Author: Peter Schilling

  • How Theater, Music, and a Little Love Toppled the Empire

    livesofothers1.gif

    Das Leben der Anderen (The Lives of Others)
    , 2006. Written and Directed by Florian Hanckel von Donnersmarck. Starring Ulrich Muhe, Sebastian Koch, Christa-Maria Sieland, Ulrich Tukur, Thomas Thieme, Hans-Uew Bauer, and Volkmar Kleinert.

    Now showing exclusively at the Uptown Theatre.

    Legend has it that Lenin, upon encountering Beethoven’s Appassionata Sonata, claimed that he could not bear to hear it anymore, for it made him want to stroke the heads of men… as opposed to smashing them in, which is what he felt he needed to do to get his revolution off the ground. Filmmaker Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck wondered to himself, “Was it possible to construct a situation in whcih Lenin would be forced to listen to the Appasionata?” In the Lives of Others a man, a functionary who has submerged all of his humanity in pursuit of a perfect state, is forced to listen. And he becomes real.

    The Lives of Others begins in an interrogation room, with a poor man accused of… something. We are never sure what, and what doesn’t matter. What are sure of, however, is that this is a paranoid country, East Germany, and the Stasi, the secret police of said country, is powerful. The man is shoved into a chair, told to place his hands beneath his thighs, and the questioning begins.

    This guy has no chance, as the state has men like Gerd Weisler (the great Ulrich Muhe) working diligently for them. This opening is brilliant–told in flashback, as Weisler is teaching other young hopefuls the art of wrecking the spirit of their countrymen. Weisler is perfect at his job, betraying only the slightest pride in a job well done, making notes to watch the student who wonders about the morality of some of his techniques. Weisler is almost a machine–he has the patience of a metronome ticking away through a long evening. He will do what it takes to make his prisoners confess, never questioning their guilt. For if they are in the chair in front of him, there can be no question.

    His former classmate and now superior, the merrily ambitious Grubitz (Ulrich Tukur), asks his pal Weisler to come to a night of theater. Grubitz is interested in his friend’s opinion of the playwright, Georg Dreyman (Sebastien Koch). Dreyman is the darling of the state, and a man who truly believes in the cause of the GDP. It’s not enough–we know, deep down, that it is never enough. “I would watch him,” Weisler says. And so the man too good to be spied up is spied upon.

    Of course, it is Weisler who will spy on Dreyman, and to the snoop’s surprise, he will begin to fall in love. Not with Dreyman’s lover, the actress Christa-Maria (Martina Gedek), not with Georg, but with the ideas of love and art and honesty. By listening to the lives of others, Weisler comes to understand that they are quite alike.

    Weisler’s fall, if you can call it that, begins slowly. He is punctual and not to be undone by emotion. But as he listens, he is forced to hear the sounds of two people truly in love, people in love with their plays, with Bertolt Brecht, with their friends, and, in the case of Georg, in love with the idea of the state. This is the film’s great conceit: Weisler and Georg are two halves of the same coin–passionate for what they do, ideal citizens, taking to heart what the country is supposed to mean–brotherhood and all its trimmings. Weisler comes to understand that they are more alike, in fact, than his superiors, one of whom is fucking Christa-Maria because he knows a secret that would get her kicked off the stage forever–she is a drug user. Weisler’s soon discovers, too, that his friend is simply a pencil-pushing beaurocrat who only wants to move up in the world–he has no qualms ruining the life of a young man simply telling a joke, or ignoring warnings of sabotage if it will hurt his career. Weisler comes to see that it is his subjects who are true to the state, not the party functionaries.

    Slowly we come to care for this Weisler, who steals a copy of Brecht, who listens to the music emanating from the apartment below, and who eavesdrops on their lovemaking not as a peeping tom in search of a cheap thrill, but as a poet in search of inspiration, hoping to find love in his own dark heart.

    So Weisler intervenes, hiding information and trying to protect his charges, which leads to disastrous results. The Lives of Others is a remarkable film, for its tension, which locks upon you like a vice, forcing you at times to root for the wrong people (such as when Weisler has to bug Georg’s building), and its nearly unbearable emotional charge. The film is funny in spots, humane, its plot, worthy of Hitchcock, never getting in the way of rich character development. We come to know every one of these people, and even the tiniest character is shown ground up by the state–and later freed, when the wall comes down.

    The jokes in the film offer welcome relief of an almost unbearable tension, but also drive home what this whole world is about, and how disastrous and dehumanizing it was. At one point, Weisler elicits the services of a prositute who, in one of the films many damning jokes, is as much on a schedule as he is in his spy work. Life in the GDP is too comparmentalized to allow for love.

    The Lives of Others has two endings. The first is expected, not predictable, but we know good things will not happen. And then the director surprises us, and time moves on, the wall comes down, and there is a brief moment of justice. After years of paranoia, of devouring souls and wrecking lives, the state is broken, and the individual is allowed to flourish. Left nearly broken, our hero, Wiesler, will grab at the small taste of love, poetry, and freedom.

    livesofothers2.gif

  • This Weekend: Gallic Alternatives in Downtown

    theson1.gif

    Le Fils (The Son), 2002. Written and directed by the Dardenne brothers. Starring Olivier Gourmet and Morgan Marinne. Showing Friday night at 7pm.

    and for the children:

    Les Contes de la Rue Broca. Directed by Pierre Gripari. Showing Sunday afternoon at 2pm.

    Both films are being shown downtown at the Alliance Francaise de Minneapolis/St. Paul.

    Sick of the Oscars? By now we’ve had nearly a month of ‘controversies’, a month of wandering past those bright yellow Little Miss Sunshine boxes at the video store, of hearing the film pundits bark about Dreamgirls. Yeah, you could go and see The Departed or Babel if you really want to, or you could see a movie downtown. And not at Block E. No, you could visit the Alliance Francaise in the heart of the lovely warehouse district, where you can catch, this Friday, the Dardenne Brothers’ Le Fils. You could even enjoy the snow they predict will be falling, as you wander out of some fancy restaurant and walk through the romance to the Alliance. In fact, you ought to get some romantic mileage just saying “Alliance Francaise” over dinner–it just sounds sweet, doesn’t it?

    I do have to say, however, that Le Fils is not exactly an upbeat movie. But it is beautiful, a simple and yet compelling treatise on forgiveness. A week after Valentines Day, maybe you’re back to fighting and need some of that. Le Fils is the story of a broken man, Olivier, a shop teacher at a school for wayward boys, who becomes obsessed about one of his charges. That is all you will get from me, for the story unfolds patiently, and when it reveals its secrets, it is devastating.

    More importantly, though, is the Alliance’s Sunday children’s show. It appears that the AF is going to screen children’s features, aimed at the very young (under 7, please), the last Sunday of every month, at least through April. I say ‘most importantly’ because alternative children’s films are scarce. Kids have it rough: where adults can take in Norbit or highbrow fare like Volver, what do kids have? Nothing but third-rate cartoons and CGI on the big screen.

    In fact, I would argue that Le Fils would be good fare for the wayward teen. A great night out even if they aren’t wayward. But I digress…

    Frankly, I couldn’t find much on Les Contes de la Rue Broca, except that it seems to be based on a popular French storybook about North African immigrants. The film will be in French (of course) without subtitles. So it looks to be not only a great afternoon treat for your kids in French immersion classes, but a really nifty story about a side of Paris we might not have ever thought about. Which is just what you want from a kids film!

    Both features will have light refreshments (popcorn, pop, water–no wine, as this is Minneapolis, not Cannes), and a suggested donation of $5. For directions, visit the Alliance Francaise website.

  • For Your Lunch Break: Trailers, Trailers, Trailers!

    Now that we’re hip-deep in the muck of the winter movie season, we can look ahead to some of the more promising flicks–March and April, in particular, offer some tantalizing choices. I recall my younger days back in old Mt. Pleasant, MI, and the spring giving us little more than cheap horror, lousy John Hughes rip-offs, and tepid romantic comedies. I’d grab the Sunday New York Times and drool over the ads for the art-house flicks and wish, wish, wish that Tom Cruise would drop dead.

    Today, of course, we have the internet, DVDs, and the like, to make the urchins back in my home-town waste their hours more productively. Those kids have coffee shops and laptop computers and… ah, hell.

    Anyway, I’m always impressed by trailers, their ability to sum up a movie in a minute or two. Thus far, the best trailers I’ve seen in the past few months have advertised two of the worst movies I’ve seen: Little Children and the forthcoming Black Snake Moan. So take these with a grain of salt.

    Grindhouse. What a concept: a double-feature (literally, there’s two full-length movies) by Robert Rodriguez and Quentin Tarantino, with trailers and ads in between. Three to four hours of blood and gore and sex like only they could offer up. It just occurred to me, though, that Tarantino might just be more prudish than we think–has there ever been a nude scene in any of his films? I don’t think so… The trailer is awesome, the movies look like they’ll be at least entertaining, though Rodriguez is unbelievably erratic. Could be a long night.

    Zodiac. Lots of blood this spring. But this feature is already being billed as David Fincher’s (Se7en, Fight Club) masterpiece, two-and-a-half hours of utter tension. The story of the pursuit of San Francisco’s notorious Zodiac killer, this one’s being marketed brilliantly–great trailer, and they’re sending us critics these creepy replicas of the Zodiac’s Halloween cards. Eesh. Looks tremendously entertaining.

    The rest of these have decent trailers, but the movies themselves… well, we’ll see:

    Across the Universe. 60s musical featuring songs of the Beatles sung by the beautiful people! Didn’t they do this already with Hair?

    Pride. The story of an African-American teacher in inner-city Philadelphia who, unbelievably, starts a swim team for the local toughs who can’t shoot hoops because they took the net down. What?! ‘Based on true events’ (what does that mean exactly?), the trailer’s fun until it devolves into a literal weep-fest, which means the movie’s much worse. I bet there’ll be a good soundtrack, though.

    The Valet and Angel A. Two French films, one a typical sex comedy, the other a sexy action film. The first, a long-suffering valet accidentally walks into a paparazzi shot of a prominent and very married man walking with his lover, a supermodel. In order to protect his marriage, his handlers pay the valet to date and live with the supermodel, to make it seem that she was on that streetcorner with him. Get it? Like a croissant, The Valet could be buttery and light, a simple joy, or it could be dense and cheap and off-putting with its artificial taste.

    Of the second, Angel A is about a punk in trouble with the local mob gets help in the form of a long-legged, sexy, sexy, sexy angel. She dispatches the mob, no doubt undresses, and vanishes. Is she the devil? What? From the guy who brought us The Fifth Element and The Professional. Will this film be the devil (as in, awful) or an angel (as in, fun).


    Hot Fuzz
    is the new comedy from the guys who brought us Shaun of the Dead, which had its moments of brilliance. This one looks to have the same moments, especially in the scene where Simon Pegg points out that a fellow detective has a Guinness moustache. This time, Pegg is sending up action films. We’ll see.

  • Sunday Sermon: Thieves Like Us

    wanda.gif

    Wanda, 1971. Written and directed by Barbara Loden. Starring Loden, Michael Higgins, Jerome Thier, and Frank Jourdano.

    You Only Live Once, 1937. Directed by Fritz Lang, written by Gene Towne and C. Graham Baker. Starring Henry Fonda, Sylvia Sidney, Barton MacLane, Jean Dixon, William Gargan, Jerome Cowan, John Wray Walter, and Guinn ‘Big Boy’ Williams.

    Who’s in prison today? The poor, minorities mostly, those gang-bangers who make us shudder en route to a night of fine dining in Block E? One thing I’m certain of: they’re no longer Clyde Barrow or Al Capone. Someone as handsome as Warren Beatty or trafficking in such luscious diversions as bathtub gin only inspires our imaginations, not our fears. We love those guys. Why, we have tours of Capone’s favorite hideouts, restaurants advertise as the place where bootleggers go, and Prohibition was a blast, don’t you know? Keillor telling us he used to imagine himself as Starkweather, but I doubt you’re gonna get any white writer to say he or she thinks of themselves as some kind of drug dealer, the Capone of today. Crime films, like those in the 30s and 70s, championed the white criminal, pushed into his or her trade by forces beyond their control, victims of an unjust and ironic world. Johnny Cash played concerts to these fellows. No one plays concerts to jailbirds anymore.

    If a guy pulls a gun on you, what difference does it make if he’s white or black? Well, in Hollywood, it makes the difference between boffo box office and a big-fat flop.

    Look there, at Fritz Lang’s You Only Live Once and Barbara Loden’s Wanda. 1930s. 1970s. In the first, an innocent man is convicted for a crime he didn’t commit. He’s a three time loser, this Eddie Taylor (Hank Fonda). His wife, Joan (Sylvia Sidney), implores him to give up at first, to trust the system. He does, fails to beat the rap, goes to jail to wait on the chair. And look at that prison! A gulag of hardworking European immigrants, many guilty as sin; others, like Eddie, victims of circumstance. It was the Depression after all. We can forgive these boys, with their funny way of talking tough, their hardened camaraderie. Lang makes Hank Fonda growl and rage with more intensity than he ever showed before (ever–it’s an amazing performance), and we growl and rage right along with him. When he busts out and kills a priest in the process, we’re aghast at the injustice. Eddie and Joan, on the lam, will meet a rough end, but they’ll also reach some sort of spiritual catharsis.

    Wanda, on the other hand, is just no good. She’s a white-trash blonde from Pennsylvania coal-country, who simply gives her husband the divorce he’s seeking (in order to be with a woman who will actually care for the pair of kids he and Wanda have sired) and she’s off, without money, hooking up with some of the most honestly portrayed men in cinematic history–losers all, yet everyone in possession of a tiny slice of dignity. Barbara Loden’s film is incredible in that it doesn’t politicize Wanda’s journey from man to man and finally to Mr. Dennis, a criminal who takes her on a bumbling and fatal robbery spree. Loden doesn’t care to damn Wanda, nor does she elevate her to being some sort of feminist icon, or a symbol of the free-love, wanderin’ decade. Wanda is simply a silly, lost woman, not bright, who seeks love in all the wrong places and whose ennui defines her. Nothing goes right for her, nothing will ever go right for her. We know that, and still we’re riveted by her sad story.

    Now imagine, if you will, a remake of both of these films today. Would we, white audiences (my guess is that Rake readers are predominantly white) who make up the lion’s share of the box office, embrace a black Eddie on the lam for a job he didn’t commit? Some three time loser from the North side, black and not wearing suits and ties (as Eddie does in this film), but as equally articulate as Fonda (Eddie’s a handsome and sharp tongued fellow in You Only Live Once, a far cry from anyone in his shoes in real life), who is set up in, say, a gang murder, or robbery?

    Or if a black woman, abandoning her kids because she claims she’s “just no good” and then hits the road holding up bars and banks would elicit any sympathy from us? She’d be a candidate for Jerry Springer, maybe, if she would shout more.

    Something tells me there’s not a chance in hell. These films wouldn’t play anywhere in the suburbs… unless they had some sort of Oscar-winning rap soundtrack. Even then, it’s a slim chance.

    Something also tells me there’s not a chance in hell that you could even get financing for such ventures. But if we want, we can try, I guess, to watch these movies, on DVD both (Wanda from the library, You Only Live Once from Netflix) and imagine ourselves in the shoes of today’s criminal. That’s the point, you know, the reason we watch these movies, and watched them, in years past (Wanda more today–the film played in literally one theater in America). We are not just supposed to be excited by the story, but relate, at least a little bit, to the characters we see. We are supposed to fall in love with Eddie and Joan, who rob gas stations and eventually get plugged. We are supposed to feel for Wanda, who’s probably never going to see her children again, choosing to fuck anyone and never have a good relationship.

    Get this: Eddie and Joan and Wanda walk these streets. We don’t need to walk up and hug them, don’t need to hope that criminals get soft sentences or forgiveness for violent crime. But perhaps we do need to watch movies like these and understand that old adage, “there, but for the grace of God, go I”. In the slums, in Uptown, even in the suburbs (perhaps especially in the suburbs), we’re all just a mood away from flooring it and being on the lam, two steps away from the gallows, a hair-trigger from ultimate freedom.

    youonlyliveonce.gif

  • The Inner Reaches of Outer Space

    inlandempire1.gif

    INLAND EMPIRE
    , 2006. Written (I guess) and directed (definitely) by David Lynch. Starring Laura Dern, Peter J. Lucas, Justin Theroux, Jeremy Irons, Harry Dean Stanton, Karolina Gruszka, Jan Hencz, Grace Zabriske, Julia Ormond, Diane Ladd, Ian Abercrombie, Bellina Logan, William H. Macy and the augmented Emily Stofle.

    Now showing exclusively at the Oak Street Cinema.

    In David Lynch’s new book Catching the Big Fish, the section on INLAND EMPIRE opens with this verse from The Upanishads:

    We are like the spider,
    We weave our life and then move along in it.
    We are like the dreamer who dreams and then lives in the dream.
    This is true for the entire universe.

    There’s a moment in INLAND EMPIRE, almost three hours in, when Laura Dern’s Nikki is confronted by a menacing figure with a face that appears to be made of wax. By now we are exhausted, and scared, having walked the sticky tightrope of Lynch’s spiderweb, which seems to have no end. Nikki is equally worn out. Terrified, she empties a revolver at the wax face, which accomplishes nothing, his face melting and filling the screen. Like the man behind the dumpster in Mulholland Dr., he is an unstoppable force, not a force of nature, but a pinpoint in the fabric of the reality, a tiny hole through that which protects us and hides the simmering unconscious. David Lynch enjoys punching through the screen that shields us, be it the image of a small town, the dream of Hollywood, or simply the appearance of reality.

    David Lynch has been studying Transcendental Meditation (TM) for over thirty years now. It seems time to come to terms with the fact that, like artists whose religion informs their work–be it Catholicism or Islam or Buddhism–David Lynch is a filmmaker who relies heavily on the visions that TM has offered him. TM is as real for Lynch as the Dalai Lama and Christ are for Scorsese, except that INLAND EMPIRE, in spite of its length and incomprehensibility, is eminently more watchable than Kundun or The Last Temptation of Christ. Where in the past many of Lynch’s efforts seemed purposefully incoherent, I’m starting to believe that, while still incoherent, they are accurate representations of a world distilled through the mind of an artist supremely in touch with his inner being.

    And at first INLAND EMPIRE seems to belie the criticism that the film is absurd and impossible to follow. A woman, Nikki Grace (Laura Dern) has signed on to play the part in a film ridiculously titled On High With Blue Tomorrows, directed by the pompous Kingsley Stewart (Jeremy Irons) and co-starring alleged hunk Devon Berk (Justin Theroux). Problems arise, in the person of the cryptic neighbor (Grace Zabriske), who promises Nikki that she will get the part, and yet warns the younger woman about unleashing evil into the world. Also, the leading man is constantly threatened by Janek, Nikki’s husband, played by the Jan Hencz with steely intensity and little else. If Devon sleeps with Nikki, Janek will kill him, or more likely, have him killed. To make matters all the more intriguing, it turns out that Blue Tomorrows is a remake of a Polish film, in which the two leads were murdered. As this is being explained to Nikki and Devon, they discover that someone mysterious is watching them from the shadows. Devon investigates, but the person, persons or spirit has vanished.

    That’s the swiftly moving first hour of this three hour film, though there are clues to the depths with which INLAND EMPIRE will dive: the rabbits, for instance. There are segments of Lynch’s online television show, Rabbits, which is nothing more than the interior of a spacious Hollywood pad, with people walking around in dull 50s-style suits, with giant rabbit heads. They talk and the laugh track engages at odd moments. There’s a prostitute with her face blurred out, and a girl crying at the events on her television set, which appears to be the action in the movie we’re watching.

    And then cut… to the set of Blue Tomorrows. Of course, Blue Tomorrows is a movie that no one in Hollywood would ever make, not with a title like that and Douglas Sirk dead and gone. Nor would actors with names like Nikki Grace and Devon Berk appear in anything other than mid-grade porn. As usual, Lynch doesn’t give a rip about making his movies-within-movies seem like real things, or his people talk and act in a manner that’s reflective of life as we see it on the streets. The people in Lynch’s films talk in sentences that are clipped, odd statements that are meant to infuriate, confuse, and often menace. Their faces seem pinched, as if the oxygen levels on the set were just shy of what human beings need, or the gravity’s just a bit too strong. David Lynch’s films–INLAND EMPIRE especially–seem shot on a distant planet, after the sun has set but it’s not quite pitch-black. The feeble light gives us just enough to make out and react to before the darkness swallows us whole. This is Hollywood, from Lynch’s point of view.

    INLAND EMPIRE loops in and out of the real and the imagined and the deeply imagined life, in which the Blue Tomorrows movie plays itself out, another movie (in which Dern is seen among prostitutes swaying to “The Locomotion” and she is eventually murdered), and some oddball scenes involving ketchup, Polish whores, an interview in a dark room, and, once again, a return to the square family with giant rabbit heads. Characters you’ve come to care about suddenly turn into actors in a film, then a different movie from that one, then back to INLAND EMPIREagain (ostensibly reality), and the fiction within the fiction vanishes and gives way to the rabbits and crying whores once again, each filmed in lonely, empty rooms that seem to have come from outer space. And you know that, deep down, that both the whores and rabbits will return yet again to trouble you later in the film, and probably later at night.

    And we ask ourselves: What are the rabbits? Does Lynch even know? Or the references to the circus? The barbecue and ketchup scene? The press notes for the film are as follows: “A Woman In Trouble”. Some help.

    Lynch explains (in Catching the Big Fish) that his friend, the actor Krzysztof Majchrzak is given a choice between three props for an isolated and seemingly unrelated scene at a shed. Krzysztof can choose between a broken tile, a rock, a red light bulb. He chose the bulb, which he held in his mouth the duration of the scene. This, according to Lynch, is a reflection of the Unified Field–that a man would come to the set wearing oddball glasses, pick a red bulb, and act in the scene with it in his mouth–they are all related.

    What that does for the audience is give us direct access to a world that is utterly different from our own experiences, and in the sense that INLAND EMPIRE gives us something we’ve never seen before, it works beautifully. And even better, the film maintains its menace, and its grim attitude about Hollywood. Between Mulholland Dr. and INLAND EMPIRE you have two of the most damning films ever made about the way the Dream Factory devours souls. In a startling scene, a ghastly Diane Ladd (Laura Dern’s mom) grills Nikki about having difficulty keeping her paws away from Devon, with whom she’s only just begun work. It’s a sickening, yet funny, parody of the Entertainment Tonight garbage, more real and ultimately more hilarious than Christopher Guest’s jokes in For Your Consideration. Perhaps because it nauseates as well as liberates–by this time already you’re looking for a laugh, and Lynch’s films always have one or two very good ones, and INLAND EMPIRE is no exemption.

    Nothing will protect the people of INLAND EMPIRE against the rot that will devour them. They are stuck, fighting against those vile creatures with wax faces who seek to devour their artistic souls, against their desires to make love to one another (prompted, most likely, by the dream world of their acting), and find that once they enter the labyrinth of Hollywood, there is no escape. Lynch pushes his people into the maze, but leaves them no bread crumbs or string with which to help them emerge. The audience can wish it had Chinatown or Hollywoodland to frighten them about Southern California in a funhouse way , but INLAND EMPIRE is the real thing, as real as the movies get. David Lynch dives deep here, has undoubtedly seen the system eat up talent like bon bons, and is out to remind you that your dreams come with a price. The actors, actresses, directors, screenwriters, they’ve all paid… won’t you?

    inlandempire2.gif

  • You Want Valentine's Day Movies? I'll Give You Some F#@%!ng Valentine's Day Movies…

    Looking for an alternative cinematic thrill on this most romantic of corporate holidays? Thinking that it might not be entirely worthwhile to see Dreamgirls or Sleepless in Seattle when your feelings are, well, a bit more complex? Here’s a list, thrown together at the very last minute, of some features that will add some spice to this sweet evening… and by spice I mean a cold stare or a full blown argument. Nothing says you can’t ‘communicate’ on St. Valentine’s Day.

    Sid and Nancy. Saw this the other night with some pals from the Rake staff. Difficult to understand with all the cockney slang, grainy, drug-addled, dull in spots and thrilling in others, might just make you and your spouse do the mosh pit, get blitzed and then, if the mood’s right, shout, scream, break things, and then fall bloody to the floor after you’ve smashed a bottle against your head. Please, don’t beat one another or kill the other party. It’s only a movie, though it’s based on a true story.

    Taxi Driver. Murder politicians or pimps to prove your love! Didn’t work for John Hinckley, but it might for you.

    Oldboy. Disgusting, violent, Korean thriller that culminates in a near rape sex scene that is virtually impossible to endure… and later you find out it’s much worse than you thought! Should make your lover (male or female) swear off affection for a fortnight.

    Pandora’s Box. Classic silent film (your lover of conventional films will thank you for that one alone!) in which a girl who only wants to be loved finds bliss by being stabbed to death by Jack the Ripper. Joy!

    Eraserhead. Here’s a man’s nightmare about women and babies! Check out the girl in the radiator with her malignant cheeks (and bursting giant sperm with her heels) and the Eraserhead baby, who looks like E.T. with Down’s Syndrome. If you can finish this masterpiece, why the rest of the night will be spent in tense silence, and probably mutual loathing.

    The Squid and the Whale. Spot-on, brutally honest film about divorce. You wanna talk about where our relationship’s going, honey, well, here’s where our fucking relationship’s going…

    The Lady From Shanghai. Orson Welles’ baffling and yet entertaining film about how much he hates Rita Hayworth. Poisonous.

    For the guys: 12 Angry Men. Not a romance, but a charged film that takes place in a sweltering room with, as the title suggests, a dozen pugnacious males. I’ve seen this four times, and each time the women in the room felt abused, as if they had been locked in that place with these jerks. A good way to have the place to yourself.

    For the gals: Brief Encounter or Notes on a Scandal (a choice between staying in or going out). Oops, beautiful young women married to men who listen, care for them, do everything just right, and the result is they have affairs with doctors or fifteen year old boys. No matter what you do, boyfriend, you ain’t never going to be certain of my fidelity, eh?

  • Disturb Your Valentine This Weekend

    bvelvelt.gif

    Blue Velvet, 1986. Written and Directed by David Lynch. Starring Kyle MacLachlan, Isabella Rossellini, Dennis Hopper, Laura Dern, Dean Stockwell (freaking unbelievable), Brad Dourif, Hope Lange, George Dickerson, and the original Eraserhead, Jack Nance.

    Now showing in a new 35mm print at the Oak Street Cinema.

    Valentine’s Day is Wednesday next, and it’s customary to celebrate on the exact day, surprising your gal or guy with something sweet on that oh, so sugary day. A bouquet of flowers showing up at work, a package of Russell Stover candies with the edges turned gray from age, a card you picked up at the SuperAmerica, maybe you make dinner or pick it up at Applebee’s. Then again, it might be beneficial to really tear it up on Saturday, to enjoy your festival of romance on the weekend. To celebrate, and celebrate late into the night. Have yourself a nice dinner at some joint and then, at 9:15 walk hand in hand past the inebriated college students wandering from Sally’s or Stub and Herbs and check out the best movie in town this weekend: Blue Velvet.

    Consider: what else are you going to see? You artsies could end up checking out Jude Law going down on Juliette Binoche in the flawed Breaking and Entering and afterwards enjoy a glass of fine wine in Uptown, and ruminate over what you just saw. Flip through the paper, check out the online listings, and there ain’t nothing but movies you should have seen two weeks ago, horror, and some silly romantic comedies that’ll only make you feel as if love is something that comes in a Reddy Whip can.

    Blue Velvet’s the exception. And, oh, is it the fucking exception. Something tells me most people haven’t seen it on the big screen, that giant blue velvet curtain swaying in the opening credits, almost a sexual thing in itself. The colors, the performances, Rossellini’s Dorothy Vallens stark naked and terrifying, a scene that not only will trouble you at night, but troubled the townsfolk where they filmed this masterpiece, and ended Lynch’s ability to film on the streets. Almost wrecked the picture, it did.

    You’re going to be disturbed by Blue Velvet, you and your date. You’re going to go home wondering why your mate took you to this run down theater, what the living hell they were thinking, Dennis Hopper’s Frank sucking down that nitrous, that ear covered with ants, that God-damned white-faced Ben (Dean Stockwell), crooning–

    A candy-colored clown they call the Sandman
    tiptoes to my room every night
    just to sprinkle stardust and to whisper
    go to sleep
    everything is all right

    Everything is far from all right, especially when Dennis Hopper’s Frank interrupts the singing to slug the hero and shout “I’ll fuck anything that moves!”

    I’ll spare you the rest of the plot. If you don’t know it, you should, and if you don’t, you’ll be all the more freaked. Which is just what Dr. Phil ordered.

    So why not put some spice into the relationship? To go home, staring at your partner out of the corner of your eye. She seemed a bit turned on by that rough play between Kyle and Isabella… Did he think Dennis Hopper was cool? The guy’s a rapist, for Christ’s sake… What the hell was my boyfriend/girlfriend thinking? Those little tests endear us to one another, my friends. A restless night’s distrust is good for the soul, and sharpens the blade of love.

    Above all, Blue Velvet is a stunner, and a must-see on the big screen, where Frank and Jeffrey and Sandy and Dorothy all loom larger than life, and stomp merrily into your nightmares. Nightmares are good–they make you curl up in the late hours with your loved one. They make you appreciate the waking hours, appreciate the familiar warm touch of your spouse’s back. What other movie will help you to appreciate that special someone like Blue Velvet?

  • The Last Picture Show-er

    Local 219 of the International Union of Showbiz and Theater Entertainers was recently called to order over breakfast at the Edina Perkins. Bob Anderson, at seventy-nine still an imposing presence with broad shoulders and a strong handshake, pushed his omelet aside, pulled out some notes, and addressed his audience—myself and a waiter. “There are about eight remaining union projectionists,” he explained. “Only a few of us are still working, and I’m the one with the most seniority …” He cleared his throat. “Which means I’ll probably be the next to go.”
    It used to be that if you owned a movie theater, you relied on union labor to show the picture. Once upon a time, in fact, a person could make a decent living doing the work—in Fritz Lang’s Clash by Night, one of the characters earns his wages looping film late into the evening. This is in stark contrast with today’s reality, where teenagers get your blockbuster rolling with little more than the push of a button.
    Anderson got his start as an apprentice projectionist back in 1947, and, before the rise of the multiplex, worked in literally every theater in the Twin Cities. He was on the staff at the opening of the Riverview, got the arc lights burning when the drive-in was king, and has had a hand in each of the twenty-four Minneapolis-St. Paul International Film Festivals. From his perch in the booth, he’s watched the cinema’s transition from primarily black-and-white affairs to Technicolor and 70mm; he sat through the auteur movement of the 1970s, treaded Hollywood’s shallow waters of the 80s and 90s, and weathered the assaults of television, videotape, and DVD.
    As a young boy, Anderson’s curiosity was piqued when he was given a toy projector with a Felix the Cat cartoon one Christmas. This was a simple, hand-cranked number with a light bulb, but he was instantly entranced. “Since then, whenever I see a movie I have to turn and admire the silver light from above,” he said. “I can’t help it.” His passion grew over time, and throughout junior high, high school, and college, Anderson played the part of resident audio/visual geek. “You could find me hauling the projector and cans of educational films between classes. That was a lot of work.”
    After graduation, Bob entered the nine-to-five world, working for a local advertising firm and settling down with his wife and kids. But the bug never left him, so he would steal away to the local movie houses each night, determined to break into the insular world of Union projectionists.
    It was a tight-knit community: You couldn’t just walk in and become a certified Union projectionist. There weren’t a lot of jobs to go around, and projectionists were famously reluctant to retire, so it was difficult to get a foot in the door to the booth. After a few months, however, Anderson was finally accepted into the union as a registered apprentice, shuttling between theaters. A projectionist had to know every machine, from the military green and imposing Simplex projector to the sleek, silver Philips Norelco. Back then, the nitrate film was tricky and dangerous stuff, highly flammable. “The projection booths were like an Alcatraz jail cell,” Anderson explains, and it was his job to get the hell out if the thing caught fire—the booth, with its reinforced concrete, was designed to contain the blaze and keep the theater from burning down, at considerable risk to the poor souls inside.
    While the story was unfolding on the screen, Anderson would be wrapped up in his work, cleaning and splicing the celluloid or maintaining the machines. In the early years, he found himself in the projection booths of dozens of different theaters, filling in for a sick or vacationing colleague. He finally landed a regular gig at the Lucky Twin drive-in, where he remained until the theater was closed and slated for demolition. “People didn’t pay too much attention to the feature there,” Anderson admits. “It was necking heaven.” Once, a wiseacre rearranged the wording on the marquee’s traction board to read, “START YOUR FAMILY AT THE LUCKY TWIN!”
    Watching Anderson work today is a clinic in professionalism—he handles his machine like a man who knows what he’s doing and has flexed this knowledge on an almost-daily basis. With a seasoned hand, he threads film, carefully oils his machine, and listens to the rhythm of the movie rattling through the reels for any odd sound indicating trouble. Recently, at the Bell, where he had been hired to screen a preview of an already-forgotten movie, Anderson seemed at ease in the overheated projectionist’s booth, which had the damp, dusty aroma of an old radiator. This was clearly the refuge of an organized man, with its oil-stained toothbrushes, film cutters, screwdrivers, and tools all neatly in place. I couldn’t help but imagine all the masterpieces Anderson had brought to moviegoers over his career—fifty years is a lot of film history. When I mentioned all the time he’s spent in the projection booth, he nodded and said, “God, have I ever. See, there’s two of me—the guy with the nine-to-five job and the wife and family, and the projectionist. Everyone leads a double life—mine just happens to be up here.”

  • Real Men Wear Plaid

    Despite a thin frame and a tendency to shiver uncontrollably, I’ve always been one to appreciate the cold. You won’t find me on the slopes or skating across a patch of ice, however, nor will you catch me clad in some ultra-light nylon parka. I simply don’t see the point in layering, instead preferring old-style jackets made of natural fabrics with big buttons. This Minnesotan’s main winter activity involves meandering through the city’s neighborhoods or around its lakes, collar up against the wind. When the weather turns especially bitter and I find myself outside alone, the city falls away and I imagine that I am a hero from a Jack London novel, facing doom on the great frozen tundra—even if it’s just Lake Calhoun.
    My winter constitutionals improved considerably some fourteen years ago, when I discovered the Filson Double Mackinaw Cruiser. One afternoon, while flipping through a roommate’s copy of GQ, I happened across an article on the somewhat legendary jacket. In the photograph, it was draped over a chair and bathed in light from a warm fireplace, which was no doubt thawing a group of grizzled prospectors just back from a dog-sledding trek through the Yukon. The article claimed that Filson’s wool jacket was warmer than down or synthetics. It said the Filson was fabled. It was unique. So, flush with college graduation money, I called the company and bought the jacket they claimed I would hand down to my children one day.
    Now, I do not wish any future offspring of mine to be as fashionably challenged as their father. Although the Filson Double Mackinaw Cruiser is the epitome of utility, its iconic red-and-black tartan pattern often prompts strangers to make cracks about my resemblance to Elmer Fudd. But in my eyes, the Cruiser is a thing of beauty. There is nothing more comforting out among the elements than the weight of a wool jacket, and that rich, dry aroma is also soothing (though I do smell like dog when the thing gets damp). The Filson company claims that the fabric has been culled “directly from sheep that have acclimated to the same wet, cold conditions you may encounter while wearing one of our garments.” I’m assuming, of course, that the conditions they’re referring to are what Canadian Mounties face while trudging up the Mackenzies, as opposed to what an out-of-shape writer encounters while scurrying across Nicollet Avenue to reach the hotdog vendor.
    Although they’re designed with hunters in mind, Filson Double Mackinaw Cruisers are ideal for bookish types like myself. There are four deep pockets in front, one of which has slots for rifle shells that are the perfect size for pens and pencils. A one-piece cape shrouds the shoulders and arms and reaches down to the abdomen, and hand-warming pockets work wonders when the forgetful forget their gloves. Also, there is a game pouch at the small of the back—a flap of fabric that keeps the body warm and also serves to hold slim paperbacks, newspapers, or magazines. When I asked a hunting pal of mine whether one would really store a dead bird in there, he stared blankly and said, “That’s why it’s called a game pouch.” When I appeared aghast at the thought of a duck dribbling blood into my jacket, he rolled his eyes and said, “Good equipment gone to waste.”
    I’m aware that my owning a Filson jacket is somewhat akin to a man buying an SUV or heavy-duty truck, believing that it makes him more rugged and manly. Reading the Filson catalog only fans the flames of this fantasy, as one is captivated both by the harrowing testimonials and many of the products’ sheer ugliness. The company motto is, “Might As Well Have the Best,” which might explain the thirty-dollar socks and $250 cardigans. (The Double Mackinaw Cruiser costs around three hundred dollars.) The testimonials make you wonder whether Jack London’s characters might have survived, if only they had been sporting these astounding coats. Over the years, the catalogs have told of an Alaskan pilot crashing into the snow and surviving thanks to a Filson, of a Filson belt securing a gate against a raging bull, and of a pair of their tin-cloth pants that kept one fellow’s manhood intact when attacked by a jumping chainsaw.
    It’s a man’s world at C. C. Filson—there are no women in the catalogs, and no women’s clothing. You might also argue that no woman would be caught dead with a guy wearing these hideous shirts and pants. But they’ve made strides. A few years ago Filson introduced its Double Mackinaw in a dark, solid gray. I purchased one of these recently—the old one is just fine, thank you, and ready to be bequeathed to my progeny—making me look less like a lumberjack and more like Albert Camus in his French Resistance mode. I have yet to see how the new gray hides blood drippings from a dead duck, but it certainly covers the occasional coffee stain.

  • One for the Sons of Bitches

    Do you know who wrote your favorite film? If the names Sidney Howard, Frances Goodrich, and Joseph Stefano fill you with a sense of admiration, then congratulations on recognizing what most of us consider trivial: These are the people who wrote the classics Gone With The Wind, It’s A Wonderful Life, and Psycho. Even among filmmakers, the obscure status of screenwriters tends to be the norm—director Nicholas Ray once grumbled, “If it were all in the script, why make the film?”
    Ray was referring to the gulf between the script and what ultimately shows on the silver screen. By the time a finished flick hits your hometown theater, the screenplay, just one small part of the overall process of filmmaking, has devolved into a mongrel combination of original and consumer demand. Sometimes, as with “high-concept” franchises like the Mission: Impossible series, you don’t even need the kernel of original thought—the script is almost an afterthought. At the very least, the screenplay is interpreted by a dozen very different pairs of eyes, from the director’s to every actor who mangles a line, to the cinematographer and editor. If you want power over your art, screenwriting is the last medium to pursue.
    Nevertheless, as it is for so many others in the movie business, an Academy Award is the premier accolade for a screenwriter. Perhaps to make up for the lowly status of writers in the pecking order, the Writers Branch of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences seems to take great pride in making oddball choices in films it selects to vie for the best screenplay Oscar (individual branches of the Academy—Directors, Composers, Film Editors, etc.—nominate films for awards in their categories). Sometimes the directors go crazy and give David Lynch a nod, but for the most part, the Writers Branch has a habit of unearthing the strange bedfellow, nominating and awarding an established literary figure (George Bernard Shaw, John Irving), or tipping its hat to an edgy new presence like Quentin Tarantino. While the Academy as a whole often bestows crowd-pleasers like Rocky or Titanic with the best picture award, screenplay awards have gone to such daring fare as Network, L. A. Confidential, and The Piano.
    Best Original Screenplay remains the only Oscar that Citizen Kane won, and the only Oscar that Orson Welles ever could claim as his own. Charlie Kaufman, perhaps the best screenwriter working in America today, has his for Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. He was also nominated the previous year for his masterwork, Adaptation, a movie whose conceit was that a screenwriter named Charlie Kaufman created an imaginary twin brother Donald, and together they attempted to adapt an unfilmable book into a decent screenplay (both Charlie and the imaginary twin were nominated in real life). Pedro Almodóvar has his, too, for Talk To Her.
    Because it rewards eccentricity, there is a certain hip factor to the best original screenplay Oscars. This category remains the one corner of the Academy where, year after year, some of the coolest films get nominations—and actually win. While Sideways might earn nods for best picture and best director, no one expects it to actually win those awards … but it did earn Alexander Payne and Jim Taylor statuettes for best adapted screenplay. In 1995, Christopher McQuarrie’s Byzantine Usual Suspects beat out the much more classically structured (and ham-fisted) Braveheart; and Preston Sturges—a comic genius and arguably one of our greatest directors—has three nominations for his writing, one of which (The Great McGinty) resulted in an Oscar.
    But just as the Academy likes to award actors- turned-directors (Robert Redford, Clint Eastwood, Kevin Costner, Mel Gibson)—perhaps knowing these icons would never win an acting award—so, too, it awards actors who lower themselves to write. Billy Bob Thornton, a legitimately decent actor, owns a little gold man for writing Sling Blade, as do Matt Damon and Ben Affleck for Good Will Hunting; Emma Thompson has one for acting in Howard’s End and another for her adaptation of Sense and Sensibility. Certainly, it does the Writers Branch no harm to welcome these high-profile types into its inner circle; while one could accuse the members of kowtowing to the stars, there’s also a case to be made for crediting the passion of writers—whoever they are—in bringing to the screen a work that they’re especially tuned into. Affleck and Damon were barely on the rise when they won their screenplay award, as was Thornton; and Thompson simply adored Austen.
    Despite that passion, only the most devoted film buffs seem to glom on to published screenplays. Plays, too, are seldom read, but often published in the hopes that they’ll be produced (moreover, while theater buffs outside large cities might never get to see the new Pulitzer-winning play, movies are accessible anywhere). And if you’ve ever cracked a copy of Kurosawa’s Seven Samurai with the best intentions—as I’ve done—you’re likely eventually to set it down and cue the DVD instead. Robert Towne’s Chinatown, rightfully heralded as one of the greatest screenplays ever written and taught in the best scriptwriting classes, is one exception of a well-read script. It remains that writer’s only Oscar—he’d been nominated for Last Detail and Shampoo in addition to Chinatown, for three nominations in as many years; sadly, it may have damned him to a lifetime of comparison. (His most recent work was the risible Ask the Dust.)
    The script for Chinatown reads like one of Dashiell Hammett’s hard-boiled thrillers, sparse and compelling; it still makes one shudder at its grasp of evil. But do we recoil from the wretched Noah Cross as we read him on the page, or because of what we remember of John Huston and how his acting in that role provoked such dread? Thing is, Chinatown is a classic because of its screenplay but also because of Roman Polanski’s vision, which gave the film its sense of foreboding, and its grim, cynical ending—which the director changed from Towne’s upbeat close. Then, too, there is Nicholson’s foolish leading man, John A. Alonzo’s washed-out cinematography, and Jerry Goldsmith’s moody score. Add to all of these a producer in Robert Evans, who brought these talents together and kept them from one another’s throats.
    When Irving G. Thalberg was the boss of Universal Studios during the mid-1920s, he bluntly summed up the prevailing attitude toward those who toiled on screenplays: “The writer is the most important person in Hollywood. But we must never tell the sons of bitches.” Studios have always been desperate for good ideas, and the screenwriter is your source for this most important product. Ultimately, though, no screenplay—from Citizen Kane to Chinatown—can stand alone as a classic. Perhaps this is because film is both utterly collaborative and thoroughly permanent. Plays are momentary, changing with each production, and the faces, voices, and places in a book are visualized differently by each person who reads it. But a movie, once made, exists essentially forever. Just as no one can ever remake Chinatown without seeing Jack Nicholson, no one can go back to Towne’s original vision, even if someone were foolish enough to attempt a remake. It’s in our collective consciousness now.
    Movies need screenwriters as much as they need actors and actress, producers and directors and editors. And while the writers are the ones who see the film first, in their heads, they are perhaps the ones who suffer most as they watch their vision mutate into the final product. The screenwriter might indeed be the most important son of a bitch in Hollywood, but he is not the only son of a bitch by far.