. On number four, Fine said, “I think I’ll try to wing one without my music.”

    Moments later, he changed his mind: “I think I’ll get my music.”

    Much laughter and applause.

    Fine played eight pieces in all, displaying enough virtuosity to convince the faithful that he was no piker. But the evening was dragging a bit. Three young men sitting near the American flag planted by the bar got up to leave. And when Fine asked, “Is it okay if I sing a song?” the applause was rather muted.

    “Have you heard of South Pacific?” he ventured.

    Polite silence.

    “Well, I’m not going to sing anything from South Pacific,” he said, laughing, and he offered a lovely rendition of “That’s All,” the 1952 Alan Brandt and Bob Haymes love song that cropped up most recently on American Idol 5.

    “I can only give you love that lasts forever . . . ,” he crooned, and I wondered whether maybe there would be a CD. But before I could ride that idea to its conclusion, Fine finished up with a spirited, “That’s all, folks.”

    Later, Fine told me that it had been 15 years since he last performed in public and that he’d actually scheduled the concert before he decided to run for Congress. But he was happy to play during the campaign, he said. “It lets people know I’m a human being.”

    I wanted to bring up the Nixon analogy, but I found myself distracted by the nearby presence of Jens Christensen.

    Christensen, dressed this evening in cutoff denim shorts held up by thick suspenders, served on the Minneapolis City Council from 1965 to 1974, the year of Nixon’s resignation, back when Republicans ran the city. So I asked him about his reaction to the lively turnout of young Republicans and the polished performance of the city’s GOP standard bearer. Could we be seeing the resurgence of the Republican Party in Minneapolis?

    He allowed that the crowd was “a good mix” but said it’s a conservative resurgence he was pining for.

    Nixonian? I suggest.

    “I’m more of a Gingrich fan,” he said.

    And tonight’s piano player?

    “I need to check him out more,” he said. “Where does he stand on abortion?”

  • “The Only Other Job I’d Like”

    The candidate was running late, of course. So, on a sweltering June morning, I was left to wander the third-floor headquarters of Peter Hutchinson’s gubernatorial campaign and consider its architect. Two floors above a coffee shop and the funky Architectural Antiques, someone erected temporary walls to form a couple of small offices, and in one large, sunny room, staffers at desks went about the business of furthering the prospects of this unlikely endeavor. An unruly collection of signs—“Not Left. Not Right. Forward.”—leaned against the far wall, which is decorated with the painted handprints of campaign volunteers. The large air conditioner stuck in the window above the empty receptionist’s desk was not doing its job.

    This is what a long-shot third-party campaign looks like: plenty of energy and innovation; not a lot of money. But politics is the art of the possible, and ever since Jesse Ventura “shocked the world” by winning the governor’s race in 1998, third-party dreamers, like those in Hutchinson’s Independence Party, have been drawing inspiration from that bizarre campaign and throwing themselves into the electoral fray. That’s part of the reason why Hutchinson had driven down to Owatonna early that morning to talk with a bunch of people who don’t know him from Adam. The rest of the situation, however, still seems puzzling.

    Even the most obvious questions are worth asking: Why would somebody who’s built a successful public-policy career (head of the Dayton-Hudson Foundation, finance commissioner under former Governor Rudy Perpich, Minneapolis schools superintendent) into a very lucrative consulting business want to run for public office for the first time at age fifty-six? Especially in a year when the DFL Party is all spit and vinegar, sensing as it does its first opportunity since 1986 to climb back into the governor’s office, and when the Republicans are firing away at all comers with both barrels (at least when Cheney visits)?

    Furthermore, why disrupt a family, one that has not been without challenges already, at a time when most middle-aged fathers are looking for more time on the golf course or awaiting the arrival of the first grandchildren? In other words, what’s wrong with stability and maybe a little anonymity, rather than the pressure cooker of media attention that comes with a high-profile statewide race? Especially when your toolbox of personality traits has been so ill-equipped to help you on the stump?

    Two years ago, when I interviewed Hutchinson for a piece in the Minneapolis Observer, he said he was seriously considering a run. At the time, it was hard to take him seriously without grilling him in a way that seemed inappropriate. Of course, now he had become a serious candidate, so I was eager to have a serious conversation. If he would ever show up …

    Just then, the door opened and Hutchinson strode in with a couple of campaign staffers. Clean-shaven for the first time in some thirty years (a nod to political reality if ever there was one), and sporting a crisp cotton shirt and slacks, he looked none the worse for his early-morning campaign jaunt. In fact, he was downright ebullient, crowing about how folks outstate “really get it” when he talks about changing the way the state needs to be governed. He was smiling broadly and fairly bouncing out of his shoes.

    “Is there any coffee?”

    As much as his close friends are supporting his campaign, they have to be a bit astounded that he would even consider such a thing. But Hutchinson claimed he’s long thought about pursuing the governor’s job. He recalled talking with his wife, Karla Ekdahl, about it almost twenty years ago. “We were walking on the beach on Cape Cod, talking about the future, and she asked me, ‘What would you really, really like to do?’ ”

    “I told her, ‘The only other job I’d like is to be governor.’ ”

    “ ‘The problem is, you’d have to run,’ she said.”

    She was no doubt referring to the unconventional aspects of her husband’s nature. At the time he was running the Dayton-Hudson Foundation, after a stint as Mayor Al Hofstede’s deputy mayor, and though he was by all accounts a well-connected politico and an effective, innovative administrator, he was also an introvert.

    “He had this Zoot suit and Earth shoes, and showed up every morning with a thermos bottle full of tea,” Ekdahl recalled. “He never turned on the lights in his office.”

    During the 1970s, Hutchinson was a committed vegetarian who didn’t touch alcohol, and when they were courting, Ekdahl noted, he didn’t even own a car. Even today, she calls him something of an ascetic—“the least conspicuous consumer on the planet.”

    None of those idiosyncrasies seemed to matter to Governor Rudy Perpich, who came calling in 1989 when he needed a new commissioner of finance. There was just one hitch, Hutchinson told the governor: He wasn’t a Democrat.

    “ ‘Well, what are you?’ ” he recalled Perpich asking.

    “ ‘I’m an independent.’ ”

    “The governor thought for a minute. ‘Well, that’s OK. You take care of the finances. I’ll take care of the politics.’ ”

    Hutchinson took the job, despite the seventy-five-percent cut in pay from his foundation gig (and a discount at Dayton’s): It was, he said, “the closest thing to being appointed to governor that you can have.”

    His tenure in the Perpich administration was not without its rocky moments. He was roundly criticized for claiming the state had a budget shortfall in 1990 when it turned out there was a surplus. When Perpich lost his re-election bid, Hutchinson was once again looking for something to do.

    The following year, Hutchinson and Babak Armajani, a longtime friend, created Public Strategies Group, a public policy consulting firm. In 1993, the firm took on the task of running the Minneapolis Public Schools.

    The arrangement—a private, for-profit consulting firm operating a large urban school district—made national headlines and thrust the reticent Hutchinson into the maw of one of the state’s most vicious political machines. The results were predictably mixed. Hutchinson claims the district saw improved academic achievement and better financial management. Critics contend it was a failed experiment made more bizarre by Hutchinson’s abrupt and mysterious departure four years into the contract.

    But it’s not the relative assets or liabilities of his résumé that most concerned Hutchinson as he contemplated his run. As an Independence candidate, he figures he has the right mix of public-sector service and private-sector experience to connect with increasing numbers of voters who are disgusted with the polarization of the major political parties. And he has no qualms about defending his record—or his market-based approach to government, which engages citizens as “consumers of government” (he’s even co-authored a book about it, The Price of Government). He was just a little shaky about transforming himself into a politician—and taking his family along for the ride.

    “It’s a big deal. It changes the family. It rearranges everyone’s plan,” he said. “It wasn’t Karla’s plan.”

    Neither he nor his wife recalled the schools superintendent’s years with great fondness, and even though their two daughters—Julia, twenty-one, and Emily, twenty-three—were both away at school, they knew the campaign had the potential to create some chaos, at best.

    “Karla knew we had to choose to do this,” he said. “It was too big a deal.”

    Hutchinson threw himself into the campaign full time last October, and eventually the whole family came on board, even though Ekdahl had concerns about her daughters coming home to work on the campaign through November. “I never in my life heard him sound so energized and enthusiastic,” said Julia.

    For Emily, it’s a “chance to effect some change.”

    There was just this little problem of going out on the stump and actually talking with strangers.

    “I’m not afraid of hard work,” Hutchinson said. “The scariest part was standing up in front of people you don’t know and telling them what you think.”

    To his great surprise, he quickly discovered that the people of Minnesota were “nowhere as mean as the politicians” and soon found he was a natural stump speaker. “Nobody would imagine that I’m an introvert now.”

    Emily agrees. “He was always standing in the corner at parties and he was always the one who was asking Mom when they could leave. Now it’s been a complete one-eighty. Now it’s Mom who says, ‘Peter, we have to go.’ ”

    An hour after he arrived from his Owatonna jaunt, Hutchinson was reporting on another small-town victory. Campaign workers gathered around him in a broad half-circle as he described an earlier junket to Fergus Falls, where he spoke to a group of county commissioners.

    The response, he said, was nothing short of exhilarating. “They all signed up for our campaign”—there was a roar of approval—“We just flew home from there.” (It’s an ironic metaphor, since Hutchinson—unlike his counterparts in the major parties—does not actually fly from city to city.)

    “The dots are being connected,” he continued. “We keep exceeding expectations. It’s a hoot and it’s going to get better. And now we even have air conditioning.”

    A staffer reported that a recent radio show brought up Hutchinson’s controversial tenure as schools superintendent; he wondered how campaign workers should respond to that criticism.

    Things got better in the district during his term, Hutchinson said, and the campaign will stress those results. “Leadership is about changing things and making them better. When we got there, school achievement was going down. When we left, student achievement was going up,” he said.

    And his abrupt departure from the job?

    That was about family, he explained, going on to describe how his daughter Emily had been admitted to the hospital with severe anorexia. He was in a bad way himself, stressed to the point of debilitation—he could barely lift his arms. A leave of absence was the right thing to do, he said. After two months away from the job, he knew it was time to move on.

    “The lesson is that taking care of family is the number-one thing you have to do.”

    The same staffer pointed out that two out of three Hutchinson campaign volunteers are teachers or principals, a note that generates a warm round of applause.

    Later, Hutchinson went into more detail about his comments. He had gone many years without talking publicly about the crisis that precipitated his departure from the school district. He knew it would come up in the campaign, though, and talked specifically with Emily about how to address it; she gave him permission to go public.

    Still, Hutchinson’s own difficulties at that time were more difficult to unearth. His father, an aeronautical engineer, died of a heart attack at forty-seven after a life spent urgently devoted to getting things done. It’s a trait he passed on to his ambitious second son. “It’s like schlepping the canoe on the longest portage in the Boundary Waters,” he said. “You never put the canoe down.”

    And those final months running the school district represented a nearly tragic convergence of his workaholism, his daughter’s illness, and his long-running fear that he wouldn’t outlive his father.

    “It was a billion hours a day,” he said of his superintendent job. And with Emily hospitalized for a second time and close to death, he finally dropped the canoe. “I couldn’t do it anymore.”

    He took two months off and returned to work for barely a week before a stormy school board meeting sent him and Public Strategies Group on their way. Six months later, he celebrated his forty-eighth birthday. “I still remember from that day to this I have felt completely free,” he said.

    Now he takes vacations, spends ten minutes most mornings meditating with his wife, works out regularly, and sees his future as separate from his past. “These are my years, years to do stuff that is not predetermined,” he said. “I don’t have that apprehension anymore.”

    Later that day, before an overflow audience at the Theater Garage in Minneapolis, Hutchinson seemed to be fumbling his entrance. As one of his young campaign workers introduced him, he could be seen in the window of the cheesy set onstage. He was supposed to come through the door of the set, but couldn’t seem to open it. It was an awkward moment until the emcee noticed the problem and opened the door.

    Hutchinson walked on stage, appearing a bit shaken. But then he launched into what was obviously a planned piece of political shtick. “I couldn’t get through the damn door,” he said, to scattered laughter. “That’s what politics is about: You can’t crack the party.”

    This was Hutchinson, the stand-up guy. He went on about getting calls from his Democrat friends who are worried he’s going to throw the election to Pawlenty and calls from his Republican friends who are peeved that his campaign is going to elect Mike Hatch. There’s a third possibility, he told the mostly youthful crowd: “We’re going to take so many votes away from the Democrats and so many votes away from the Republicans and unite the Independents that we’re going to get elected.”

    It was a good turnout for a muggy night that threatened rain. And while the crowd was not what you’d call raucous (“All this alcohol and no questions?” Hutchinson quipped at one point during the Q&A), it was clearly curious about this campaign.

    As he has done at every campaign stop, Hutchinson trotted out his four key issues—health care, education, transportation, and the environment—all the while explaining why the two major parties never seem to get around to dealing with the “main things.”

    The problem, he said, is that the “five G’s: gays, guns, god, gambling, and gynecology” tend to take precedence over the real issues at the Legislature. “And now we’ve got two more,” he added. “Green cards and stadiums for gladiators.”

    Health care will be his top priority, Hutchinson told the crowd, because it’s draining all the resources from the other three priorities. But he’s not a fan of single-payer health care. He’d devise a way to get HMOs to cut the thirty percent of each health-care dollar that gets sucked into administration. He believes they should all use standardized databases, forms, and other administrative systems—and then focus on prevention. “The state can do that,” he argued.

    On education, he would focus on four issues: improving early childhood education, demanding student and teacher accountability, establishing higher standards for high school graduation, and increasing access to a college education.

    With Minnesota ranking as the nation’s leading importer of electricity, Hutchinson wants more attention paid to developing alternative sources of energy. He favors voluntary industry compliance whenever possible, but would enforce pollution-control regulations when necessary.

    And why have other political leaders failed to make progress on these issues in recent years? Because the political system in this state is on life support, he said. “And a Native American friend of mine gave me the best advice: When you’re riding a dead horse, the best thing to do is to dismount.”

    The line got a good laugh, but Hutchinson was already moving on, explaining why he’s challenging the status quo. “People look at this campaign and say, ‘Is he drunk on power and ambition, or does he not have anything to do with his life?’ ”

    He paused for effect. “Well, that last thing may be true …”

    The crowd was warming up to him now, and Hutchinson drove home his main point: He can win if young people vote. “The two parties are counting on you to stay home,” he said. “This is your chance to have your voice heard, to change the outcome.”

    It’s the Jesse Ventura formula, and someone in the crowd got the connection. He asked Hutchinson how he’s going to get anything done as a third-party governor.

    The governor sets the agenda, Hutchinson replied, and once that agenda is set all it takes is a certain kind of leadership. “Politics is about hoarding credit and spreading blame,” he explained. “I’m fifty-six years old. I’m not going anywhere. I don’t need the credit. Let’s get the work done.”

    Later, as the Band of Northern Aggression took the stage, Hutchinson was buttonholed by gaggles of young people. He appeared totally at ease, patiently detailing his approach to running government. Nearby, Ekdahl was hugging everyone in sight. According to campaign staff, 120 people showed up and contributed about seven hundred dollars.

    Those results certainly pleased the party’s Fifth District chair, Peter Tharaldson, who was standing outside the theater, surveying the scene. I asked him how Hutchinson’s campaign differs from Tim Penny’s run in 2002, and what he thinks about some pundits’ speculation that this may be the last stand for the Independence Party. “He makes a much more concerted effort at talking to people and meeting people” than Penny did, Tharaldson said. He also claimed that because Hutchinson was “removing some of the barriers” to his party’s prospects, he will attract a larger crossover vote (Penny polled sixteen percent, finishing third behind Tim Pawlenty and DFLer Roger Moe).

    The other difference between today and four years ago has much to do with the gridlock that occurs every year at the Capitol, Tharaldson concluded. “The other two parties can’t do a better job of selling him.”

    Three days later, Hutchinson attended a candidate’s forum on the St. Paul campus of the University of Minnesota. He was on the dais with DFL gubernatorial hopefuls Steve Kelley and Becky Lourey. Hatch and Pawlenty have chosen to ignore the forum, which was sponsored by the Minnesota Chapter of the National Association of Social Workers.

    It was evident early on that this was a Lourey crowd, as her every utterance was greeted with a surge of applause. But Hutchinson loosened them up with his “five G’s” line, drove home his commitment to changing the health care system, and slapped the current regime’s education agenda by pointing out that the state’s high education ratings (twenty-three percent of Minnesota high-schoolers get college diplomas, tops in the nation) may not be worth bragging about: “That might be the best in the country, but that’s like having a first-class ticket on the Titanic,” he said. “The view is great, but it’s going to be pretty cold when you hit the water.”

    But when asked about two of his five G’s, he headed for higher ground: “Minnesotans agree that fewer abortions are better than more,” he allowed. And on gay marriage, he was similarly noncommittal: “Let’s strengthen the things that make marriage stronger.”

    In other words, it’s the pragmatic middle where he would reside as governor, rather than the ideological extremes that his opponents occupy. “This is the one thing that independents get to do that other people don’t,” he said.

    That got a rise out of the otherwise cherubic Kelley. “I disagree with Peter that other people don’t get to do something about this,” he said. “The seeds for bipartisan solutions are already there.”

    That resulted in a nice round of applause, but then Hutchinson came back with the “dead horse” line in his closing remarks, which hit home with Lourey’s crowd—and with the ever-diplomatic Lourey herself. “Can you see that any one of us would make a better governor than Tim Pawlenty?” she asked.

    Afterward, in a crowded hallway outside the auditorium, a young woman approached Hutchinson. “I’m a Kelley supporter, but I’m going to check you out. I really like what you have to say,” she told him.

    Hutchinson thanked her, and after she departed said, “That’s the way it’s been everywhere.”

    He was headed up to Princeton later that day to tour a farm that’s run on methane fuel cells. “It’s completely off the grid,” he marveled.

    It wasn’t the first time this candidate had admitted how much he was learning during this campaign—not just about politics (though that certainly is true), but also about immigration, transportation, agriculture, and other rural issues. When he was reminded that he wouldn’t be doing that if he were stuck in some office earning a living, he smiled. “Yeah, my family’s been wondering about that.”

    Candidates like Hutchinson are blessed in some ways by their lack of political credentials. In the same way that Ventura’s brief tenure as a council member and mayor in Brooklyn Park offered little indication of how he would govern, Hutchinson’s résumé gives his opponents a fairly small target. But voters are similarly ill equipped to render a judgment.

    And while Hutchinson’s work in the Perpich administration offers some clues as to how he would operate as an administrator, his tumultuous years at the helm of the Minneapolis schools may offer the best portrait of him as a leader.

    At the time, the response from some school board members and other education advocates was not favorable. Longtime public school advocate Dennis Schapiro wrote several stories in his Jola Education Monthly criticizing the board’s decision to hire PSG, as well as Hutchinson’s decision to hire consultants who had connections to his firm. Schapiro also raised questions about how funds were allocated to pay those consultants. “By circumventing normal channels, obscuring the sources of funding, serving cronies well, and leaving staff development people to take criticism, the cure may be as bad as the sickness,” he wrote in September 1994. Nearly two years later, Bill Green, now the district’s interim superintendent, gave Hutchinson and PSG a failing grade as part of the board’s 1996 year-end evaluation.

    Yet Schapiro says today that Hutchinson “probably did the best job of managing the financial end of Minneapolis schools of anyone in the past twenty years.” And longtime school board member (and DFL loyalist) Judy Farmer contends that the Hutchinson/PSG experiment was largely a success. She credits him with getting the district to focus on student achievement while helping to reshape the culture of the organization from one burdened by fear to one inspired by hope.

    “He’s a very frank and open person, and he’s an optimist—an incurable optimist,” she said. “His general buoyancy does a lot to make people feel it’s OK to talk.”

    Still, even though Hutchinson surrounded himself with competent people who strengthened the organization in areas where he had less expertise, his inclination to believe all things are possible sometimes hurt the operation. He didn’t want the district to be run by a single person, for instance, so he created a “superintendent’s team” with his colleagues at PSG.

    “He really thought that a team could do the superintendent’s job,” Farmer recalled. “Some of that worked, but then he took a few days’ vacation and when he returned, he said, ‘I can’t believe it. I come back and there’s a huge stack of stuff on my desk, and I can’t believe someone else couldn’t take care of it.’ ”

    When I asked Hutchinson about this a few days later, he happily embraced the optimist label. “If you don’t aspire to big things, big things don’t happen,” he said.

    A few days later, on June 15, Hutchinson was set to announce his running mate at a St. Paul press conference. A half-hour before the event, I met with former congressman Tim Penny, a high-level Hutchinson adviser, in a coffee shop around the corner from Metropolitan State University’s St. Paul campus. In his blue suit and tie, he looked the part of the veteran political sage—though he confessed that he’s more excited these days about playing guitar in his rock band than talking politics.

    He’s optimistic about Hutchinson’s campaign, though. “He wants this job for all the right reasons,” he said.

    And you didn’t? I ventured.

    “I had a weak image,” Penny replied. “He’s all you’d ever want in a guy who understands policy, and he does have some of the Ventura pizzazz.”

    We headed over to the press conference, where Hutchinson sprang his latest surprise: He introduced not only his lieutenant governor, Maureen Reed, but an entire slate of constitutional officers, including attorney general (John James), secretary of state (Joel Spoonheim), and state auditor (Lucy Gerold). He called it “Team Minnesota.”

    Nine days later, Penny was nowhere to be seen at the Independence Party state convention at Midway Stadium in St. Paul. Nearly three hundred IP delegates were in the bleachers behind home plate, while on the field below, St. Paul Saints players loosened up for a game against the Sioux City Explorers. It was a package deal: The IP faithful got to endorse their slate of candidates, chow down on beans and brats in the nearby picnic grounds, and cap it all off with a ballgame under the lights.

    Outside the stadium, a lethargic bison, the IP’s mascot, drooled on the sidewalk, signaling that this was something other than politics as usual. So it’s not surprising to learn that party leaders had given the chore of organizing the convention to the Hutchinson campaign—more specifically Ekdahl, Hutchinson’s wife (she had also ensured that every delegate received an orange scarf to wave when they voted). And while that may seem a bit odd, it also seems a bit unfair, given that Hutchinson actually had an opponent for the IP endorsement: Pam Ellison, a St. Paul education activist.

    When asked about the challenge, Hutchinson noted that the only significant difference between Ellison’s platform and his is her ardent support for single-payer health care. It’s not part of the IP platform, he noted. “I don’t think Minnesotans are quite ready for that.”

    Interestingly, Ellison didn’t mention the issue in her speech, which was received with polite applause as the sky began to darken. A party loyalist was monitoring the approaching thunderstorm on his cell phone and giving IP officials regular updates. “It’s holding steady out in Chaska for now,” he reported. Julia Hutchinson and other campaign volunteers gathered near a large box filled with orange and yellow ponchos.

    Ekdahl scurried by. “We had to go to ten Target stores to get five hundred of them,” she said.

    Karen Anderson, the former Republican mayor of Minnetonka, introduced Hutchinson, who thanked everyone, including Wally the Beerman, for coming. He had said earlier that he doesn’t like to read from prepared speeches, but he had one in front of him at the podium. The lines were by now familiar, the issues the same as he’d been addressing for the better part of the past year. But at the end, he threw in a twist: He got the crowd—his crowd—to chant the mantra that will accompany Hutchinson and his dream throughout the state over the next three months: “Not left. Not right. Forward!”

    When the results came in (Hutchinson 250, Ellison 27) nobody seemed particularly moved—just relieved that they might still have time to get under a roof somewhere. The endorsee remounted the podium, the small brass band played, and the sky, as if under orders from Pawlenty and Hatch themselves, began to spit.

     

    Craig Cox is editor of the Minneapolis Observer

    (www.mplsobserver.com) and the Twin Cities Daily

    Planet (www.tcdailyplanet.net).

  • The Long Bomb

    The last time our Golden Gophers won a Big Ten football championship, none of this year’s players had been born. It’s possible that some of their parents hadn’t either. In 1967, we had a shifty quarterback named Curt Wilson, a bruising fullback from South St. Paul named Jim Carter, and an All-American defensive end in St. Louis Park’s Bob Stein. The team finished 8-2 and shared the conference title with Indiana and Purdue.

    The Rose Bowl invitation went to the Hoosiers, even though the Gophers had trounced them 33-7 during the season (conference officials gave them the nod because Indiana had never won a conference championship). Even as a sixteen-year-old fan I was convinced that some sort of curse had been placed on my team, though I told myself hopefully it wouldn’t be long before the Gophers would rise again. They never did.

    It’s been nearly forty-two years since the Gophers have been to Pasadena, California, home of the Rose Bowl, on New Year’s Day. Four decades have passed since that marvelous 1960 team—featuring the legendary Sandy Stephens, Tom Brown, and Bobby Bell—was crowned national champion. Since then, the University of Minnesota’s football program has wheezed its way through five coaches, a handful of minor bowl appearances, and an annual struggle with major college football reality.


    Sure, there have been moments; but shockers like the 1977 upset of top-rated Michigan and the 1999 squeaker over second-ranked Penn State really only served to illustrate the futility of the team’s mission. And the periodic trips to places like Shreveport or Memphis for bowl games named after lawn-care equipment have done little to push the program toward respectability.

    The sad fact is this: The economics of major college football essentially disqualifies the Gophers from competing with the Ohio States or the Michigans or the Penn States of the world. And to spend any time, energy, or money on this particular pipe dream is neither helpful to the university’s mission nor charitable to the dwindling number of Gopher football fans who still happen to care.

    Since 1997 the University of Minnesota has invested more than $17 million on a football program that in a good year might generate $12 million, about what Michigan takes in from a couple of home games. And now there’s talk of building a new stadium on campus, a $100 million exercise in delusion that, coming on the heels of major budget cuts at the university, is guaranteed to generate more campus controversy than quality competition.

    It is, in fact, a kind of neurotic enabling pattern, not unlike offering a drink to the guy right out of Hazelden. There’s nowhere to go but down. Yet here we are again this fall, hearing the perennial silliness about Rose Bowl prospects and the great young running backs and the improved defense and how, if things break just right, anything can happen.

    You can argue, of course, that this is no different from any dreamy-eyed sporting delusion that strikes at the beginning of any season, but it’s different when you’re talking about Gopher football. Here the deck is stacked as it is nowhere else in sports. Not only do the Gophers have almost no chance to rise to the top of the Big Ten, they have almost no choice not to try.

    Writing in the New York Times Magazine last year, Michael Sokolove described the trap that is major college football thus: “Football is the SUV of the college campus: aggressively big, resource-guzzling, lots and lots of fun and potentially destructive of everything around it.” To Sokolove and other critics, big-time college football is a no-win situation for all but a handful of schools whose gridiron tradition easily lures the top high school recruits, rakes in millions in endorsement and TV money, and supports a lavish athletic department. None of these apply at the University of Minnesota. The football team averages barely 40,000 fans at its home games and generates less revenue in a season than the University of Michigan rakes in during a couple of home games.

    Gophers athletic director Joel Maturi understands the ultimate futility of this pursuit probably better than anyone else in town. His arrival last year coincided with the near-death experience of three Gopher teams during a massive athletic department budget deficit. The men’s and women’s golf teams and the men’s gymnastics team eventually cobbled together enough donations to survive another year, but the cup-in-hand episode (which included a uniquely humbling telethon) had to inspire some doubts about the viability of Gopher sports in general and the football program in particular.

  • Burning Down the Firehouse

    To look at the tidy little house at 48th and York, you’d think the fire that killed Pearl Gallagher on June 14 didn’t really amount to much. Sheets of plywood cover the windows, but there are no flame-scarred walls, no singed rafters. The flower garden just beyond the front door blooms as if nothing happened. The perky impatiens nestled in a ceramic lamb at the bottom of the steps wait to be watered.

    This fire, like most of the 200-odd blazes the Minneapolis Fire Department puts out each year, was pretty routine. The dispatcher downtown got the call at 8:21 p.m., and by 8:24, Engine 28 was on the scene from the station six blocks away. Engine 25 arrived a minute later. The house was already engulfed in smoke, and Gallagher’s son was there telling firefighters that his mother was in the living room. Two firefighters went inside. A third engine, number 22, pulled up at 8:27, just as the first ladder truck showed up. Five minutes later, a heavy rescue crew arrived.

    Meanwhile, inside the house, firefighters couldn’t find Pearl Gallagher. She wasn’t in the living room at the front of the house as her son had thought. Fighting through thick smoke, they finally found her in the rear of the house, where she had collapsed from smoke inhalation. At 8:38, firefighters pulled the 70-year-old woman from the house and began efforts to revive her. Soon she was hustled off to the hospital.

    Four days later, Pearl Gallagher was dead.

    To a civilian reading through an official incident report, a tragedy like this is both instructive and provocative. Firefighting is romanticized all the time—never more than in the past two years—but it is a highly technical and tactical profession. Every second counts, and every firefighter has a specialized job to do. When you lose time or have the wrong equipment or not enough firefighters, the results can go from bad to worse in a hurry.

    An expert looking dispassionately at the circumstances surrounding Gallagher’s death would say that our fire department did its job. Four firefighters were at the scene in less than five minutes. That is within standards established by the National Fire Protection Association. Fifteen firefighters were there within eight minutes—another NFPA standard.

    It’s certainly true that people sometimes die in fires even when the department is firing on all cylinders. Still, in firehouses around the city, Gallagher’s death added fuel to a smoldering controversy. Budget cuts at the Minneapolis Fire Department have resulted in layoffs and ladder-company closings—including a ladder company at Station 27, less than three miles from Gallagher’s house. Ladder trucks and crews are key to ventilating a burning building—cutting holes in the roof to help clear the air inside. Could Pearl Gallagher have been saved if the ladder crew from Station 27 had answered the alarm, rather than the one at Station Eight at 28th and Blaisdell, a mile and a half farther away? Would it have made a difference if there had been four firefighters on those three engines, instead of three? Nobody will say for sure. But one firefighter told me, “Four minutes less in that atmosphere, would her chances be better? Yes.”

    Many people, some of them in positions of authority, have no idea what a Minneapolis firefighter actually does. They don’t know that firefighters are the city’s first responders, and that they make tens of thousands of runs to “medicals” all over the city, including shut-ins who have no contact with the outside world other than with whoever responds to a 911 call. People don’t know that it usually takes more than one firefighter to lay down “charged” hose, because one firefighter can’t pull hose past more than two 90-degree turns. And people don’t realize that one of the most important things firefighters do is knock holes in things, to provide lifesaving air.

    Contrary to conventional wisdom, fire stations are no bastions of card-playing, truck-washing layabouts, shuffling around the station until some opportunity for heroism beckons. At least once every half-hour, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, a crew is being dispatched somewhere in the city on an emergency medical call. They are the first to arrive when somebody’s suffering a heart attack or a gunshot wound. Crews also responded to more than 9,000 calls last year to handle various other “hazardous conditions.”

    There are fires, of course. The numbers have declined steadily over the past 30 years, especially as older commercial properties have either burned down or come up to code, with sprinklers and the like. There were 724 structural fires in 1970, compared to 261 last year. Still, the number of people needed to battle even a routine blaze hasn’t really changed.

    The crew of the first engine to arrive on the scene usually sends two people in—one with a charged hose—for search and rescue. With a four-person crew, one starts the pump and another provides support for the “attack line” (the first hose in)—helping to feed hose if it gets stuck rounding more than two corners or if it gets lodged beneath the wheel of a car. As a result of budget cuts, that fourth person now often comes from the crew in the second engine to arrive on the scene, which can cost the first crew valuable time in its search-and-rescue efforts.

    Equally vital is the arrival of the ladder company, which is called upon to ventilate the structure by chopping holes in the roof to let out the smoke. Inside a burning house, firefighters generally cannot see more than a few inches in front them; they navigate by feeling along the walls. Also, without proper ventilation, volatile gases can accumulate and explode.

  • Building the Boys of Summer

    There’s no tarp on the ball field at Cretin and Grand, though snow sprinkles the brownish grass and the morning promises more. A white portable fence arcs in awkward sections from the right to leftfield foul lines, where orange foul poles stand uncertainly against a wicked northwest wind. For a clueless pilgrim seeking the heart of American small-college baseball, it’s all a bit underwhelming.

    I’ve crossed the river on this early April morning in search of everything that is pure and wholesome in the world of college sports, a place where students go to school to learn, and where they play ball for fun. It’s a world completely foreign to followers of March Madness and the Bowl Championship Series, recruiting wars, and academic scandals. Casual readers of the sports pages would know little of this universe, but hardcore fans may get an occasional glimpse, as some of us did last fall when the Johnnies of St. Johns University played for the Division III football championship, or in 2001 when the University of St. Thomas baseball team beat Marietta (Ohio) 8-4 to become only the second Minnesota team to claim a national college baseball championship (the Golden Gophers did it in 1965).

    But I’m not here at McCarthy Gym to rehash past glory. I’m looking for edification—enlightenment even—on the sticky subject of college athletics. I want to know what can be done to unravel the tightening knot of money, media, and malfeasance that plagues major college sports. And Tommies baseball coach Dennis Denning may be one of the only guys in town with an answer that makes any sense.

    Dennis Denning stands at the front desk in corduroys and a sweatshirt. He extends his hand—a fleshy, gnarled mitt that betrays a lifetime of foul tips and bad hops—and shows me to his office. I notice the framed and autographed photos on the wall of the cramped room, and the stocky, white-haired coach describes some of the more notable of the batch: Tommies alum Buzz Hannahan in a Philadelphia Phillies uniform (“Three for five in his first spring training game this year”); Twins farmhand Jake Mauer (“Only four errors last year at Quad Cities”); son Wes wearing the Montreal Expos colors (“He’s a St. Paul cop now and doing great”). I remark innocently on the potential of Jake’s brother Joe Mauer, the Cretin-Derham Hall phenom whom the Twins drafted out of high school, and Denning launches into a detailed explanation of Joe’s batting stance and swing—neglecting only to mention that the young Twins catcher may have picked up some tips at Denning’s long-running summer baseball camps.

    Before we can get to the exploits of his other star pupils, guys like Paul Molitor, Chris Wienke, and Steve Walsh, the phone rings, and Denning is quickly pulled into what seems to be an emergency academic counseling session. “Yeah, OK, uh-huh…Well, if you drop it, you’ll be ineligible, you know…” he says. The conversation ends with instructions on where to get help. He hangs up and describes the forlorn player on the other end of the line as a junior varsity player having trouble with chemistry. “A lot of these kids come here after getting real good grades in high school, but they’re not prepared for how hard it is here,” he explains.

    It turns out that Denning’s job at St. Thomas extends far beyond running a baseball program that has become a perennial NCAA Division III powerhouse. He’s in charge of programming at the gym, acts as an informal academic counselor, and even does a little groundskeeping on the diamond outside. “It’s like running a park and rec center,” he says.

    No administrative assistants, no PR flunkies, no sycophantic boosters. It is a small-budget operation in a conference full of small-budget operations. “Our facilities are terrible,” he says, almost apologetically. “The worst facilities in the MIAC.” And yet, Denning’s baseball team can boast a national championship, two second-place finishes, and NCAA tournament berths in seven straight seasons.

    “His team consistently improves throughout the year,” says Concordia College baseball coach Bucky Burgau. “Along with getting very good players, Dennis is a very good teacher of all phases of the game.”

  • Get Rail!

    I once punctuated a doomed love affair with a ride on the Empire Builder to Glacier National Park in Montana. It was my 25th birthday, and I spent it sighing deeply into a window-framed postcard of North Dakota, idly expecting the steel rails to yield some inspiration.

    Instead, I was deposited unceremoniously outside an RV park in West Glacier with a too-heavy pack, bad shoes, and a strong impulse to hitchhike east. A week later, I was back on board, but feeling more like a commuter than a wandering romantic—sort of like grabbing the 21A back to St. Paul after last call in Minneapolis. Except I really needed a bath.

    Still, I understand the allure of faraway places and the mystique of train travel, even though that understanding mostly comes from old Hitchcock movies. I’m less certain of the train’s appeal as engineering marvel. It is very large and very powerful and afflicts its devotees with a delicious sense of danger. (Early steam engines were liable to explode at inconvenient moments, and modern trains remain slightly prone to derailment.) But there is something prehistoric about these machines in their lumbering, inertia-bucking clumsiness. Even at moderate speed, the modern train has little sense of balance and nothing remotely resembling grace. It is a big old clunky, foul-smelling, grease-spewing juggernaut that somehow has dodged extinction for the past half-century.

    So, I’m not sure about trains. It’s great that they’re often cheaper and more comfortable (especially for kids) than the terror-stricken airliner. It’s great that you can get a decent breakfast on the 8 a.m. to Chicago. And it’s great that you can check out the appliance-strewn backyards of people you’ll never meet as you pass through towns you’ll never visit. But trains are surprisingly slow, seldom run on schedule, and reliably serve bad beer. And on the mythic level, well, I think it’s pretty much over.

    Or is it? Two blocks from my house in east Minneapolis, crews of bundled, burly men are building an 11-mile rail line that about this time next year will be carrying what the state’s policy wonks pray will be large numbers of happy commuters into downtown Minneapolis and out to the airport and Mall of America. The half-billion dollar project is not only the largest publicly funded construction effort in state history, it may be the most maligned, ridiculed, and lampooned as well.

    I can’t say I disagree.

    You can trace the stupidity of Light Rail Transit way past Jesse Ventura and Ted Mondale, before Arne Carlson and John Derus—all the way back to a gloomy rail yard in 1954, where on a rainy June day a man named Fred Ossanna, hiding out under a damp fedora, supervised the burning of the last Minneapolis streetcar.

    The Twin City Rapid Transit Company, which Ossanna headed, once operated nearly 530 miles of electric streetcar track in the metropolitan area. Lines tied Minneapolis and St. Paul together and ran as far west as Minnetonka, east to Stillwater, north to White Bear Lake, and connected suburbs as far flung as St. Louis Park and Columbia Heights. It was, according to some observers, the best transit system in America. But between 1949 and 1954, Ossanna and his crew of progressive-minded bean counters successfully transformed it into a bus line.

    And here we are, nearly a half-century later, starting all over—but with none of the wild frontier optimism that allowed the system to be built in the first place.