Category: Blog Post

  • My Morning Game Of Scrabble

    abcd.jpg

    I close my eyes, whistle, and send the dogs off into the brush to see if they can scare up any words. I’m not sure how long I sit here –it varies, I suppose, from night to night. When it gets quiet like this, though, and I can’t even hear the rustling or baying of the dogs, I get a little bit spooked.

    Some nights –more and more often lately– they’re out there a long time, traveling great distances across the barren fields. It’s March, after all, and the winter tends to drive language underground. It’s too dark, there are too many rough patches, and I’m too tired to run with the dogs, so I just sit here quietly with my eyes closed, waiting.

    I no longer expect the dogs to bring back any stories or even paragraphs, and a sentence of any length would frankly be a surprise at this point. One night, I’ve no doubt, the dogs will finally disappear for good, but for now I’m grateful for whatever random, useless words they manage to drag back and drop at my feet. A ‘why’ or two, a ‘what,’ maybe a ‘mule,’ ‘moon,’ ‘river,’ or ‘road.’ A good night might net me a handful of multi-syllabic words: ‘casket,’ ‘donkey,’ ‘steeple,’ or ‘gasoline,’ although ‘gas’ is the more likely candidate.

    At the end of the night, usually when the winter sun is casting its first bruise across the eastern horizon, I’ll gather up whatever words the dogs rustle up on their rambles, stuff them in a burlap bag, and tote them back home across the fields. I’ll then empty the bag onto the kitchen table and spend a couple hours moving the words around, trying with little success to make them say something.

  • Offsides

    So, it is day two of what amounts to a four-day Rosh Hoshanna for Minnesotans; it is the state high school hockey tournament. As threatened, we have set up the office television, stretched the bunny ears across the bookshelf, fiddled with the horizontal and the vertical. We only saw a little of yesterday’s game between Warroad and Albert Lea, such was the struggle to get tuned to the new channel—45 on the UHF.

    We’ve been meaning for a while to turn you onto a wonderful new Canadian magazine called The Walrus. Now is a perfect time to do that, because nothing brings Minnesota and Canada closer together than our mutual love for the game of hockey. While Canada may have a stronger claim on the game (having, after all, invented it), by proximity and practice, Minnesota is more or less a provincial extension of Ontario. We like it that way.

    In fact, there are two related articles in The Walrus that we wish to bring to your attention: This month’s cover story by Jeremy Rifkin (he’s the fabulous author, by the way, of that book everyone is talking about that describes how Europe will now eclipse the US as a superpower, so we better get used to playing second fiddle) describes a shadowy alliance between Blue State America (that’s us!) and Canada. (Let’s not get too excited. There is an accompanying article titled “Is Canada Fading From the International Stage?” Uh, we’re not sure anyone noticed one way or the other.)

    Secondly, last month’s issue had a wonderful story on hockey literature that asked why there has been no great hockey book since Ken Dryden’s wonderful book “The Game,” which was published way back when we were playing goalie for Mankato West High School. Indeed, it is hard to believe that a game that condenses the poetry of motion of soccer and combines it with the violence of pugilism, and the choreography of basketball, does not have a body of literature worthy of the game.

    For our own part, we pledge to work on this one of these years. We figure it’s a good start that we’ve had the skates out a few times this year to wet a blade with the young ones—nothing inspires a reconsideration like the next generation.

    And finally, we note that in that same back issue, a Walrus writer paid us the indirect compliment of rewriting one of our stories—about the innovative approach of a certain Minneapolis lawyer who is revolutionizing (and humanizing) the process of divorce. Oh, and Utne magazine, our hometown blue-state bible of self-help, has recognized The Walrus as “Best New Title” in its annual alternative press awards. (We have been jumping and waving our arms from across Hennepin Avenue for three years now, and no one seems to notice over there. We love them, and they don’t seem to believe us. We are very needy, it is true.)

  • There Are Some Things I Just Can't Bring Myself To Say Anymore

    Fantasy baseball is one of them. Fantasy league is even worse. There’s something essentially emasculated about these terms, and to use them in the form of an admission –“I am in a fantasy league”– seems somehow shameful. I’ve no doubt that a first-rate thesis could be written on the homoerotics of fantasy league baseball, but I’m not about to be the man to muck about in the subject. I’m not that desperate to be a pioneer.
    I also can’t deny that I have, in fact, been in a fantasy league, participated in just such a fantasy, but I am unable to feel proud of this fact.
    I certainly have nothing against those who continue to derive enjoyment from such unwholesome activities, but I think the whole thing requires too much explaining to sane people to be truly healthy. I just can’t bring myself to say those words with a straight face anymore.

    It’s like going up to the counter at Wendy’s and having to order a “Biggie” fries. I refuse to do it. Get a more dignified phrase, I say.
    I went into a Wendy’s the other day and tried to order a chicken sandwich and a large fries.
    “Biggie fries?” the woman asked.
    “Large,” I said.
    “Large or Biggie?” she asked.
    “I want the largest you have,” I said.
    “The Biggie?”
    “Is that the largest?”
    “The Biggie is the largest.”
    “Look,” I said, “I’m not going to play this game. Why don’t you just call it a large like everyone else?”
    The woman was clearly exasperated. “Do you want the large or the Biggie?”
    I wasn’t about to demean myself by taking the bait.
    “Fine,” I said, “Just give me the large.”

  • Sleep, That Wretched Nurse

    ball of twine.jpg

    I don’t suppose I can reliably claim that I have just seen, at four a.m. in the third day of March in the Midwest, the first firefly of the summer. That won’t, however, stop me from staking my claim. I see what I see, and the world can believe whatever the hell it wants.

    I fell asleep briefly an hour ago, in my chair, and woke with a start (as I often do) when a phrase bloomed in my brain, almost like the way that ghostly little box pops up in the corner of your computer screen to indicate you have a new email message. On this occasion the phrase was this: But I am not a fleet of tankers.

    From there the words will generally start drifting across my skull in random, almost spectral strands, like mist moving along a creek in the middle of the night. I had a brief image of an Amish farmer, standing at the window of his house in a dark valley, watching fireworks blow open the sky beyond the bluffs, at which point I noticed the firefly in the backyard.

    Time seems stranger to me all the time. It seems to seize up in me. I have these odd experiences, generally during the daylight hours when I so seldom can tell whether I am asleep or awake. I used to think that during these episodes I was slipping into some sort of trance-state, or having an out-of-body experience. Now, though, I just accept them as real.

    I’ll notice, for instance, that the clock hands are frozen, the second hand hanging in one place along the clock face. I’ll look out the window and see the old man next door paralyzed over a rake, or stranded halfway up a ladder, one foot suspended in space.

    I’m not talking about blackouts or mere repetition or some combination of aphasia and amnesia. No, I seem to literally and consciously fall out of time, out of step with the rotation of the planet, if in fact the planet rotates (my ignorance is vast). I get yanked clean out of time for ten or fifteen minutes at a stretch. I can move through the silent house, pause at the refrigerator to pour myself a glass of orange juice, and drink the orange juice while staring out the back window above the kitchen sink.

    If the clock stops at, say, five minutes to ten and remains seized up for ten minutes, within an instant of the resumption of its normal function the clock, and time in general, will have corrected itself. The clock hands will immediately read five minutes after ten, the old man will be bagging the leaves in his yard, and there will be no dirty orange juice glass in the sink.

    There have been occasions where during these otherwise frozen moments I have fetched the newspaper from the porch, sat down on the living room floor and read the paper from front to back, only to discover fifteen minutes later that the hands of the clock have resumed their normal operation and the paper is back on the welcome mat outside the front door. At which point, of course, I go through the whole routine all over again, and from time to time notice small (yet nonetheless disturbing) changes in what I read moments earlier.

    I hesitate, sometimes, to make these admissions, but I figure at this point there’s no sense in holding anything back.

  • A Year Since You're Gone

    A little over a year ago, Paul Gruchow killed himself—and we are still feeling robbed. At the time, we put pen to paper and tried to memorialize him as best we could. We still believe that he was one of the finest environmental essayists ever, anywhere.

    Just today, we finally got around to reading Michael Finley’s remembrance in an issue of Minnesota Monthly from a few months ago. Though he handles his subject delicately—and maybe just a hair too solicitously, but it is after all unkind to speak ill of the dead—Finley makes it clear that Gruchow was a troubled man. What was clearly a diagnosed case of bipolar disorder was activated and aggravated by Gruchow’s chosen profession. Gruchow was irritated that he hadn’t achieved wider acclaim. He knew what we know—he deserved it. Jealousy and envy are ugly emotions, but they are universal.

    Finley stumbles a little in his tribute to Gruchow in trying to explain what Gruchow did on the printed page. It would have helped to quote Gruchow himself more, but this is a challenge in trying to reproduce a writer whose impact was subtle and cumulative—no major fireworks, just the slow accretion truth, rather like the way hay is baled.

    The last time we spoke to Gruchow we talked about the unique kernal of truth that he shares with John Muir and with Aldo Leopold—but what is conspicuously missing in the writings of the better-known (and wealthy) Annie Dillard, and his real nemesis, the exceedingly popular Gretel Ehrlich.

    Ehrlich titled her seminal book “The Solace of Open Spaces,” which was published in December of 1986. Two years later, Gruchow published his indispensible “The Necessity of Empty Places.” The slight play in titles is rhetorically a key to understanding the difference between the writers and where each belongs, relative to the canon of nature writing.

    For Ehrlich and her long list of (predominantly female) acolytes, nature is really just a projection screen for an unrelenting program of self-help. To be fair, this tradition goes back to some fine American forebears—especially the Transcendentalists Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau. Nature is a proving ground for the human spirit—the value of flora and fauna in the environment is their capacity to communicate profound truths for the betterment of the observer—that is, the writer. We concern ourselves with nature because “open spaces” have the capacity to provide “solace” to human actors in their midst.

    If that were as simple and true as many fleecey, tree-hugging, journaling hikers would like to believe, Gruchow would undoubtedly be alive today. Still, it’s not as if Gruchow didn’t cover some of the same territory, but he did it from exactly the opposite side of the mountain. Nature exists in, of, and for itself—it owes nothing to humanity. On the contrary, humanity owes it everything. It is enough to talk about conservation and perservation as goals in themselves—irrespecive of their “spiritual” or therapeutic value to the funny two-legged mammal with opposable thumbs.

    This dichotomy is, interestingly enough, built into the charter of the United States park service. Congress charges our rangers with administering the national parks for both preservation AND access. Today, we constantly see the users fighting with the preservers. If more people read Gruchow today (and we are sure they eventually will) we’d talk less about parks as a “national resource” or “reserve” and more about how to protect environments that show minimal human input (or, more commonly, outtake). In other words wilderness has value independent of humans, and we’d be wise to start acting that way. Ironically, it would serve our long-range interests better. Gruchow knew that. It was not a truth that could save one man, but one for an entire community.

  • Some Old Words While I Unpack My Bags: A Common Misconception Regarding Paradise

    willis 7.jpg

    I’d like, if I could, to correct a common misconception regarding Paradise. The animal sanctuaries are actually, in fact, offshore, a couple islands just off the coast which have been set aside for cats, primates, and horses. As with humans, however, not all cats, primates, and horses are admitted to Paradise, although virtue is not the determining criteria for these animals. To enter Paradise –or rather, to be granted eternal refuge on these Paradisiacal adjuncts– a cat, horse, or monkey has to have had the sort of relationship with a human whereby it was perceived by its human companion to have been in possession of a soul. Such relationships constitute what is offically called “Empathic Baptism.”

    This is admittedly a rule that doesn’t make a whole lot of sense, but it’s been in place since the last major ammendments and revisions to the admissions criteria were signed into the Book of Law at the end of the 19th century.

    Dogs are the only animals given a blanket pass to Paradise proper –good dogs, I should say, but there have been very few remembered examples of dogs having been denied admission. I have to admit that, being a dog person, I find this arrangement more than satisfactory. There are, though, plenty of people –equal rights animal rights activists, mainly– who carp about the issue all the time, but it’s the way things are in Paradise. This is essentially a very conservative place, where proposals for even minor changes are frowned upon and met with stiff resistance from the governing council. There are also, I should say, a lot of people here who have no apparent love for animals of any kind, and this is a constituency that is constantly complaining about the absence of meat from our diets. If we had a democratic system in place here and the matter of admitting animals was put to a vote I have no doubt that the animal lovers among us would be soundly defeated.

    Certainly people recognize that if you open the gates to such animals as cattle and chickens and rats and the like you’re going to have a big problem on your hands in a hurry. The mortality rate and life expectancy of most animals makes any sort of concessions or compromises on this point problematic, to say the least. We’re already packed in so tight that social interaction is all but impossible. The streets are always so crowded that I virtually never leave my dormitory any more, and I’m forced to share my bed with the six dogs who spent most of their lives with me. It’s admittedly not the most comfortable of arrangements, but I guess that’s the price you pay for attaching yourself to other living creatures, and I wouldn’t think of making a fuss.

    I had a neighbor for a time –a woman from Portland– who bitched so loudly and for so long over the refusal to grant an exception for her ferret that she was eventually shipped back to Purgatory until she learned to keep her yap shut. I can’t say I was sorry to see her go.

  • Adult Swim

    I assume the swimsuit issue of Sports Illustrated is out, although I have neither seen it nor gone looking for it, have never done so that I recall—though I certainly do not mind it when it passes into my life, say in the waiting room at Jiffy Lube. One of our prized possessions here in the office is an old copy of a swimsuit issue from, like, the paleolithic age, with Cheryl Tiegs on the cover. I say “our,” but Sandberg owns this, and he has it positioned to advantage in his cubicle. This is one of two tremendous assets of Sandberg’s cube, the other being a limitless supply of Ibuprofen.

    People have asked what the connection is between Cheryl Tiegs and The Rake. I am not at liberty to give all the details, but the basic outline is this: We are good friends and fans of Dan Buettner’s (he wrote for our very first issue, but seems to have gotten very busy ever since—the power of a byline in our little rag!), and of course Dan and Cheryl have been dating for some time now. The lovely and gracious couple has been known to show up at various Rakish soirees. Sandberg has been threatening to have Cheryl autograph his yellowing artifact from the Mezzozoic (though we hasten to add that Miss Cheryl has aged far better than the magazine).

    This old issue of Sports Illustrated is fascinating to look at for reasons other than taking a trip in the way-back machine to oogle swimsuit fashions in the era of Gerald Ford. It also has a feature on Henry Bouchet, the Minnesota North Star (and Warroad native) whose career was ended by an eye injury sustained in a terrible beating that occured in an NHL hockey game. (We remember that with horror. Horror! Twas ever thus; we left the end of last season with a similar, ferric taste in our mouths.) This year, of course, we don’t have pro hockey as a distraction—although we’re fast approaching the MSHSL tourney, and as everyone knows, kids peak early these days, especially jocks, so we like to share in their moment before the long decline into hairlessness and shoe sales and reunions in unbearably long five-year increments. Cue that old saw about the one TV we have here in the office, blah-de-blah.

    So, anyway, I read somewhere that Sports Illustrated has, for very many years now, made a standing offer to its subscribers: Anyone who does not wish to receive the Swimsuit Issue may request that it not be delivered, and their account will be credited with an additional issue at the end of their subscription. I also read where there is no record of anyone ever exercising this option.

    In other words, the wave of cancellation threats appears to come each year not from subscribers, but from the angry spouses of subscribers and other heated busybodies. This is not exactly rocket science, of course. What we see here is a failure to communicate. Dude, forget the free clock radio, the Sharper Image gift certificates, the coily tie-less shoelaces, the TIME-AOL-WARNER brand cordless telephone with three speed-dail presets. Sports Illustrated subscribers, you need to keep your eye on the ball here. It is your job to convince your partners that the swimsuit issue is a valuable resource in your ongoing efforts to educate yourselves in the finer sartorial points that are so central to the lives of your loved ones. We have it on good authority that there is nothing sexier than a man who takes a keen, empathetic interest in clothes and fashion and accessories and footware. And this is important: Be sure to indicate that it is only through being exposed to the extreme that you can better understand the mean. In other words, it is not possible to have a good understanding of sexy one-piece woolen bathing suits with three-quarter sleeves and revealing above-the-knee skirt without a summary of what’s going on in the area of thongs and string-bras.

    Also, swimming is a very strenuous and serious sport, worthy of illustration.

  • One More Reason To Be Grateful You're Living In Twins Territory, Part One

    I have every reason to believe our lads are steroid-free (seventeen reasons, in fact –that being the number of seasons since a member of the local nine has hit thirty homeruns), and I wouldn’t expect to hear of any dirty piss tests emanating from the Twins’ clubhouse any time soon.

    The truth is that the organization hasn’t had any obviously synthetic muscle-heads or otherwise unnatural mirror-candy since they got rid of the superhumanly-ripped tandem of Rich Garces and David West some years ago.

  • Feedback Loop

    It’s new-issue Monday, and there is nothing as exciting or scary as setting your work of the previous month before a jury of 65,000 peers. We tend to get feedback of three kinds. First, there are complimentary emails from readers who like what they read, and these are the ones we read repeatedly, we print them out and tape them onto the refrigerator, we high-five each other outside our cubicles, we go back and read the issue with a warm glow in our hearts, we buy flowers for our loved ones, we call our grandmothers just to say hello, we ride to lunch on a cloud of fizzy egotism. Aren’t we great?

    The second sort of feedback we get is from smart readers who trouble-shoot the new issue for smallish, stupid errors (hopefully, never major ones—knock on wood!) on the order of screwed-up phone numbers, incomplete information, misspelled names, and that sort of thing. These are always terribly embarrassing, and we are suddenly plunged into a deep funk of despondency and self-loathing. Maybe we are working in the wrong industry? Who are we trying to fool? We really ought to be fired! We could always sell the house and go into sheep farming. We begin to hyperventilate. Then, just in time, a few more happy emails arrive, and we begin to feel better. We vow never to repeat the same inane mistakes. Stern warnings are issued, wrists are slapped. We will do better. We must do better. Someone will get fired next time, we swear, but ain’t gonna be a next time! Perfection is only a month away!

    The final sort of feedback we get is just strange. There are occaisonally readers who think we lean one way politically, while they lean politically the other way, and it incenses them that our views seem to contradict their views. Now, to be perfectly fair, we DO have strong preferences about the way things are versus the way we think they ought to be. Despite banging on with our unsolicited opinions about “objectivity” and “news” and “media” and “blogging” and “neo-cons,” we wish to clarify that we are merely observers with (we hope) informed opinions about the industry in which we work. The magazine is not really a news vehicle per se, not in the same way that a daily or weekly newspaper is. That’s not our gig, that’s the other guys. So we’re more comfortable about have a special take on any subject we may take up. But see here: We think one of the mortal sins of working in media is succumbing to shrill, predictable, party politics. We wish to be correct, of course, but more important than being correct is being a pleasure to our readers. We think there are very few pleasures in shrill, predictable, party politics. We try to find new, interesting, fresh ways to say true things.

    But our point is a more mundane, interesting one. For some reason, each time we receive a note from someone who is unhappy with their perception of our politics, that person without fail does not sign his or her name, nor leave any return address. It is almost as if they are ashamed of their own opinions. We feel fairly confident in calling this, too, a sin—though it’s probably a venal one. A person who lacks the courage of her convictions makes us sad, and slightly irritated, and we make the grumpy decision not to publish these sorts of letters, even when they are very smart or funny (which they often are). This is a short-term satisfaction; if you want to express your opinion to our other esteemed readers, you need to sign your name so we can at least make sure you’re who you say you are. But in the big picture, it’s depressing, because it represents a breakdown in one of the fundamental processes of a civil society: The thoughtful public colloquy about controversial and difficult issues. That’s pretty lame, and karmically speaking, just one step above anonmyously vandalizing the walls of public bathrooms.