Month: October 2005

  • Chasing Life

    Dan Buettner is best known as a writer and extreme adventurer who rode his bike around the world from east to west and from north to south through the Americas and Africa and Europe and Asia. He has crossed the roadless Sahara desert, numerous jungles, and active war zones. He has contracted dozens of diseases and hosted plenty of parasites. He has written three books, and has had his every move monitored by millions of schoolchildren. But Dan Buettner really got his start in croquet.

     

    The first time I’d heard of Buettner, things were looking up for the crew of AfricaTrek, a record-setting bicycle trip from the Mediterranean Sea to the Cape of Good Hope. In April of 1993, the Star Tribune published one of its periodic dispatches from the trek, with this introduction: “They forded eighty bridgeless rivers, survived on roast monkey meat and bananas and gashed their legs crashing off muddy rainforest paths. Now the four men bicycling across Africa think the tough part is over.” But what stuck with me about this report was the account of a stretch through Zaire (now Congo), where dictator Mobutu Sese Seko’s rule was violently crumbling, when the team’s wounds would not heal because of the intense humidity they were encountering. It sounded like pure hell.

    Thirteen years later, at a coffee shop near Macalester College not far from where he lives, Buettner relayed even more gruesome outtakes from AfricaTrek. He enumerated the various parasites and sicknesses that caused the four riders to lose eighty pounds among them by the time they reached the Congo. He told me a horrifying story about seeing corpses on the highway while biking through Nigeria, where no drivers stopped to investigate or even move this “human roadkill.”

    “I am not going to lie, it was hell, and if I had just been on my own doing it for fun, I would have quit,” he said, in a momentary departure from what one of his friends calls his ruthless optimism. “But when you make commitments, I think they really drive you through times of hardship. I had all these sponsors, I had a staff of people, I had all these classrooms following us along with CNN. Knowing we would let them let down if we quit—that was kind of our saving grace.”

    Dan Buettner is forty-five years old, though he could pass for a decade younger. He’s the father of three kids ranging in age from elementary school to college. He typically dresses in a way that most baby boomers can no longer pull off. At the coffee shop, for example, he wore an ironed aquamarine shirt unbuttoned one button too far, with a beaded necklace threaded through a weathered Asian coin. But hey, I figure a guy who pushed his bike across the Sahara, which he calls “a sandbox the size of the United States,” is entitled to a lifetime’s worth of open shirts. On top of that, he dates seventies supermodel Cheryl Tiegs, who presumably requires some bold fashion choices from her companion. And that bauble around his neck? No doubt it’s a precious gift from a friend he made in some exotic, far-flung destination.

    For Buettner, life gets more interesting as he gets older, and his most recent project is all about aging. “About two and a half years ago, I came across an article about baby boomers and how there were seventy million of them and every seven seconds another one turns fifty,” Buettner said. It occurred to him that these baby boomers, whose interests are shifting from the recreational drugs of their youth to prescription drugs like Prilosec and Cialis, would be interested in learning how to add a few years to their lives. He was able to enlist as sponsors and partners such respected organizations as the National Geographic Society, the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, the University of Minnesota School of Public Health to create what he calls the Blue Zones project.

    Buettner says there are at least four regions on the planet that are demographically confirmed to lead their respective continents in life expectancy, in disability-free life expectancy (a measure of the quality of life in later years), or in concentration of centenarians. He has dubbed these regions “blue zones.”

    This month, Buettner’s account of his initial visits to three blue zones—Okinawa Island in Japan, Sardinia in Italy, and the city of Loma Linda in California—will be published in National Geographic. Among other things, the work examines how the diet, lifestyle, spirituality, and social relations of people in these regions may hold clues to their longevity. (He declines to name the fourth blue zone at present.)

    But the twelve-hundred-word article is only the beginning for Buettner. Starting October 31, he’ll be leading a new expedition back to Okinawa Island in Japan. It’s his first adventure in more than two years, and the first of four blue-zone educational “Quests” he’ll lead this and each subsequent fall (Sardinia is scheduled for 2006). This portion of his work is the real nut of the subject. He and his team of fourteen adventurers will spend ten days conducting intensive research and trying to learn more about how longevity works. Through his Blue Zones website, millions of students and interested adults will follow and supervise the quest.

    In 1984, Buettner was a recent graduate of the University of St. Thomas who had returned from a year in Spain, where he had backpacked, discovered a latent talent for bike racing, and learned Spanish, among other things. As he describes it, he “blundered” into a dream job with National Public Radio in Washington, D.C. His assignment was to help the legendary literary editor and participatory journalist George Plimpton organize a celebrity croquet tournament. The event was a fundraiser for NPR but was backed by a developer in Boca Raton, Florida, who wanted to draw attention to a new development. Buettner helped recruit forty celebrities who were each paired with three big-dollar donors. Why croquet? “It was one of these sports that’s semi-aristocratic,” he said, adding that it required no special ability from either celebrity or donor.

    Buettner cultivated a special knack for connecting the rich with the famous, and for getting his travel expenses paid. In addition to being flown regularly from Boca Raton to Washington to New York, where he was put up in the San Moritz Hotel, he also swung a deal where the tournament’s sponsors would fly him and several of his fellow organizers home every weekend. “But instead of saying that home was St. Paul, where it was freezing, we rented an apartment in Freeport, Grand Bahama Island. So every weekend we’d get to fly to the Bahamas, and it was a fabulous experience!”

    The life of the leisure class had fallen into his lap. “I think that, like most college graduates, I aspired to the same kind of life of wealth and ease that Americans generally strive for,” Buettner told me. “But this year was so wonderful to me. I got to ride around in limousines all week. We had an unlimited expense account, ate at the finest restaurants. And after nine months I was sick of it. I didn’t give a damn about nice restaurants—I mean, I wanted to go home and make a sandwich! I was living the life of someone who was fifty-six and very successful, so I had this wonderful opportunity to look ahead. It was almost like one of those Ebenezer Scrooge epiphanies where you see where you’re going to be in the future and see you don’t want to end up there. So you change your path.”

  • The Courtroom

    She didn’t tell me exactly what I have to wear, she just said to “dress my ass up,” Char tells Stephan. The three dust-topped round bulbs over the bathroom mirror whiten her face to stark, a finger of pewter shadows like chalk drawings under her eyes as she leans in close, paints in tiny pointillism black eye pencil a trace line along her eyelashes. In the heavy Wisconsin dampness, her breath fogs the glass while she draws with the certain hand of a practiced child.

    “That’s absurd. Your mother is ridiculous.” Stephan leans back, his hip bone juts above his low and sagging belt as he rests against the door frame; his grandmother’s bathroom has a pink tub, pink toilet, pink sink, and handrails are installed at angles on the walls. The boy is over six feet three in his platforms; spikes of his hair nearly brush the top of the thick-coated doorway.

    “No jeans. No holes,” Char says.

    “What does she think, you’re an idiot?”

    “I’ve told her to leave me alone with the fashion. I warned her.”

    “She has no idea.”

    “I’ve told her so many times.”

    “Did you bring that black velvet shirt?”

    “It’s on your bed. With the fuzzy skirt. Remember the Goodwill one?”

    Stephan finds it, the shirt flops in his hand like an overfed kitten; he spreads it out against his chest and looks in the mirror. Miniature onyx buttons close the front up to a V neckline laced with tiny black looped stitches and where he stretches it it slowly slinks back down to Extra Small.

    “The sleeves have to go. Walk in there sleeveless,” he tells her.

    “Do we have time?”

    “When’s the hearing?”

    “Two. And we have to ride bikes there.” Char puts down the eyeliner. She blinks at herself in the mirror. Distortion, camera-ready, eyes in animation, her black-caked lashes emphatic like flags for calling things home. “You’re coming with?”

    “Of course.” He holds the shirt up to Char’s chest and it droops there formless. “I’m chopping the sleeves; they’re low on the sides so it’ll work.”

    “Is it nympho-teenage-slut enough?”

    “It will be. See, you have no tits. I have nothing else to work with.”

    “The skirt. We have the skirt. It’s total fake animal-skin whore.”

    Stephan has orange-handled scissors and he snips the sleeves off slowly in the lint-specked light, precise, within thread widths of seams. Moisture from the growth of mildew along his grandmother’s tile grout lines at the bottom edge of her water-trailing plastic shower curtain rises misty in the heat. It smells like algae and rain and something eroding.

    “It’s Rhonda’s shirt. She will be so pissed,” Char says.

    “I can’t believe you’re wearing your mom’s hacked up shirt to her DUI hearing.”

    “No one tells me what to wear.”

    Incense burns in Stephan’s room, Charlotte unbuttons her shorts, drops them on the floor next to his bed where CDs are stacked and sliding in a broken mosaic on the carpet. She pulls on the secondhand and sleek furred skirt, a faded velour like calico cat inbred with silver glitter. It zips up the side. She sits and pulls white socks up to her knees. Her legs inside the cotton hang sticklike where she sits, her heels dangling against the dust ruffle.

    “You got my shirt?”

    “One sec.”

    Charlotte opens a brown lunch bag, she empties it onto the orange and green frayed afghan at the foot of the bed, chains and rings and scraps of leather and beads drop into the holes and weaves of the blanket.

    “Here. Try it.” Stephan holds out the shirt, now sleek, a lank vest. “Want me to do the buttons?”

    “I’ll pull it over.”

    Char gets up, pulls her T-shirt over her head and holds her arms up as she leans toward him, a hunched entreaty of slim bones and naked shoulders. Stephan drops the shirt bottom over her hands and she stands. The V neckline hits her midchest. The thin spread of her ribcage shows fanlike above the buttons.

    “You really have absolutely no tits, do you?”

    “I’m not even fifteen yet; give me a few weeks.”

    “Well, you have jewelry. That will help.”

    Charlotte strings her wrists with rawhide bands, rubber circles, a wide leather strap with scuffed studs that snaps closed. “What are you gonna wear?” she asks.

    “I was thinking yellow.”

    “Toss me that shoe.” Char points. The shoes are black with stacked four-inch heels and a wide strap below her ankle, deranged maryjanes on a gin run. She clips silver hoops into her earlobes and stands up. “What do you think?”

    “Jesus. You are almost scary.”

    “Psycho child slut?”

    “The judge is going to freak.”

    “I want him to cry.”

    “It’s Bombed-a who’s going to cry.”

    “Nobody tells me what to wear.”

    “What if it’s a woman judge?”

    “Whatever.”

    “What have you decided for drugs?”

    Char goes to the bathroom to check the mirror.

    “Oh my god. I look like a music video gone thrift store trash.” She walks back into the bedroom, sifts through the rest of the jewelry on the bed. A black cameo missing its pin. Screw back earring that looks like a wad of chewed gum.

    “I have the usual Valiums, some new Percocets from Grandma’s elbow thing last week,” Stephan says. “What do you want? Dope? I got vodka.”

    “How much time do we have?”

    “Hour.”

    “I have to be able to maintain, right? Nothing sloppy. I want that like droopy eye, sleazy porn girl kind of thing.”

    “No drinking then. It’s court.” Stephan looks at her, raises a finger. “A couple Valium now and one more when we get there.”

    “I won’t fall down or anything?”

    “What are you putting on? Dear god.”

    Charlotte laughs and turns to show him, a choke chain for a large-breed dog. Unruly around her neck, its throttling ring lies against her collarbone; heavy links pull it down as she moves, tethered baubles of discipline, industrial against her skin.

    “That is so perfect,” Stephan says. “You are too much. Bombed-a is going to lose her freaking mind.”

    “Is that the worst?” Char goes back out to the bathroom mirror and laughs again. “Should I put the leash on, too?” she calls to him.

    “I don’t know. What color is it?”

     

    Stephan and Char hold hands when they walk into the hearing room at the courthouse. The air conditioner clatters in the window and the linoleum is scuffed and bootblacked from years of heavy treads and weak cleansers. The humid weight of leftover smoke in the walls. A desk sits at the front of the room with an unplugged lamp and foam coffee cup on it and a few rows of folding chairs are lined up with a pathway down the center of them, like a jagged wedding aisle of the shotgunned. Rhonda is sitting in front and she looks back and spies them and glares. Char sees the twin lines between her mother’s eyebrows, parallel creases of rage and terror. A purse with a looped braid handle on her lap. A woman in a dark blue jacket sits next to Rhonda with a very straight back and Rhonda is so tiny that two of her would not be as wide as the woman. A man in a gray suit sits alone across the aisle from Rhonda and he stares ahead at the concrete block wall.

    “This is the sorriest. Is this really even a courtroom?” Stephan says.

    “There is like nobody here.”

    “I guess Bombed-a did not rate the big room. No camera crew for her.”

    “This room is too depressing. It’s like capacity 50.”

    “Are you sure this is even legal? Is this in the Constitution?”

    They sit in the back away from the aisle, the side farthest from Rhonda. The blue jacket woman looks over at them and then at Rhonda, who nods. The judge comes in and sits up front at the desk like a teacher starting class and a woman goes to a small desk to his right, the court reporter. The judge starts talking to Rhonda, Stephan reaches over with his hand cupped low at his lap and Char, taking the Valium from him without moving her eyes off the judge, palms the pill into her mouth. The adults talk on, reviewing and summarizing. Char has seen this downcast head of her mother before, from back seats and tavern doorways, in the kitchens of the concerned, through the glass that separates principals’ offices, her remorse false and ominous. Charlotte can almost feel the beating undercurrent coming now in waves from that exposed neck, her mother’s furies simmering and coiled and constant.

    “What is your mother wearing?” Stephan whispers. “Is that an actual Peter Pan collar?”

    “I can’t see.” Char leans forward and stretches. “Jesus. She’s wearing my dress.”

    “Good god. That is yours?”

    “She went into my closet and took out that dress.”

    “Seriously. Honey.”

    “That bitch.”

    “You cannot honestly resent her wearing that thing. Look at her. She looks like a shrunkenhead baby Jane doll.”

    “My Aunt Linda gave me that dress.”

    “Let Bombed-a have it. Forever.”

    “I got it in seventh grade. I can’t believe she would take that.”

    “Ms. Basler,” the judge says from the desk. “You understand that this is your fourth conviction for Operating While Intoxicated? Do you not understand this? I don’t see that you’ve made any serious attempts at all.”

    “Give me one of your rings,” Char says.

    “Which.”

    “Any one. Something clear.”

    Stephan has collections of rhinestones on his fingers. He holds out a deep red crystal solitaire, it glows laser infused. Char shakes her head no.

    “Like topaz even,” she whispers.

    “Here’s my poison potion holder.”

    The crystal is shaped into a faceted box and hinged; the lid opens and clips into place.

    “There’s a couple Vicodins in there,” Stephan tells her. “They’re old.”

    “That’s good. This will work.” Char puts it on her left ring finger.

    “And is this the minor child?” the judge says and looks at Char.

    Char stands up. She curls the toe of one of her shoes under her other foot, her hip dips down and she leans forward. “I’m the minor child.”

    “What’s your name?”

    “I’m Charlotte Basler. Sir.”

    “And you are how old?”

    Char holds her hand out to Stephan seated next to her, she flips her hair and looks down at him. She sees he is holding back his laugh.

    “I’m fourteen years old, your judge. Judging.”

    “All right.”

    “I’ll be fifteen at the end of the month.”

    “Who’s that with your daughter, Ms. Basler?” the judge says to Rhonda.

    “He’s my fiancé,” Charlotte answers. She sees her mother turn and look at her but Char doesn’t look back. She holds out the gigantic ring toward the judge.

    “What’s your name, son?”

    Stephan gets to his feet, his trousers are neon yellow and he’s wound ties around the ankles at the tops of his platform boots. The boy bends sideways into Char, his tie-dye shirt looks like it’s burst into flames.

    “Stephan Harrison, sir. We’re in love.”

    “All right, that’s fine,” the judge says. “Ms. Basler, do you know this boy?”

    “Yes.”

    “Are these children engaged to be married?”

    “No,” Rhonda says. “They’re. Don’t. Whatever.”

    “Your judge?” Charlotte says. “Your judgeship?”

    “Yes, miss.”

    “We are too engaged. I don’t know what my mother is talking about.”

    “She may be thinking that you’re too young to be engaged.”

    “That boy is gay,” Rhonda says. Charlotte gasps and pushes out her lower lip. She reaches down to scratch her thigh.

    “I beg your pardon,” Stephan announces to the room.

    “Not everyone is against gay marriage,” Charlotte says and pushes her shoulder into Stephan. He curls his arm around her, the two of them a mascara-smudged couple atop the wedding cake of the damaged. Char stares at the judge and puts her finger on her lip, she feels Stephan laughing, his ribs hard against her side.

    “Please have a seat,” the judge tells them. “Sit down.”

    “Can you feel the rage?” Stephan whispers in Char’s ear. “Bombed-a is going to blow up into tiny pieces and turn into rain.”

    “Here’s me, the minor child,” Char whispers.

    “And I think you’re homeless now.”

    They are laughing harder, her shoulders hurt from it, the judge talks on and Char has her hand tight over her mouth.

    “Let’s go. Let’s go. I am dying,” Char says.

    They stand up and Char really feels the Valiums now, she trips over the leg of the heavy aluminum chair next to the aisle, it clangs like a BB shot in the stuffy room and they stumble out the door at the back and no one calls to them to stop. In the corridor the cackle of their laughing echoes, and they slump into each other as they go, arm in arm past the vending machines and a man reading a newspaper in a T-shirt that says Bud Light.

    “Goodbye, mister judge,” Char calls back behind them when Stephan opens the door at the entrance. The hot air settles on them like a soggy quilt. “Did you see blue jacket look at me? She wanted to kill me.”

    “I will never get over your mother in that dress. That will haunt me for the rest of my life. Was that like gingham?”

    “I hope they put her in jail.”

    “They won’t.”

    “Minor child.”

    “They never will. You’ll have to ride her around to the bars on your bike.”

    They are tall in their platforms and weave as they walk to the bike rack at the side of the lot. Stephan has the key, he takes off his U-lock where it’s clamped both their bikes to the steel bars and Charlotte’s laughing still. He stops her a second in the sunlight; a tiny black thread dangles on her shoulder from the clipped shirt seam and he reaches to pull it away.

     

  • Ahoy there, tailor!

    Not long after the new Design Collective boutique opened in Uptown, its display window featured a two-tiered, amphibious-looking skirt whose ruffles, shaped with wires, were so impressive they stopped a passerby in her tracks. “It makes me think of a nudibranch,” explained Barrett Johanneson, months later, as he fished the skirt out of the trunk of his Volkswagen, where it had been stored since a fashion show some weeks ago. “It’s a sort of sea snail,” he added, before there was a chance to ask.

    Johanneson is the soft-spoken founder and leader of Labrador Style, an ensemble of five friends who are also clothing designers, and who share a fascination with sea life. (They take their name from the coastline-rich northeasternmost province of Canada.) Other one-of-a-kind Labrador designs include a top made from layered and hand-stitched strips of terrycloth and a men’s white dress shirt with hand-painted aqua blue stripes—a watermark, so to speak, of Labrador’s oceanic motifs.

    It’s hard to believe all this plum, avant-garde fashion comes out of the unglamorous, garden-level apartment near Cedar Lake that Johanneson shares with his friend Adrianne. “I do feel bad about the times I leave it kinda dirty,” he said, typifying male roommates.

    Johanneson and his fellow Labrador designers use the apartment’s spartan, bare-walled living room as their studio space. There’s a sewing machine, a mannequin bust, a tiny cabinet stuffed with notions, a glass-topped worktable, and an overhead projector used to throw patterns onto fabrics and tees, so as to allow hand painting. “When we’re getting ready for a fashion show or photo shoot, we basically all live in this room,” Johanneson said.

    He opened up a hallway closet, where some of Labrador’s most interesting creations are stowed. Out came a squid-shaped hand bag, dyed with squid ink and part of a whole line based on a squid motif. “This is a bikini constructed out of East German surgical masks,” he said, holding up a particularly puzzling item from the stock.

    While the wire, squids, and medical equipment attest to Johanneson’s avant-garde leanings, he also has a special affection for vintage fabrics, which he acquires from antique stores, thrift shops, and on eBay. He even keeps a few sentimental swatches close at hand, such as a remnant of seafoam silk with gold accents, which his mother used to make her prom dress. He likes busy patterns as much as the next guy, but prefers materials with a softer touch that, again, remind him of the sea. He picked up a rich, azure-colored fabric. “Feel it. It’s watery,” he said. “That’s going to make a fantastic dress someday.”

    That dress will have to wait while the designer works through his current obsession with jeans. A couple of just-finished pairs are tossed over an end table, one with a dramatic surf-like curve at the front pockets, the other with wavy panels running along the outside seams. “These are a study in tiny jeans,” said Johanneson, a tall fellow, holding an unfinished pair to his legs. They looked like they’d fit a five-foot fashion model. But oh no, he said. Exuding the sort of whimsy and drama that come through in Labrador’s clothing, he whispered, in all seriousness, “Someday these will be mine.”—Christy DeSmith

  • Fresh as a Faux Daisy

    Not so long ago, if you heard “wipe” used as a noun, you probably thought of a baby’s bottom. That was in the late nineties, when baby wipes made up eighty-two percent of the “wipe market.” Now, of course, you can buy disposable cloths soaked in just about any kind of fluid and stuffed into an airtight plastic container. There are wipes to clean your car’s dashboard, wipes to clean up stray dabs of paint, wipes to clean your dog’s ears. But it was the recent arrival, by mail, of a Palmolive DishWipe sample that gave me pause. I don’t think of myself as old—on a good day, I’ll get carded at the liquor store checkout—but I realized that I’d somehow missed this revolutionary wipe wave, been left, so to speak, in the dust.

    When I was a child, my siblings and I had cleaning duties to fulfill every week in exchange for our allowance, and I guess the methods we used back in those pre-wipe days have stuck. We stuck our little hands into the too-big yellow rubber gloves and scrubbed, dusted, sudsed, or vacuumed according to Mom’s instructions. She seemed to know best then, and to this day I still save old T-shirts for dusting and toothbrushes for getting into nooks, and I have worn holes in the knees of my “cleaning jeans.” Housework is work.

    But that kind of work is about as old-fashioned as a Chore Boy copper scrubber. Apparently, the new way to clean involves a lot of wiping, misting, Swiffing, and tossing. Sponges (like “dishrags” before them) face extinction because cleaning implements should immediately be thrown away after use. At this rate it won’t be long before good old elbow grease is eradicated with a squeal of disgust by consumers brandishing plastic cylinders of grease-cutting Mr. Clean Wipes. While manufacturers are making big bucks on these presoaked disposable cloths, one has to wonder why it took so long for them to invent cleaning products that work the same way we want everything else to work: immediately, and with as little effort as possible.

    Still, there’s a contradiction brewing. While wipe culture enables a quick-and-easy approach to cleaning, at the same time it cultivates a rapid-growth disgust of bacteria, dirt, and germs. I began to look more closely at the offerings in the cleaning aisle at my local Cub Foods. Along the bottom shelves, plastered with big yellow “PRICE CUT!” labels that made them seem desperate, were the same powder cleaners my mom swears by. It’s no surprise. Using those involves a whole lot of scrubbing, and why scrub when we can wipe or, better yet, mist? On an eye-level shelf, I zeroed in on an improbable-sounding Scrub-Free Disinfectant and Bathroom Cleaner. Disinfect with no scrubbing? Tell me more! The instructions began, “Remove gross filth or heavy soil prior to application of the product.” Now, I’m no expert on what it takes to remove “gross filth” (which sounds suspiciously like a euphemism for “dirt”), but I bet it would take some scrubbing.

    Okay, so a product that sounds too good to be true probably is. It turns out that wipes and many of the “scrub-free” products are meant for use between those occasions when we get in there and really scrub. But this raises another contradiction: Why put on ratty jeans and a sweatshirt and spend a whole Saturday sanitizing the house when we can take care of visible grot with a few wipes? Why scrub a floor that has that “just Swiffered” glow? If it looks clean, isn’t that good enough? Journalist Barbara Ehrenreich, in the course of writing Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting by in America, took a job at Merry Maids, where she was trained in the franchise’s techniques for housecleaning. In addition to working as quickly as possible, she found, cleaning consisted of dampening a cloth with the appropriate fluid and then wiping down every surface. She felt like she was merely pushing dirt around instead of banishing it the way her mother taught her: with buckets of scalding sudsy water. After checking in with an expert who confirmed her suspicion, she came to the conclusion that “the point at The Maids, apparently, is not to clean so much as to create the appearance of having been cleaned.” And thousands of Merry Maid customers are just fine with that. But at least they’re keeping their homes presentable, even if they’re not doing the work themselves. For those of us who don’t hire Merry Maids, or even less-merry housecleaners, it’s often a different story.

     

    Somehow we’ve raised ourselves above the indignity of unpleasant household tasks that were once commonplace. The respect that was once accorded to getting things spic-and-span with a good hard scrubbing has been replaced with squeamishness. I was struck by a scene in Jonathan Franzen’s novel The Corrections in which a son watches in disgust as his mother, raised during the Depression, scrapes bits of food from the sink trap into the garbage can. Our revulsion over such tasks translates into profits for those manufacturers who produce wipes and other gadgets that promise to virtually eliminate cleaning. At the very least, they ensure that we don’t come into direct contact with dirt, and that we can throw away anything that does.

    More easily grossed-out consumers and easier profits for manufacturers of cleaning products do not necessary equate to cleaner homes. From 1999 to 2004, while sales of air fresheners went up thirty percent, the household cleaning products market declined almost nine percent. No matter how many air fresheners we spray around, light up, or plug in, we eventually have to clean up the source of our stink. And when that happens, the Clorox ToiletWand is there.

    Let’s look at the evolution of no one’s favorite cleaning job. The old way to clean a toilet was to kneel down and get up close, making sure to scrub the throne in all its awkward angles, thereby developing a forced intimacy with this place where we crap. Once the toilet brush was invented, we could remain a full twelve inches or more from the worst parts. This was a great improvement, but now we had the problem of storing a brush—soaked in toilet water, possibly contaminated with flecks of feces—right there next to the commode. There are two solutions to that problem: Go back to kneeling and scrubbing, or throw away the offending brush after each use. Faced with this choice, it seems consumers are more than willing to spend extra on disposable brushes.

    Of course, the cleaning revolution didn’t come without a reason. We need our cleaning problems wiped away because we’re all busier than ever and many of us, especially those in the burgeoning class of one-member households, are home less than we used to be. We stop in for a bit after being at work all day, and then go out again for the evening or park ourselves in front of the TV or computer. On top of that, houses are getting bigger (in the last thirty years, the average new one-family home has grown by 670 square feet), even as the time spent cleaning them shrinks.

    In Outwitting Housework: Brilliant Tips, Tricks, and Advice on Housekeeping… and Life, much of author Nancy Rosenberg’s advice involves using stolen moments to keep up with cleaning. Wipe the bathroom mirror while brushing your teeth; straighten a closet while waiting for the shower to run hot. That all sounds fine, but should we really be using those precious extra minutes for spot cleaning? Why not sneak in a little cardio, eat some whole grains, catch up on e-mail, weed the garden, or do any of the other million things that constantly need doing? Rosenberg, however, doggedly attempts to turn our values back to the days when a sparkling home and the work to get it that way was a point of pride. “Don’t think of housekeeping as cleaning, or chores, or drudgery. Don’t think of it in negative terms,” she writes. “Instead, see this as a gift you give to yourself. See this as a tool that will make your life easier, less complicated, and more manageable.”

    I’m willing to try, but I’d prefer to give myself the gift of a Roomba Floorvac, the little robot that “automatically senses, finds, and eliminates dirt!” Then I’ll never have to vacuum or even Swiffer again. I’m going to hold out until they invent a disposable Roomba that rolls itself right out to the garbage after filling up with my gross filth. Then my conversion to the new clean will be complete.

  • The Jane Addiction

    Every year there’s a ritual in my house: My wife gathers all of her Jane Austen novels from the bookshelf and reads them in chronological order. Once that liturgy is complete, she devours all five hours of the landmark BBC production of Pride and Prejudice, or Bridget Jones’s Diary, the Laurence Olivier Pride, Bride and Prejudice, or one of the many other adaptations of her novels over the course of a long weekend. My wife is either devout or obsessed. I’m still not certain.

    Then there’s my dentist. A real bookworm, she nonetheless loathes Jane Austen. In fact, while visiting London, she took a special trip with her eldest daughter—who shares this bitterness, especially after having to write a college essay on all six novels—to Winchester Cathedral, where Austen is buried. There, they both danced on her grave. And she was delighted to hear that had Mark Twain been alive to join them, he would have dug Austen up and, in his own words, “beat her over the skull with her own shin-bone.”

    Such passions are common when it comes to the bard of Hampshire and her works. While my wife and the legions of Janeites are in heaven, eagerly anticipating the newest film adaptation of Pride and Prejudice, due in theaters this month, my dentist and her daughter (not to mention the spirit of Sam Clemens) must be particularly vexed. For this last decade has seen the cinematic market for Pride and Prejudice explode; with five variations released in the last five years alone, it’s a legitimate phenomenon and one that spans both space and time. If you’re reading an article on Pride then you’ve got to be as familiar with its plot as you are with your morning ablutions. Essentially the story of the mutual misunderstandings betwixt prejudiced Elizabeth Bennet and the prideful Mr. Darcy (or is it vice-versa?), Austen’s 1813 tale reigns as one of the hallmarks of British literature: Its humor and wit make it probably the greatest page-turner from England’s fluffy Regency period. But is that enough to justify so much devotion, and so many different interpretations?

    The first major film production of Pride came at the suggestion of, of all people, Harpo Marx. Harpo—the silent one with the flowing blond curls—enjoyed a lively stage production of Pride in London and immediately wired MGM’s Irving Thalberg, urging him to produce it for the silver screen. Thalberg didn’t live long enough to see the film into reality, but MGM hired Aldous Huxley to write it (along with Jane Murfin), and cast Greer Garson and Lawrence Olivier in the starring roles. The Huxley Pride is my personal favorite: the plot, light and perfectly designed as a box kite, is compressed into a swell little production, with added bon mots that Austen herself could have written. It’s brilliantly scored by Herbert Stothart, whose leitmotif for Mr. Collins is delightful, and acted with verve by all parties involved, but containing two particularly impressive performances—of Lady Catherine and Mr. Collins—by two of the most underrated character actors, Edna Mae Oliver and Melville Cooper, respectively.

    Watching this Pride, we can see exactly why Austen’s story works so well on the big screen and in modern times. Pride boasts some of the most memorable characters ever set to paper: the Bennet girls, from the intelligent older sisters Elizabeth and Jane to the flighty Lydia and Kitty to the brainy Mary, hovered over by the matrimony-mad mother, Mrs. Bennet; Mr. Darcy, the haughty rogue whom female readers (and viewers) hunger for; Mr. Collins, a cousin come to take his pick of one of the girls as his bride, and one of the finest comic creations I’ve ever read; Lady Catherine de Bourgh, Mr. Darcy’s aunt and the dowager who screams to be portrayed by a Dame like Judi Dench (and who does so in the new film); and Mr. Bennet, the father of the clan and the cynical soul of the book whom Martin Amis once called the “the dark backing behind the bright mirror” of Austen’s work. All of these people mill about the cozy confines of Meryton, an idyllic village so far removed from politics and strife it could be heaven itself. But in Pride Austen accomplished in three hundred featherweight pages what it took Tolstoy, in Anna Karenina, nearly a thousand somber ones to do: Pride is not simply about falling madly in love, but about what it means to be married. Her light tone allows the story to shine even in truncated forms. In the space of a two-hour movie, we see not one marriage begin, but four, each one simultaneously a prototype, a warning, and an example. And with Elizabeth Bennet and Fitzwilliam Darcy, Pride and Prejudice captures, in the words of art critic and historian Robert Hughes, “the microcosm of marriage, an Ideal Republic of two.”

    These Republics were on treacherous ground when Huxley set to work adapting the novel in 1940. With the Luftwaffe threatening London, he wrote Pride as a subtle summons to urge American involvement in the war, to show exactly what would be lost without our participation. The story was moved forward in time just a few years, in order to include a reference to the defeat of Napoleon—a victory that would not occur for another twenty years after Pride was written, but England’s last great military victory. Austen’s Meryton, olde England, and marriage itself would soon be lost under Hitler’s bootheel if we Americans did not act.

    Pride fell out of favor for some time after that—there were a few television productions catering to England’s insatiable appetite for dry costume drama, unmemorable versions virtually unwatched today. But in 1995, the BBC took a chance on a Simon Langton and Andrew Davies production that once again reflected current tastes. Their first triumph: casting Colin Firth, who took what is arguably the strongest and most complex male character in all of Austen’s work and shaped him into a vibrant human being. Firth is outstanding: seething throughout most of the film, haughty, and then just right as his arrogance melts away and he falls for Elizabeth Bennet (Olivier’s Darcy is fine, but far from brilliant). Cinematically, Firth made Darcy just as Brando made Stanley Kowalski.

    Langton and Davies’ second triumph: having the selfsame Mr. Firth’s Darcy take a dip in a pond. He emerged dripping wet and climbed into the fantasies of Janeites forever. This Pride was not explicitly sexual, but unabashedly erotic. Thus, it took only fifty-five years (in film time) for Pride to acknowledge that married couples have sex.

    Austen’s examination of the complexities of marriage, weaved into a seemingly effortless plot, makes Pride a story that can be perfectly adapted throughout the ages, even in different countries. Since 1995 we’ve seen Pride in more than a half-dozen adaptations: Furst Impressions, a children’s television show starring Wishbone, a Jack Russell terrier; the two Bridget Jones movies, starring Firth again in the Darcy role, once again dampening his shirt but not his sexuality; a modern-day production by, of all people, the Mormons; an English-Indian Bollywood musical Pride set in latter-day Amristar, India, featuring the sexiest Bennet sisters yet; and, coming full circle, this newest Pride, which is supposedly a “muddier, cloudier” version, in contrast to the sunny ’95 vintage. Mormons embrace it, Indians dance to it, and even dogs wear the roles like gloves. That is quite a ride for an almost two-hundred-year-old novel, and it is unparalleled in movie history. I’m just waiting for the gay Pride.

    Detractors hate Austen in part because of her focus on marriage and the mistaken belief that she is reinforcing the idea of a woman’s dependence on a man. There are also the silly manners and the sunshine and happy-ending world of Meryton. I’d like to think that Twain hated her for the same thing that bugs me the most: Austen’s is a world of the upper classes, where to be destitute is to have “only” a yearly income of a few hundred pounds and but one servant.

    However, if you can cast your eye past these differences, you discover a story unlike any other, one that so richly reflects the possibilities of marriage. The Bennets are not dependent women: Lizzy rejects the wealthy Mr. Darcy because he seems to look down upon her family—though his sentiments match her own more than she would admit. She also refuses to consider his money as a source of happiness. If she fails to marry, we don’t doubt that this Elizabeth Bennet will nevertheless succeed in her life. In the end, it is her strength and intelligence that reunites them. Austen covers the other bases—the relationship between Mr. Collins and Charlotte is one of convenience and economy, and silly Lydia and Wickham’s elopement is an example of the perils of reckless love—but Jane’s and Lizzy’s pairings are the ideals of wedlock.

    I imagine that I used to resemble Mr. Bennet, harrumphing behind my newspaper while my wife swooned over Colin Firth. But we’ve also sat and watched the various Prides together over the years, and I enjoy the story more and more as time goes on. When we’re through watching one of the movies, I like to reflect on our marriage—I can’t think of another story that challenges me on that sometimes delicate subject. My wife and I are older now, and though we like to be inflamed by the likes of Keira Knightly (Elizabeth in the newest adaptation) and Colin Firth, we also know there’s a lot more than just wet shirts and muddy stockings: Like Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth Bennet, we’ve grown to have a profound respect for one another. Over the years, marriages are bound to lose some of the fire you’d find raging throughout Wuthering Heights, but a slow burn over time, a loving endurance—isn’t that what we all hope to find in this type of union?

  • This One's for the Ladies

    It’s time to take that other monthly business more seriously.

    Yeah, I know this is the November issue. But, gentle readers, I am speaking to you from the recent past of October third! Boooooooo! I am the ghost of October third! And where I’m coming from, it’s still National Breast Cancer Awareness month.

    So let’s take a minute here to be aware of our bajungas. I know some of you are male, and I do always try to play to a mixed crowd. But it ain’t gonna happen this month. You fellas can still read on if you’d like; just be aware that I’m going to be talking about woman stuff, and what the hell, as long as you’re still reading, take a minute to be aware of your breasts. You guys can get breast cancer, too.

    This reminds me of the time back in the seventies when the boys and girls in fourth grade were separated for that special gym class. The boys went to their talk with Mr. Leinfelder, the gym teacher. We girls were ushered into the multipurpose room to watch a filmstrip about private parts. The Kimberly-Clark Corporation gave us gift packs of U-boat sized “mini” pads. Just about every female teacher was present to make sure there was absolutely no giggling. Even a couple of the lunch ladies were there. I don’t remember what the filmstrip detailed, exactly, except that we all were supposed to expect to become women soon, and when one became a woman, there were certain accoutrements that you had to keep on you at all times. Things that you would keep in your purse, because you were now a woman and women carried purses just for this purpose, to carry things in them for a while and then put them in their underpants. Things to contain the flow. After the filmstrip, to our collective horror, and with all the enthusiasm of a flight attendant demonstrating the nearest exits, Mrs. Chevalier, the most soignée member of our faculty, held up a pair of giant practice ladies’ briefs, unwrapped a mini, and pulled the adhesive zip strip off to show us all how to stick that bugger on target.

    “Like a diaper?!!” Deanna LaMenga yelled out. And then there was giggling, and plenty of it. Nonstop, irrepressible giggling—from the time the filmstrip ended, throughout the painfully awkward “Question Asking Time,” and during the bathroom break, when Deanna ripped open her Kimberly Clark Gift Pack and stuck mini pads all over her face and chased a guffawing Jenny Tooley out of the girls’ room and down the hall, arms stretched out stiff in front of her, groaning like the Mummy.

    I laughed that day until my sides ached, and then I laughed some more. Everybody did. The lone exception, curiously enough, was Gina Venutti. Gina was in our grade, ten or eleven years old, but she had C-cup boobs and a figure that would make grown men look the other way fast. Gina didn’t laugh that day. And now I understand why.

    When you’re a young girl, accepting the responsibility of your changing body is so thrilling, so new, that you don’t take any bit of it for granted. Then you grow up, live a little in your skin, and it’s just another damn thing on the to-do list.

    For women, there’s always a party in our pants. Menarche and menstruation, childbirth, perimenopause, menopause, cramps, aches, pains, not to mention yeast infections, bladder infections, and all the rest. You couldn’t ignore it if you tried. In the upper berth, meanwhile, your buoys bob calmly, isolated from the relative storm of the southern hemisphere. As long as they look good, they are pretty easy to forget about. Until there is trouble.

    So, as the ghost of October third, I’ve come to haunt you into performing your breast self check. Not just this month, but each and every month from here on in. Pick a day each month and stick to it. Do it a week or so after your period. Think of it this way: You got your oil changed, so now it’s time to rotate the tires. Do what works for you. My friend Kiki uses the arrival of the telephone bill as a reminder to do her self check. This wouldn’t work for me, as I studiously disregard the arrival of all my bills. I’m the type of person who needs something more dramatic to jog my memory. So I use the air raid siren that goes off the first Wednesday of the month. I immediately take cover, and take my health into my own hands.

  • A Jury of One's Peers

    Sitting on my desk is the final “absolute, no kidding, no extensions possible” request for my submission to the Harvard and Radcliffe Class of 1981 Twenty-Fifth Anniversary Report. After twenty-five years, Harvard wants an accounting of what I have done with my life. I ignored the three or four previous requests because I had trials to work up and columns to write.

    Yeah, right.

    Here’s the real reason. I am scared to commit to paper a life story that—let’s be real—almost certainly will not be as impressive as those of my classmates. Scarier yet, am I really prepared to stack the reality of my forty-six years up against all those expectations and lofty dreams I had when I marched out of Harvard Yard in June 1981?

    In high school, I was a strange amalgamation of Steve Urkel from television’s Family Matters and Eddie Murphy’s Dr. Klump, with a touch of Richard Roundtree in Shaft. I was nerdy, but also cool (well, at least I tried to be). My classmates toted backpacks through the halls and wore jeans and T-shirts for their senior portraits; I proudly carried a briefcase to class and wore a tuxedo in mine. My parents, battle-scarred veterans of the Civil Rights Movement, were native Mississippians who moved our family to Denver in 1964. They were educated professionals, but both had grown up enduring the daily indignities of the old Jim Crow South. They very desperately believed that the “talented tenth,” as African-American scholar W.E.B. du Bois termed the best and the brightest black folk, had a moral duty to “uplift the race.” Therefore, my sisters and I were raised, as were most black middle-class kids in the late sixties and early seventies, to get the best credentials we could, so as to continue to carry out that duty.

    When I got into Harvard, my father promptly plastered five Harvard bumper stickers onto our two cars. The Denver Post ran a story headlined “Collins Headed to Harvard.” The assistant principal at my high school asked me to forget the times he had reamed me for various transgressions and to instead remember him fondly when I “became somebody big.” And when I arrived in Cambridge in September of 1977, the entire Class of ’81 was shepherded into the Harvard Square Theatre, where we were told that we were the most brilliant and talented group of young people ever assembled in one place, destined to scale great heights in recorded human history. Of course, we knew that was a slight (but only slight) exaggeration.

    Placing a kid like me, one already infused with an inflated sense of my own importance, in an institution like that was very dangerous. Don’t get me wrong—I’m glad I went to Harvard. I did learn that there were people—many people—smarter than I was. Unfortunately, I also believed that most of them were at either Harvard or similarly self-absorbed elite institutions.

    I remember a late-night discussion during my senior year that involved deciding, only half jokingly, who in our little group would be best suited for which Cabinet post. We not only believed that great power and riches awaited us somewhere over the Ivy League rainbow, we were also all afraid of facing each other if, years later, we ended up back in Kansas—not powerful, not rich, just, well, ordinary.

    Ever since my college days, I have heard, sometimes softly and sometimes quite loudly, an incessant murmuring in my head. Sometimes it comes just from my parents, asking, what have I done “for the race”? At other times, they are joined by the chorus of those damned Harvard ghosts, taunting me with my own boasts made long ago and with expectations that were never fulfilled: The fancy political appointment that never quite materialized. Those unmade millions resting in someone else’s bank account.

    The truth of the matter is, I am not a master of the universe—far from it. If I follow the script for columns like this, I am supposed to say that I have come to terms with how my life has turned out, I no longer am tormented by those voices, and I cannot wait to see my fellow members of the Class of 1981 next summer. But I know that’s not entirely true. As much as I tell myself that I am content with my rather ordinary life—and, for the most part, I am—I still hear the voices, albeit not as forcefully as in years past. And if I am “real” with myself, I gotta admit that they can still push my buttons.

  • Confusion Say

    If, in the past few weeks, you’ve encountered a super-strange message in your fortune cookie at a local Chinese restaurant (like A skyscraper can fall just by looking at it. Yet ‘War is over if you want It.’ or Think of something you understand until you no longer understand it. Or, simply, Wait.), then you have experienced the art of Marcus Young. Except that Young himself doesn’t have much use for the word “art” in describing what he does. He is, he said recently, very open to other terminology.

    Unless the terms are “intrusions” or “interventions,” which have been used to describe his projects, and which he doesn’t care for, his intentions aren’t so violent, he says. When the lanky thirty-five-year-old walked at a snail’s pace down Nicollet Mall, every day for a week, smiling continuously and wearing a pale gray robe and carrying an umbrella, a press release called his actions a “performative disruption,” a notion that caused Young to raise his eyebrows quizzically. Would he go for “extreme promenade” instead? He laughed, and countered with his own suggestion: “a gentle confusion.”

    Regardless of what they’re called, Young hopes his projects will encourage people to “look at the simple things that are around us all the time. What can I change to reveal something new, something hopefully better?” Take fortune cookies, the breaking open of which he firmly believes is “a wasted moment. You have these expectations, and the message almost always turns out to be a disappointment.” Young decided to reveal something new in that moment, simply by writing better-quality fortunes. The idea came to him after he met an actual writer of cookie fortunes; naturally, Young wondered how he might land such a gig.

    Some of Young’s fortunes were directly pilfered from his Big Idea Store, a project last year in which he sold “Big Ideas” for five cents each; others he wrote from scratch, resulting in two dozen in all. Then he turned his final selections over to Keefer Court Food, a South Minneapolis manufacturer of Chinese baked goods and fortune cookies, which sent back a custom batch of ten thousand cookies. “There’s nothing special about the cookie—the object is not important,” Young said. “I wanted the text inside to gently confuse people, to give them a moment that they might carry with them inside their heads for a while.”

    Young arranged for six Chinese restaurants, five in the Twin Cities and surrounding suburbs and one up in Walker, to distribute his cookies to unsuspecting customers. Although he had financial support from forecast Public Artworks, he wielded personal credibility with the restaurants as well—not just as a Hong Kong-born Chinese-American, but also as a former busboy at his parents’ Chinese restaurant in Des Moines. The restaurant owners got to preview the fortunes and nix any they didn’t like; only one did so, declining Have a prayer for waking up, for using the toilet, and for the animals by the road.

    During the run of the project, Young reprised his busboy role at some of the restaurants so he could witness the “gentle confusions” provoked by his cookies. He watched proudly one evening as a table of ten burst into laughter—some of it rather nervous or even hysterical, he thought—and read their various fortunes aloud. The diners then spent several bewildered minutes discussing propositions like If we know the weight of air, how heavy are our thoughts? How light is enlightenment?” and People always say it happens for a reason. This is true but not for the reason they think. Young smiled at the memory. “They were beguiled; they didn’t know what to think. And no one was going to step in and say, ‘You’re part of an art project.’” When he cleared the table, he found that the diners had all kept their fortunes.

    On another occasion, employees at the Rainbow restaurant on Nicollet Avenue reported to Young that one woman was so upset by her fortune—We could be better off if we had only two faces.—that she demanded a refund for her meal. That upset Young himself, until he decided that an angry reaction was just as valid as a delighted one. “There’s a spectrum of engagement,” he said. “Some people glance at their fortunes and nothing registers on their faces. But with that woman, the effect remained with her—it mattered.”

    With all of his projects, Young wants to see if people can “have a more meaningful experience with art when they don’t know that it’s art.” Which raises a tree-falling-in-the-forest conundrum: If art is on display and no one knows it’s art, then is it art? Plenty of people were not fooled when Young was inching along Nicollet Mall in his robe for the Pacific Avenue project (which he reprised on Wall Street in Manhattan last month); some asked him point-blank if he was a performance artist (or a monk). No matter what the question, he remained smiling but silent, sometimes offering a shake of his head in response. But he had to smile extra broadly when one man, after firing off a few questions that went unanswered, announced triumphantly, “I know—this is about patience!”

    —Julie Caniglia

  • Out of Season

    Fall is the transition time for outdoor sports, and, for semi-serious cross-country skiers, it’s time to strap on the old roller skis. Even the most accomplished skiers, however, who roller ski through all the dry seasons, can’t escape the fact that it’s a little bit ridiculous using ski poles with no snow on the ground. There’s something about it that makes people want to shout at you, “Hang on, lycra boy, winter will be here soon enough without you getting all enthusiastic about it.”

    But if you shell out anywhere between $275 to $400—as I did— for a pair of roller skis with bindings (you generally use the same boots as you do when the snow flies), and if you’re willing to accept that there is just no way for you to look cool on roller skis, you can’t beat the sport as a way to train for your time on the snow—if it comes.

    On their poles, roller skiers use carbide steel tips with no baskets. These tips need to be kept sharp enough to hold a pole plant on asphalt, and occasionally to defend against territorial dogs or cyclists. As the pavement gets colder, a proper pole plant gets even more difficult. Some newer models of roller skis have inflatable tires and larger wheels that allow skiers to handle looser and softer surfaces, such as crushed limestone. Those sorts of surfaces make poling easier as well as gentler on the elbows. Skiers with any sense at all also wear a helmet, and the more thin skinned or accident prone will take the extra precaution of sporting elbow and knee pads as well.

    But why not just use in-line skates, which can be considerably less expensive? It’s not just a plot to sell more specialized equipment to gear geeks. Andy Turnbull is a nordic racing specialist at Hoigaards and has been roller skiing since the late 1970s. Turnbull explains that in-line skate wheels are generally too fast to allow a skier to work on proper snow technique—you end up turning over your stroke too quickly. (Nine out of ten roller skiers appear to be skate-skiers, but there are also ratchet-wheeled skies for those who ski in the classic, kick-and-glide speed-walking shuffle.) Also, you don’t get much of an upper-body workout.

    If it seems like most roller skiers are operating without brakes, that’s because they are. Upper Midwest ski guru Lee Borowski recently wrote that he thinks all roller skiers should have brakes on their skis, but because brakes are mostly sold as extras, the majority of skiers hit the road or trail without them, relying on techniques like snowplowing or running off into the grass (if there is any) to stop their momentum.

    Almost any experienced roller skier can offer personal stories of spectacular wipeouts, although most don’t result in serious injuries. Recent history, however, does offer a cautionary tale: In 1999, one of the greatest skiers of all time, Bjorn Daehlie of Norway, crashed on the road during a training run. The resulting injuries and back problems led the most decorated winter Olympian of all time to withdraw from full-time racing. I like to tell myself that story when I recount how once, on a construction detour off a bike path, I managed to dig a ski pole into a sewer grate, promptly snapping the pole, ripping my arm back, and nearly flipping me over backward. (I knew I was going to be okay when, despite badly skinned knees, thighs, and elbows, my first impulse was to look around to see if anyone had seen me take such a monumental and embarrassing dig.)

    Is it worth the snickers of other trail users and the dangers of road rash to get a jump on the ski season, which can be madly inconsistent and El Niño-dependent? Andy Turnbull pointed out that the Twin Cities had roughly nine days of natural, skiable snow last winter. He said, “Sometimes I think I ski on snow in order to train for roller skiing rather than the other way around.”

    —Dan Gilchrist

  • Local Legends

     

    I’ve always liked to talk to people, especially strangers. I also like to drive the roads outside the commercial net of the interstates, the state highways and neglected county roads that still take you right into towns that can feel either forsaken or impossibly wholesome, and sometimes both at the same time. On such roads, particularly in Minnesota, the moment you leave the city limits of one place you can often see the familiar rural navigational landmarks—steeples, grain elevators, and water towers—of the next little town rising from the flat prairie and farm fields.

    I’ve been doing this sort of thing—driving back roads and being generally nosy—since I first learned to drive. In those days an automobile was a form of real salvation, a means of escaping my own suffocating hometown and discovering that there was another world out there, full of interesting people and places. My own town—Austin, Minnesota—was a decent, easy place to grow up, but held limited charms for restless adolescents. Real, fascinating weirdness of the sort I craved seemed to get driven underground, if not right out of town. (I still remember a short-lived head shop downtown called, if I’m not mistaken, either the Soviet Embassy or the Soviet Revolution.) When I started driving, I was looking for novelty as much as freedom; I suppose, for me, the two have always gone hand in hand. Going somewhere else was also liberating in the sense that it allowed me to escape the pigeonhole of identity that seems to be the inevitable byproduct of living in a small town; being freed of the feeling of being wholly known and classified permitted me to be myself and also to try on some of the other identities I was playing around with at the time. People in other towns, it seemed to me, were less wary, perhaps precisely because I was a stranger. Like lots of folks everywhere, they were vulnerable to the flattery and curiosity of interlopers, and I discovered that even towns that were virtually carbon copies of Austin were teeming with odd characters and people with interesting stories they were more than happy to share.

    Once upon a time, for instance, on one such utterly aimless ramble, I met a woman who appeared on the old television game show Let’s Make a Deal. This is a strange thing to be haunted by, as I have been, for so many years. Yet that woman, and her story—her account, I remember, was made up of many colorful strands leading up to her few, fleeting moments of minor celebrity—of that one day on which she unexpectedly found herself standing face to face with Monty Hall in a television studio in California, has stayed with me ever since I first met her.

    That random encounter had been exactly the right sort of magic I have come to associate with and expect from traveling. I’ve met many other people out in the sticks with similarly interesting stories, and I’ve stumbled across people who’ve done extraordinary things, and who have made the places they live more colorful or virtuous. To me, these sorts of people have always been more interesting and three-dimensional than the bona fide celebrities or dignitaries that occupy so much space in the national consciousness.

    A few weeks ago, I got the old compulsion again. I thought if I just got in my car and drove in any direction I would turn up living legends and amiable eccentrics in every town along the road. It would be like shooting fish in a barrel. Talking to a friend about this idea, he said, “Oh, hell yeah, just pull up to the curb, grab the first person you see, and they’ll have a story to tell or they’ll point you in the direction of someone who does.”

    The truth was, I was restless, and I thought that if I could just get out from under the city and outside my old autopilot orbits for a week or two I might clear my head, or at the very least meet some interesting or inspiring people.

    With this idea in mind, I decided to hit the road to see how many of these sorts of colorful characters I could bump into in the small towns of outstate Minnesota. Before I left, a coworker and I worked the phones, after basically jabbing our fingers randomly at a map of the state. We were calling local city offices or chambers of commerce, so I wasn’t terribly disappointed when we failed to turn up much in the way of what I thought I was looking for—there were some interesting folks whose exploits belonged decisively to history (long dead people, in other words), some actual minor celebrities (a QVC Channel hostess, for instance) who no longer lived in the towns they were born and raised in, and a few purported “local characters,” who, based on the sketchy information we received, might or might not have been promising.

    But no sweat, really. The truly entertaining and obsessive locals would be most easily discovered through inquiries in local bars, public libraries, and historical societies. I also believed it was possible, as my friend had asserted, that I’d be able to find my legends by simply walking down the sidewalk of any small-town Main Street and chatting with the residents.

    This was, after all, essentially how I had met the Let’s Make a Deal woman. One day I was out poking around in little towns around the state, and in the public library of one such town I had a discussion with two women during which they mentioned a local couple who had a large and distinguished collection of miniature bells. I generally like people who have large and distinguished, or even undistinguished, collections of anything. Naturally, I asked if it might be possible to see these bells. A phone call was made, directions were scrawled on a slip of scratch paper, and I walked several blocks off Main Street, knocked on a door, and was ushered into the presence of the bells. There were indeed a great many bells (some of them not miniature at all), and the woman was passionate about her hobby. I recall that when a large truck rumbled past the house the bells began to quiver in unison. They didn’t ring, exactly; it was more like the rattling noise of kitchen cupboards and silverware drawers in an earthquake.

    The first bell in the woman’s collection, I believe she said, had been obtained on her honeymoon. One thing led to another, which is, of course, how most obsessions snowball, and how most interesting conversations proceed.

    The woman was curious about my curiosity regarding her bells, as might be expected. I explained that I was always fascinated to discover how many truly interesting people lived in almost every town in America, people with interesting hobbies, experiences, and accomplishments. Local celebrities or legends, I told the woman. People like you.

    “Oh, Lord no,” the woman said. “Good heavens, no.” Her bells, she insisted, were small potatoes.

    And then she told me about the Let’s Make a Deal woman. Another phone call was made. A young man from the Cities is in town, the person on the other end of the line was told, and he’s interested in hearing about the game show. Once again I was dispatched with an address in hand.

    I’m not sure how old the Let’s Make a Deal woman was, but I’d guess she was then in her early seventies. She had lots of photos. She had been dressed as a hillbilly, I think it was, or maybe it was a scarecrow. And she had a signed copy of Emcee Monty Hall, the biography of the show’s host. There had been, she recalled, a lot of standing around and waiting. She’d had a feeling she would get on the show, somehow she’d just known. She hadn’t won a car or anything that fancy, she said, but she hadn’t been skunked, either; she’d won a washer and drier, which she didn’t need and had to pay the taxes on, but it had been a fun and wonderful experience regardless. “This was before we all had the video machines,” she told me. “That’s the only thing I’m sorry about, that I don’t have the show on tape.”

    I didn’t have a camera, which is something I regret to this day. I also wasn’t talking to this woman as a writer; I wasn’t thinking of her as a potential character for a story. I was just interested in hearing her story, and looking at her photographs.

    Later, in a used bookstore somewhere, I actually found a copy of Emcee Monty Hall, and I read the book with great pleasure. This is ridiculous, I realize, but after digesting Monty Hall’s words of wisdom I came to see in Let’s Make a Deal a fine metaphor for life. Everything’s there: faith, hope, disappointment, the desperate desire for attention that sometimes goads people to behave like total jackasses, and the occasional too-brief bursts of glory and exultation. It was a show that was about living with the choices you make, really, and accepting what’s behind the doors you open, or down the fork in the road you’ve chosen to travel. It’s also about gusto. Here’s a little snippet from Emcee Monty Hall that says what I’m trying to say much better than I can say it: “Of course, everyone can’t win big or winning big wouldn’t seem big. Whatever they win, the contestants seem happy. Monty says he has seen ladies make bad deals, perhaps trading a three-thousand-dollar car for three young pigs, and still kiss him. The men do not kiss him, but some hug him. He has had men grab him and throw him straight up in the air. This scares him because he worries about his back, which goes out on him constantly. He goes backstage complaining, ‘Oh, my back.’”

    A modern map is a congested thing. Looking at just one page from a modern road atlas it’s immediately apparent that there’s a lot out there, no matter how loosely or broadly you define “out there.” In even its most seemingly empty stretches, Minnesota is a very crowded place. This is still essentially a state of small towns, clustered close together and sprawling out in every direction from the fat inkblot of the Twin Cities. I thought I might kick off my trip by trying to find the Let’s Make a Deal woman. I had an idea the town might have been either out on U.S. Highway 12 west of the Twin Cities, or along state Highway 56 in the southeast corner of the state. I felt certain I would recognize the place when I saw it.

    Highway 12 definitely offered a greater concentration of communities, and if I followed it all the way to the western border of the state, I could then swing north and eventually pick up Highway 55, which would take me back to Minneapolis through another string of little towns. I headed west one morning. By noon I had a creeping suspicion that I was working with a seriously flawed central question; either that, or something strange was happening, or had happened, in America in recent years. I don’t know, perhaps it was just a bad patch of luck, but I can tell you that it took me almost four hours to cover sixty miles. In every town I ran into virtually the same story, which was not the story I was looking for. Nobody seemed to feel much like shooting the breeze. Even the drunks were more guarded. People clammed up on me.

    In small towns and rural areas there’s always been a certain amount of reserve and charming self-effacement when dealing with outsiders, of course, but you could generally get around that without much problem if you were persistent and curious enough. The key, I’d always known, was simply to get people talking, and then to keep them talking by your obvious interest in what they were saying.

    It wasn’t working, though. Oh, some folks would rack their brains all right. Particularly in the local libraries and city offices, they would scratch their heads and ponder and mull and maybe bandy a few ideas back and forth among themselves. And then they would half-heartedly offer up the name of, say, some fellow who’d been the county assessor for forty years, or a former mayor who had a park named after him. Every town seemed to have dead people who’d done something interesting once upon a time (politicians, mostly), or local sons or daughters who went out in the world to make a name for themselves.

    “What was the name of that gal who moved out east and married some big shot?” a woman in one town—it could have been Montrose, Waverly, Howard Lake, or Dassel, or, really, any other town out that way—asked her coworkers, who couldn’t seem to remember the name of either the girl or the big shot.

    “How about that old barber who used to be a race car driver?”

    “He’s dead. My God, Janice, he’s been dead for years.”

    I quickly learned that in the local bars I could reliably expect this response from some regular: “Local legend?” (Points across the bar.) “That guy’s a legendary drunk!” I also encountered the inspired variant, “That guy’s a legendary asshole!”

    In every town I would inquire about the Let’s Make a Deal woman. No one had heard of her.

    By noon I was in Darwin, a town that was once home to Francis Johnson, who was exactly the sort of character I was looking for. The result of Johnson’s lifetime labor, the world’s largest ball of twine wrapped by one man, is permanently displayed in its own glass-enclosed gazebo beneath the town water tower. Johnson’s twine ball, twelve feet in diameter, is a spectacular piece of work, and it’s nice to see the community give his achievement its proper due; it has become a sort of iconic roadside attraction that everybody in the state seems to know about, yet somehow I’d not only never stumbled across the thing, but had never even heard of it. Darwin holds an annual Twine Ball Festival, and adjacent to the ball’s permanent resting place is a bar, the Twine Ball Inn, and a souvenir stand that sells things like T-shirts, refrigerator magnets, and hats. Johnson, while unquestionably a legend, is not, alas, a living legend. He died in 1989.

    Death, in fact, dogged my entire journey. It was that “living” business, unfortunately, that posed a pretty serious problem. There were dead legends everywhere I went, and I sensed a clear attitude among many of the locals I talked with that this was precisely the way they liked their legends, that death was the ultimate credibility stamp or qualification on any true legend’s résumé. The achievements of the living were tenuous things; they could be too easily eclipsed, the people behind them disgraced. Once safely in the ground, a legend could no longer do much to discredit himself or his community.

    To many of the people I talked with, the very word, legend, was fraught with semantic difficulties; it seemed to suggest to them a story that folks tell about the past, about people who are dead and unmistakably historic, or mythical places or characters. A legend belongs to a place’s past, to its history.

    Death, I suppose, allows enough perspective for an honest appraisal of the achievements of native daughters and sons, and provides a bit of a historical comfort zone in which civic pride in these legacies can find proper incubation. It was hubristic to toot the horn of someone still living, unless, of course, they had gone somewhere else to make their mark and had earned the validation of the outside world. Thus Hibbing can celebrate Bob Dylan and Mound can proudly proclaim itself the birthplace of Kevin Sorbo. The people in these small towns seemed to understand implicitly that when local kids go out into the world to make their mark, they’re not likely coming back.

    I also figured out that the sort of people I was looking for and would personally classify as living legends were people with some peculiarly obsessive drive—folks who would be locally regarded as eccentrics or crackpots, if not outright lunatics. In small towns, I discovered, there is a prevailing attitude that such character flaws are absolutely not to be rewarded with anything in the way of attention or recognition. It was best to simply ignore them and then, when they died, confiscate their twine balls or the other products of their lunacy and build a community festival around them or let them fly their freak flag through eternity at the local historical society.

    I drove all the way west and then swung back east on Highway 55. I was making very slow progress. I was not, in fact, making any progress at all, unless tacking miles onto the odometer qualifies as some definition of progress.

    In every town I would go through the same basic routine. People would shrug, rub their chins, and consult their coworkers. Often enough, a phone call would be made to a local historian and a few names would be proposed and dismissed. I would be encouraged to see a woman at a local frame shop, or a guy at the post office who was an avid birdwatcher and history buff. At the tavern or serviceman’s club I would once again be offered an introduction to a legendary drunk. Plenty of people, including a man who was painting curbs in downtown Maple Lake, nominated themselves.

    I was encouraged to visit Hubert Humphrey’s old hometown of Waverly. Somewhere else, I was informed, a former Vikings cheerleader was at work at the turkey plant. In Buffalo a woman at the Chamber of Commerce referred me to Mary Ellen Kreitlow, who referred me to Ruben Bonk, who, Kreitlow said, “Coffeed every afternoon at three o’clock at Culver’s with some of the other older fellows.” Bonk proved elusive, so I ventured to the Wright County Historical Society just outside of town. There I talked with Maureen Galvin, the curator. Galvin and a few other volunteers engaged in some brainstorming while I admired Albert Nelson’s “Mighty Nelsonian,” an imposing contraption that took up a good part of one room. The Nelsonian was a thirty-two-piece musical instrument, a one-man band, that could be played using two keyboards. Nelson tinkered with his one-man band for decades, and the final version on display at the historical society, completed in 1957, featured such diverse instruments as accordions, violin, cello, xylophone, banjo, trombone, and two guitars. He showcased the Nelsonian at the Ripley’s Believe It or Not Odditorium at the Chicago World’s Fair, and later spent many years on the road, traveling and playing with a circus out of Florida.

    Nelson was clearly an interesting man, and, in my eyes, an obvious legend. He was also dead. Long dead.

    The brainstorming session in the other room had been remarkably productive, particularly when compared with my other experiences thus far. Galvin and her associates had clearly given my question some serious thought. They had even excavated some material from file cabinets for me to peruse.

    There was, it turns out, a woman from Buffalo, Debbie Meyer, who had married the entertainer Andy Williams. She now, however, lived in Branson, Missouri, where her husband has a theater. Her mother, Mary Jane, who had until recently resided in Buffalo, was also now in Branson.

    Bernie Parquette, a gospel singer, was from Buffalo as well. Parquette was definitely a local legend, someone said, and a truly incredible singer, but she wasn’t still residing in Buffalo. She was, in fact, living in Branson, where she had twice been named “Gospel Female Vocalist of the Year.”

    Bob Dylan’s brother, David Zimmerman, I was told, had once served on the Buffalo school board.

    And in nearby Howard Lake there was a guy named Bruce Hoffman who was a champion fiddler and had once appeared on Star Search once. Hoffman, alas, was now in Branson.

    And so it went. I drove north, crossed the state, and headed back south along the eastern border. Somewhere out there were towns that claimed to be the birthplace of Greyhound Lines (Hibbing) and the birthplace of water skiing (Lake City). Rothsay was home to the world’s largest prairie chicken, and Fountain touted itself as the sinkhole capital of the world. I saw giant statues of a trout, a green giant, and a mosquito. I’m sure there were other giant statues I’ve forgotten.

    Still. No one I talked to had any recollection of a woman who had once appeared on Let’s Make a Deal.

    The entire time I had been on the road, it had been outrageously hot, and I drove in and out of thunderstorms for several days. I was south of the Twin Cities on Highway 56 when for some reason I became convinced that the hometown of the bell collector and the Let’s Make a Deal woman was somewhere nearby. I had traveled that stretch of highway on a number of occasions, so the towns all looked familiar to me. I had a good feeling, a strong feeling.

    When I got to West Concord I was certain I had finally stumbled into the right town. It was late in the afternoon, and the Main Street was almost completely abandoned. I walked into various businesses that I found open and time and again made my increasingly desperate inquiry.

    “Have you ever heard of a woman in town who once appeared on Let’s Make a Deal?”

    No, I was told at each place, no, that didn’t sound like anyone in town.

    “How about a woman who collects bells?”

    “Bells? No, I can’t think of anyone,” someone told me. “There is, though, an older gal who collects shells.”

    By this time I was feeling utterly defeated and beleaguered. There were possible explanations; I’d been severely handicapped by the fact that I didn’t have a cell phone, and I hadn’t been able to figure out how to use the wireless internet connection on my laptop. I’d had bad timing and even worse luck. Maybe the lousy state was entirely legendless, or maybe all the legends really were dead. I had no idea anymore.

    I decided to drive the forty miles to Austin, my own hometown, and get a motel room to lick my wounds and try to hatch a game plan. I haven’t lived in Austin in more than twenty years, and the place has undergone a lot of changes since I moved away. Even so, I get back often enough that the town still feels achingly familiar. Every time I return, I’m reminded of the empty, humming, vacuum feel of the place on summer nights and of how anxious I once was to get away.

    Austin has a population of 23,324, but it’s always felt much smaller than that to me. It’s located ninety miles almost directly south of the Twin Cities, just off Interstate 90, and you could jog to the Iowa border in a couple of hours. Hormel, the Fortune 500 meat and food processing company, was founded in Austin, and still has its corporate offices and a packing plant there. Austin’s got a Target now, and one of those sprawling, nondescript clusters of chain restaurants and retail establishments that you see everywhere these days. It didn’t have any of that stuff at the time I moved away. I can still remember, in fact, when McDonald’s first came to town.

    As I sat in my room at the Days Inn eating a pizza from Steve’s, my all-time favorite pizza place and the source of many of my happiest memories of Austin, I tried to think of whom I would define as the living legends of my hometown. Suddenly, I felt just like the people I’d been talking to for the last week. I honestly couldn’t think of anyone. There were my old friends Otto McDermott, a long-haired plumber who drove a van with the yin-yang symbol painted on the side, and John Beckmann, a lawyer and one of the best writers and most interesting people I’ve ever met. Both of these guys had been instrumental in introducing me to a world outside of Austin, and were legends to me, but I have no idea how the other people in town saw them.

    For a town of its size, Austin has produced more than its fair share of accomplished and distinguished people. The late Pulitzer Prize-winning poet Richard Eberhart was born and raised there. Novelist Tim O’Brien, football coach and analyst John Madden, and golfer Tom Lehman were all born in my hometown. Mike Wuertz, a pitcher currently with the Chicago Cubs, played high school baseball in Austin. I have no doubt that the stages of Branson are crowded with talented former Austinites.

    I had absolutely no idea who might live there now, however, other than, I’m sure, lots of intelligent, interesting, and talented people who were nonetheless not living legends. At this point I had no idea, in fact, what I ever might have thought the term “living legend” implied, other than a woman who had once appeared on Let’s Make a Deal.

    The next day I went in search of the Mower County Historical Society, which was located at the fairgrounds in Austin and which I had never visited. It was a pretty impressive place, full of interesting stuff and fantastic photos. There were lots of dance posters from the old Terp Ballroom (“Old Time Dance Every Friday Night”), which I remembered as a roller skating rink from when I was kid. These days it’s some sort of church.

    Jacky Pierskalla, the society’s director, and Polly Jelinek, its secretary, mulled my challenge.

    “If this was twenty years ago, you’d be in business,” Jelinek said. “Nowadays people move on.”

    Death, of course, is the ultimate form of moving on, and in a dimly lit room inside the Historical Society building I discovered a monument to one more dead man’s obsession that is almost the equal of Francis Johnson’s twine ball in Darwin. William Tyrer’s “Wild Animal Three-Ring Circus,” assembled over more than fifteen years, is a sprawling and startlingly detailed creation. Composed of carved and modeled figurines and elaborate props, Tyrer’s spectacular circus includes hundreds of pieces, ranging from clowns and wild animals to trapeze artists and lion tamers. There are indeed three rings, all of them hives of activity, and contained under a giant canvas tent that is packed to the rafters with visual stimuli. Even the peripheries are busy with minute details, and outside the tent there are dozens of wagons and all manner of behind-the-scenes hubbub.

    Pierskalla and Jelinek didn’t know much about Tyrer other than the bare-bones details that are displayed with his tabletop circus: He worked for Hormel for forty-seven years and died in 1969. During the years Tyrer worked on his labor of obvious love, he was a member of something called the Circus Model Builder’s Club, and once displayed his creation at the Circus World Museum in Baraboo, Wisconsin.

    Tyrer did have a son, Kenny, who was still living in town, I was told, and I was given a phone number. I tried to get ahold of Kenny Tyrer every day for a week, but nobody ever answered the phone at his home. Unsurprisingly, he did not have an answering machine.

    I spent a great deal of time marveling at William Tyrer’s circus, and it gave me some small encouragement that there might still be people out there in towns all over the state who are working away at similar wonders in absolute obscurity.

    While I was browsing around the historical society I stumbled across a photograph of Knauer’s, a tiny meat market downtown that had been a museum of exotica even in the Austin of my youth. It was an old-school, throwback market of the type that must have once existed in small towns all over America, and at a time when even the most out-of-the-way places have Wal-Marts, Targets, and all manner of twenty-four-hour Super Stores, it was a genuine relic. Every time I returned to my old hometown I was both astonished and relieved to see that Knauer’s was still surviving, and I’d been going in there on Christmas Eve for oysters, cheese, and bulk candy for as long as I could remember. It was a place that I’d always taken for granted, and I realized that I knew nothing whatsoever about its history.

    After I left the Historical Society I stopped off at Knauer’s on my way downtown to the library. The almost impossibly cramped little market was bustling, and there were three generations of Knauers working behind the scenes—Bob (who admitted that he was “almost eighty”), his son Mark, and his grandson Bob.

    Knauer’s, the elder Bob told me, has been in business since 1886, and when I asked him how long he’d been at it, he answered, “I’ve been going since six o’clock this morning, unloading semi loads of beef.” He had, it turned out, been going a lot longer than that. He’s been working at the family market for sixty-five years, with a little time off for military service, and grew up in a house next door.

    “This is pretty much it,” Knauer says. “The Knauers are meat cutters, and they’ve always been meat cutters. This is the only thing I’ve ever done, and in all those years I’ve never gotten a promotion.”

    Looking at the historical photos of the market that adorn the walls, it’s apparent that the basic layout of the place hasn’t changed much in over a century. When Bob’s grandfather, Tony Sr., first came over from Austria, the Knauers were sausage makers, a trade that Tony had learned in Vienna. In the early years, the family ran a small slaughterhouse just outside town, and had a sausage factory and smokehouse behind the market.

    “You didn’t have refrigeration or suppliers in those days,” Bob says, “so you pretty much had to do everything yourself. At one time we had nine meat cutters going like gangbusters ten hours a day back here.”

    The Knauers have held onto their history over the years; the original smokehouse still stands out back, and a number of original fixtures—an icebox, a meat locker with an imposing oak door, and a cash register—have all been preserved, or at least left alone. There’s also a huge black onyx safe in the back room that had the lock blown off in a robbery once upon a time.

    They still cut their own meat at Knauers, and Black Angus steaks are the market’s specialty.

    “Quality is everything in a business like this,” Bob said. “If you don’t have quality you’re not gonna be around for long. We’re hanging in there, but we’re pretty much the last of the Mohicans. It’s always a battle running a place like this. It always has been. There’s so much competition, and there’s more all the time. The nice thing about keeping things in the family is that you always have plenty of helping hands.”

    In the two days I spent in Austin, nobody I talked to mentioned Bob Knauer when I inquired about local, or living, legends, and it occurred to me that there was something seriously flawed in not just my own conception of what a legend was, but also with the conception of virtually everyone else I’d talked to.

    Try to think of your neighborhood or orbit of friends as a small town. Who among the people who populate that town would you describe to a stranger as a living legend? What would be your criteria for making this determination?

    Look around. Surely there are people like William Tryer and Bob Knauer in your midst. There must be, even if they seem like nothing more than average Joes to the people who live just up the street. Surely all of the legends in your little world aren’t dead, are they?

    No, surely they’re not.

    Of course they’re not.