Month: June 2006

  • Glad And Sorry

    west bend 2.jpg

    When he came up through the tunnel, the darkness had not yet lifted and the cicada were still in full damp rattle.

    The heat had broken in the night, and the coolness was stirring up an apparational moving fog, heavy, moist. The street lights were dropping fuzzed cones of grainy and ineffectual light straight down into the fog.

    Across the street he could see the smeared neon in the windows of the slaughterhouse bars and diners. A laugh broke like a whip and set off a dog somewhere out in the neighborhood beyond. From the stockyards he could hear the sleepy and pleasant idling of freight trains, readying to move out across the plains and into the mountains.

    At the mouth of the tunnel there were two children huddled in rain slickers, shaking little UNICEF cans. There was nothing in his pockets but blood. His pants and socks and boots felt sodden.

    He couldn’t stand to change and shower in that filthy locker room with all those bellowing and exhausted men. Every morning he liked to be the first one up the tunnel, the first one home in bed next to his wife as daylight made its appearance at the windows.

    He would be drifting off to sleep as his wife dressed quietly for mass and kissed him goodbye.

    how 2.jpg

  • Market Frenzy

    Like many food tourists, I’m driven to seek out local markets—public, farmers, indoor, outdoor—everywhere I travel. Invariably, I end up wandering the aisles awash with both wonder and jealousy. In Vancouver, the booths and stands crowded into the Granville Island Public Market nearly bring me to tears with their spectacular selection of fresh fish and cheeses. The San Francisco Ferry Building Marketplace is so chock-full of local food artisans and champions of the sustainable food movement that leaving that place is like breaking up with a soul mate. Pike’s Place in Seattle, La Boqueria in Barcelona, and Chatuchak in Bangkok have all left me coveting a great market here at home.

    This year my wishes have been granted. The past couple of months have already seen a flurry of activity on the Twin Cities market scene. The opening of the Midtown Global Market in June was a Twin Cities milestone: Finally we have an indoor public market—home to produce, interesting dry goods, and prepared foods, restaurants, and arts and crafts from around the world. The St. Paul Farmers Market finally began construction on Market Hall, which will provide year-round indoor accommodations right next door to its outdoor market in Lowertown. Back in Minneapolis, nestled between the Mill City Museum and the new Guthrie Theater, the Mill City Farmers Market is supplied by local organic growers and geared in part to local chefs (its driving force is Brenda Langton, the chef and owner of Café

    Brenda). Add to this the success of neighborhood markets—the Midtown Public Market (not to be confused with the Midtown Global Market), an outdoor seasonal market just off the light rail transit line on Lake Street, or the suburban Maple Grove Market that jams a community center parking lot—and it seems that markets in Minnesota are far more than a fad. Certainly this market frenzy is exciting, but I still wonder if, given the history of struggling markets here, we can make it all work.

    The Twin Cities’ first public market opened in 1853 on the corner of Seventh and Wabasha in St. Paul. In 1876, Minneapolis established a fruit and vegetable market on First and Hennepin. During those times when little produce was being shipped in from other cities, the crops of local farmers were in such high demand from city dwellers that under-the-table deals often depleted the goods before the market even officially opened.

    By 1881, St. Paul had built a massive, block-long great hall for its public market; and by 1916, Minneapolis claimed to be one of the top three fruit distribution centers in the country. In order to handle the nearly five million dollars’ worth of produce that passed through the city each season, Minneapolis built a permanent market structure in the 1930s at Glenwood and Lyndale Avenues, which is still in use. These days some 240 vendors rotate among just 170 stalls, but at its height, it boasted more than four hundred vendors.

    What happened to these centers of food and commerce? For starters, after World War II Americans fell in love with convenience. Fleets of refrigerated trucks bringing avocados from California and oranges from Florida to smartly lit supermarkets indicated the beginning of the end for many farmers markets; as the number of local market buyers dwindled, farmers found outlets with giant distribution centers and brokers who did the selling for them. Then the 60s and 70s brought more and more women into the workforce; it became easier, faster, and more necessary to buy frozen peas from the grocery store instead of strolling through a distant market to pick through a fresh bushel. The more Americans consumed processed food, the less they cared how it was grown and who grew it. As a result, in 1981, the St. Paul market moved to Lowertown and downsized from 682 stalls to 168. Just when it seemed like our country was made of Cheez Whiz, a generation of chefs, restaurateurs, and growers began banding together to re-establish the connection between food and farm. People now crowd farmers markets, waiting in line to chat with the farmer behind the cabbage stand, seeking the historical origins of their heirloom tomatoes, and supporting the use of organic and sustainable farming methods. It seems that this desire to connect with both our food and our local communities has driven the renaissance of the public market, not just here but nationwide—thanks to 111 percent growth between 1994 and 2004, there are more than 3,700 markets across the country today.

    Yet a passion for fresh food is not enough to make a market successful. The Uptown neighborhood flirted briefly with a farmers market in the Calhoun Square parking lot, but they couldn’t attract enough vendors or customers. The chefs at Auriga tried to launch an organic market, much like Brenda Langton has done with the Mill City market, but couldn’t keep it going. A good market is more than just a bright idea from a neighborhood association—it requires the right location, the right mix of vendors, smart management, and, of course, local support.

    Then, of course, there’s the question of competition. If the local market in Excelsior is successful, will fewer shoppers drive to the big-city markets? Small producers must decide on the best place to spend the lucrative Saturday morning, or whether they can stretch their business to cover more than one market. And what of the struggling Midtown Public Market just down the block from the Midtown Global Market? Will they help or hurt each other? Add to all this competition from the sophisticated grocery industry, which is among the nation’s leaders in innovation. Shoppers today need not suffer the grungy Pick-n-Saves of the world; we have a strong network of co-ops that have been championing local and organic products for decades, not to mention the more-recent efforts of Kowalski’s and Byerly’s/Lunds. Then there’s Whole Foods, and the newest game in town, Trader Joe’s.

    Given such abundance, it’s easy to see how even health nuts might put on some pounds. What will it take to make this newest generation of public markets thrive? Good old Midwestern commitment—to the farmers markets, to small producers, to local artisans—is the best way to keep the local food culture growing.

  • Why Race?

    When we were all younger and firmer, my husband was a competitive runner and our daughters were Dad groupies. Upon returning from the crusades, battle scarred and sweaty, the girls would surround him, hopping around with Barbies in their fists and shrieking, “Did you win Dad, did you win?” The situation was such that sometimes he could truthfully say yes and a cheer went up, yeah, and all was happiness. But sometimes when he was being silly and honest, he said, “No, I was tenth.” Not only was he tenth, he was colder than yesterday’s starlet. The daughters were of the Linda Evangelista don’t-get-out-of-bed-for-less-than-ten-thousand-dollars school of thought. Why race if you weren’t going to win?

    Of course that’s immature thinking. Judging from the streams of competitors transitioning from swim to bike to run in the Lifetime Fitness Triathlon later this month, not to mention the ten thousand runners who’ll be making their way down Summit Avenue in the Twin Cities Marathon in October, there must be lots of reasons to race that don’t include a prize worth $500,000. The Road Running Information Center reports that while numbers of participants in marathons have steadily climbed in each of the past ten years, median finishing times are significantly slower—from 3:54 to 4:23 for men and from 4:15 to 4:51 for women. This suggests the athletes swelling the ranks are definitely not racing to win.

    Missy Fee, thirty-eight, race director for the Heart of the Lakes Triathlon in Annandale, first became involved in the event as a competitor in the early 1990s. There were perhaps one hundred other racers that year, including her husband who signed up on race day. This year, the short course reached its five-hundred-entrant limit in just two days, four months prior to race day. Between short and long courses and relay teams, the Heart of the Lakes Triathlon drew one thousand entrants who each paid sixty dollars to participate. “It’s hard to say what’s motivating people to enter triathlons,” she said. “I can only speak for myself. I was a competitive athlete in high school and college, and I had run several marathons. This is a local event, and when I saw what the distances were, I thought, I can do that.”

    Suzannah Mork, a doctoral candidate in the school of kinesiology at the University of Minnesota, has interviewed twenty ironman-distance triathletes and discovered several characteristics unique to participants of this extreme event that comprises a 2.4-mile swim, a 112-mile bike, and a 26.2-mile run. “In most events, racers compete against each other. Ironmans are so challenging that there is a strong sense of cooperation and camaraderie among racers, and every finisher really is a winner.” The triathletes she interviewed listed many reasons for racing, among them, curiosity, motivation to exercise, an enormous sense of accomplishment, and even social opportunities. “There’s a lot of time to talk on a fifty-mile bike ride. Triathletes appreciate the chance to meet and socialize with other like-minded people. They commented, ‘We used to meet for coffee. Now we meet for a run.’ ”

    Overwhelmingly, the reason proffered for racing is to challenge oneself, to discover something about oneself by finding limits and then pushing beyond, to see what’s on the other side. So says Jan Kahring, age fifty-three of Maple Grove, who, when interviewed, was in the thick of training for Grandma’s Marathon, her first. “I like to push myself but I need a race to motivate me to get out and do the training.” She recalled a cold, rainy weekend when she did an eighteen-mile run—something that would not have occurred had she not been training.

    Any intuition that training more often and more intensively increases one’s susceptibility to injury was debunked by Liz Schorn, a physical therapist in Minneapolis. “I think people who race are more attuned to proper training techniques, hydration, diet, and stretching and therefore are less likely to get injured,” she said. “Racers are also more likely to have invested in better-quality gear which helps prevent injury. The noncompetitive athlete may take a more casual view of these factors and, even though they are logging fewer miles, may be just as likely to sustain injury.” She notes that while participation in races has increased over the past ten years, the number and types of injuries she sees has remained steady.

    Of course, race participants don’t sign waivers of responsibility for nothing. Two entrants died during the 2006 Los Angeles Marathon, and a third was hospitalized. Race officials ran out of water during last year’s Life Time Fitness Triathlon, held in ninety-degree heat. At least three competitors ended up in Hennepin County Medical Center’s intensive care unit. This year both the Mad City Marathon in Madison, Wisconsin, and the Med City Marathon in Rochester took place over the unseasonably hot Memorial Day weekend; both events were called off after five and three hours, respectively. In Madison, some five hundred runners who were still on the course were encouraged to accept a ride to the finish area or to walk the remaining miles at their own risk.

    “I don’t really get it,” says Diane Wiese-Bjornstal, an associate professor of kinesiology at the University of Minnesota, speaking of the flood of people entering races these days. “Racing does motivate people to be active, and as a kinesiologist, this is important to me. But my cynical side has observed that races serve as a notch on the belt, an observable accomplishment that seems increasingly important in our society,” she said. Beyond health, Wiese-Bjornstal suspects that at least part of the motivation for neo-racers is our society’s obsession with the tangible evidence of success; acquiring a souvenir race T-shirt serves as a marker of success, much like driving a Hummer or buying a mini-mansion. Anyone can jog or go for a swim or a bike ride, Wiese-Bjornstal points out, but “racing has become increasingly attractive in part because it raises the status of the participant. The intrinsic value of physical activity has shifted to extrinsic—‘Look, I completed a triathlon’ rather than ‘I am a disciplined person’ or ‘I love being outside on my bike.’ ”

    Many of the registrants filling triathlons and marathons are young professionals trying to make their mark on the world. Wiese-Bjornstal observed that this generation was one of the first to have had a highly scheduled childhood, with organized sports starting as early as three years old. If a child enjoys whacking around a can with a stick, the inclination for many parents is to channel that activity into a peewee hockey program, where he quickly learns there is more glory in competing than there is in merely whacking around a can with a stick. It’s not surprising that children who grew up connecting physical activity with competition and external rewards would, as adults, choose to race, Wiese-Bjornstal explained.

    “That may be true,” said Charlie Peterson, a runner and triathlete from St. Paul. “I saw a lot of people wearing their T-shirts and finisher’s medals around after the Boston Marathon. The T-shirt is really important to some people.” Although a young professional himself, Peterson says his motivations for racing involve travel and socializing. “It’s a fun thing to do with friends and a great way to see another city.”

    The opportunities to socialize and belong to a community played an important role in Janet Robertz’s decision to race. The forty-four-year-old Bloomington resident had been running every day for seven years before she ever entered a race. Even though she was the first woman finisher in that event, she was sorry she’d entered. “It was a horrible experience—stressful, competitive, crowded, and I felt just terrible. This was the exact opposite of everything running had been for me. After that first race, I wanted no part of it.”

    But being both intrinsically motivated and talented as a runner, Robertz eventually transitioned from being vehemently noncompetitive to becoming one of the country’s top masters (age forty and older) runners. “I still love running by myself on trails through the woods, but racing has opened a whole world to me. I’ve gotten to travel and I’ve met the most wonderful people. It’s been fantastic. Back before I was racing, I knew nothing of the running community. I thought I was kind of weird. A few years ago, I was at the Avon marathon and my sister said, ‘Oh my gosh, all these people look just like you.’ It’s true. They’re my people.”

  • Lizz Winstead

    Jon Stewart’s smart satire makes watching The Daily Show one of our favorite things to do in bed. But it’s a little-known fact that the show owes much of its sassy vibe to Minnesota-born humorist Lizz Winstead, who, with Madeleine Smithberg, co-created the show. Winstead still works the comedy circuit, performing one-woman shows such as Don’t Get Me Started and Stream of Consciousness that get personal on touchy topics, and she’s also appeared on programs like Politically Incorrect and Air America’s Unfiltered. She’s at home anywhere she has an opportunity to lampoon and dissect the news of the day, which is why we permitted her to bring item #1 to The Rake’s deserted island; her powers of creativity are fueled by current events, and it just wouldn’t be fair to cut her off.

    1. I would have to bring a computer that would give me Internet access. I need to read Slate and listen to NPR every day. I’m a total news junkie, and I have to keep up with what’s going on in the world.

    2. Would a Scrabble board be a ridiculous thing to bring if I was by myself? But I love Scrabble. I play a lot of Scrabble, and I always have. I like the strategy of it. Even if you lose, you achieve your personal best just by being strategic and paying attention. I’m competing with myself, not with the other person. But hey, with my computer, I can play Scrabble on the Internet.

    3. My dog, Edie. She’s a rescued collie-shepherd mix. She would provide the most joy I could possibly have on the island. She and I could go swimming, and she’d tell me all her secrets. She’s named after Edie from the documentary Grey Gardens [about the deteriorating cousins of Jacqueline Bouvier Kennedy]. In the movie, there’s a little Edie and a big Edie; my dog is little Edie and I’m big Edie.

    4. A family photograph of my siblings—I’m the youngest of five—singing to my parents on their fiftieth anniversary.

    5. I like crappy coffee. It keeps me not broke. In New York I buy coffee from the men who have coffee carts on the streets for a dollar, and I think it’s delicious. Other people think it’s not so great. And I’d bring a bottle of Oban Scotch.

  • No Sympathy

    So to summarize your story [“No Way Home,” June]: Cambodia is hot. Cambodia sucks. Boy comes to the U.S. with his parents. Boy joins a gang, and never bothers to get citizenship, despite living here fifteen years. Finally, after being in fairly regular criminal trouble as a juvenile, he’s eighteen when charged with a felony and deported. (By the way, what objective journalist would travel all the way to Cambodia to talk to a criminal and not press him on what precisely he’d done?) Poor fellow feels “betrayed.” What part of this is unfair? This is not a “good kid,” accidentally picked up by The Man on his way to Sunday school. This is a habitual petty criminal, who finally strayed into the big leagues, and got punished. I say “good riddance.”

    All those folks said such nice things about him—did any of them perhaps feel that they should intervene? Stop his self-destructive course midstream?

    “It’s not right to send people to a country they do not call home without giving them the opportunity to argue for a second chance and to show what they’ve done to turn their lives around.” What? The lack of objectivity at letting this statement stand unchallenged is staggering. This punk got lots of second chances, and third chances, and probably fourth and fifth chances too. Eventually (I would hope much sooner) his chances ran out.

    “Should people be deported when the U.S. has been involved in creating the conditions that led to their becoming refugees?” Personally, I’d love to challenge Mr. Hing on the deep racism in that statement. As if it logically follows: refugee, thug, criminal? This country was built on refugees. Economic, war, political, religious—aside from autochthones, we all are refugees and the children thereof. By his logic, we’re all apparently free from culpability for our personal behavior? If the consequences of Moek’s deportation were so severe, perhaps he should have followed a narrower path? The rest of us manage to understand that lawbreaking leads at least to jail, so we don’t do it. Or is your author suggesting somehow that Cambodian refugees are too stupid to understand the logical consequences of criminality? Don’t want to be deported, separated from your family, your home, sent someplace else? To quote a film: “Stop breaking the law, loser.” In fact, the crying shame is that of the 1,500 “caught in the process,” only 145 have been deported. 0.100 is a pretty crummy batting average.

    Steve (last name withheld by request), Eden Prairie

  • Pooh-Poohing the Plastinates

    The only positive thing about the very creepy Body Worlds exhibit at the Science Museum [The Rake’s Progress, June] is that it’s dead humans and not the usual dead animals that are being violated, disrespected, and exploited in the name of art.

    Frank Erickson, Minneapolis

  • Nary a Peep from Parry

    Clinton Collins, Jr., clearly defines the problem of the Star Tribune’s reader’s representative [Free the Jackson Five, June] when he concludes that “complaining to the Star Tribune is OK—if it is the right complaint, on the right issue … ” The irony here is that the Star Tribune did have a reader’s representative who was responsive to readers’ comments and concerns. His name was Lou Gelfand and I had a long-standing and cordial relationship with him. When I called him, he was always accessible and attentive. He was never too busy to listen or to return my calls.

    It’s been disappointing to me that I’ve been unsuccessful in replicating this relationship with Kate Parry. I enjoy Kate’s thoughtful articles and it is obvious that she enjoys writing them; it’s also obvious to me that she’s not a one-on-one reader’s representative. It seems that the emails and phone calls that really capture her interest are the ones that create subject matter for her articles. She’s a talented journalist, but she has not filled the vacuum created by Lou’s departure. I am still waiting for an answer to the email that I sent to her on December 15, 2005.

    Arlene Fried, Minneapolis

  • The Illusion of Cooperation

    Diane Arbus, whose retrospective is now on view at Walker Art Center, used her exceptional technical skill as a fashion photographer to create a world inhabited by circus freaks, the mentally handicapped, nudists, giants and midgets, and, even more disturbing, “regular” people made up to go out on the town. Taken as a whole, this work creates a community without typical boundaries of race, social status, or physicality. With the unflinching, semi-nude self-portrait taken early in her career and included in the exhibit, Arbus planted herself firmly in this community. It’s shot into a mirror, and this mirror serves as a metaphor for the whole of her work. Her empathy is apparent as she holds the mirror of her camera up to all her subjects, and sees herself.

     Community is an elusive—and illusive—concept. The reality is tougher yet. It’s become an industry in this country to destroy any illusion of cooperation. Ann Coulter trashes the 9/11 housewives as political opportunists and then gloats on television that she did it to sell books. Al Franken calls conservatives lying liars, and sells lots of books to the other side. Instead of using his convention speech to embrace a common future for Minnesotans, Governor Tim Pawlenty takes the opportunity to demonize gays and people on welfare.

    Politics is now being played as a zero-sum game. There can only be winners and losers. Politicians like Jim Ramstad, who would reach across an aisle to fellow addict Patrick Kennedy, are the ones who are marginalized. Ramstad will always win his sensible political district, but he’ll never wield the big stick in Washington because he’s unwilling to use it to punish.

    This corrosive behavior is particularly evident in “virtual” communities. Think of fiction, where someone like Vince Flynn or Cormac McCarthy can act out violent fantasies (and, we hope, exorcize them) within the safety of the printed page. As readers, we can participate to a degree, either in killing the bad guys with Flynn, or being a bad guy with McCarthy. The only rules are in our head. Online, anything goes as well.

    Online, anyone can create fiction without the hard work and discipline displayed by real writers or artists. The lines between creator and consumer aren’t defined; anyone can be an idea killer. Any discussion that starts in a civil fashion can career off in any direction, and often does. A perfect example of this occurred on the online forum Mnspeak.com the other day (disclosure: my son owns Mnspeak) when, believe it or not, a discussion of Minneapolis’ crackdown on housing violations morphed almost immediately into a discussion of German prepositions. That digression was characterized by its benign nature. Others can degenerate into ad hominem attacks fueled by commenters who intentionally try to derail any civil discourse for the purpose of calling attention to themselves, or even to intentionally destroy a community. When it happens, serious people get fed up and leave. When there are no rules, people who like to play by them simply refuse to play. It’s a game of a different nature and it’s as good an explanation as any as to why online communities tend to burn out.

    Conversation between people who actually have to face each other is less likely, one would hope, to end up in the ditch. When one actually listens to a correspondent, a conversation is more likely to ensue. Are you actually interested in what the person has to say, and are you willing to consider his view? Or are you debating rather than conversing? Are you trying to reach a solution to a common problem, or are you trying to score points? Is civility more likely because there can be consequences in a face-to-face encounter? When you can’t stand off from your targets like pundits or politicians do, or can’t hide behind anonymity online, the possibility of a smack in the face is always there.

    As repugnant as Ann Coulter already is, imagine her standing in front of a woman who watched on television as her husband or son burned alive in the World Trade Center. Would she be able to look into tear-filled eyes and deliver the same vitriol? Imagine Tim Pawlenty’s anti-gay tirade from the state Republican convention podium delivered right to the face of one of Diane Arbus’ transvestites. Would he have the audacity to do that?

    In one of her journals, Arbus wrote, “There is so much to learn, mainly it is never as good as you hope or as bad as you dread.” The majority of her photographs were made with a wide-angle lens that forced her to get very close to her subjects. These images prove that she was willing to get close enough to listen to and learn from people very unlike herself. It is that sort of communication that we should seek, even if that communication doesn’t necessarily lead to agreement.

     

  • Guatemala

    Bharati Acharya [Minneapolis] knew she would have a lot of time to read at Lago
    Atitlan, Guatemala. Among her other things, she packed a copy of the Rake in
    her luggage. The only way to get around the lake is on one of the dozen,
    or so, boat taxis that traverse the waters. But a lot of time is spent
    waiting for boats to fill with passengers before leaving the dock at various villages surrounding the lake. Acharya took time to catch up on the latest issue during the wait
    time.

    Bharati Acharya

  • St. Maarten

    Fernando & Becky at Magen’s Bay, St. Thomas US Virgin Islands, same place where they spent their honeymoon 20 years ago. Second photo: Well, that’s Dumbo reading the Rake at the comfort of his cabin in the Royal Caribbean Explorer

    Fernando & Becky Torres