Blog

  • Old Man Movie

    Let’s begin by getting one fact clear: Al Milgrom, the Twin Cities’ most famous fool for cinema, is an old man. His driver’s license makes the bold claim that he was born in 1922—a claim belied by both his appearance, for he doesn’t look a day over sixty-five, and his behavior, for he acts like a teenager. But even without the state’s corroboration, Al is old by anyone’s reckoning.

    Yet, someday, even Mel Gibson will get old. What is important with respect to Al’s age—what he and no doubt a bunch of other people are concerned with—is his legacy. I don’t mean legacy in any grand sense of the word. Al is not a war hero or a great political leader. But he single-handedly has run the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Film Festival throughout most of its twenty-three-year history, and founded the U Film Society, likely before you were born. He may make legitimate claims to a meaningful legacy in the city he has called home for the better part of his eighty-three years, inasmuch as it would be a different place were it not for his obsessions, which, as obsessions should, have infected the civic body, mostly for the good. “Al is the godfather of the alternative film movement—people have heard of him everywhere,” said one veteran of the art-film scene recently in Berlin, where I accompanied Al just months after reporting for duty as his underling.

    Of course, no legacy is complete without blots, smears, and plenty of broken eggs. A film festival is a big omelette, and the fish tales of Al’s, shall we say, unbridled passions are as bountiful as spring rain. Al has yelled at, pissed off, and obliquely threatened a good half of this city. But such behavior always comes in the service of his attempts to pry this place open, to peel away its provinciality like the skin from a tangerine. One myth-become-legend has it that he called Bill Kling, president of Minnesota Public Radio, at his home one Sunday at midnight (Al is quite the night owl) to berate him about the lack of radio coverage for a foreign film he’d deemed both excellent and exceedingly important. I don’t know how true the tale is—Al does possess an uncanny ability to ferret out rare phone numbers—but a cursory glance at the logos on festival catalogs from years past evidences an abrupt absence of MPR sponsorship beginning in 2001. At any rate, as in the movies, we should take the tale as a character-defining scene. You may envision Al Milgrom as John Wayne, if it helps.

    Al has been compared to all manner of saints and sinners in his half-century at the wheel of his cinematic jalopy. Those who love him—and they do, honestly, speak of love—see him as a beacon on the vast prairie. They recall how he once drove a confused Jean-Luc Godard around this most un-continental of cities, introducing him to the important film folk of Minneapolis, who, by Al’s calculus, included a local Iranian coffee vendor and the projectionist at the U Film Society. Those who are less than fond call Al “a little Nazi”—pointed criticism, considering that he is Jewish.

    Clearly, Al is someone who inspires more opinion than understanding. Plenty of people know that what he does either floats their boats or punches big holes in the bottoms of them. What fewer know—and perhaps, ultimately, it is unknowable—is why Al has persisted for so long in his voyage on less-than-smooth seas in what may only be described as a leaky craft. (The U Film Society, which in 2002 merged with Oak Street Arts to become Minnesota Film Arts, is no Walker Art Center.) Perhaps the only way to know such things is to view Al in his natural habitat.

    It was February and I was in Potsdamer Platz, at the heart of a reborn Berlin, drinking beer with Al at midnight during that city’s esteemed film festival. Everyone seemed to have come down to this strange new center of town, a glass and aluminum gleam built on Japanese capital in the irrational, heady days of a newly reunified country. This year’s Berlin International Film Festival, which has become Potsdamer Platz’ most visible and anticipated event, was a monster: more than three hundred films unspooling in a mere ten days on some forty screens within several hundred yards of each other. An earth-sized disco ball hung over the cobblestone plaza in the middle of it all, sending shards of light far into the pedestrian side streets, where they stabbed the eyes of passersby exiting the murk of the cinema.

    The bar was packed with smoking, drinking Berliners, and it was loud like an airplane. Al and I were lodging with one Achmet Tas, a thirty-five-year-old Turk who smokes nonstop, and exhales opinions with each breath. Al met Achmet a few years ago at another bar in Berlin, and now sleeps on his couch in exchange for supplying him with an official “Advisor to the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Film Festival” credit, which loosens the doors for Achmet at various festival parties and screenings. Al, perennially late in organizing his own industry credentials, was ironically attending as a correspondent for the Pulse.

    One thing became immediately clear in the few days that I spent with Al in Berlin, and that was that I was seeing his idealized self, the man he aspires to be. Not that he fancies himself European, or is a heavy drinker and smoker. It was more a matter of Al’s easy comfort with the essential randomness of a film festival. Film festivals are about people meeting for intense bursts of opinion broken up by hours and hours spent alone in the dark. And this is the world in which Al thrives. Myopic by nature, Al has the uncanny ability to be completely ignorant of what is going on around him, provided there is a film to talk about. His body language has been honed by forty years of such behavior: his elegantly long fingers are frozen in an eternal jab, his head leans forever slightly forward to engage in argument, and a wide-brimmed hat serves as shield from whatever irrelevant chaos might be erupting around him. In cinematic terms, one can easily see Al debating the merits of some new European film as, in the background, Hollywood-style, one car careens off the hood of another, twisting into the air and crashing in an exploding heap behind Al just as he wraps up his critique with his favorite phrase, “It didn’t work for me.”

    Al in Europe, then, is Al at home, even when he is staying on someone’s couch—it was a nicely made-up couch, too, with sheets washed in that headily scented German detergent. Achmet played a better host than one might have expected (the only items in his fridge were candy). Everyone stayed up long past midnight most nights, when we all bumped into each other in the smoke-filled CinemaxX Lounge after a solid twelve hours of film-watching. The odd-couple companionship of Al and Achmet was arresting, as Al’s subdued but dogged arguments were for once overwhelmed, by Achmet’s manic pontifications. As he grew frustrated with Achmet’s bellicosity, Al began to insert a telltale phrase, “Lookit,” at the start of every opinion. “Lookit, the main character is drawn sketchy, there’s no motivation to her! I just thought it was weak.” To which Achmet, more impassioned still, responded, “Al, you are not right in this one, and I will tell you why…”

    Back in Minneapolis, the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Film Festival (now affectionately dubbed M-SPIFF) was beginning to shake to life. The days were lengthening, everyone on staff was getting sick, and Al was nowhere to be found. He’d left his bag on Achmet’s floor—a bag that contained all his festival contact information and film selections—and was chasing it by telephone through U.S. customs in Mobile, Alabama. We were only a few days from our deadline for bookings, and there was a score of titles that Al insisted he had secured, which we were dubiously trying to corral. (Al Milgrom’s “yes” is equal to anyone else’s “maybe.”) But no matter. Over the next few days, the festival would grow by leaps and bounds, extracting a pound of flesh for every title secured.

    The legacy of a man obsessed with foreign film—Al is old-school, and has little fondness for the Sundance phenomenon—M-SPIFF is a curious cultural creature. For one, it is not a slick operation by any stretch of the imagination. Where other U.S. festivals revel in artifice and manufactured glamour, Al’s monologue has, for the better part of its twenty-three years, taken the opposite approach. For example, Al’s gift-of-choice to last year’s guest of honor, Swedish filmmaker Jan Troell, was a mallard decoy. One gets the sense that he is as blind to the glamour of film as he is to anything that is not bouncing off the silver screen.

    This is a great blessing. Film people, frankly, are among the worst on the planet. Shallow and self-aggrandizing, they exist for the most part in a marshmallow world, where no interaction is devoid of some perfume being blown up your bum, no matter who you are. Titles, prestige, and the patina of importance are the currency of the film festival industry, and it is a currency that increasingly attracts a vulgar element. As the perception of merit spills off the screen onto irrelevant things like parties, tote bags bearing logos, and Roger Ebert’s banal omnipresence, the essential goodness of the film program itself is perforce lost.

    Al’s incredible myopia—his inability to be motivated by anything more or less complex than whether or not a film “worked for me”—is, then, at the heart of his persistence. For there is always something out there that does, in fact, work for him, and even as an old man, he is dogged in seeking it out. That these films are often found on continents where drinking too much coffee and coming to work late are perfectly acceptable behaviors is, of course, a perk, but the driving force is what is and what might be on screen.

    Yet, for all the strength of its program, M-SPIFF as a civic event can, will, and must change. The world demands as much. It must grow up, and play the games that adults play. It is a bittersweet proposition. No one relishes practicing the machinations of festival power: attempting to sabotage the Tribeca Film Festival with secret premieres, or tricking some Polish film outfit into sending a filmmaker without telling them how far from Chicago Minneapolis truly is. But the festival world is increasingly driven by money, just like everything else, and money breeds distraction. It is sad to witness: the barnacles of industry are slowly encrusting all festivals, and whether for good or for bad, M-SPIFF is destined to join the fray, just like everyone else.

    Al seems resigned to the changing times, to these new processes. Curiously, the great tantrums that I had been promised when I came to Minnesota Film Arts have not materialized. On the contrary, Al seems quite relaxed and amused these days—even humble. Of course, arguments about films erupt daily, and happily, voices rise and tempers flare. “There is no way we are playing that film!” leads to, “Lookit, it’s a good film! You didn’t like it, but it’s won major awards, it has a name talent—if we can get it into the Latvian press, get it out to the Latvian restaurants, it will do well!” and so on. Al still manages to listen to nobody about anything that is not an opinion on film; everything he says, in turn, is filtered through a rather fantastical lens, part optimism, part outright deception. But at the end of the day, the films still come, discovered by Al during some sixteen-hour viewing session in the Czech Republic’s Karlovy Vary, or another far corner of the world.

    I once asked Al how he got into this line of work. Many years ago, he had been a journalist, a stringer for the Washington Post, and the Berlin-based editor of—believe it or not—Stars & Stripes, the U.S. military newspaper. “I was going to grad school at the U for a Ph.D.,” he explained, “and I just sort of started showing movies. I think the first film was a Buñuel title.” I asked him about that abandoned Ph.D., and he shrugged it off. “I was going to do sociology, because it seemed easy. But you see, I always thought I would just do the film stuff for a while, but it sort of took over. It was a lot of fun, really.” When asked why he keeps going, he insisted it’s merely because he needs a job. “I only have about fifteen hundred dollars saved up, you know,” he said. “I have to keep busy.” But there’s more to it than that. Over the years, he’s been offered retirement packages in return for giving up control of the festival. Yet he refuses. Even when he did, once, temporarily retire, Al couldn’t stand it. He broke into his locked office with a crowbar.

    Maybe the question is, why wouldn’t he want to keep going, flitting around the globe, discussing the one thing he cares about most? The solace of selecting, watching, and then sharing good films is what he lives for. When I pressed Al a little harder on the matter of retirement, he looked at me quizzically, as though I was the understudy waiting for him to fall down the stairs, à la Showgirls. Then he turned back to the phone to argue with a Dutch distributor about a fantastic Indonesian documentary, The Shape of the Moon, which he caught at Rotterdam, turned me on to, and which will play in Minneapolis as part of this year’s film festival.

  • From The Request Line: Hayjo Revisted

    hayjo.jpg

    Bloom of fireworks above a black field, the idle of insects throbbing from the damp ditches. Distant petroleum carnival of light, dark steeples, and a watertower announcing the presence of a town. Is that the rattle of a snare drum from somewhere out in the fields? Tell me again what lives in that place beyond this darkness. The bonfire will signify what again? When it all goes up in flames what is it we’ll be burning?

    I like this song, it reminds me of something. I can’t put my finger on it, but it involved, I’m sure, a night just like this. We were in a car, going somewhere else, or perhaps just somewhere.

    Somewhere else came later, I suppose. Back then there was only this. Remember? When there was only this? It was never enough. Perhaps that was the problem. You can’t put your finger on it. I love that about you, how you can never seem to put your finger on it, and how badly you would like to put your finger on it. Things, in general, the way they don’t seem quite real to you, within reach. Graspable. The way you’re always saying Hold out hope, as if it could mean the many things it could mean. Not just a clinging to, not just something desperate, but an offering. Something extended. Something shared.

    I love these quiet roads, just outside what is our life, that feeling of being lost in a still unfamiliar place, of being plunked down on another planet, looking out with dim longing and dimming wonder at the distant glow of the puzzle that will never be home. Can’t say. That’s another one of yours that I love, as if you mean it, as if there’s some mysterious proscription, as if you honestly cannot say, cannot utter whatever words might explain, whatever words might possibly make a difference.

    Because –and this I choose to think and believe– those words are still forming in you, still turning over and lining up in your head, still drilling and taking shape and preparing for the long march up into the light, when they will become, magically, truth, the truth we’re going to need to turn finally and forever away from that dark, still-mysterious planet barely rising across the black, empty fields.

    hayjo 2.jpg

  • More Spring Training Nonsense

    If you go beyond the Twins’ so-so 8-11 record in Florida and scrutinize what they’ve actually done in those games, you might be tempted to forecast a rather alarming repeat of what made the team so maddening for much of the 2004 season.

    Look at the runs scored and runs allowed numbers for the AL Central teams this spring:

    Detroit: 125 RS/97 RA

    Chicago
    : 122 RS/112 RA

    Cleveland: 132 RS/107 RA

    Minnesota
    : 77 RS/76 RA

    Kansas City: 99 RS/105 RA

    I doubt that it means a damn thing, but you see an awful lot of high scoring games in spring training, and seventy-seven runs seems pretty shocking. I guess if you want to take the glass-is-half-empty approach, you could be alarmed that the Twins have scored at least 25% fewer runs than every other team in the division. And the glass-is-half-full folks can always take comfort in those pitching numbers. All around, though, the math looks pretty damn familiar.

    Finally, here’s a little spring training trivia: Gary Gaetti set the club record with ten spring homeruns in 1983. So far this year the entire team has hit ten homers in nineteen games.

    As I say, I’m sure it’s nothing. I’m sure it doesn’t mean a damn thing. I wouldn’t even give it another thought. I’m sorry, in fact, I even brought it up.

  • The Hacks: Manhattan Edition

    Here is a true-life fairy tale for all embattled and embittered freelance writers everywhere—and we can say with some satisfaction that we know this fable by heart. But let’s run through the paces anyway, and we may arrive at a new and surprising moral to the story.

    A solid mid-masthead writer at a New York magazine has been writing good if not sizzling feature stories for several years. He is already way ahead of most of his peers; it is a dream job to have a writing contract for a Manhattan glossy, a lot like reaching the Major Leagues. But after a change of management, he is suddenly out of favor, and he is fired. He spends the next year or so trying not so much to get another contract as to merely land an assignment. He finally gets one at another major publisher, and he produces the story. It is killed. He progresses slowly down the long list of potential markets, hitting what finally appears to be the bottom of his list—some city magazine in the outback, which likes the story and publishes it.

    In the meantime, the writer manages to land another assignment back in Manhattan, but this story too is ultimately killed—for no apparent reason other than the caprice of the editors. This story too finds a home at that same humble city magazine. So now virtually every prestigious magazine publisher in New York—Conde Nast, Rodale, Wenner, probably Hearst too—has had its crack at Potter, and has taken a pass.

    Early the following year, both stories are nominated for the industry’s highest honor—the National Magazine Awards, the Pulitzers (?) of the glossy world. So, then. A happy ending indeed, for Max Potter—and, one surely hopes, a shaming experience for Jim Nelson, Michael Caruso, Jann Wenner. And a sobering one for any other editors-in-chief with nose to grindstone in the slabs of Mid-Town. (Well, we don’t really expect such a widespread deflation of ego over there, but it’s fun to fantasize.)

    As Potter mentions in today’s Observer, though, the really shameful thing is that his story is literally the exception that proves the rule. One can only imagine the hundreds of stories that never get published nor even written, because New York editors are too concerned about lunch at The Four Seasons and too worried about out-manuevering one another for whoever passes for the A-Rod of the moment in magazine writing. See, the thing is, the reading public cares less than anyone dares to imagine about bylines and mastheads, and while we editors are busy googling ourselves and calculating our own Q-ratings, the public yearns to be surprised, entertained, enlightened—and they do not need to see a writer’s resume first.

    What we’re trying to say in our clumsy way is that there simply is not enough curiosity, good humor, and open-mindedness in an industry that takes itself far too seriously, and honors committments to ego before it ever gets around to processing and properly rewarding solid journalism that happens to be produced by a nobody.

    Now, the surpising moral of this story: It is the same editors who rejected Mr. Potter’s stories the first time around who sit on the juries that this time not only accepted them, but considered them some of the best journalism produced in the nation last year. How did that happen? Whether this confirms or contradicts your own worst impressions of the magazine industry, we say bravo to 5280, and we think it bodes well for publications that don’t operate with the same levels of narcissism required of our New York friends.

  • The Right and Life

    We’ve been on vacation in Florida this week and for us news junkies it’s been a pleasure to partake of the St. Petersburg Times, and ignore the usual suspects. In consequence, we’ve been able to read the local, rather than national, coverage of the Terri Schiavo case, and get the perspective of the people who have been covering the story since way before DeLay and Frist decided to play God.

    One story today noted the outrage of Florida Republicans at DeLay referring to Florida judge George Greer as a murderer and terrorist. It happens that Judge Greer is himself a Republican, and has a lot of Republican friends who have rallied to his defense. The irony of the Republican Congress violating its own oft repeated mantra of states’ rights to interfere in a Florida matter is not lost on the people down here. Say what you want about Florida (and we are certainly guilty of calling them names ourselves on many occasions,) but the folks here, even many right-to-lifers, don’t care much for DeLay’s cynical grandstanding.

    Also today, an editorial pointed out that President Bush’s pronouncement that he should “err on the side of life” rings a bit hollow when one takes a look at the executions he approved while governor of Texas, including that of Gary Graham, the last American to be executed for a crime committed while a juvenile. As the Times points out, Graham was almost certainly innocent, and yet Bush rationalized his execution by asserting that he was guilty of other crimes. Actually the Times didn’t equivocate at all on the topic of Bush’s pronouncement: “That is a contemptible hypocrisy,” is the exact language they used.

    Finally, columnist Howard Troxler asked today why DeLay and Frist waited during a legal procedure that has been going on for years before they acted “to say our [Florida’s] law does not count.” He recounts the story of Thomas More, albeit the fictionalized one of A Man for All Seasons. You may remember Thomas More as a genuinely religious man who gave his life for his principles when he refused to approve the divorce of Henry VIII. Troxler notes that the government of Henry was willing to trample its own laws for its political ends.

    No matter what you think of whether Terri Schiavo should be kept alive or allowed to die, it is clear that the Florida judiciary did not take the matter lightly. The litigation has been going on for years. All sides have had their day in court, and the Florida legislature has had ample opportunity to make its wishes known.

    In that context, the self righteous Thomas DeLay stands out in sharp contrast to the righteous Thomas More. One can only hope the Christian voters in Florida remember the difference the next time they get a chance to make their opinion known as to which sort of religion they prefer.

  • Happy As A Flapper To No Longer Call That Miserable Planet Home

    I had to wait.jpgideological.jpg

    I’m not talking about that old world, mister. I’m trying to forget I ever lived there. All those bastards had ants in their pants, and you’d think it wouldn’t be possible to cram that many drunken jackasses in a Volvo, but you’d be sadly mistaken. I saw it all with my own eyes.

    Oh, Lord, now you’ve got me started. Katie bar the door.

    There used to be this punchy little Irishman who worked as a doorman in my building, and I couldn’t even tell you all the beatings that hateful devil gave me over the years. He was what I’d guess you’d call a stickler, and I had –or so he avowed– issues with compliance. You name it.

    What it really boiled down to, what it always boiled down to, was that the fellow didn’t like the cut of my jib. He said as much, on more than one occasion. He’d accuse me of ‘randy couplings,’ and the absurdity of that unjust allegation can still make my blood boil. I was –and remain– a gentleman through and through.

    Whatever it was I tried to carry into the building, whether briefcase or grocery sack, the Irishman would insist on ‘having a little peek in my trunk.’ There were scenes, I can assure you, that went beyond mere humiliation into the territory of violence and perversion. Just the thought of the little storage closet he had there in the lobby makes the hair stand up on the back of my neck.

    Believe me, I saved my pennies, and when they began to take reservations for the rocket ship off that godforsaken planet I was among the first to put down a deposit. I’m happy as a clam these days until some miserable, homesick joker starts prattling on about the good old days and then –just like that– I’m right back in that storage closet with the Irishman.

    forsaken 3.jpgfrigidaire.jpg

  • Line-Up Speculation

    Surprises and disasters large and small could still be looming in the final week of spring training, but right now it looks like the Twins opening day line-up will look like this:

    Shannon Stewart
    Jason Bartlett
    Joe Mauer
    Justin Morneau
    Torii Hunter
    Lew Ford
    Jacque Jones
    Michael Cuddyer
    Luis Rivas

    With Ford, Jones, and Cuddyer in the sixth, seventh, and eighth spots that suddenly looks (at least potentially) like a pretty powerful lineup; certainly the most promising batting order Ron Gardenhire has been able to throw out there in the last couple years. I don’t even mind Ford batting sixth, particularly following Morneau and Hunter. It’s almost perfect, in fact; he’ll have the chance to keep rallies alive, move guys around the bases, or work with a clean slate. The only wild cards, really, are Cuddyer and Bartlett, but I would think that the second slot should be a nice way for the kid to break into the major leagues, and Cuddyer shouldn’t feel a whole lot of pressure batting eigthth. I think they’ll both be fine.

    Then, of course, there’s Rivas, but isn’t it nice to know that if Luis once again sucks eggs the Twins have options? In that eventuality even one of the utility guys (Punto, for instance) would be an upgrade, and there’s always the option of pushing Cuddyer back over to second and installing Terry Tiffee –who’s gotten a good, long look in Florida, and has been decent– or one of the other spare parts at third.

  • From Tampa to Red Lake in One News Cycle

    We hate being the center of the national news when it means yet another school shooting. And we hate having to write this: What possible service can this news be to the Plain People of America? It most certainly is news, even though we detect a certain low-level anomie—even a perverse detachment developing, as each new shooting story trickles into the living rooms of an increasingly jaded public. Normally, these sorts of stories are justified in newsrooms under the “protect the children” code that all professional journalists learn today—there is much danger in the world, even (especially?) in its most isolated corners. We report on these sorts of tragedies in the hopes of averting future tragedies. Right?

    But that would require some pragmatic answers to complex problems. (More security? Trigger locks? Outlaw video games and trench coats? Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ? Uh, no, we were thinking a bit more serious than that.) Instead, what we see is something of a circus of gory detail, the voyeuristic stenography (block that ironic headline, please) of reconstructing a crime scene, without a lot of analysis or thoughtful consideration. Most efforts to process such an incident are feeble, moralistic, empty, soft-headed. What is a reader or viewer left with? What is the take-away?

    We can’t bear to read through the reams of sensational coverage (the silver lining of heinous news: Nice work, Bemidji Pioneer, drinks for everyone in the newsroom—after a tasteful moment of silence, of course), so we don’t really know what we’re talking about, frankly.

    But one thing we did notice this morning was a humble little press release from the National Mental Health Association that linked to an important resource page: Bullying and What To Do About It. Here is a salient extract:

    “Although its always been around, bullying should never be accepted as normal behavior. The feelings experienced by victims of bullying are painful and lasting. Bullies, if not stopped, can progress to more serious, antisocial behavior. Recent incidents of school violence show that bullying can have tragic consequences for individuals, families, schools, and entire communities.”

    See, gaining a little insight into the news is a lot easier than anyone could hope.

    We would never be so simple-minded as to suggest that certain geo-political situations bear any relationship at all to the insular, microcosmic, uniquely troubled world of the Red Lake reservation. But it makes a guy think.

    If reporting terrible news actually made the world a better place, well, we should be on the threshold of an honest-to-God golden age. But all signs point in the other direction. Still, there are a few heroes of the dawning Post-American Sino-European world. (Pre-emptive rhetorical device: Forced to live? Or allowed to die? It’s how you frame the question, innit.)

  • Link Rodeo

    mrINever.jpg

    Gogol’s last words: ‘A ladder, quick, a ladder!’

    Elias Canetti, The Agony of Flies

    I’ve never been able to sleep like a normal person, and I literally could count the number of dreams I remember in my lifetime on one hand. This last week, however, I’ve been trying a new medication, and experiencing the sort of sleep I like to call crocodile-skimming –I feel like I’m almost completely submerged, but there’s a small part of my mind that just keeps bobbing right at the surface between consciousness and unconsciousness. I do, though, have little bursts where I actually go all the way under, and these episodes have been marked by vivid dreams, most of which I can’t remember. Last night — I’m certain influenced by something I read in the above-mentioned Canetti book– I had a dream in which I was hiding from a god who did not create humans, but rather captured them. This morning I went through the portion of the book I had read last night but could find nothing that would have obviously triggered such a dream; so maybe, in fact, it really is just a case of my unconscious mind finally –after forty years– getting a chance to strut its stuff.

    groundhog001.jpg

    Also, here’s an assortment of links that have been backing up on me. Consider it a sort of online gallery crawl
    :

    Chris Payne: Photographer

    Chicago Street Photography

    Tokyo Eyes

    Drive-In Theaters

    Bernd and Hilla Becher
    More Becher
    Becher: Watertowers
    More Watertowers

    Jeff Brouws: Photography

    Roadside Peek


    Coney Island Polaroids

    Squidfingers: Polaroids

    Polaroids

    Andrei Tarkovsky’s Polaroids

    Mini Golf

    Roadside Architecture

    Soviet Children’s Picture Books

    The Internet Pinball Database

    Tom Waits’ All-Time Top Twenty (Thanks to TMFTML)

  • The Value of a Good Nap Revealed: $10!

    We are pleased to report yet another first here at the magazine: Last night, we finally took a nap on that old seat-sprung couch over there. (Photographic evidence to the contrary was carefully staged.) This morning, there are lots of reasons why we might want to just close our eyes and make the world go away—but last night’s little episode of shut-eye was actually the direct consequence of the subscription model for online content.

    Let’s explain. Many readers have commented on the simpatico they see between the magazine and radio—specifically the more playful versions of public radio—and we frequently work directly with MPR. The relationship extends from a basic story-telling ethic. Great radio, like a great magazine, does not waste words. It rewards you for listening by creating vivid mental pictures (in print, we have the luxury of giving you pictures, true, but we do not have the passive immediacy that a voice in your car has).

    Anyway, our obsession with radio’s story-telling possibilities goes way back, predating even a short run of writing for Garrison Keillor. (He didn’t like us very much.) It goes back to the 80s, specifically to Sunday nights in Eugene, Oregon, lying on our back on the carpet, staring at the ceiling, and listening to “Joe Frank: Work in Progress” on KLCC. And occasionally we drifted off, in a sort of narrative-induced trance. If you know Joe Frank’s work, you need no explanation—indeed, you realize any explanation is invariably feeble. Frank is typically described as “the master of noir radio,” but that implies that there really is something called “noir radio” and that there are other people producing it. (They aren’t. Well, they ARE, but they are not really being broadcast anywhere. The whole thing with radio is that it is a “push” technology—it comes to you. You get to be passive about it. Any radio-style production that uses a pull model—you go and get it because you know you want it—is probably doomed to fail.) Anyway, noir radio, if there is such a thing, is this: creative monologues, dialogues, fictional sketches, audio experimentation, typically produced with or without sound effects, soundtracks, sound loops, and so on. Ira Glass occasionally tinkers with the form, but less so in recent years. Keillor’s “Guy Noir” has nothing to do with it.

    Since we ended up working in a parallel industry, we actually got friendly with Joe Frank a few years back, and we commissioned a story on KCRW, the legendary Santa Monica radio station that used to employ Joe. (A long aside, for extra credit: KCRW is frequently cited as one of the prototypes for our shiny new radio station, the Current. Which reminds us of a conversation we had over the weekend—a smart friend indeed was pointing out that public radio’s original insight was that commercial radio couldn’t or wouldn’t do news in a way that fully took advantage of the medium. Commercial news at the time was pretty much what commercial news is today—top-of-the-hour soundbites and summaries, barely going beyond what in print would be a headline and subheadline. NPR’s genius, born at St. John’s abbey lo these many years ago, was seeing that the listening public could short-circuit the traditional ad-based model and pay directly for more substantive news and thoughtful round-the-clock broadcast journalis. Now, the genius of MPR, and visionaries like Bill Kling and Sara Lutman, is that ~music~ is the next frontier of public broadcasting. We’ve been meaning to say this for a while: it is very gratifying indeed to see that there are still some new tricks left in this old dog!)

    So we heard a while ago that there was supposedly some strange falling out with KCRW (and its legendary director, Ruth Seymour); but in hind sight, it might be that Joe Frank had a falling out with public radio in general—although we note that he recently participated in the pledge drive of New York’s WMFU, where they still broadcast back issues of his many, many radio shows. Joe seems to have little or no interest in producing new shows for radio. Instead, he has cast his lot with the Web, appealing directly to his fans to subsidize his work.

    Last night we popped for a one-month subscription—feeling magnanimous, we guess, after becoming founding members of the Current—but then realizing we deserve no such pat on the back, having been public broadcasting free-loaders whenever the personal well had run dry. It is an interesting model; Joe is now producing a three or four new audio pieces per month, usually one long piece, several shorter pieces, sometimes posting short films based on his work, and so on.

    We intend to make good use of our month-long subscription, and if it means naps every Sunday night on our couch, then so be it. We encourage you to do the same.

    UPDATE: Readers have pointed out that there is an advertisement for The Current that pops up right over there, to the right of your screen. We–meaning me, the writer of this particular blog—have no control over which advertisements appear over there. Frankly, I don’t have a lot of control over what I end up writing about each day, either!