Year: 2006

  • There She Goes Again

    The current Minneapolis epicenter of prostitution, at least if you ask the neighbors, centers on the residential streets around Hiawatha Avenue and Lake Street East. The area is so active that an all-volunteer, amateur “John Patrol” has sprung up in order to keep an eye on things. The foot patrollers have been known to rat out a prostitute or two, and they reserve a special disdain for pimps, but their true raison d’être is intimidating the men who venture into their neighborhood to pick from the hookers. The rotating clan of about a half-dozen is mostly women, proud residents of the Corcoran neighborhood, and they will resort to just about any measure short of a direct confrontation: staring, copying down license plate numbers, stopping by to see the truck-drivers who often park along a nearby residential street, and especially dialing the police.

    This is difficult work, so the John Patrol members like to make themselves useful in other ways, too. For example, they pick up litter as they go—fast-food wrappers, intravenous drug needles, used condoms.

    One recent evening, on the hunt for johns, the patrollers passed several dilapidated rental properties with buckling mini-blinds drawn over foggy windows, beer bottles strewn across the front lawns. “There’s the brothel,” said Sarah, a founding member of the patrol, gesturing toward one such house. The group kept walking, and waved to the retired-age couple next door, who were enjoying a cookout on their back patio.

    Conversation found that the patrollers had schooled themselves in the ways of the street, and even reveled in some of the details. A middle-aged white woman described how Sur-13, “a Laotian/Latin gang,” had tagged her house several times. Jeff, a white forty-something patroller, claimed to have seen a drug deal go down at the gas station we’d just passed. Mike, a lifelong Corcoran resident in his early thirties, also white, described the night a friend dropped him home after a Pearl Jam concert; several prostitutes banged on the windows of his car. Sarah, showing her savvy, claimed to be on a first-name basis with several hookers.

    At various points, female residents of Corcoran have been mistaken for prostitutes. They were not flattered. For example, Sarah, an attractive thirty-something with a thin build, tattoos, and chestnut hair streaked with blonde and auburn, says she gets pestered by johns “all the time.” Kathy, a bottle-blonde forty-something who favors black eyeliner and, for the occasion of patrolling in eighty-five-degree heat, black athletic shorts and a matching tank top, said she had been honked at and waved to earlier that very day. This was by “an old guy in a green van, old enough to be my grandfather” who then circled the block to get a better look.

    The johns are understandably confused because prostitutes these days don’t necessarily strut their stuff in hot pants and spiked heels. On various patrols, I saw all manner of looks. One evening, we strode past a wan, middle-aged white woman with cropped black hair whose dusty jeans and unadorned white T-shirt hung loosely from her bony frame. Sarah leaned in to say that the woman was definitely a prostitute. On a hot Sunday morning, while parking my car, I noticed a potbellied Asian woman strutting up the avenue in a denim skirt and gauzy floral tank top. Was she a hooker? The lack of a dress code meant that everyone was suspect. Later, when walking with the patrol, the Asian woman passed by once more and several patrollers confirmed that she was indeed a lady of the night.

    Turning the corner onto Thirty-first Street, near South High, the John Patrol spotted a prostitute sitting on a retaining wall. She wore a white blouse, high heels, and fashionable cropped jeans—quite glamorous. From across the street, I discerned that she’d taken care to iron her blonde hair smooth. “That’s Carrie,” said Sarah, who went on to describe how much more beautiful Carrie had been before falling into drugs and prostitution. Another patroller dialed her cell phone. When the police arrived, moments later, Carrie rose to her feet and unceremoniously placed her hands on the hood of the squad car. Not having been caught in the act, she was released with a warning.

    A moment later, Carrie came stomping up Longfellow Avenue, just ten paces behind us, and I got a better view of the leathered skin that had tarnished her looks. As Carrie stood knocking at the front door of a “bad house,” a big, dark van bearing two plump black men came rolling by at five miles per hour. The word “pimp” was uttered by a few speculative patrollers. But after nailing a parking spot, the driver of the van waved to and thanked the group for its efforts. He even offered to lend a hand at a later date, explaining that he thought the walking might help him and his wife lose weight. The balloon popped on a tense moment. Everyone exhaled. Two patrollers crossed out the van’s license plate number in their notebooks.

  • A Special Skewer

    One must be awful careful these days when bringing up H. L. Mencken. The “Bard of Baltimore” was an inspiration to a generation of plain-talking columnists long before Molly Ivins or Maureen Dowd were even born—or before anyone in journalism worried about hurting people’s feelings. Mencken’s specialty was puncturing the pomposity and pointing out the peccadilloes of the privileged. However, he was no great champion of the common man. He reviled ignorance even more than he did corruption. As he said, “All professional philosophers tend to assume that common sense means the mental habit of the common man. Nothing could be further from the mark. The common man is chiefly to be distinguished by his plentiful lack of common sense: he believes things on evidence that is too scanty, or that distorts the plain facts, or that is full of non sequiturs.” 

    According to Mencken, the main cause of ignorance was religion, especially the kind practiced by an “auctioneer of God,” i.e. a Protestant Bible-thumping tent revivalist—or, if you will, today’s television evangelist. Indeed, he maintained that one of the most destructive acts in the history of man was translating the Bible into the vernacular, thus making its fables accessible to the uncritical, uneducated vulgarian. These translations amounted to putting the Bible’s interpretation into the hands of the auctioneers instead of keeping it within the exclusive circles of the learned clergy of the Latin Church, which, “despite its frequent astounding imbecilities, has always kept clearly before it the fact that religion is not a syllogism, but a poem.”

    While he had utmost disdain for bombastic preachers, Mencken reserved a special place on his skewer for those who, like William Jennings Bryan, made their political fortunes by pandering to the religious rubes. Mencken’s accounts of the Scopes “Monkey Trial” of 1925 are entertaining for their piquant descriptions of the hypocrisy rampant among the citizens of Dayton, Tennessee. (It’s almost as if he, Jeremiah-like, foretells the “auctioneering” that would come from the likes of Jimmy Swaggart and Jim Bakker two-thirds of a century later.) But the obituary he composed for Bryan, the three-time presidential candidate who led the prosecution of Scopes, and died five days after the end of the trial, is unique in its venom, not just for Bryan himself, but for his natural constituency: the inhabitants of “every country town in the South and West.”

    Here’s my favorite excerpt: “[Bryan] felt at home in such simple and Christian scenes. He liked people who sweated freely, and were not debauched by the refinements of the toilet. Making his progress up and down the Main street of little Dayton, surrounded by gaping primates from the upland valleys of the Cumberland Range … he was obviously happy.” In case you missed the “primate” reference, there’s another one further on: “The simian gabble of the crossroads was not gabble to him, but wisdom of an occult and superior sort. In the presence of city folks, he was palpably uneasy.”

    But, even more damning than the mere fact of Bryan’s consorting with the rednecks, were his reasons for doing so. Mencken explained it like this: “He [was] deluded by a childish theology, full of an almost pathological hatred of all learning, all human dignity, all beauty and fine and noble things … He was born with a roaring voice, and it had the trick of inflaming half-wits. His whole career was devoted to raising those half-wits against their betters, that he himself might shine … His one yearning was to keep his yokels heated up—to lead his forlorn mob of imbeciles against the foe.”

    I keep a book of Mencken’s essays by my bedside and page through them when I’m bored with what I’m currently reading, or extremely tired of the predictability of those pale simulacra of Mencken who pass for newspaper columnists today. Wouldn’t it be wonderful to open a paper one morning and see what Mencken would have to say about Dennis Hastert and his “American Values Agenda,” or Hillary Clinton and her flag-burning legislation, or Michele Bachmann and gay marriage?

    Not that I believe today’s newspapers would dare print anything so vicious.

    Besides, what would really be the point? No one has yet improved upon Mencken’s assessment of such politicians: “The worst government is often the most moral. One composed of cynics is often very tolerant and humane. But when fanatics are on top there is no limit to oppression.”

  • The Conservative Idealist Speaks

    Rake columnist Clinton Collins states that I failed to answer a young law student that queried me about legacy admissions at elite universities [Free the Jackson Five, July]. In all fairness to Collins, there was quite a bit of cross talking during the discussion he recounted, so it is possible that he did not hear my response.

    It is an odd game of absolutism Collins plays. He takes the position that all forms of discrimination are equal and that any preference given is therefore equally pernicious. Reason suggests this is untrue. Our society has rightly decided that among the varying and unequal forms of discrimination, racial discrimination is particularly abhorrent. As a result our laws prohibit such discrimination. There is, alas, no such law barring the practice of colleges admitting the children of alumni.

    Further, the academic qualifications of legacy students generally match those of non-legacy applicants. At Harvard, Collins’ alma mater, the average SAT score of legacy students is just two points below the school’s overall average. Middle-class black students, on the other hand, score a combined two hundred points below their white and Asian peers on college admissions tests.

    So Collins’ contention that the issue of preferences is not a question of brainpower is also wrong. It is precisely the question: Can black students compete academically with their white and Asian counterparts? Dear as my friend is, he and other race-preference supporters advocate a system that screams “black academic and intellectual inferiority.”

    Collins also asserts that we need racial preferences so long as there is any hint of race prejudice in the world. Collins, however, is not a latter-day Coalhouse Walker and current affirmative action policies haven’t a thing to do with race prejudice; they are instead an effort to orchestrate diversity. Black students are not being denied entrance to universities due to race. Universities are bending over backward to enroll black students. Finding a paucity of eligible black students, they must lower standards in order to get a critical mass of black students on their university campuses. “Critical mass” is what the Supreme Court defined in Grutter v. Bollinger as “enough minority students to provide adequate opportunities for the kind of interaction upon which the educational benefits of diversity depend … ”

    Rather than address the lack of competitiveness among black students during the discussion, Collins offered politically correct phrases like: “Not lowered standards; different standards.” What remains unclear is this: Where there is no evidence of racial discrimination in admissions, and if there is no shortage of brainpower, why must our students be evaluated using different standards?

    Black youngsters achieve excellence in athletics, dance, and music through practice, dedication, and the high expectations of their family and peers. Shouldn’t we demand a similar dedication and hold equally high standards when it comes to academics? If I became frosty during the discussion, it is because I am admittedly angry that we can so effortlessly embrace the notion that black inferiority is perpetual and that our academic success is impossible without help. The one thing Collins got right is that both of us were raised to know better.

    Joseph C. Phillips, Los Angeles

  • Graphic Designers Are People …uh, Artists, Too

    Having lived through and worked through the era, I appreciated Cathy Madison’s “We went crazy for a decade” and would have liked to have seen specific reference made to Butler Square. As a designer I officed there during the late 1970s into the early 1980s and the place uniquely reflected an aesthetic hybrid bridging the creative/artistic and “yuppie” sensibilities that Madison writes about as separate sensibilities.

    Although not typically considered a “fine art,” I would have also appreciated more elaboration about or reference to the then-emerging Twin Cities graphic design scene. Also of note: As a writer and editor (Format, the Advertising Federation of Minnesota’s magazine) Cathy Madison’s role in shaping this era and communicating about it is also memorable and significant.
    Thanks for publishing her piece. It brought back, even if for a few pages, a unique era in the Twin Cities creative community for those familiar with—as well as for those unaware of—this history.

    Patrick Redmond, St. Paul

  • Too Many Men in This Picture

    Thanks for the great revisit of the art scene in 1980s. At first I thought it was just another nostalgic article, but it got better as I read through it. Then I remembered that someone (Churchill?) once said something about studying history. If we don’t know our history, we are destined to repeat it. (That’s what I remember of the quote.) So that got me to thinking a bit more.

    A couple of things popped into my head. First, what happened to the women artists from WARM gallery? Several male artists were mentioned by name in that article. So, did the women die? Are they still around here? Who are they? Second, are we learning from history? Does anyone realize why it is important to have artists? What specific things about an artist’s lifetime of work makes her art important? Does anyone have a larger answer beyond obtaining grants and selling to General Mills? I do appreciate that you once again covered the 1980s. There are so many twentysomethings who don’t know how hard the artists from that era worked to get attention for the arts.

    Loretta Bebeau, Minneapolis

  • Let Me Hear the Ladies

    I was glad to see Cathy Madison’s “look back at a gritty underappreciated decade” of the Minneapolis art scene in the 80s. I’m pleased that she acknowledged that the “first-gallery bragging rights went to the Women’s Art Registry of Minnesota,” WARM Gallery, as it was then known. I was disappointed that the rest of the article didn’t mention any of the women artists who were very visible and active during that time. I would like to invite Cathy Madison to see what was happening at WARM in that lively decade by going to see the current exhibition at the Weisman Art Museum—WARM: 12 Artists of the Women’s Art Registry of Minnesota. [Editor’s note: the exhibition runs through September 17.]

    Harriet Bart, Minneapolis

  • Who Profits to Nonprofit Art?

    Cathy Madison’s “We went crazy for a decade” [July] was a truly pleasurable trip down memory lane—a guilty pleasure, at that, recalling for me the days of fashionable poverty and gallery internships. I spent my student loan money on trips to Chicago and New York, bounced back and forth between the U’s fine arts department and MCAD, and generally frittered away my time surfing the already-waning synergy of the late-80s and early-90s art scene.

    Probably to conserve length, Madison blurs the distinctions between what was and is the commercial gallery sector versus the huge number of non-profits: a spectrum shift seen over the past twenty years that has real bearing on the future of the Twin Cities art scene. A respected and established framer and exhibition designer in the Northrup King complex recently made his feelings plain: Non-profit galleries don’t exist to make a living for their artists, and they’re ruining the art market. They sponge up grant funds while cultivating “presence,” making stars primarily of their founders, and keeping local prices artificially low. I’ve worked for WARM, for No Name Gallery in its day, and for more contemporary “art centers” as well as having been a for-profit dealer. Commercial galleries still struggle to survive in a pinched urban market, competing with art centers while the cash is increasingly concentrated in the Republican suburbs (a desert of flat-screen TVs, fund raisers and NIMBYism). Local and national foundations have bounced back since September 11th, and the urban non-profit art centers vie hungrily for their attentions, with curatorial efforts increasingly built around “fundable projects.”

    At the same time, a top-down ethical hollowness that mirrors the corporate culture of our times results in margin over mission: non-profit organizations that are opposite to the “of, by, and for” alternative art spaces we used to enjoy. The Soap Factory is the lone exception. Artists, bottom line, are still very much on their own in this town. While Madison ends her tour on a hopeful note, I tend to side with Scott Seekins (minus his fondness for fishing): Between the anti-intellectual penury of the suburbs and a city saturated with non-profit art sponges, this town cannot nurture a viable market for most visual artists.

    Jennifer A. Schultz, Minneapolis

  • Charles Baxter and George Rabasa

    There’s no telling what might be on the table at this tête-à-tête hosted by the splashy new Central Library, but a lively, rambling conversation is all but guaranteed. University of Minnesota Professor Charles Baxter has written a batch of widely acclaimed books of poetry as well as prose (including The Feast of Love, a National Book Award finalist), while George Rabasa, a recipient of the Writer’s Capricorn Award for Excellence in Fiction and a two-time Minnesota Book Award winner, has recently published a new novel, The Cleansing (The Permanent Press). Through readings and discussion of their work (and presumably that of other writers), Baxter and Rabasa will discuss the dynamics of action and conflict in fiction. 300 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis; 612-630-6000; www.friendsofmpl.org

  • Pazzanni

    While school’s out, young trapezists around the Cities can finally get about the business of putting on a proper circus. Showcasing the acrobatic prowess of Circus Juventas’ most advanced performers, Pazzanni, a production based on the famed carnivales of sixteenth-century Venice, promises to be a locally grown Cirque du Soleil-style spectacle—one whose tickets are far more affordable than what the famed French-Canadians charge. And even though Circus Juventas is a troupe of K-12 aerialists, this production is more than kids’ stuff: A pair of master Venetian mask-makers have come to town for the occasion—the very ones responsible for the masks in the movie Eyes Wide Shut. 1270 Montreal Ave., St. Paul; 651-209-6799; www.uptowntix.com

  • Leah Cooper

    Cooper has been the plucky executive director of the Minnesota Fringe Festival for the past five years, bringing the beloved assemblage of offbeat theater back from the brink of financial despair and growing it into the largest non-juried performing arts festival in the country. (There are now fourteen of them nationwide, and about fifty-three Fringe Festivals in the entire world.) But this is to be her last season overseeing this sometimes chaotic undertaking—she submitted her resignation earlier this year. When we caught up with Cooper recently, she was entrenched in the process of hiring her replacement, as well as, of course, preparing for the onslaught of camp, confessionals, and kung fu that commences on August 3.

    So what the heck would make you leave the Fringe?

    It’s just really that I’ve been here for a very long time. The previous two executive directors stayed for just four years each, so I’m already past the track record for burnout. But it’s not really burnout. It’s just that I’ve accomplished everything I set out to. I sort of saw coming in to rescue the Fringe as a way to help the community, as a way to give something back. And I feel like I’ve done that now. The job has been so demanding, but I’m an artist myself and it hasn’t left a lot of room for my own creations.
    Also, my husband and I love to travel.

    So, how did you go about rescuing the Fringe?

    Well, the first thing was digging the festival out of a deficit. Prior to my coming on, in 2001, the festival had grown so rapidly on the outside, in terms of number of shows, numbers of audience members, and press coverage. But the institution hadn’t at all grown. Dean Seal [the Fringe’s previous executive director] had taken it over on his own with hardly any pay and it had just reached a point where it was too big for its infrastructure. So we’ve added the systems to support it all. We’ve hired staff. We’ve grown our funding base. We’ve incorporated promotions and publicity. Also, my life before the Fringe was in software—I was a database engineer. So we’ve also improved the accounting system and things like that.

    About this husband you speak of. We understand you recently tied the knot with local playwright Alan Berks.

    Yes. We were married in April.

    How’d you meet him?

    Through the Fringe Festival. He was here [in Minneapolis] on a Jerome fellowship through the Playwrights Center. And the fellows had invited various members of the theater community to come out with them, to help them get a sense of the theater scene. It was Alan’s job to get together with me. He and I had coffee and three hours later I was like, ‘Huh, I kind of like him.’

    What’s next for you two?

    We’ve leaving October 1. We’ve sold our house and everything in it and we’re planning an extended backpacking trip through South America.

    Will you ever be back?

    Oh, yeah. We both consider Minneapolis home. He’s from Chicago originally. And I’m from Los Angeles. But we’re two happy transplants.

    The Minnesota Fringe Festival runs August 3 through 13. For more information, visit the beast of a website Cooper helped build: http://www.fringefestival.org.