Category: Columns

  • Ex Oriente Lux

    Some countries come up so often in the news that you feel you ought to know more about them. There is a painless way to achieve this. Read travel literature. An intelligent travel book provides more enlightenment than any number of newspaper accounts of the latest atrocities, as well as placing in a longer historical perspective lands which (as was once said of Ireland) produce more history than can be consumed locally.

    Imagine, then, the pleasure of finding a book about the Near East that is both easy to read and fresh in its perspective. It is William Dalrymple’s From the Holy Mountain. The author had the fine idea of travelling clockwise around the Eastern Mediterranean (what we used to call the Levant), starting from the monastic community at Mount Athos in northern Greece and ending among the Copts of Egypt, chronicling the scattered remnants of the Christian commonwealth which once covered the whole Mediterranean world in the three centuries leading up to the rise of Islam in the mid-seventh century.

    Dalrymple’s visit to a Christian abbey in northern Mesopotamia is particularly poignant. He describes one of the surviving monks, a man whose native tongue is Syriac, a variant of the Aramaic language Jesus spoke, looking out over the monastery’s parched and deserted vineyards. The escarpment of Tur ’Abdin was an area whose wine was well known in Biblical times. Not anymore.

    In the Muslim Near East, Christians have traditionally been associated with winemaking. Of course, despite the Koranic prohibitions, they had no monopoly on its consumption. One thinks of the Ottoman Sultan Selim the Sot, and of the poet Omar Khayyam with his book of verses underneath the bough, his loaf of bread and jug of wine, and Thou—even though scholars tell me that the lines would be more accurately translated as a cask of wine, and half a sheep, and Thou. But in common belief, Christianity and wine went together; the Armenian Christians of Ispahan in Persia made rugs with irregularities in the pattern which the dealers called “tipsy carpets.”

    Many modern Near Eastern states produce fine wines. The Vieux Thibar of Tunisia is powerful stuff and the multifarious wines of Turkey are a pleasure to the traveller. (My favorite is called Villa Doluca—pronounced do-lud-jah) but they are not frequently found round here. The best known Levantine wine is called Chateau Musar, made for more than 70 years now by a Maronite Christian family in the Bekaa valley in Lebanon. The vines grow on gravel and limestone 3,000 feet above sea level, and they are guaranteed a mild climate by protective mountains on either side. This valley is otherwise famous for the ancient temples at Ba’albek, the largest in the Roman world and known in pre-Christian times for its ritual prostitutes (and known today for its warlords).

    There is nothing quite like Chateau Musar. It comes in a claret bottle (with shoulders), its maker studied at the University of Bourdeaux (France was the dominant western power here from the mid-19th century onwards), and the grapes are mostly Cabernet Sauvignon, the variety which gives flavor to most Bourdeaux. Yet the taste and character is more like a Rhone—more sunshine, more alcohol. I recently considered a bottle of the 1996 vintage. It was strong yet subtle.

    Chateau Musar takes a long time to make. The different varieties of grape (Cabernet, Cinsault, and various others) are fermented separately for two years before they are blended and then left to age for several more years. It also varies in price; I have seen it on the Internet for less than $12 and for more than $20. This is a wine well worth bringing home in your luggage if you take a trip this fall, to lands where it is more readily available—the Levant, Europe, or England. Whether you think it was Noah who invented wine or Dionysius, Chateau Musar will show you how the ancient art of winemaking can be refined to a high elegance.

    Oliver Nicholson is a classicist at the University of Minnesota, and former Secretary of the Wine Committee at Wolfson College, Oxford.

  • Enlightened Self-Interest

    In life, where you stand very often depends on where you sit. And when it comes to the police, I have usually taken the stand that they have to be monitored very closely, especially when it come to relationships with black and brown people. I have a lot of personal and collective history that bred this well-founded distrust. During Mississippi’s hot summers of the early 60s, white cops brutalized my parents and many other civil rights workers. I saw Rodney King getting the stuffing beat out of him on videotape. I have been stopped in my car just for being black. In fact, I have sued police on behalf of people claiming racially motivated abuse. That was all before I changed where I sit. Nine months ago, I remarried and moved from Richfield to North Minneapolis. Now that I live less than six blocks from the Jordan neighborhood, Minneapolis’ gangbanger central, I can no longer afford the luxury of automatically distrusting the police.

    I live in what is euphemistically called a neighborhood in “recovery.” Malcolm X once remarked that if you wanted to find the “so-called Negro” in any large American city, you just had to find the neighborhood with a school named after Abe Lincoln and with homes abandoned by Jews. This is certainly true of my stretch of the North Side, where prosperous Jewish families built handsome homes 80 to 100 years ago. Then in the 60s and 70s, just as Malcolm predicted, the soul brothers moved in (and to be fair, did a little rioting on Plymouth Avenue) and the kosher brothers moved out. In the 80s home values plummeted to fire-sale prices across most of the once glorious North Side. In the last 10 years, rising home prices in nicer parts of town and decreasing crime in the area has given these homes a well-deserved second wind. And the Minneapolis police deserve much of the credit for the turnaround.

    The key to their success? The “Computer Optimized Deployment Focused on Results” program, also known as CODEFOR. According to Minneapolis police Lt. Troy Schmitz, the program uses computer data to figure out “where the action is,” thereby allowing the police to concentrate their efforts where “bad things are happening.” Now, as I suggested before, given my strong civil-libertarian/free-the-Jackson-Five bent and with images of Birmingham and Rodney King dancing in my head, I believed CODEFOR could easily give rogue cops cover for jacking up anyone, particularly African American males, who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.

    I must admit that these very legitimate worries take on a different view when one sits, eats, and sleeps within a 20-minute walk of the city’s greatest concentration of gangbangers. According to recent statistics, the Jordan neighborhood is seeing increasing turf wars between the Vice Lords, the Gangsta Disciples, and other gangs. Minneapolis police chief Robert Olson, who recently bested Mayor R.T. Rybak in a turf battle of his own, decided the best defense is a good offense and, using CODEFOR, is turning up the heat in Jordan and adjacent neighborhoods like mine.

    According to Capt. Stacy Altonen, commander of special investigations, the police really do know who most of the bad guys are. Lt. Schmitz confirms that Minneapolis police keep lists and pictures of known “gangstas” and that the police watch them more closely. The civil rights lawyer side of me is a tad bit nervous about that. The “I-live-just-six-blocks-away” side is very comfortable with this, thank you very much.

    This year, Minneapolis has had 19 homicides as of July 19. All but one were either gang-or drug-related. Seventeen of the 19 murder victims were African American males ages 18-39. Half of them lived in Jordan. The true underlying causes are the usual suspects—unemployment, dysfunctional families, lousy educations, and institutional racism. I do not want to let anyone off the hook who has contributed to or can help alleviate these systemic incubators for gang violence. However, cop bashing does not change the cold hard fact that nearly all Minneapolis’ murders this year stem from African American gang members killing each other, or worse yet, other African Americans unlucky enough to get caught in the crossfire. So, MPD please, please use CODEFOR with my blessing if it helps keep this mayhem far away from my family and me.

    Clinton Collins, Jr. is a Minneapolis attorney and commentator.

  • The Philosopher and the Wine List

    Bertrand Russell may have looked like God—piercing eyes, white hair, son of the Duke of Bedford, that sort of thing. But he was a philosopher not noted for an enthusiastic belief in the Divine. When asked what he would say when he got to Heaven, he replied in clipped tones, “‘God’, I will say, ‘you are a very mean fellow. You did not give us enough evidence to go on.’” Many restaurant wine lists seem to operate on the same divine principle. I know someone who was driven to ordering “vin rouge” from one particularly pretentious list—not red wine, you understand, but vin rouge.

    More often you look down the list under the appraising eye of someone who thinks you ought to be able to make wise decisions about wine (if about nothing else in life) and you see no more than the name of a grape variety, “Syrah,” and the maker’s name, “Joe.” You shut your eyes, hope for the best and state your choice, humming the while, “Che Syrah Syrah, whatever will be will be.” Which is of course not just the first line of a cheesy pop song. “Che Sara Sara” is the motto of the Duke of Bedford, which is why you see it all over the place in London—especially near the British Museum, long owned by the Duke of Bedford (Bertrand Russell, again).

    Sometimes you’re lucky. A pithy line on a wine list the other evening, “Pinot Noir, Kenwood” introduced a really pleasing bottle and prompted a spot of reflection. It would be a pity to have had the experience and missed the meaning. What was there to know about this wine? Let’s try induction.

    Kenwood is more likely to be named for a Californian town than the homonymous manufacturer of kitchen appliances or the upmarket mosquito breeding-ground of Minneapolis. Pinot Noir is the grape the French use to make the nectar known as Burgundy. (Did B. Russell feel that nectar was wasted on the Gods?) So this was going to be red and probably stronger, fruitier, and more voluptuous (I nearly said full-bodied, but you know what I mean) than many table wines. The bottle itself provided more information. It announced its year (2000) and the area it came from—the Russian River Valley, a misty wooded cleft in the California coast first settled by Russian fur-trappers in the early 19th century, as they spread south from Alaska (at that time Russian territory). It said that it contained 13.8 percent alcohol by volume, which was cheering but not of course the most important point. And on the back it said it had been aged in French oak barrels for a year (oak imparts its own taste), had a smooth finish, and should not be drunk when I was pregnant (pretty safe there; B. Russell too) or about to drive. Helpful, all of that, but only pointers to the empirical pleasure of pouring a glass and examining it with as many senses as are decent and legal. The eye saw a good deep red, the nose detected the sort of smell you might get if you cross-pollinated a garden rose with a bottle of brandy, the good round taste suggested that after the first glass a second might be an enormously good idea. It was the mind, though, which suggested that this was a drink less analogous to Burgundy than to Port, an Old World wine with few Californian equivalents (though there is an intriguing wine wittily named Starboard).

    Only experience will enable you to verify my observations. I thought this a wine delightful in itself, a Ding an Sich. At significantly more than $15 a bottle, this is a bit more expensive than most of the wines which make their way into this column, but I certainly thought it was worth it. Would Bertrand Russell? Can we know what is in Other Minds? It is easier to sample the evidence and make up our own.

    Oliver Nicholson is a classicist at the University of Minnesota, and former Secretary of the Wine Committee at Wolfson College, Oxford.

  • The Bod Mod Squad

    I went out for coffee with my daughter the other day and the guy behind the counter sported a spike through the bridge of his nose. I couldn’t take my eyes off it. Get this—later, my kid said I was rude for staring. Well, isn’t that the point? Tattoos, scarification, piercing. You can’t tell me this stuff is for introverts.

    I’ve seen nose rings and cartilage grommets, but the spike guy hit a new mark. This wasn’t piercing, this was a puncture wound. It seems to me that the trend in post-punk street-wear is to appear as if you have been through a horrible metal shop accident, or perhaps some kind of ritualistic torture. That’s probably the Hellraiser symbolism of all the needles and nails and chains. Young adulthood is torture. I certainly wouldn’t do it again. But if I had to, you can bet I wouldn’t drive a railroad spike through my face. The braces were bad enough.

    Self-mutilation is not just for ne’er-do-wells any more. Good girls are getting into the act now. They’re into what they call “cutting.” Imagine feeling so pent-up full of rage and fear that you just had to… make a little mark. It’s still creepy, but sanitary and precise in an upper middle-class sort of way. When I was 15, you couldn’t get me near a razor. That was my counter-cultural message.

    When nose rings became common, not so very long ago, people wondered what might be next. Scarring? Branding? Amputation? No one would have predicted the popularity of thorny, armadillo-scale-like subcutaneous implants. The other week in a St. Paul record store I saw a guy who has artificial devil horns implanted on his forehead. He told me he didn’t know who Joni Mitchell was. He recommended Enya, and then I knew for sure he was Satan’s helper.

    How do people without health insurance manage to afford this kind of elective surgery? Can you sneak Grandpa’s tackle box over to the Piercing Pagoda and say, “Gimme the Full Metal Jacket?” I once worked with a guy who had bolts installed on either side of his neck. He said he could identify with Frankenstein’s monster. I guess the idea is that by handicapping yourself socially and physically in this way, you become somewhat like Mary Shelley’s sensitive tragic outcast, who was misunderstood and scary and able to withstand pain. Who did not have a place in this world. Except the guy I worked with did have a place. Even a title. He was my supervisor.

    Then there are tongue rings, nipple rings, and rings in even more sensitive places. I’m used to seeing them now, like cell phones and hip huggers, but I still don’t understand it. Even back in my experimental days, when I took a fascinating stranger to bed, I didn’t want it to be a Jim Rose Circus matinee. (Though I might have made an exception for the cannonball guy, who probably knows a lot about thrust.) No, in my day all I needed to make a daring statement of personal rebellion was a box of hair dye and a pair of scissors. Or a baby.

    I guess I know what bothers me about industrial bodywork, though I hate to admit it. I’m not supposed to get it. I’m not cool. My 14-year-old daughter tells me she can’t wait until her 18th birthday. She’ll get an eyebrow ring and a fire-breathing Chinese dragon emblazoned on her shoulder blade. At least it’s not her boyfriend’s name tattooed on her rear-end and antlers implanted on her forehead.

    I’m counting on this whole craze being played out by then. My guess for what’s next on the bod-mod horizon is total body deconstruction. Flaying. Removing decorative patches of skin, possibly to give to one another as prom gifts or to be grafted onto one another, bringing pinkie-spit swears to a whole new level. Or perhaps the removal of the body altogether. If you’re just a pale gray brain floating in a jar, that way you know you’ll truly be appreciated for who you are, your soul, the sum total of your ideas and deeds rather than what you look like, or where you live and how you dress. Fashion Rule No. 1 has always been “Less is more.”

    Writer, performer, and femme fatale Colleen Kruse is at mscolleenkruse@ hotmail.com.

  • Affirmative Inaction

    Years ago, my father told me a little rhyme he learned growing up in Mississippi. “If you are white, you’re alright. If you’re brown, stick around. If you’re black, get back.” This little ditty seems to capture what happens when Minnesota publishers of white mainstream publications put black people on the cover of their magazines. They simply do not sell as well.

    In April 2002, The Rake put a Somali woman on the cover to highlight a top story about strained relations between blacks and Somalis. According to The Rake editor Hans Eisenbeis, the issue had nearly twice as many returns as the previous issue which had Bob Dylan on the cover. “That issue was one of our strongest issues editorially. The writing was great. But people just did not pick it up. Tom [Bartel, The Rake’s publisher] warned me that putting a black person on the cover could be a problem.”

    Bartel admits that when he owned City Pages, he found that putting dark faces on the cover torpedoed the pickup rates. “We tried it enough times to know that we were taking a risk.” According to Rebecca Sterner, a Minnesota-based publishing consultant, “magazine covers with black faces just don’t sell as well. This is not just a Minneapolis problem. It is a national problem.”

    Illustrating her point, Sterner spoke about a major national magazine that featured Cosby Show kid Raven-Symone on its cover. The photograph was “gorgeous.” Yet the issue bombed. “The magazine was very frustrated. They thought the issue would fly off the racks.”

    Sterner believes there are two explanations—one harsh and the other a bit more politically palatable. “One could simply say these things happen because we are a racist society. The more charitable view is that people are more comfortable buying a magazine when they can identify with the cover subject.”

    Brian Anderson, editor of Mpls-St.Paul magazine, insists that “it is the topic, not the person” that moves the magazine. However, he was not willing to categorically state that his staff did not talk about race when designing covers, conceding that the color of cover subjects is a “factor” in how well a particular magazine sells.

    One thing is certain. Local publishers are very skittish discussing race and magazine covers. Publisher Bartel says “it’s a dirty little secret” in the publishing business. Yet, no one other than Bartel was willing to say so on the record. “Publishers do not want to appear to be racist. And they do not want to appear to accuse their readers of being racist either.”

    I matched the covers of Mpls-St.Paul magazine and Minnesota Monthly with the actual newsstand sales numbers as verified by the Audit Bureau of Circulation for the past two and a half years to see if sales dropped when black people were on the cover. Most of the time they did, sometimes dramatically. For example, Mpls-St.Paul ran its annual “Top Docs” issue in January 2000, selling 19,165 newsstand issues. The next month’s cover featured African American Tonya Moten Brown, U president Mark Yudof’s right-hand person. Sales dropped 60 percent. According to Anderson, this drop was to be expected because the “Top Docs” issue is always such a big seller for them. Yet the next year, the issue following “Top Docs” actually did better than “Top Docs.” Hmmmm.

    Minnesota Monthly’s statistics tell the same story. In January 2001, the magazine put Paul Magers and his dog on the cover and sold 5,879 newsstand copies. When black Viking Robert Smith graced the next cover, newsstand sales nosedived nearly 40 percent.

    MSP editor Anderson still maintains that topics and notoriety are the deciding factors on who makes the cover cut. “If I have the opportunity to put Randy Moss or Kevin Garnett on the cover and it made sense, I would do it.” Unfortunately, Anderson misses the point. I certainly do not doubt that he will put a black person on the cover of his magazine again. But the numbers do not lie. The explanations and the rationalizations are endless as to why they do not sell as well. However, when it comes to selling magazines—as with nearly everything else in our society—race matters. Pretending otherwise does not make it so.

    Clinton Collins, Jr. is a Minneapolis attorney and commentator.

  • Summer Pleasures

    According to Sir Winston Churchill, the Royal Navy has only three traditions, “Rum, Sodomy, and the Lash.” It’s certainly true that until only a few years ago every enlisted man in Her Britannic Majesty’s fleet had the right to a substantial tot of rum every day at midday. It was powerful stuff. The custom went by the board when it was agreed that perhaps it was not a good idea for sailors in charge of Exocet missiles and other lethal modern ordnance to spend their afternoons in a condition that would make it illegal for them to drive a car.

    Things were different in the days of sail. The wooden walls of an 18th-century ship enclosed a community that was often cold and always wet. Sailors needed their comforts. The British warmed their men with rum made from sugar plantations in the West Indies; so did notorious pirates like Captain Henry Morgan (he of the “Old Bold Mate of Henry Morgan” song) and Long John Silver (“Yo Ho Ho and a Bottle of Rum”).

    But as far back as the early 1600s, the Dutch provided for their sodden sailors by giving them a spirit called brandywine (literally “burnt wine”). To make it they needed to buy substantial quantities of relatively bland wine to distill. Much of this they shipped in from France, particularly from the port of Nantes, at the head of an estuary where the lovely river Loire runs west toward the Atlantic.

    To provide for the Dutch trade, the area around Nantes was planted with a heavy fruiting grape called the Melon de Bourgogne, which was brought in from Burgundy. People suggest the name of the grape comes from the round leaves on the vines, but it might as well come from the fact that these grapes taste like melons—which is to say, they taste like nothing much at all. When the Dutch export market dried up, the farmers around Nantes found a way to turn the grapes they were growing into a very palatable white wine called Muscadet, ideal for summer drinking, pleasing with a Welsh Rarebit (sharp cheese grilled on buttered toast), wonderful with fish.

    I recently considered a bottle of Domaine de la Cognardiere “Bella Verte” Muscadet (substantially less than $15 on the Minneapolis side of the Edina-Minneapolis frontier). It had an initial taste that was pleasingly round, perhaps like the smell of a sun-filled cabin that has not been opened up for some months, slightly sharp, pleasantly musty. But the full benefit came on breathing out. This generated a taste like the fume of two flints clashed together. I can see this taste mingling with the smell of burning sparklers, now apparently legal in Minnesota, on July 4.

    The secret of the wine lies in the way it is allowed to ferment on its lees, “sur lie,” as it says on the labels. The liquid derived from the grapes picked each autumn is left over the winter in casks together with the solid dregs, and it is this which gives depth and complexity of flavor to what might otherwise be a rather dull drink. Sometimes the dregs impart a slight but refreshing fizz.

    Muscadet is like nothing else. Many other wines are made along the banks of the river Loire. They vary from the delightful vintages of Pouilly-Fume, with their heavenly smell of blackcurrants, redolent of country gardens in midsummer, to beverages which in wet cold years would be better employed as battery acid. But most of these are made from the Sauvignon Blanc grape, none from the Melon de Bourgogne.

    This is a wine to sip in a hammock. If you need summer reading to go with it, try Flying Colours by C.S. Forester, a novel in which Captain Horatio Hornblower of the Royal Navy escapes from Napoleon’s France by drifting in a rowboat down the Loire, past the chateaux, past the vineyards. Life could be worse.

    Oliver Nicholson is a classicist at the University of Minnesota, and former Secretary of the Wine Committee at Wolfson College, Oxford.

  • Road-Tripping Through the Dew

    Last year my friend Terry moved back to Nashville to take care of his ailing mother. Last month, when she passed away, I packed my kids, 11 and 14, in the car and drove an unplanned 820 miles in 15 hours to be with him. We left on a Thursday at 5 a.m. I worried about keeping two kids in the car like that, like veal, but we had to rocket if we wanted to make the memorial service. I had $100 in my pocket and no cash in my cash card until Friday. No fast food, no amusement parks.

    The kids got into the spirit of the trip—after all, three days off school is three days off school. We ate PBJ’s and hard-boiled eggs out of the cooler in the back like an America’s Most Wanted family. After a period of silence, somewhere before Kentucky, I heard from the backseat. “Mom, make Isaac stop touching me.” My spine froze. I looked in my rearview mirror to find two dust-covered faces with puffy, punch-drunk eyes and dry, angry mouths.

    I pulled off at the next station to fill up the tank. After paying, I had 60 bucks left. I looked at the kids, who were tussling by the diesel pump, whisper-fighting through clenched teeth. They’d hit the wall. Getting back in the car would be a big mistake. In the distance, just off the highway I saw a motel sign that read “Rooms $39.95. Cable, Indoor Pool.”

    The Budget Inn was two stucco buildings, the main two stories, the other a long strip of rooms facing a swampy field, a “they’ll never find your bones” field. We parked in the deserted lot, walked to the front desk, and rang the bell. A narrow-eyed old troll wearing a Peterbilt cap sprang forth and asked me what I wanted.

    “I’d like one of your $39.95 rooms, please.” I said. He sized us up. Single woman traveling with two homicidal kids. Easy pickings.

    “Don’t got no rooms for $39.95. That’s last month’s special. Ain’t changed the sign yet. Room for you plus two gonna run $45.” “Fine,” I lied. “I’ll take it. I’d like a room in the main building, by the pool.” I dug in my pocket. I’ve been a woman traveling alone before. You always have to stay in the main building. It’s where people can hear you scream. It’s also where the free “coffee” is in the morning. “That costs extra,” smiled the Troll. “You want budget rate, can’t be by the pool. Gonna have to be in the strip.”

    “How much for a room by the pool?”

    “$75.”

    I looked out the window into the empty parking lot and laid my money down.

    “I only have $60. We’ve been on the road all day and we’re tired.” The troll snatched up the small pile of bills on his counter. “S’okay,” he smiled magnanimously. “We getcha by the pool. You the only folks here tonight.”

    The kids swam. I took a tepid shower, and we tumbled into bed. I woke up at 3 a.m. to hear puking in the bathroom. My daughter had too many hard-boiled eggs. I stayed awake till 5 a.m., then roused the kids to get back on the road. I turned to my son, still snoring face down next to me, and nudged him.

    “Honey. We have to get moving. You can sleep in the car.” In response, he lifted his sweet, sleepy head, and spray-vomited all over the bed. The kid was set on mist. He sputtered an apology, and I cleaned him up. We got our stuff together to make a hasty retreat. I glanced around the room to make sure we hadn’t left anything behind. I walked to the bed, and pulled the covers over the mess like covering a corpse at a crime scene. Our gift to Rumplestiltskin. Under normal circumstances, I’d have rinsed the sheets in the sink, but 60 bucks is 60 bucks, and you get what you pay for.

    Colleen Kruse is a Twin Cities actress and comedian, mscolleenkruse@hotmail.com

  • Do Me!

    It’s not hard at all to kick back and get your nails done. And what you choose to have done to your nails conveys a message to the world around you. What will it be? Buff rimmed ovals just peeking over the edge of your fingertips? Vicious blood-red daggers? The Flojo? The Flojo is true nail art. Usually defined by nails of Guinness Book of World Records length, with long canoes curving down and forward, Flojo nails stop just short of describing a complete spiral. They can be any color. In fact to be a true Flojo, they should be many colors, perhaps even with good luck charms pierced through them. Women who wear the Flojo are sometimes regarded with horror or disbelief, as though they are crippling themselves by grooming their digits into uselessness. How can they type? How can they eat? How can they open car doors? What the supremely confident Flojo wearer says to the world is that she fully expects that you will peel her grapes and open her doors.

    You can’t get the Flojo at, say, the Red Door Salon. Like most cutting–edge fashion, nails like this are born in the street. Lake Street to be specific. Nail salons thrive on practically every block down Lake Street, from Nicollet Avenue to West River Road. There’s Nail It To Me, Nails For You, and my old haunt, Do Me Nails. I got my falsies done there almost every other Saturday night for two years. I thought the name was charming, and I wanted to support the businesses in my old neighborhood. I always pronounced it with a lilting Irish brogue, thereby creating a double entendre, softening the vulgarity. It may be the polish–remover fumes talking, but the first time I walked into the salon, it felt like home. Cheap wood paneling and rec-room carpet. Television and radio blaring at the same time. Kids running around bugging their moms for a treat. There were neat rows of manicure stations, and spice racks loaded with varnish of every imaginable color. I couldn’t wait to take my place at a bench and get my nails fussed over.

    Usually I preferred a short frosty blue tip. It’s an affordable luxury, running about 25 dollars every two weeks.

    On my last trip there, I patiently waited my turn—contemplating a palm tree-themed Flojo. The door burst open to a large white woman with tight, angry cornrows—apparently a difficult regular customer—with a Flojo emergency. She held a family-sized bag of Doritos, from which she extracted handful after handful of corn chips, working them into her mouth as she complained. “I got my nails done yesterday,” she griped bitterly. Holding her chip hand up to the light, she bellowed, “I gotta date tonight and one of the mofo nails came off! You gotta get me a new one right now—(munch)—’cause I don’t know where the other one is.” The technicians at the bench squirmed. I’m both a nail-biter and a chip-eater myself, and it occurred to me what might have happened to that false fingernail.

  • Why can’t I be a “Super Lawyer?”

    Like Moses coming down from Sinai with the Ten Commandments hot from the hand of the Almighty, Minnesota Law & Politics publisher Bill White will soon give us another Minnesota “Super Lawyer” list. The chosen will be revered among lawyers (or at least that is what they will tell their clients to justify higher fees). And advertising dollars will rain upon Law & Politics like manna from heaven. The annual list, which White cooked up in 1991 as a cheesy send-up of the fashion magazines’ supermodel lists has become the cash cow that keeps the magazine afloat the rest of the year.

    The problem with the list, as publisher White readily concedes, is that it’s skewed toward bigger firms and whiter faces, firms that practice big-ticket law. Lawyers of color, government lawyers, legal aid types, and those who practice in greater Minnesota are woefully underrepresented.

    Now, in fairness to Bill and editor Steve Kaplan, both of whom I genuinely like, they take the list very seriously try to produce something with integrity. According to White, many are called but few are chosen. First, the magazine sends out 18,000 questionnaires to Minnesota lawyers. (Though a number of the minority lawyers I spoke with have never received one. I have not received one in years. White told me that mine went to a building I moved from in June 1999. Curiously, my bi-monthly issues of the magazine have faithfully followed my every office move since then.)

    After White gets the questionnaires back, he and his staff begin to prune the list. White has assembled a “blue ribbon panel” of lawyers to help cull the wheat from the chaff. So who is on the “blue ribbon panel?” The top vote getters from the previous year’s list, who have little incentive to make the list more inclusive. Now, after the council of elders has given its holy stamp of approval, the list goes back to White and the gang, who tabulate the results.

    White, who claims that compiling the list is an act of “public service,” does not then release the list. Instead, he contacts the people on the list and their firms to let them know they have received the blessing of their peers and by the way, do you want to buy an ad in our magazine, effectively tooting your own horn at the moment you receive your laurels?

    Bill White chuckles. “Okay, I admit it. We got a great deal doing here. Our first objective with this issue is to make money.” However, he adds, “We have consistently produced a credible list. If we did not, lawyers would not scramble to get on it.” (For the record, I have never been named to the “Top Lawyer” list; neither have I scrambled to get on. Naturally, I am heartbroken at this egregious oversight —hence, this column!)

    At least part of what he said is true. Some lawyers do scheme, campaign, and occasionally even beg to get on the list. White says he gets dozens of unsolicited resumes and glossy pictures every year.

    Publisher White pooh-poohs such politics. “We call that logrolling. You know, you scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours. We know who votes for who. If someone for your firm votes for you, his or her vote does not count as much. If we see ‘block voting,’ we get suspicious.”

    In other words, White tacitly concedes that some lawyers are more equal than others. “Our system is not perfect,” he admits. “We certainly could do a better job of including lawyers of color, government lawyers, lawyers from greater Minnesota. To a great extent, how ‘public’ a lawyer is has a lot to do with making the list. We know that estate planning lawyers are less likely to be included than personal injury ones.”

    So, is the list a bankable, reliable list of the best and brightest on Minnesota’s legal landscape? Or just a reliable bank for the magazine? The answer depends on whom you talk to. For lawyers trying to make the list, inclusion is a powerful marketing tool. What do they care if the selection methodology is less than reliable and skewed toward the lighter shades, certain practice areas, and larger firms, as long as they make the cut? For the magazine, it’s the profit engine that economically powers the bi-monthly’s other five issues.

    Does any of this really matter for legal consumers? Not as long as they take the list for what it really is—an ego boosting (for the lawyers), practice building (for their firms) and tremendously lucrative (for the magazine) piece of entertainment. In other words, caveat emptor.

    Clinton Collins, Jr. is a Minneapolis lawyer and ABC Radio talk show host. You can reach him at ccollins@collins lawfirm.com.

  • Westering Home

    A lot of godly folk seem to forget that the Lord’s first miracle was turning water into wine. But it was a minister from the Western Isles of Scotland who pointed out that this was hardly remarkable. In his part of the world, he opined, the Good Lord turns water into whiskey every day.

    Of course he was right. Whiskey has its origin in the generous quantities of cold water which a benign Providence, aided by the Gulf Stream, pours onto the sodden and stony landscape of the northern United Kingdom. No rain, no whiskey. The English spell it “whisky,” the Scots prefer plain KY (yes, like the jelly), but either way it is an anglicized form of the Gaelic uisgebeatha, which means “water of life.” Few parts of Scotland are more sodden than the island of Islay (pronounced EYE-lah). This is the watery world of Compton MacKenzie’s happy novel Whisky Galore, filmed in 1949 as a rollicking Ealing comedy with the title Tight Little Island. Islay is located at the northern end of the narrow channel that unites Northern Ireland to Southwest Scotland in a Celtic cultural syzygy. The island gets more than its share of the rain brought in by westerly winds off the Atlantic. No surprise then to find a dozen distilleries on Islay, each making a distinctive single malt whiskey on the banks of the island’s peaty streams.

    Water is essential. The other necessity is grain to make the malt. Moored alongside the wharves at the distilleries, you will see the ships, dirty British coasters with salt-caked smokestacks, which bring in the barley. The grains are warmed and moistened so that they germinate and generate sugars. Some of the peaty taste of the final liquor comes from the reek of the peat fires which provide the heat. The germinated barley, the malt, is milled and then mashed—brewed in water roughly the temperature of hot coffee. The resulting sweet liquor, full of sugars and all sorts of interesting enzymes, is then made to ferment with living yeast before it is distilled and drawn off into casks to grow old gracefully. As it ages, some of the spirit evaporates and makes the angels happy, but much single malt whiskey also comes to America, where, thanks to lower taxation on alcohol in the United States, it is often cheaper than in its country of origin (about $40 a bottle in these parts).

    Single malt whiskey is the characteristic product of a single distillery. Much of it finds its way into the familiar blends of Scotch, where it is mixed with grain whiskey, a spirit produced by a less exacting process. It is the malt element which gives each blend its characteristic taste. Cutty Sark, for instance, a blend which appeals to the American taste for lighter sweeter Scotch, contains a good deal of Islay single malt. It was actually invented during Prohibition and shipped into the States by the redoubtable Captain Bill McCoy, whose name survives in the expression “the real McCoy.”

    Blended whiskey is warming in a Minnesota winter, of course, but it is single malts which engage the intelligence as well as the heart. Laphroaig is perhaps the best known of the Islay malts, but it’s definitely an acquired taste—the unkind have compared it to iodine strained through creosote-coated railroad ties. Of them all Bunnahabhain is the most immediately appealing. The name (Gaelic for “mouth of the river”) is easily pronounced: BOON-a-haaven. On the label is an old boy at the wheel of his British coaster. The whiskey is pale gold, sweeter and lighter than most Islay malts perhaps because the spring water reaches this remote and beautiful place through pipes and is therefore not so heavily impregnated with the taste of the surrounding peat. A dram of Bunnahabhain taken before you walk the dog on a summer evening may well lead to a second. It ought to have you, in the words of the old song printed on the bottle, “Westering Home with a song in the air/ Light in the eye and it’s good-bye to cares.”

    Oliver Nicholson is a classicist at the University of Minnesota, and former Secretary of the Wine Committee at Wolfson College, Oxford.