Tag: Paul Thomas Anderson

  • There Will Be Blood, There May Be Disappointment

    I finally saw Paul Thomas
    Anderson’s There Will Be Blood last
    week. I was impressed, but the twelve others in the audience didn’t seem to digest
    it as well. Several left during the less exciting last hour of the film. Others
    derisively asked "whose idea was it to see this movie?" as they were leaving.
    It is a divisive movie to be sure, not unlike No
    Country For Old Men
    , but it is one with such a beautiful cinematic power
    that I couldn’t help but think the others had sadly missed the point. Here are some notes on the "point" of the film, as I see it.

    The film’s incredible opening
    sequence simply and brilliantly sets up the long story to come, and it burns
    with cinematic genius. The sense of danger in the oil wells is palpable and
    overpowering. The still landscape shots are reminiscent of Antonioni, and like his environments they carry a menacing weight that reflects the characters that inhabit them. There are shocking scenes of violence (not superfluous or overly
    grotesque), that set up the psychic landscape of the film — a place where the
    worst can happen instantly and where men wait nervously for it to happen. The
    stunning soundtrack swells with atonal screeches of orchestral strings and
    textures. Imagine Penderecki’s "Threnody For The Victims Of
    Hiroshima" played against the ominous presence of a Sergio Leone
    desert. Johnny Greenwood (Radiohead’s guitarist) creates a sound world that embodies
    and accentuates the dread and the sense of potential in what Willa Cather
    called “the raw materials out of which a country is made.” PT Anderson’s visionary
    and seemingly effortless direction is enough to carry the film alone, but he
    also has an enthralling script and at least two magnificent performances to
    work with.

    At dualistic odds are self-made oil baron
    Daniel Plainview (Daniel Day-Lewis) and a young preacher (Paul Dano). Each of
    them is drunk with power and self-gratitude. Each of them worships his own self-destructive god. The towering presence of Plainview’s oil derricks even
    mirror that of a crucifix, and they attain a sort of overbearing presence of
    control as all life and activity centers around them. Part of this is thanks to the set
    and costume designers who create an ascetic, yet richly evocative landscape.
    One scene, in which an oil derrick explodes with both tragic and promising
    consequences, is a marvel of cinematic design and direction. The camera moves
    swiftly, in what feels like a single tracking shot but actually isn’t. It captures so many events, right before your eyes and with so many implications — both
    physically and psychically transformative — that we are left breathless.

    The film’s thematic scope is as narrow-mindedly focused as its main character (speaking almost exclusively to the nature of
    power) and yet its breadth seems so epic that it exacts a mesmeric reverence
    out of the land, the oil, the men, the business, and the pursuit of power.
    Unfortunately, the idea that Anderson could have done something with a deeper political metaphor is present. But Blood is a film about a very specific
    man with a single-minded and self-destructive desire for power, not the nature
    of the oil business, capitalism, or even Christianity. The parallel between the two men and the two
    power structures they represent is understated — which may be good, because any greater
    social or political theme would have detracted from the incredibly magnetic
    performances of Day-Lewis and Dano.

    As the film ends, we see the
    natural, logical conclusion that attends a psychopath like Plainview. He emerges out of his alcoholic
    slumber for one last opportunity to one-up his rival, Sunday. Afterward, we are
    left to imagine him crawling back into the alcoholic death that is his huge,
    empty mansion. It’s hard for me to imagine viewers getting upset with
    this ending, although there are sure to be many. It is a pitch-perfect
    transformation of the film’s main subject into the cinematic embodiment of his
    character. Cold, ruthless, abrupt and deceptive, Blood is a dogged parable that
    achieves an awesome power. If the film isn’t perfect (which it isn’t), it
    doesn’t matter because it is awe-inspiringly successful in its execution.