Blog

  • The Upper Crust

    Just about everyone can name someone they know who hates meatloaf. Or yogurt, I bet you can find someone in your circle who categorically hates yogurt. But I dare you to locate someone who hates pizza. Sure, you can find a friend with tomato issues or one of those poor, lactose-intolerant freaks who cries if cheese is even in the room with them, but that’s not the same, is it? When you’re a kid and you get all A’s: pizza party! When you’re sheet-rocking your buddy’s cabin: pizza break! When you’re an agoraphobic, what keeps you alive: pizza delivery! Is it the delectable complexity of combinations or is it the mind-blowing simplicity of bread with toppings? Whatever it is, pizza is the 24/7 chow that has conquered the world.

    Even though you can find pizzerias from Bangkok to Biloxi, pizzas are generally thought to be Italian in origin, which is generally true. Throughout antiquity, especially in the Mediterranean region, people used flat bread as a plate, and the Egyptians were believed to celebrate the birthdays of their pharaohs with flat breads seasoned with herbs and spices. The pita, an obvious relation, had been eaten for thousands of years all over the world before it was brought to Italy by soldiers from abroad.

    Though there’s no Big Bang theory that applies to the invention of pizza, the style we know today came together in Naples, which is commonly acknowledged to be the pizza capital of the planet.

    In the 18th century, it was known in tradesmen’s circles that the poorest sections of Napoli had the best food (a tradition that endures in many large cities). The flat pies were sold as street food by young boys who ran around with tin stoves on their heads. In 1830, Antica Pizzeria Port’Alba became the first pizzeria. They used a large round brick oven to fire their instantly famous pies—which they are still churning out today. Some people believe that it is this wood-fired cooking method that make Neapolitan pizzas the world standard. Others attribute the San Marzano tomatoes that grow in the volcanic soil of nearby Mt. Vesuvius, lending them a soft lusciousness. Still more swear by the pure buffalo mozzarella and its tanginess that makes any cow’s-milk imitation taste like wallpaper paste.

    Here in the Land of Opportunity, Lombardi’s opened on Spring Street in New York City in 1905 with its very own brick oven. Of course, New Yorkers like to claim they’re responsible for giving pizza to America, but credit should again be given to the Italians. Stationed in Italy, World War II GI’s took advantage of the local fare and brought back a hunger for the easy meal. It wasn’t long after the war (1958, to be precise) before two young brothers, still enrolled at Wichita State University, came up with a winner of an idea we’ll call Pizza Hut. Two years later, two Wisconsin brothers came up with a little brand we’ll call Tombstone.

    Pizza innovations have since proliferated, with deep-dish, stuffed crusts, dessert versions, BBQ style, “gourmet” white pizza, and all manner of other gussied-up folderol. Truth be told, the version that you can get delivered to your door in thirty minutes or less has almost nothing to do with the original idea of pizza, and I’m not just talking about the aberration that is Canadian Bacon and Pineapple. What was once a healthy, fresh repast is now helping to pad your ass. The gang at the Center for Science in the Public Interest (they were the ones who made you scared of movie popcorn) notes that just one slice of the Pizza Hut Stuffed Crust Meat Lover’s pie packs the fat of an entire McDonald’s Quarter Pounder. And I bet you don’t pick up a second QP like you pick up a second slice. Not one to mince words, Jayne Hurley, who headed the pizza study at CSPI, says, “You need cheese stuffed into a pizza crust like you need reverse liposuction to force more fat under your skin.”

    Provoked by this obscene permutation of their national treasure, the Italians formed the Associazione Verace Pizza Napoletana. A governmental DOC (denominazione d’origine controllata) organization like the ones that protect the names “Chianti” and “Parmigianno Reggiano,” the VPN sees its mission as one of preserving simplicity and authenticity. The dough must be shaped by hand, without a rolling pin. The pizza must be baked in a wood-fired oven, without a pan and should be “soft, well cooked, fragrant and enclosed in a high, soft edge of crust.” Graciously, they allow that “all types of pizza are agreeable to basil leaves.” To be able to call yourself a true Neapolitan pizza joint, you must become a certified member of the VPN with a trained pizzaioli (pizza maker) on staff.

    Count yourself among the lucky, because Punch is a local outfit that is one of a handful of American members of the VPN. Not only do they turn out a dough that is soft and well cooked, but they proudly import the San Marzano tomatoes and authentic mozzarella di bufala which make their pies undeniably the best in the city. Pizza Nea is also turning out great wood-fired pies with astonishing toppings and innovative combinations. If you love a pizza not for the crust but for the sauce, then the Savoy Inn in St. Paul has the fresh, spice-laden stuff of dreams. Fat Lorenzo’s in Minneapolis comes in a close second. All these places will give you something the big chains can’t: texture and flavor that aren’t suffocated by heavy swaths of bland cheese.

    If you’re under house arrest, you too can have flavorful pizza without delivery or DiGiorno. Pizza dough is the essence of simplicity: flour, water, yeast. If you have the cash, you could invest in a miraculous, top-of-the-line Mugnaini oven direct from Italy (their national distributor happens to be right here in town). Otherwise, you should definitely pop for a pizza stone. These flat round stones heat up in your oven before you place the pizza on top, simulating the bottom of a brick oven. While it can’t cook your pizza in ninety seconds like the Mugnaini, it will help to elevate the crust to near-VPN standards, bringing you that much closer to true pizza perfection.

    ~Neapolitan Pizza Dough~

    Makes four nine- to ten-inch pizzas

    It’s best to use a blend of cake flour and all-purpose flour to achieve a Neapolitan-style crust. This tender dough stretches more easily and has less of a tendency to spring back onto itself, making it easier to wield and shape.

    1 teaspoon active dry yeast
    1-1?4 cups warm water (105ºF)
    1 cup cake flour (not self-rising)
    2-1?2 to 3 cups all-purpose flour
    2 teaspoons salt
    Olive oil, to grease the bowl

    Sprinkle the yeast over the warm water in a measuring cup. Let stand one minute or until the yeast is creamy. Stir until the yeast dissolves.
    In a large bowl, combine the cake flour, 2-1?2 cups of the all-purpose flour, and the salt.

    Add the yeast mixture and stir until a soft dough forms. Turn the dough out onto a lightly floured surface and knead, adding
    more flour if necessary. Work until smooth and elastic, about ten minutes.

    Lightly coat a large bowl with olive oil. Place the dough in the bowl, turning it to oil the top. Cover with plastic wrap and set in a warm, draft-free spot and let rise until doubled in bulk, about 1-1?2 hours.

    Punch down the dough with your fists (quite gratifying). Cut it into two to four pieces and shape into balls. Dust the tops with flour.
    Place the balls on a floured work surface and cover each with plastic wrap allowing room for expansion. Let rise sixty to ninety minutes, or until doubled.

    While patiently waiting for dough to rise, place a pizza stone with dusting of cornmeal in oven on the lowest rack. Heat the oven to its maximum temperature.
    Shape dough on pizza paddle (officially called a “peel”) dusted with cornmeal, and add toppings. Gently slide pizza onto stone in oven. Bake each for six to seven minutes.

  • Rum, Monogamy, the Lash

    DEFEND YOUR MONOGAMOUS LIFE
    I was enjoying Stuart Greene’s column, “Ménage à… Nah,” in your July issue [Sex & The Married Man]. I agree that sexual adventurism is definitely not for everyone. But I was amazed by this blanket statement he imposed at the end: “[Sex experts] who aren’t afraid to delve deeper into moral and psychological issues seem to agree that humans are essentially monogamous by nature.” This is highly untrue, at least if you examine the historical norms. In a recent study of 1,154 past and present societies, anthropologists documented that 980—a huge majority—have allowed some form of multiple relationship. Even today, a number of traditional indigenous societies allow either polygamy or polyandry. This isn’t to suggest that these societies didn’t also have monogamous relationships, or that those who only have one partner in their life are somehow deficient. There are many relationship styles: straight or gay, single-partner or multiple-partner, and Greene deserves credit for determining that he’s happy in a monogamous relationship. But we need to be very careful about assertions regarding which types of relationships are our “essential nature,” and extremely cautious about branding other types as “dysfunctional” or “hurtful,” as he goes on to do. This wasn’t a psychological judgment, it was a moral judgment. Greene seemed to need to defend his own lifestyle.
    Steve Anderson
    Minneapolis

    TOO MUCH LOVE FOR ONE LOVER
    Regarding Stuart Greene’s interesting ménage article, I have to say that I think Stuart should learn more about the subject. He says “humans are essentially monogamous by nature, and that this type of sex-play is usually evidence of some kind of dysfunction, often something very serious and hurtful.” Being polyamorous myself, I can say with certainty that he is mistaken. It may be true that some monogamous couples who occasionally participate in a ménage may have deeper issues, maybe not. There are large numbers of people who participate in open, honest multiple-partner relationships. Like all communities, the moral and psychological nature of these people ranges across the spectrum. By and large, though, most of us are emotionally mature enough to have gone beyond jealousy and possessiveness to allow ourselves to be open to long-term loving relationships with more than one person. Any casual observer of human nature and history knows that most men are not monogamous by nature. In some cultures men have affairs or mistresses, and it is not considered the least bit unusual or improper. In our prudish culture, this is less accepted but often ignored or overlooked. With the large divorce rate and the high incidence of infidelity, it should be obvious that monogamy is an artificial institution that correlates higher with dogmatically religious people. Participants in polyamory feel that the emphasis on sexual monogamy is unimportant, that fidelity with one’s partner(s) is being honest and truthful, and it is the mark of a mature relationship. Perhaps Stuart is unfamiliar with the broad community of adults who participate in swinging, open relationships, polyamory, and/or BDSM and is just jealous that his old flame has a more open sexual lifestyle than himself. Stuart’s final thought, “Great sex does not make a great relationship,” says it all. Why can’t one have great sex and great relationships?
    Atom Aton
    Minneapolis

    THE LOOCH IS ON THE LOOSE
    At last, Mary Lucia’s voice back into the consciousness of Minneapolis [Soundtrack to Mary, The Broken Clock]! I mourned the loss of REV, and then ZONE, not only for the music but for the honest, passionate, wickedly funny, loosely censored Mary Lucia. I anxiously and hopefully wait for the day that Mary is back on air. Until then, I will keep looking for written word from Mary.
    Shellae Mueller
    Bloomington

    HEY GOOD-LOOKING, WHAT YOU GOT COOKING?
    I thoroughly enjoy your magazine, finding it interesting, well-written, and good-looking. But a serious matter forces me to point out what I see as an error in the article “Getting Baked” [The Rakish Angle, August]. There is no clear evidence that “tanning booths are less likely than sun exposure to cause melanoma.” From everything I have read, the jury is still out on the various causes of melanoma, a horrible beast of a disease. One thing is clear: You won’t find many oncologists hanging out in tanning booths. The last thing consumers need is cancer information generated by the tanning industry.
    Maureen Mitton
    Hudson, Wisconsin

    NO MAN IS AN ISLAND
    Robin Shaw’s article “Unhappy Trails” [August] missed the point. It’s not what is the best use of the land, but who gets to decide how the land is developed, if at all. If the court rules that Brian Sandberg owns the land, do we label them “activist” judges? What I did learn from that article is that, in the end, Sandberg is SOL. Even if the state Supreme Court rules in favor of Sandberg, apparently the Legislature can still appropriate the land for the public good. So, it would seem Sandberg will eventually have to decide whether to defend his rights with his gun against the Legislature’s pen. I love the bike trails and use them frequently. Do all the real benefits of having the trails outlined in the article negate the rule of law? In a sense, Sandberg is in the same boat as Native Americans whose land was taken from them because they did not use it to its fullest extent.
    Darryl Wheaton
    Lakeville

    Editor’s Note: We’re pretty sure the “rule of law” favors the state Legislature. It’s often referred to as “eminent domain.” Property-rights advocates who defend their views with guns tend to lose in these types of disagreements.

    SPEAKING OF PROPERTY RIGHTS…
    I was so surprised to read Louise Erdrich’s letter in the August edition of The Rake [Letters]. If memory serves, the lot where Charlie Lazor is building his house was for sale for a long time—years, even. I rollerblade that trail almost daily (I agree with her that the Kenilworth Trail is superb, one of the green gems of the city), and have marveled at the new house gracing the lot no one else would buy. If she wanted to preserve the green space, why didn’t she buy the lot herself, or rally her neighbors to buy it collectively? Since she didn’t, she can’t exactly complain about what someone else does with it. And, the house is not a concrete wall, as she so inaccurately described it. Gorgeous wood and glass are the primary materials of Mr. Lazor’s house. To my eyes, it’s much more sculpturally and sensitively designed than many of the bland older houses on lots nearby. And those older houses sit on what was once green space, too—just because they’re old doesn’t make them any less of an assault on bygone green space, or make them automatically beautiful. Mr. Lazor’s house inspires and thrills me each time I pass it. (And I love the humane beauty of its affordability.) Clearly, we are drawn to different expressions of beauty. Beauty is subjective, after all. (I do love Ms. Erdrich’s books and her bookstore, though.) I was shocked and surprised to read this from Ms. Erdrich—especially from Ms. Erdrich.
    Solveg Peterson
    Minneapolis

  • Ross Taylor

    “Zookeeper” is surely one of the top twenty coolest jobs in the world, and for Ross Taylor, a South Minneapolis native and University of Minnesota graduate, the path to this career started, oddly enough, in clown college. Studying to be a circus clown led to a job as big-top animal caretaker and then, for the past twenty-five years, keeper at the Minnesota Zoo. Taylor is one of the folks responsible for the animals on the Northern Trail—that’d be buffalo, Przewalski’s horses, moose, and of course the endangered Amur (Siberian) tigers. Lately he’s been especially busy with some new arrivals—a pair of female tiger cubs born in May. Visitors have been able to watch the cubs in their den via closed-circuit TV, but starting September 18, the youngsters will be on view romping around the main tiger enclosure. When we enlisted Taylor for our desert-island game, we were pleasantly surprised to discover that, unique among all our previous interviewees, he’s actually been stranded on a real desert island: specifically, Mili Atoll in the Marshall Islands, during his two years with the Peace Corps in the 1960s. “The minimum temperature the whole time was seventy-one degrees,” he says. Here’s what Taylor would take along for another stint in the South Pacific:

    1) “A machete, because you can’t drink one of those big coconuts without them. You can use it for building huts, or just about anything you can think of.”

    2) “A refrigerator. Boy, do you miss ice when you don’t have it for two years. Solar-powered, and stocked with supplies to make the perfect Hawaiian Sunset—rum, a
    little pineapple juice.”

    3) “Several blank canvases and painting supplies for capturing the island sunsets. I mostly paint with acrylics, because they’re so easy to handle. Recently, I’ve been painting animal-related portraits—tigers, actually.”

    4) “A jar of mayonnaise, for when a palm tree falls down and you cut out the heart for a heart-of-palm salad. If you haven’t had salad for a year, it’s pretty much beyond description.”

    5) “Two cats, to keep the rodent population down, which is a problem on a desert isle. Two cats because you can amuse yourself watching their interactions.” But Taylor would probably leave the tiger cubs at home—referring to the book The Life of Pi, he notes that on a desert island it’s probably best not to live next to a predator that weighs three times as much as you do. “I’d stick with domestic cats,” he says.

  • Road Trip to Myself

    It won’t be long now. September’s weight presses in on my teacher bones, and there’s only one way to stave it off and prepare for the shock of going back to school: Take a road trip of several thousand miles with five kids. So here we are in Mackinaw City, Michigan, where sturdy-looking Midwestern families gather to enjoy the azure waters and soft sand beaches of Lake Michigan.

    The sky above the straits of Mackinac spans clear and stunning, the same as it’s been since I first started traversing the Upper Peninsula with my sister and our Nana eighteen years ago. Back then, after we’d dropped off Nana at our aunt’s house in Detroit, we’d turn around and head back north on I-75 for a long car party of Doritos and cigs and Tab and music so loud that one state trooper had to use the bullhorn to catch our attention. Finally we noticed him and pulled over. A cloud of air-conditioned smoke emerged as my sister rolled down the car window. “Ladies,” the trooper said through tight but upturned lips, “I’ve been following you with the lights and siren for the last three miles. It’s time to fasten your seatbelts.”

    This morning, a rainbow kite with six tails flies impossibly high, and another exactly like it lags at least a hundred feet below, trying hopelessly to catch up. On the ground, the thick smell of fudge coats my nostrils. I’m sitting alone in a coffee shop in the bustling town square—which is actually an outdoor mall — and I’m pretending to be a serious novelist at work on a great manuscript instead of a harried columnist trying to work on vacation. Tomorrow, we head for a friend’s private island in the Georgian Bay, a place so remote that there is neither phone service nor electricity nor flushing toilets. At the nearby arcade, Jon and the kids entertain themselves watching the teen locals show off on the Dance Dance Revolution Extreme machine. It’s so entrancing that I blurt out a promise to get the home version for our basement.

    Later, I find myself wondering if promises made in the heat of vacation are binding. After all, do we really know what we’re saying or doing or even who we actually are when we’re on the road?

    Think how many couples tie the knot while vacationing, only to come to their senses with a sickening shock once the trip is over. Of course, for Jon and me, such a jolly and spontaneous act would be different. Since we’ve been living together for so long, we are already balancing all of the responsibilities of marriage and family life, just without the paperwork. Plus, we’ve been planning to marry for quite a while. By now, the most frustrating aspect of being unwed is the inability to use the simple terms “husband” and “wife.” Can a “boyfriend” have a touch of gray? Does anyone especially care to be a fiancée more than once? Can a heterosexual have a “partner”? And no offense, but I’d rather lock myself in the bathroom than have a “significant other.”

    Traveling as a blended family brings all this up, since we’re meeting people and introducing ourselves over and over again. We get a little loopy. This morning at the cabin, while Jon and I were still in bed, I heard my daughter Sophie say something to her stepbrother about “when my dad and your mom get up.” Silence. Laughter. Who’s who around here, anyway? Isn’t that part of why we travel — to get enough perspective on ourselves and our lives to figure it out?

    These questions must have been nagging me the other day, when I surprised the Mackinac ferry driver (who looked about fifteen) by asking him if he was licensed to perform weddings “at sea.” Alas, he wasn’t. But no matter, because after the Georgian Bay we’re headed south, to Manhattan, where we will dodge terrorists before heading to the Jersey shore near Cape May, which is awfully close to Atlantic City, if you get my drift.

    At the table next to me a grandmother is sharing a sandwich and orange juice with a little girl about eight. The child is wearing a red T-shirt with a white cat on it. She reminds me of my younger daughter, and of the wistfulness of teenage girls before they grow up, and of myself years ago.

    All these young families walking by the window, and the childless couples, bronzed and urgent, they remind me of time passing. Revisiting these places I’ve been so many times before, it’s oddly disorienting and comforting at the same time. I see my past and my future, but it’s my world right now that comes into focus. These kids we adore, the chaos and the effort and the comedy, honestly, it aches in that way I love to feel, because I know it will never be like this again.

  • Rites of Passage

    There’s an arbor in my neighborhood that I drive past every day. Sturdy pre-fab construction, what looks to be bare, untreated wood. It catches my eye not because it’s beautiful, but because it is goofy. It’s the placement of the thing that gets me. It’s plopped a third of the way into the front yard of the house.

    It is not arching gracefully over a walkway or path. Nor does it draw the eye through to focus on a lush planting. Furthermore, it’s not an accidental placement of the thing. It’s been sitting on that front-yard grass, bare as a bone for its second summer now, and it looks as though it’s going to stay there. It looks as though someone had a Jack Daniels break on chore day, went to Bachman’s, dumped two hundred dollars on a three-sided pine box, hauled it home, stood it up in the yard, passed out, and then woke up the next day and decided to leave it where it stands as a physical reminder to remain sober while landscaping.

    I’m not saying that as a judgment, merely as an observation.

    I live a couple of blocks away from the house that boasts this oddity, and I don’t know the people who live there. The rest of the house seems well-kept and ordered, at least from the outside, which only makes the Doorway to Nowhere that much more puzzling.

    So, I’m out having coffee with my groovy artist pal, an old friend I haven’t seen in a while. He travels around a lot, and because I pretty much stay in the same place, I know we’ll always catch up sooner or later. He knows where to find me. It’s been more than a year since we’ve spoken, and when he asks me how I’ve been lately, the floodgates release. “My dad is sick! My kids are growing up fast! We have no kitchen countertops! The family dog had to be put to sleep!” Life is hardly falling in around my feet, but suffice it to say, there’s been a fair amount of nuttiness in the last twelve months. The next thing I know, I’ve been talking his ear off for thirty minutes straight and for the last ten I’ve been ranting about the arbitrary arbor. Of all things.

    My old pal, he laughed in all the right places and didn’t question my hopscotching brain patterns. I finally ran out of gas, and he took a pull off his hand-rolled cigarette, and a slurpy sip from his sugary coffee treat. And when he spoke, it wasn’t, “Aw, hell, baby, I’m so sorry about your dad.” Or even “The dog too, huh? Well that’s the pits, man.” Nope. It was “Colleen, how do you know that the archway doesn’t lead anywhere?”

    I stifled a wild urge to sink my teeth into his gentle hippie windpipe. Instead, I calmly said, “Well, that’s because I can see through it. That, and the last time I checked, I wasn’t living inside a Doctor Who episode. Just in case you’re wondering, I’m certain it’s not haunted either. No unexplained deaths in the neighborhood, no smell of sulfur.”

    “Sure seems to be haunting you.” He laughed.

    “Say that again but next time, cue the sitar music.”

    “Seriously, think about all the things in life that you feel you know are real, but you can’t see. Your idea of God and the hereafter. Divine reprisal for unrepentant souls. Maybe you don’t see anything on the other side of that arbor, and what bugs you is that you feel you’re supposed to. By all the rules of gardening, an archway is supposed to lead somewhere. To your eye, this one doesn’t, and that sticks in your craw so much that you’ve become obsessed by it.”

    “Obsessed is a pretty strong word.”

    “Is it? I don’t see you for a year and a half, all this stuff is going on in your life, and you ramble on about a stupid garden feature that’s not even in your own yard?”

    My morning commute takes me past the arbor and every day I still look up at it. I’ve become accustomed to the weird, bare wood arch standing stark on a plain green patch of grass. Now I’ve begun thinking of it as a pass-through that leads to everywhere, instead of a doorway that connects to only one room. A conceptual thoroughfare leading past illness, strife, and financial crunches, with wayside rests for joy and contentment and ridiculous old friends who smoke fragrant curls of tobacco and untangle thought snarls.

    It’s like a little South Minneapolis Stonehenge. A primitive calendar that reminds me each day that passes is an occasion to believe.

  • Funny Money

    When Fort Knox couldn’t hold enough gold to back all the paper money in circulation, the U.S. government in about 1913 began weaning the greenback from being a promissory note for precious metals. Instead, the mighty dollar became “fiat currency.” In other words, it became a slippery theoretical thing that depended on the Federal Reserve to wave a big wand and decree its value. The markets adjusted accordingly. No longer could you trade in your buck for its equivalent in gold. Presumably, that’s when they really locked down Fort Knox.

    Critics carped that this decision was folly, and they blamed it for every subsequent recession, depression, and hyper-inflated bubble burst in the economy. Even author L. Frank Baum felt so bad about abandoning the gold standard that he penned a children’s book in which the characters “follow the yellow brick road” to the Technicolor land over the rainbow—a green city where money is measured by the ounce, abbreviated as “Oz.”

    The slow transition to fake money was complete in 1968, when “silver certificates”—the last of the promissory notes—were removed from circulation. It didn’t take long for libertarians to respond acrimoniously (it never does). They dubbed the new bills worthless “frog skins.” But the government ignored them (it always does). Eisenhower silver dollars were soon drained of any precious metal and went out of circulation. A few years ago, the U.S. Treasury issued the quarter-sized Sacagawea dollar to replace the quarter-sized “Susan B. Agony.” The libertarians were ready. They scoffed at the brass coin as more government-issue “fool’s gold.”

    Rather than sitting back and letting the system collapse and taking all our savings with it, some libertarians founded the National Organization for the Repeal of the Federal Reserve Act in 1974. A mint master from Hawaii named Bernard Von NotHaus took the matter into his own hands and began issuing “liberty dollars” in 1998, backed by real silver and gold rather than the “national debt, Alan Greenspan, the IRS and taxes, and tanks and guns.”

    “The most popular is the ten-dollar coin that is one troy ounce of silver,” according to James Hess, a local liberty-dollar advocate who lives in South Minneapolis. “There’s nothing like having the real thing. For someone who has never held an ounce of silver in their hand, it’s exciting and liberating. I buy gas with it, I buy lunch with it. I sometimes even buy groceries with it.

    “Just as UPS and Fed Ex brought competition to the post office, the liberty dollar is forcing the Federal Reserve to improve its standards,” according to Hess. By way of a didactic warning, he added, “The Federal Reserve note doesn’t really belong to you. That’s why it’s illegal to deface a dollar. You’re just borrowing it. Even if it’s in your bank account, it’s not technically yours. All Federal Reserve money is just loaned out.”

    But are liberty dollars legal? When I asked a woman at the U.S. Treasury, she deemed it permissible, and not counterfeit. “They’re doing what?” she said with a chuckle. “As long as it doesn’t say ‘legal tender’ on it, they can do what they want.” A man named Mike White at the Bureau of Engraving and Printing concurred. “Liberty dollars are not considered legal tender, but it’s fine if they do it,” he said. Many Twin Cities stores aren’t quite so sure. Liberty dollars are available at the Libertarian Party headquarters near Raymond and University avenues in St. Paul, so the Hampden Park Coop just down the street sometimes gets this alternate currency. In general, the coop doesn’t accept liberty dollars—unless a volunteer is willing to swap their own ten-dollar note with its rough equivalent in silver. Libertarian optimism is unfazed. “If you look back, not everyone accepted Visa or MasterCard, but now everyone recognizes credit cards. Same thing with checks. It was a trust issue,” explained Hess. He said there are now more than five million dollars of liberty currency in circulation.

    Hess claims that a troy ounce of silver, or a ten-dollar liberty coin, is far more secure than a personal check or a Visa number. He claims liberty dollars can only gain in value. “If you look in the newspaper today, the price of silver is a little more than six dollars an ounce. The difference on the ten-dollar coin is the cost to mint the coin and pay for the shipping. Once the rate of silver is more than ten dollars an ounce, the tens will be melted down and made into twenty-dollar coins. You can trade in your ten-dollar coin and double your money!”

    Banks do not share this enthusiasm about the new currency. At first, a local Wells Fargo branch accepted deposits of liberty dollars from a loyal customer, “but then they had to make a decision at the national level not to accept it,” said Hess. “I told them that I’d gladly take all their liberty dollars off their hands and give them regular Federal Reserve notes, but they wouldn’t do it.”

    Nevertheless, Hess claims this is an asset that “banks don’t usually accept liberty dollars, because then the money doesn’t go to New York or out of town. It tends to stay in the community. It’s probably the main reason that I use the liberty dollar, because it helps the community I live in.”

    Hess confessed that only a handful of shops, or “liberty merchants,” accept the coins in Minnesota, but “in Austin, Texas, liberty dollars are generally accepted in most stores. There are also five-hundred-dollar gold pieces made of an ounce of gold. Not many places will accept them, but I heard that there are some car lots in Texas that love them. So if you want to buy a car with gold, go to Texas.”—Eric Dregni

  • One Man Does Not A Movement Make

    Thirty columns ago, in the very first issue of The Rake — March 2002 — I wrote that “being a real brother is not as important as being a real man. Real men think for themselves and live with the consequences of their decisions.” I admit that I took some defiant pride in the not-so-veiled assertion that I was above race. In fact, I accepted the Rake gig with the clear understanding that I was not going to be the magazine’s “head nigger in charge.” I was a writer who happened to be African-American. When it came to topics that would be covered in this space, the world was my oyster.

    However, I found myself writing about race-related stuff and the challenges of living in north Minneapolis more than I envisioned in 2002. Over time, readers began emailing, calling, and stopping me on the street to say things like, “Finally, someone is writing about us.” Even people who initially thought that I was suspect because I didn’t shy away from being critical of black people decided that I deserved my “brother card” after all.

    In fact, I began to view my column not so much as an exclusive possession, but more like American Indians historically viewed the land—as something that I merely managed as a steward. This became especially clear to me over the past several months, when I wrote about the bad guys who shattered my front window after I confronted some neighborhood wannabes about drug dealing. That column, and the one that followed, about Bill Cosby airing African-American “dirty laundry,” generated more letters from readers than any of my others. I felt simultaneously flattered and trapped by the response. All writers love knowing that they are connecting with readers. There are few ego strokes sweeter than to have a stranger leap out of a crowd and tell you “I really loved your last piece. I can’t wait to see your next column.”

    Yet I also began to feel more like a spokesman than just a writer. I am all too aware of how few African-American writers in this city have had the writing platforms that I have in the past dozen years. In fact, when I started writing for the Star Tribune in 1992, I was that newspaper’s first African-American editorial writer since Carl Rowan—in the 1960s. Things haven’t changed much since then. You can count on one hand the number of African-American columnists in major (i.e. white-owned) media outlets in this town and still have a finger or two left over.

    There is a scene in the film The American President when an advisor played by Michael J. Fox tells the president, played by Michael Douglas, that “the people want leadership! In the absence of genuine leadership, they’ll listen to anyone who steps up to the microphone. They’re so thirsty for it they’ll crawl through the desert to a mirage and when they discover there is no water, they will drink the sand.” I believe that a number of Minneapolitans are in a similar position—which explains the powerful response to those recent columns. Many of us, especially those on the Northside, feel like our problems and our pain may get headlines, but that month after month, year after year, we are denied the resources to deal with them.

    I am grateful for the support I have received from Rake readers. I will never forget those who encouraged me to fight the drug thugs and not lose hope. But as much as I care about Minneapolis and the gritty issues confronting the Northside, I must respectfully resist the temptation to allow this column to become a monthly collective cry for help from disenfranchised parts of the city. This is too big a burden for one writer, armed with only one column, to carry.

    On the other hand, it’s an entirely appropriate burden for all of us, as a community, to shoulder. We need to shake down the system and let the people who run it know that we are thirsty for real leadership—the kind of leadership that is just as fed up as the rest of us with the gangbangers, the drug dealers, the users and abusers destroying North Minneapolis. And, we need to let our elected officials know that we are willing to stick with this fight even if it means taking down members of our own families if they refuse to get with the program.

    Truth is, I want to write about other topics—and not feel that I’m letting down my community if I do so. Like it or not (and I do not always like it), I do have a special responsibility as an African-American columnist in a mostly white town. Yet those loyalties can never be greater than the one I have to myself as a writer to take on all the things—and there are many—that trip my trigger.

  • Dance of the Berserkers

    Last spring, while driving down an Arizona highway searching for an alt-rock radio station, I heard a woman’s voice cry out across the airwaves, as if in primeval prayer. A guitar answered, then dropped into a thick growl of minor chords while the melody swelled with the lyrics, before the whole thing sank into the depths of a ten-ton unison riff. My god, I thought, does Arizona have a DJ who’s into Nordic roots music? No, the song was by Melissa auf der Mar, former bassist for Hole and Smashing Pumpkins. Which means that in my mid-forties I’m becoming a headbanger. Or is it metalhead? Anyway, I couldn’t be happier.

    My infatuation with loud, primal, dirge-like music started back in 1999 with Hedningarna, one of the first Swedish groups to fuse traditional Scandinavian tunes with rock as part of a movement throughout Scandinavia. Performing live in Minneapolis to a dance piece by local choreographer Joe Chvala, the band offered up an otherworldly mix of lush, heavy instrumentation and spectral melodies. The long notes of ancient instruments like the Hardanger fiddle, the hurdy-gurdy, and the Swedish bagpipes resonated at my core. And the singers, two Finnish women, were Valkyries, their clear voices slicing like shards of glass through the battle fray, lifting every note as if it were a dead warrior being spirited to Valhalla.

    This music was nothing less than transporting. It took me to some kind of preconscious state: a place of vocalization, not vocabulary, where emotion flashes raw and unadulterated by memory or sentiment, and where instinct isn’t an impulse but a mode of survival. The kind of world created by William T. Vollman in his mythical Viking travelogue, The Ice-Shirt, populated by marauders who revel in, then lose, their ability to don the bear serk (literally, a bear shirt or skin), which makes them invincible in battle. And that was just the music. Hedningarna’s lyrics relate medieval tales of warrior kings and defiant women, of curses and enchantments, loyalties and grudges, of unfettered sensuality; they conjure a time when the boundaries between human and animal could dissolve with results both terrifying and exhilarating.

    I had gone to see Chvala, one of my favorite choreographers, but in the process gained a new musical obsession. Chvala and Hedningarna were part of the first Nordic Roots Festival in 1999. Organized by NorthSide Records, a Minneapolis-based imprint that distributes Nordic roots music throughout the United States, the festival is now in its sixth year and runs September 17-19 at the Cedar Cultural Center in Minneapolis.

    Through the past five festivals, and at other concerts over the years, I’ve become part of a local community intent on exploring the spectrum of Nordic roots music, which has found a hardcore fan base here in the Twin Cities. Its sounds include the goddess-infused ethereality of Gjallarhorn, named for Heimdal’s horn, used to transmit messages between the gods and humans; the disquieting yoiking of Sami singer Wimme; and the Hendrix-like delirium of Hoven Droven (which translates as “helter skelter”).

    Garmarna, named for the dogs that guard the gates of Norse hell, is one group that consistently sells out here. The band’s work evokes a stark, terrifying beauty as electronic instrumentation whips primal grooves around singer Emma Härdelin. The feminine eye at the center of a testosterone storm, her voice pierces the music’s dirges of lamentation and grief, as riveting as her stage presence is calm. She brings to mind the Danish/Inuit title character of Peter Høeg’s novel Smilla’s Sense of Snow: She is urbane, intelligent, and self-possessed, yet governed by fierce aboriginal intuition.

    While those groups have been fixtures at previous festivals, this year two Swedish favorites are headlining: Väsen (an acoustic trio whose name means “essence” or “spirit”) and Harv (“to dig deep”). Väsen concerts are a religious experience, the group’s earthy melodies and supple rhythms conjuring an incomparably joyous heartache; the two young men in Harv play self-described “bad fiddles” and “Harv-ify” every traditional tune they encounter, turning the Swedish three-beat polska and its relative, the Norwegian pols, into music as jagged and stunning as lightning.

    How is it that a half-Scandinavian woman raised on Baroque music and the Bee Gees can listen to Garmarna’s Vengeance or the compilation CD Wizard Women of the North and feel a visceral connection to the soundtrack of her inner life? A couple of people in town have some pretty good ideas about that. “Nordic roots music just has this resonance,” says Bill Snyder, a critic who writes about Nordic music for such publications as Sing Out. “People say they feel like they have this music in their bones, or that they’ve always known it, or that it’s immediately familiar to them.”

    It’s possible that the music’s mythic and medieval qualities—in lyrics, tunes, and instruments—contribute to that feeling. “Most of it has ancient roots in some way or another, even the modern compositions,” Snyder says. “If you believe in a collective unconscious, or that there are certain things in ritual that become part of humanity, then it makes sense that a lot of people have this visceral experience with the music.”

    Snyder’s referring to archetypes: the rhythms, symbols, characters and stories that Carl Jung and mythologist Joseph Campbell employed to explain ancient patterns of experience that constitute our shared human heritage. “People dying from broken hearts. Murders. Folk music themes, whether they’re Celtic, Nordic, or Anglo-American, are very basic,” Snyder says. “It’s pretty bloody, often not happy. It’s about survival under harsh conditions. The specifics are dated, but these themes speak to a human condition—needs, desires, love—that hasn’t changed for thousands of years.”

    Then there are the instruments used by Nordic roots groups—hurdy gurdy, nyckelharpa, Hardanger fiddle, Swedish bagpipes, and even the didgeridoo from Gjallarhorn’s ensemble—that strike a chord within the human psyche. “All of these are drone instruments, which create single notes that are omnipresent,” says Rob Simonds, who founded and runs the NorthSide label. Take the Hardanger fiddle and nyckelharpa. “They have strings that only exist to resonate. You don’t bow them, but they produce a subtle noise with an eerie quality, a natural reverb. Basically the resonance creates the ever-present drone of harmonics.”

    So are those drones like the hum of a tuning fork pitched to the thrumming strands of our DNA? “Now we’re getting into an area in which I don’t have any expertise,” Simonds says, laughing. “But there’s a whole field of study called psychoacoustics that focuses on how people are affected by different harmonic structures and keys.” Aha. Maybe that’s the key to our insatiable appetite for Harv’s “bad fiddling.” Right, Simonds explains: “Bad fiddling refers to melodies and harmonic structure. Harv likes to play these ‘blue notes’ that are quarter tones—not what we’re used to in mainstream Western music. And, well, it does weird stuff to you.”

    For another example, there’s the ever-present, polyrhythmic polska, the basis for a lot of Nordic roots music. This traditional dance is similar to a polka in that it has three beats, but as Simonds tells it, the polska’s rhythm more closely echoes the human heartbeat—and depending on which part of Sweden the musicians hail from, the first beat might be quick or long, with lots of “messing around with the space between the beats.”

    As if medieval lyrics, harmonic drone, and polyrhythmic intensity aren’t enough, those groups with female singers often add to the mix Swedish kulning—the impossibly high-pitched calf-calling that causes the hair on the back of your neck to rise. On top of that, electric instrumentation and a dose of American influence also play roles in creating the Nordic roots sound. For instance, Simonds describes Stefan Brisland-Ferner, who does most of the arranging and composition for Garmarna (scheduled to play the Cedar in fall 2005), as a “studio geek” who grew up listening to Kraftwerk and David Bowie. Kjell-Erick Eriksson, Hoven Droven’s lead fiddler, is a well-known folk musician who, “when growing up, had a poster of some old Swedish fiddle player on one wall, and on the other, AC/DC and Kiss,” claims Simonds. Hedningarna (“heathens”) is among the oldest of the Nordic roots bands. The movement’s genesis lies within the folk revival of the late 1960s and seventies that started in America and then swept the world—an influence that’s reflected in much of the Nordic region’s lush, shamanistic, hard-rock approach to traditional music.

    Both Simonds and Snyder emphasize that Nordic roots musicians consider themselves folk musicians, whether they’re playing new or ancient tunes, whether their sound is electronic or acoustic. “They think of themselves as doing the same thing folk artists have always done: taking the indigenous music of their country and imprinting it with their own personal slant,” Simonds says.

    At a Nordic roots concert, age, race, social status, and cultural background are irrelevant. During a Garmarna concert once, I talked to two preteen boys from Duluth who eagerly explained that they discovered the music through their parents. I’ve chatted with an out-of-town grandmother cruising last year’s festival with her adult daughter. And there’s the night I found myself dancing between two unlikely partners—a leather-clad biker with a shaved head and piercings, and a punked-out kid in a black T-shirt and jeans. The three of us thrashed together, turning toward each other to howl with the delirious invincibility of berserkers.

    If there’s a wild side at these concerts, there’s also nothing dangerous. The audience is unfailingly a peaceable group, assembled to revel in the music. “These bands have a remarkable way of bringing very diverse people together. This isn’t lost on these musicians,” Snyder says. It is, of course, not just the music, but the musicians themselves—unpretentious, devoid of ego, and downright fun—that inspire the outpouring of emotion and camaraderie during their live performances.

    “It’s part of the Scandinavian cultural ethic that there’s just not much ego involved,” says Simonds. “The musicians really don’t think of putting themselves first as a general rule, they think of the group first. When these bands perform, it’s an ensemble psychology.” Conversely, he adds, “the audience is so tuned in and so with the musicians every step of the way, you feel as if there’s no wall at all.”

    In other words, magic happens. The music is the portal through which to enter blood memory and swim back to ancient, raw, and irrefutable truths that lie far beyond our highly mediated, aggressively processed culture. It’s the incantation by which we put on our bear serks and for a couple of soul-satisfying, sweat-drenched hours, shapeshift into a community of dancing warriors at one with each other and the music.

    Camille LeFevre is a St. Paul writer.

  • Modern or Classic?

    With the State Fair’s feeble lineup sounding the traditional power chord that marks the close of the summer concert season,Twin Citizens can crawl back under the rock of pre-recorded music for the cold winter months. Even in Minnesota, the Internet has not killed the used record store, nor the people who insist on taking their custom there.

    “I’m well into my thirties,” said Brigid Phister, who lives just a few blocks from the Uptown Cheapo Records outlet, where she pops in about twice a week. “But I keep up.” She was dressed in a dark blue T-shirt, black jeans, black Doc Martens. She revealed a couple of modest tattoos and one visible piercing (nose). She did not look outrageous. But she was outraged. Well, a little. “This is just ridiculous,” she said in disgust, shaking her head and holding up a copy of the Talking Heads’ album Remain in Light. It’s ridiculous because Cheapo’s staff stocked the album—a pivotal work in the history of modern rock and a crucial text of the alternative canon—in its new “classic rock” section. It might have gone in the new “modern rock” section, but there it was, rubbing elbows with redoubtable seventies groups like Foghat and Triumph.

    Cheapo staffers recently remodeled their store, and when they did, they had to figure out a way to make their massive rock section more accessible. “The problem is, when you use just the alphabet, it’s a long walk,” said store owner Al Brown. “I don’t want people to be intimidated by the hugeness of the store.” His idea was to create several little stores within one giant one. In all, there are nine sections under the new scheme.

    But now, Cheapo has a problem. It’s a problem faced by grocers and librarians, Web developers, and radio programmers. That problem is: What goes where? And once it goes where it goes, what do you call it? Unlike groceries, though, music carries with it all kinds of extra emotional baggage. People identify with their music in a way they don’t identify with their mayonnaise. It’s part of what defines them. When you tamper with their music, you are spoiling for a fight.

    There are those who would rather stay out of record stores altogether than be caught browsing through a “classic rock” section. There are just so many connotations they don’t want to be associated with: Do-rags. Mullets. Drum solos. Muscle cars. Bic lighters waving in the stadium darkness. George Thorogood. Even people who like “classic rock” tend to shrink from the label. Blame radio programmers, who gave us that label, but destroyed the music’s reputation by playing the same songs—both good and abominable—relentlessly for the past thirty years. So now, “Radar Love” and “Don’t Stop Believin’” are roughly the equivalent of “Happy Birthday” and “Twinkle Twinkle Little Star.” Taken together, these criminal acts by corporate radio have led to Brigid Phister’s reluctance to shop in the classic rock section at Cheapo, even though that’s where she must now go if she wants Talking Heads.

    To be fair, it’s not always easy to decide what is “classic rock” and what is “modern rock.” Where should Dave Matthews go? Pearl Jam?

    Brown walked through the aisles with me recently, just as the exhausted staff was finishing up the restocking. The original idea, he said, was to split rock history in two using Nirvana as the breaking point. Every act whose debut album was issued before 1991 (the year Nevermind came out) would go into classic rock, everything that came after would go into modern. This presented problems right away, of course. For one thing, where does grunge itself go? Based largely on classic rock with some punk elements, you might think it should go into classic rock. On the other hand, grunge represented a tipping point in music history, marginalizing eighties hair metal and opening the way for nineties alternative and neo-punk. So bands like Soundgarden and Stone Temple Pilots went into modern rock.

    But there were other, thornier problems. The whole idea behind the Talking Heads, Television, the Clash, and other such bands was to critique “classic rock,” to rail against its excesses, even to destroy it. Nonetheless, those bands were pre-grunge, so into classic rock they went.But then things began to change. CDs started getting moved. REM, another seminal modern-rock band who started in the early eighties, went from classic to modern. So did Celtic punks the Pogues, who probably deserve their own bin labeled “super-alcoholic Irish folk.”

    One reason for the moves was confusion and disagreement among the staff. Many insisted on sticking to aesthetic principle. Others just wanted to get the job done as quickly as possible, and the grunge-based split seemed easiest. But there was another, more prosaic reason: “The classic rock section ended up being a little short,” said Brown, looking slightly sheepish. So, to balance things out, the grunge split was abandoned, and ad hoc decisions were made. Dead Can Dance and Del Amitri went into modern rock, but Talking Heads stayed in classic.

    But if the original reason for this whole thing was to save customers’ shoe leather, it seems that arbitrarily sorting the merchandise would be counterproductive. If you don’t know who is stocked where, you spend a lot of time going back and forth between the sections. I did just that in looking for a Patti Smith CD—walking the entire lengths of both sections before I found it (it was in modern rock, despite having been recorded when Kurt Cobain was still in diapers).

    “It can be a challenge to the customer,” admitted a store manager named Neill Olson. “We keep moving stuff back and forth.” He and the staff have been the objects of “good-natured ribbing” regarding the new layout, but they haven’t heard much in the way of caustic criticism from customers. Most of that has come from the staff itself. “At first we thought the whole thing was crazy,” he said. And while he’s grown “more comfortable” with it, some of his employees are less so.

    “It’s been really frustrating,” said Sarah Johnson, an exasperated clerk. “It’s all based on opinion,” she said, indicating that this was a bad thing. “The Talking Heads,” she said, citing the band that seems to keep exemplifying the conundrum, “define modern rock to me.” She feels for the more confused customers. “I’m confused by it, and I work here.”

    Olson has an answer for the hypothetical complaining customer. “Hey, buddy,” he said, eyeing me closely, and maybe sneering just a little. “There are other things to worry about besides what goes into classic rock and what goes into modern rock, you know?”—Dan Mitchell

  • Say Cheese!

    The other day about eighty thousand Christians gathered at the State Capitol for Luis Palau’s Twin Cities Festival. Just a mile away, at St. Paul’s RiverCentre, a smaller but no less devoted crowd convened at the Midwest Scrapbook Association Convention, the better to observe the objects of its own faith—designer paper and vellum and bottle caps. These are the icons of the Holy Order of Scrapbooking. (Yes, it’s one word. And yes, like “journaling,” it’s now a verb.)

    Like religion, the $4.5 billion scrapbooking industry is driven by fervor and motivated by guilt. “I do think a lot of it is guilt,” laughed Carrie Ingalls, who has worked in the biz since 1989 and is currently a manufacturer rep for a company called Bobo Co. It’s those neglected piles of photos that you’ve boxed and tucked away, she explained, never bothering to label or stick in a photo album. You feel like you should do something nice with them. And once you start to assemble them in scrapbooks, she said, “It’s an addiction.”

    So how do laziness and avoidance translate into monomania? The novice scrapbooker is faced with a dizzying array of choices that go way beyond simple page layout. There are decorated papers, ribbons, buttons, glitter, stickers to commemorate everything from a trip to the zoo to a trip down the aisle, inspirational quotes on vellum, inspirational quotes on ribbons, and so on. In a modern scrapbook, the photos hardly matter. It’s all about the “design concept” of each page. This can require, for example, flattened and decorated bottlecaps stuck to the page with Dots candies.

    Hoping to score a free copy of Simple Scrapbooks magazine, I leafed through a copy under the watchful eye of a booth-minder. “See?” she said proudly. “It will show you how to get started, what product you need, and how to organize a page, so that you can get more photos on the page and still tell the story.”

    Aren’t the photos supposed to tell the story? Apparently not. Or they’re just not saying enough. A sample page on one vendor’s wall, for example, displayed a single photo of a newborn baby. It was nested in a congeries of striped pink and blue paper, surrounded by cutouts and ribbons trumpeting the definitions for words like precious, miracle, treasure, laughter, and blessing.

    “This is never going to go away,” said C.D. Cross, an affable man who claims the title of first male designer in the industry. (Before that, he was a softball coach.) He tipped me off to two significant industry trends: torn paper and brads. Brads? “Like Brad Pitt,” he said. (Oh, now the appeal of scrapbooking is becoming more clear!) C.D. showed me a little tack-like doohickey that you can use to attach your paraphernalia to the page, to give it a kind of rustic look. A designer and representative for Outdoors & More, decidedly the most masculine booth at the convention, C.D. said scrapbooking is “the fastest-growing craft in America.”

    “I think it’s replaced quilting,” agreed Carrie Ingalls. “It’s an excuse to get together. It feels good to you personally, to do it, and to share it with others. And it really is also sort of an addiction. People can’t have enough supplies. They’re always looking for the next thing.”

    Many of the biggest scrapbooking companies are headquartered in Utah, and the Mormon interest in recording genealogy is most often cited as the progenitor of the country’s current cutting and pasting craze. It is an enthusiasm that accelerates during troubled times. Ingalls told us there was a huge surge in sales after 9/11. “That hurt a lot of industries,” she said. “But we grew by leaps and bounds. People are so passionate about this…it’s something they live.”

    Over at a booth for an Oakdale store called Paige’s In Time, a woman wore a nametag that said “Marni Fabulous.” She had a captive audience as she demonstrated The Wizard, an embossing gadget that sells for $149.99. Like one of the hucksters at the State Fair’s horticulture building, Marni had a crowd of women in the palm of her hand—laughing and waiting breathlessly for an embossed gift tag to shoot out the other end of The Wizard—when she spotted a man in the vicinity. “Man alert! Man alert!” she shouted. “Man at the booth! Do not look at the man! Do not talk about the cost of golf clubs!” Even Marni’s victim laughed, because it was true: There weren’t a lot of guys.

    When I asked Jackie Schoenbauer from Jordan about the convention’s abundance of estrogen, she said, “You know, the husbands have their hobbies. We can spend money, too.” (The average amount plunked down per visit to a store like Archivers, according to two insiders, is somewhere between forty and two hundred dollars.)

    Schoenbauer came to the convention with her friend, Chrissy Kampen, from Lakeville. Both are twenty-nine years old; both are married. “It took me a year just to put my wedding album together,” said Schoenbauer, explaining that each page had to be just a little bit different. Said Kampen, “We’re a year or two behind with our photos. I don’t foresee us being current any time soon.”
    —Shannon Olson