Category: Blog Post

  • The Program You Are Watching Has Been Prerecorded

    grotto redemption.jpg

    I don’t read philosophy for answers to the meaning of life or any of the other ridiculous questions that have caused lunatics to bang their heads against the wall for as long as humans have been able to babble. What attracts me again and again to books of philosophy is the marginalia, the odd biographical details and digressions and just plain absurd minutiae that these old fools cough up on such a regular basis. The best biographies –hands down– are of the philosophers. The unhappy little hunchbacks who waddled around the streets of their towns and endured the taunts of rock-throwing children (Kierkegaard). The closet gnomes, martyrs, and maniacs. Empedocles wrote, “Wretches! Utter wretches! Keep your hands from beans!” Three of Ludwig Wittgenstein’s eight siblings committed suicide. Kant wrote a treatise on rainbows. And the great master of gloom Schopenhauer took issue with Spinoza’s Ethics over what he perceived to be their disregard for the virtue and dignity of dogs.

    I was reading Schopenhauer’s History of Philosophy last night when I discovered the old crank railing against Spinoza for “his as unworthy as false deliverances about animals.” From assertions in the Ethics Schopenhauer concludes, “Dogs [Spinoza] seems not to have known at all. To the monstrous proposition with which the 26th appendix [of the Ethics] opens…the best answer is given by a Spanish literateur of our day (Larra, pseudonym Figaro), ‘He who has never kept a dog does not know what it is to love and be loved.’”

    I went and dug around in my basement for a copy of Spinoza’s Ethics to locate the passage that so offended Schopenhauer. Here it is: “Besides men, we know of no particular thing in nature in whose mind we may rejoice, and whom we can associate with ourselves in friendship or any sort of fellowship; therefore, whatsoever there be in nature besides man, a regard for our advantage does not call on us to preserve, but to preserve or destroy according to its various capabilities, and to adapt to our use as best we can.”

    I’m officially on the side of Schopenhauer on this important argument, by the way, and was pleased to later run across this additional tribute to dogs (in his own Ethics): “Hence comes the four-legged friendships of so many of the better kind of men, for on what indeed should one refresh oneself from the endless deceit, falseness, and cunning of men if it were not for the dogs into whose faithful countenance one may look without distrust?”

    grotto redemption 6.jpg

    All cows go to heaven

    Harmful things of the youth

    Odd books

    Galley of jazz and blues figurines

    Thump Queen: Meryl Truett

    New Hampshire Political Primary Trading Cards

    J Bradley Johnson

    Children’s Books in 1920s Japan

    The Karl Fund

    Belly Dancers and Harem Girls

    grotto redemption 9.jpg

  • They're only dead if we say they're dead

    nocemetery (Custom).jpg
    If there were any dead in New Orleans, they’d be in a tourist attraction.

    Reuters is reporting that FEMA will not let journalists on the rescue boats looking for survivors in New Orleans. It seems the journalists might take pictures of dead bodies.

    Let’s see now…no pictures of dead bodies in New Orleans equals no dead people in New Orleans?

    Remind you of anywhere else? No pictures of flag-draped coffins from Iraq equals no dead soldiers in Irag.

    Do they really think we’re that stupid? Answer: If we let them get away with this, we are that stupid.

    One more thing, while we’re talking about stupid. Just read Bush’s own words here.

  • Let Them Eat MREs

    marie (Custom).JPG
    Where W gets it

    Well, I thought I’d heard it all when Bush said “Brownie, you’re doing a heck of a job,” to Michael Brown, head of FEMA.

    Then I thought I’d heard it all when Brown said “Everyone in the Convention Center is getting one or two meals a day from us.”

    But now I know I’ve heard it all when Matriarch Barbara Bush said this yesterday about the refugees in Houston, “What I’m hearing which is sort of scary is they all want to stay in Texas. Everyone is so overwhelmed by the hospitality. And so many of the people in the arena here, you know, were underprivileged anyway, so this–this (she chuckles slightly) is working very well for them.”

    Is it too early to call for the guillotine for the ruling family?

  • There Must Be Something You Can Do

    angel sword.jpg

    This country has long been appalling and astonishing in equal measure, but these days the opportunities to be appalled are mounting by the day, and the sort of astonishment America most commonly traffics in is more and more often the stuff of incredulity and shock rather than genuine and appreciative wonder.

    Perhaps this has something to do with the fact that we are governed by a legion of nitwits and bland, blindly ambitious louts, an almost incomprehensibly undistinguished group of career politicians presided over by an imbecile who is rapidly approaching vulnerable adult status. An imbecile who favors gargantuan belt buckles of the sort most often associated with characters who make a living being tossed from bulls. A stwaggering (half staggering, half swaggering) imbecile who gives new meaning to the term “invalid,” and is possessed of a tragic and cocksure set of delusions of adequacy.

    How else to explain how it is that we have found ourselves living in a country where the horizon always seems to blurred with the bruise of some recent horror or pending tragedy?

    We could blame ourselves, of course. I’m all for that. And we could certainly blame each other, whatever and whomever we might include under that leaky umbrella of “each other.” The above-mentioned imbecile, after all, has twice had his position of power conferred upon him by people I could not now with a straight face or a clean conscience refer to as “my fellow Americans.”

    Every day –and many times throughout every day– I am blindsided by despair at the thought that I am out of token opportunities to officially reject the imbecile who is the President of the United States, and also by the recognition that the ultimate refutation of everything he stands for will now be the responsibility of history, which has a pretty poor track record of responsibility in such matters.

    My own refutation, of course, is strictly unofficial, and more irrational (and complete) by the day.

    The other thing we could all do at the moment, in response to the horrors and embarrassments of this country and this administration, would be to simply look away. Many people, of course, will and do choose this option, and though it’s tempting, I don’t recommend it.

    Instead I’d recommend you take a good long look at what’s happening and where we are. And hold out hope: hold onto it, and also extend it (a seeming contradiction whose real possibility is a testament to the versatility of hope), offer as much of it as you can spare to someone who needs it more than you do. There are always plenty –too many– of those people out there.

    Make of your refutation an action and an embrace, however small and ultimately unsatisfying.

    Here are some ways that you can hold out your hope, all of them good ways:

    Mercy Corps

    Acorn

    Feed the Children

    HurricaneHousing.Org

    The Humane Society’s Disaster Relief Fund

    Glenn Reynolds has an excellent round-up of flood/hurricane relief efforts at Instapundit

    And finally, as usual, there’s a great collection of links at Peter Scholtes’ always virtuous (and exhaustive) Complicated Fun. Peter’s on my short list of local candidates for the Nobel Peace Prize.

  • The Sunshine Bores The Daylights Out Of Me

    fair-motel color tv.jpg

    I’d ask you to wipe that smirk off your face. This is a serious matter.

    This world is plunging further into darkness.

    Okay, so maybe I’m being overly dramatic, but I can barely hold my head up. It’s damned hard to hold your head up when you’re living in a crawl space.

    Ordinarily in a situation like this I would warn you: Here comes another stream of incoherence, but at the moment there’s something you can perhaps explain to me.

    The other night, when I was out walking with the visiting black angel, I kept seeing these neighborhood watch signs that read, “If I Don’t Call the Police, My Neighbor Will.”

    What the hell is that supposed to mean? Does that not sound like a complete cop-out to you? Doesn’t that sound like passing the fucking buck? It’s so American, yet I’ve no doubt it’s supposed to be seen as some kind of deterrent to criminals. Why would it be, though?

    Because, look, that sign is logically fucked. It’s a shrug of indifference, or at least a smug acknowledgment that, hey, don’t sweat it; somebody else will take care of it.

    Let’s suppose, for instance, that each of us assumes the position of the ‘I’ on that sign, that each of us takes that attitude. Do you see what I’m trying to say? If up and down the block each neighbor automatically assumes that his neighbor will call the police, then of course nobody calls the police.

    Maybe, come to think of it, that would be for the best after all. No sense in getting messed up in something that’s none of our business in the first place.

    In the end, what it comes down to is appetite–

    the enforced idleness, the solitude:

    nothing, hectares of nothing, litanies of nothing on microfiche.

    August Kleinzahler, from “Epistle XIV”

    fair-short and socks 2.jpg

  • Neo-Con Man Vs. Paleo-Con Man

    This week’s New York Times Sunday magazine packs an interesting one-two punch. In the opinion slot, David Rieff argued a new facet of an old premise–that President Bush’s approach to liberating the world is not necessarily seen that way on the receiving end. Rieff said what many people have been thinking for some time–that the fundamentalist Islamic critique of Western Civilization is essentially anti-modernist. But he points out that this makes it a tougher nut to crack in competing paradigms than the previous gold-standard for clashing ideologies– Capitalism versus Communism. Communism, he noted, shared some basic modernist values like science and secularism. Indeed, you could make the argument that Leninism was a more pure form of modernism than democratic capitalism in its strident rejection of religion and psychology and other gassy emanations of the individual.

    It’s an old adage that in war we begin to look like our enemies, and I found it more than a little interesting that in the feature well of the same issue, Daniel Smith delineates the Bush administration’s war against science–the true cross of modernity–or shall we say its global struggle against uncomfortable facts like evolution and global warming.

    Simple-minded Americans have come to believe that the war on terrorism is in fact a thinly veiled, old-fashioned war of faith–Christianity against Islam, my god against your god. (Actually, as people of The Book, this is more accurately a “my prophet against your prophet” internecine squabble. Yeah right, and the West Bank is just a slight difference of exegetical opinion.) The more the present administration insists on conforming reality to its ideology, the more it looks no better than the forces of anti-modernity it seems to have such a hard time dealing with. Given the monopoly party’s winning success in convincing most Americans against their own best interests of half-truths and hateful moralities, I wonder why they haven’t been so successful abroad. Perhaps the struggle should be seen less as modernity versus anti-modernity but as a purer form of selfish individualism versus virulent communitarianism. So yes, maybe similar to the old capitlism versus communism monolith– but minus the science on both sides, and thus a truly frightening clash of faith founded not on reason but on passion.

    If we wanted to be true to our one abiding national faith, we should be dropping Barbie dolls and Nikes on them rather than bombs. But this is hardly a time for spreading conspicuous consumerism. Or is it? I heard somewhere that shopping is the new self-sacrifice, and I’ve been salivating to do my part–here’s the new J. Crew collection for men–now if someone somewhere would facilitate my self-sacrifice by, you know, giving me some walking-around money…

  • Get me a shovel, please

    brownfema.jpg
    Brown: Horseshit in New Orleans

    Would Bush have reacted to the disaster in New Orleans faster if someone had told him Terry Schiavo was there?

    Have you considered that the New Orleans disaster may be politically good for Bush? Besides killing off thousands of Democrats, it took the news eye off a few embarrassments undeniably of Bush’s own making. Do you remember a certain little war, in which a thousand people were trampled or drowned last week while Katrina was lashing the Gulf Coast? Do you remember that Karl Rove revealed the identity of a CIA agent?

    How about that empathy for the Gulf Coast victims, though? As Bush was quick to point out, Trent Lott’s mansion was destroyed, and Bush himself used to party in The Big Easy. I think he’d look good staggering down Bourbon Street, hurricane (the drink) in hand right about now.

    And then there’s the quick appointment of John Roberts to Rehnquist’s spot. Distracted us for an hour or so. How come he can react to Rehnquist’s death in one day but his people don’t even know that there are people dying in the New Orleans Convention Center? Turn on CNN instead of Fox at least once in a while, guys.

    Then there’s Mike Brown, head of FEMA, who was fired from his last job overseeing of horse shows. Let’s see, this guy was incompetent at cleaning up horse shit, so let’s give him a job running an agency which has the responsibility of saving thousands of human lives. Now that’s Bush leadership.

    Contrast this from FEMA’s own history: “In 1993, President Clinton nominated James L. Witt as the new FEMA director. Witt became the first agency director with experience as a state emergency manager. He initiated sweeping reforms that streamlined disaster relief and recovery operations, insisted on a new emphasis regarding preparedness and mitigation, and focused agency employees on customer service. The end of the Cold War also allowed Witt to redirect more of FEMA’s limited resources from civil defense into disaster relief, recovery and mitigation programs.”

  • You Call This A Beach?

    sidewalk entryway.jpg

    The future is stupid.

    Jenny Holzer

    I have always been clueless, but I am discovering that my cluelessness is constantly extending itself into entirely new continents of ignorance, and even moving resolutely like a glacier over existing continents in my skull that were once green-swept and shot through with sunlight.

    I guess I could choose to see this development as a sort of personal growth, as long as I am willing to extend the concept of growth to include such things as mold and bacteria.

    fair-dumbo 2.jpg

    Stories never really end. They can go on and on and on. It’s just that sometimes, at a certain point, you just stop telling them.

    –Mary Norton, The Borrowers

    fair-slide small.jpg

  • Shame, Shame, Shame

    I recognize that it’s likely ridiculous to hope for anything resembling consistency from the Twins at this point, but that doesn’t, of course, stop me from hoping all the same.

    And that –the continued, irrational investment of hope– is what makes a game like yesterday’s so damn frustrating. The two steps forward, five steps back routine has grown maddening in the extreme. So I must say that I, for one, was more than happy to hear about Carlos Silva popping off (and only in a place accustomed to relatively benign and even tranquil clubhouse chemistry could such a mild outburst of frustration be regarded as newsworthy, let alone as rocking the boat).

    I’m sort of wishing at this point that there’d be a real air-clearing donnybrook to lively up this team (and give us all something truly interesting to write about for a change).

    I will admit, though, that Brad Radke –being Brad Radke– openly pondering thoughts of suicide was pretty damn interesting as far as recent news about this team goes. It was also pretty seriously disturbing, even if you do happen to be familiar with Radke’s private headbanger reputation and taste for Metallica.

    Which Twins would you most like to see square off and kick the snot out of each other right now? From among the characters in that clubhouse what would be your dream card, and how would you handicap it?

    I’ll have to think some about that question myself. A couple years ago I would have automatically said Rick Reed and whomever was most likely to severely imperil his career, but right now it’s a tough question. I’m not really thinking about a pure mismatch at the moment; I’d much rather see a tough, closely-fought contest in which both combatants walk away with minor contusions and a grudging respect for each other.

    Also, can you point to one sustained stretch all season where the Twins played consistently satisfying baseball? I know there were a couple of modest winning streaks, but if I recall correctly even those were marred by inefficient offense and the occasional uninspired effort.

    Finally, consider this question, if you would: Is there one player, coach, or member of the organization that you could point to as most directly accountable for the frustrations of this team? Or maybe this one: Is there one game or series you could single out as the moment when you sensed the train starting to come off the tracks?

    Certainly in recent years we have had more pleasant, more beneficent moments (i.e. Torii Hunter’s collision at home plate against Chicago a couple seasons ago, or Corey Koskie’s back-breaking homer versus Cleveland that salvaged the series, and the season, last year), but I’d be hard pressed to pin the malaise of 2005 on any one person or moment.

    I’ll think about it, though, and I’ll make an effort to look. Because I’m sure somewhere back in the summer sprawled now behind us there is a place on the road where the Twins took a disastrous wrong turn.

  • Headed Straight Into The Teeth Of The Teeth Kicker

    float001.jpg

    The tree outside the window wobbled and tossed off light, little sparks like Instamatic flashbulbs in the moonlight. Was it a wagon or a wheelbarrow that so much depended on? Either way, nothing depends on them now.

    I watched a dog creeping through the backyard shadows, stunned to still be doing God’s work early in the 21st century. He paused and listened to what he did not know was a train, a nice rhythm, the night murmuring at some safe distance. Big moving water, perhaps, where another race of dogs lived with its secrets.

    The first plodding steps into September, moving resolutely into the black teeth. Soon enough the house will be smelling like a wet blanket baking, winter heat limbering up in the floorboards. And out there somewhere, sprawled behind me in the vacuum of another long night completing its free fall, are the remains of the blankest summer I can ever recall: three months on my back in the dead grass, staring up into the confused canopy of a condemned elm that obliterated the stars. A summer without a soundtrack, without a scrapbook, without a single snapshot or picture postcard to remember it by.

    The wading pool in the park across the street has been drained, and the days will be marked now by nothing but the dull racket of jumping jacks and shoulder pads and the insolent gaggle of high school students shuffling along the sidewalks on their way to Taco Bell.

    The cicadas are almost done; death, I suppose, the Arizona they fly off to for the winter. They burn down entire villages every autumn and flee to angel dusks. Soon enough the shuddering ghost-crying of geese evacuating across the moon and disappearing into the clouds.

    It was on a night like this, somewhere across the world, that I watched as a shirtless man leaned back and coughed fire into the fog. He would swish his canteen of gasoline and nudge with his boot the tin cup at his feet. “It costs money!” he shouted. “Don’t just look!”

    “How long can a man possibly breathe fire?” a bored Frenchman asked his date. “There must be other things as well. It is the same thing every night.”

    “Perhaps that is what gives it the power it has,” the woman said. “The fact that there is nothing more, that this is all he has: just the fire, just the instant, repeated again and again. The poor man is clearly dying. Give him ten francs.”

    footlong.jpg

    A Statement From Louisiana Senator Mary L. Landrieu