Tag: Poem Worth Reading

  • Hail to the Bus Driver

    When I was in third grade, my school bus driver was named ‘Slice,’ and he was the coolest. His hair was blond and spiked, held in place by gravity-resistant gel. In the front seat – where not even the nerdiest of nerds dared sit – he kept a Styrofoam container filled with icepacks and cans of orange Slice soda, which he sold for twenty-five cents, instead of the usual pop machine fifty. Before school, my friends and I would each chug one down to get our morning sugar fix – our teachers and parents probably didn’t think Slice was the coolest. But best of all, he drove what might in retrospect be called dangerously fast, so we would get to school early. Instead of dropping us off, though, he would crank up KDWB and drive around the block three or four extra times, letting us climb over the seats and run up and down the center aisle, so long as we promised not to hurt ourselves. Man, he ruled. Then he moved to Alaska, which I’m pretty sure is bus driver code for getting fired.

    Every year at about this time I’m reminded of Slice, because I see the big yellow buses start to make their rounds around the city. Empty of children, the drivers and supervisors go through their routes, as if practicing will make them any more adept.

    What this all means, of course, is that the school year is coming up. Zooming ten years ahead of third grade, college students are beginning their treks of various lengths across the country, packing their hand-me-down cars with "carefully secured suitcases full of light and heavy clothing; with boxes of blankets, boots and shoes, stationery and books, sheets, pillows, quilts; with rolled-up rugs and sleeping bags; with bicycles, skis, rucksacks…stereo sets, radios, personal computers; small refrigerators and hairdryers and styling irons…the controlled substances, the birth control pills and devices; the junk food still in shopping bags – onion-and-garlic chips, nacho thins, peanut crème patties, Waffelos and Kabooms, fruit chews and toffee popcorn; the Dum-Dum pops, the Mystic mints." (From the first page of Don Delillo’s White Noise – a wonderfully relevant book even though I don’t know what Waffelos are.)

    Something about sixty-eight degrees and sunny with a cool breeze always makes me nostalgic and weepy. Oh my gosh – good poetry also makes me nostalgic and weepy. Synergy.

    I couldn’t find any good verse on mildly subversive bus drivers, so this one goes out to the college kids (somewhat ironically, as it’s more about leaving school than arriving there…sorry…suckers)…and to former English majors about to embark on their Kerouac kicks, and to anyone who has a long commute each day and finds the means to enjoy it. In fact – not to get political here – the Road Trip seems to me a very American entity, and with gas prices doing what they’re doing, one wonders how much longer it can remain a pastime. Let’s sing it some praises, shall we?

    "Song of the Open Road" (part 1)
    by Walt Whitman (who rules, like Slice does)

    Afoot and light-hearted I take to the open road,
    Healthy, free, the world before me,
    The long brown path before me leading wherever I choose.

    Henceforth I ask not good-fortune, I myself am good-fortune,
    Henceforth I whimper no more, postpone no more, need nothing,
    Done with indoor complaints, libraries, querulous criticisms,
    Strong and content I travel the open road.

    The earth, that is sufficient,
    I do not want the constellations any nearer,
    I know they are very well where they are,
    I know they suffice for those who belong to them.

    (Still here I carry my old delicious burdens,
    I carry them, men and women, I carry them with me wherever I go,
    I swear it is impossible for me to get rid of them,
    I am fill’d with them, and I will fill them in return.)

  • A Poem for Newlyweds

    I was at a wedding this weekend, which reminded me that, at least in Minnesota, summer is the same as wedding season.

    I’d only met the bride and groom a few months ago, after they’d already sent out the invitations. They were carrying a couch out from a duplex in Kenwood, trying to figure out how to fit it in their minivan; I was carrying my Lunds bags filled with books and DVDs into said duplex. I was to occupy the room that Dan, now a young husband, was vacating so that, for two months, he and his now-wife could live in mild sin.

    "Whuttup," I said.
    "Yo," they responded.
    "Word," I said.
    "Word," they agreed.

    My roommates – fine, eligible young men – are good buddies with Dan, and he still brews beer in our basement. It’s a pretty regular occurrence that I’ll come home from pretending to work at an Internet hub, and Dan is in our kitchen, washing out old bottles to re-use, or boiling down hops, or sampling a recent brew out of a wine glass. ("Whuttup," I’ll say…)

    Naturally we – my roommates, Dan, and I – end up drinking together a bit. Sometimes we accidentally get drunk. Which has led to some expedited bonding, to the point where it would have been awkward if I didn’t go to the wedding. (Upping the ante: a half dozen of Dan’s friends from the west coast were staying at our house this weekend.) And yet the invitations were gone.

    Dan and I get along, but are still not so close that I should be able to disrupt the entire invitation/R.S.V.P. protocol of classic wedding tradition simply because I live where he used to live. I got the sense that for a couple days there was a ‘what should do about Max’ conversation going on, though that may be have been my narcissism speaking and not actual people.

    It was decided that I would tag along as a ‘plus one’ of one of my roomies, whom I’ll call Robert, even though that’s not his name. Everyone was happy – the protocol was undisturbed, I’d scored an invite through normal means, and Rob didn’t have to scramble for a real date.

    Rob did, however, have to read a poem at the wedding.

    And he was totally cool with it – Rob’s been a poetry hound for some time now. Mornings, he sits in our living room with his headphones on, bobbing his neck and mouthing lyrics – except that his iPod is filled not with hip-hop, but with recordings of Wallace Stevens and T.S. Eliot reading their own poetry. No joke.

    And so an incredibly appropriate poem was selected. A good poem, that will partially be copied below, called "Epithalamion/Wedding Dawn," by local writer Michael Dennis Browne. Rob committed it to memory and everything. But then he found out that Mr. Dennis Browne was good friends of the groom’s family, and would be in attendance.

    For two days, Rob’s hands didn’t stop shaking.

    At five p.m. on Saturday, we were sitting in our assigned chairs at the Event Center on St. Anthony Main, Rob running the stanzas over in his mind, a crumpled facsimile of the poem in his back pocket. Soon an eminent-looking man crouched down beside his seat.

    "Whuttup," Rob said.
    "So what part of the poem are you reading?" asked Michael Dennis Browne.
    "The last part. Part three."
    "Ah," said the poet. "That’s the best part."

    I’m inclined to agree.

    "Epithalamion/Wedding Dawn" (Part 3)

    You must not be angry with this planet.
    For we are in a company
    whose music surpasses its pain.
    For I tell you, I sat in the dark, also,
    and the wedding light came onto my window,
    and the hills were cleared for me,
    and the field spread out in front of me, remarkable, like marble.
    And I thought; this is their day,
    how it breaks for them!
    O sir, the angel flies, even with bruises
    O lady, a bird can wash himself anywhere.
    The dawn that came up the day of your wedding
    took me in its hand like the creature I am;
    and I heard the dark that I came from
    whispering ‘Be silent.’
    And the dawn said ‘Sing.’
    And I found the best words I could find around me
    and came to your wedding.

  • An Existential Miscommunication

    I live over by Kenwood Elementary School…and steal their wireless Internet signal from time to time…somewhat by accident…Anyway, they’ve been doing a lot of construction on the school this summer. Right now they’re working on replacing the windows, I think, and there’s a big yellow cherry picker that goes up and down the side of the building, and a guy who takes out the old frames and puts in the new ones and then, I imagine, eventually washes the panes.

    I’ve been watching this for a few days now, and then read this poem by Stephen Dunn, from his Pulitzer-winning collection Different Hours, which shares the same central image. Buy it here. His work, to my mind, is filled with big themes, and tempered descriptions of them. Like all fantastic poets, he has a knack for pointing out those things we all know about, but don’t necessarily notice until someone explains how amazing they are. Different Hours largely has a somber tone to it, which Dunn explains, somewhat coyly, is the result of his being an optimist (because he always expects good things to happen, he’s often let down).

    Better than I’m able to set a background for the poem, perhaps the poet himself, will explain a bit about his work.

    The following is taken from an interview with Guernica:

    Dunn: But the world is always somewhat vicious. I take that as a given, but at various times in various circumstances that fact will be no more than a shadow or an echo behind the poem. Other times it will be more manifest. I try to write myself into articulations of half-felt, half-known feelings, without program. I’m always working toward getting my world and, hopefully, the world outside of me into a version that makes sense of it. Viciousness requires the same precision as love does.

    And this is from an interview with Nightsun, Frostburg State University’s litmag.

    Dunn: The notion of restraint and extravagance has interested me for a while, I think especially because I tend to be someone who is temperamentally restrained. The great danger for somebody like me is that he might employ restraint out of habit, as opposed to employing it to heighten effects. I think restraint matters when it is harnessing something of size, something a little uncontrollable, something wild. I use the example of Fred Astaire, who seemed to me and to everybody, always under control. He was really using his skill to regulate emotion and to keep out the extra gestures that make art feel false.
    I like the poets of extravagance too. I love Whitman, I love Ginsberg’s "Howl," but I’m just not that kind of expansive poet.

     

    So here it is:

    "Men in the Sky"

    Leaves are falling as the telephone men
    ascend to the tops of poles.
    They are riding a magic long-armed
    machine. No need anymore to climb.
    To speak through wires is as natural now
    as falling leaves, natural as men in the sky.
    The telephone men in the cupped palm
    of the long arm are reducing the static,
    helping me reach far out of town.
    They are beautiful in their hard orange
    plumage. Finches and cardinals: mere birds
    by comparison, unchangeable, nervous.
    It’s a shame the men must come down.
    I stood next to them at the 7-Eleven
    at lunch break, heard them order ham
    and cheese on a hard roll, Dr. pepper.
    I saw them get out of their trucks
    and spit. Now the leaves graze
    their shoulders suddenly more golden
    for having touched them. My phone
    is ringing. It’s one of the telephone men,
    the highest, the one with a sufficiency
    of tools around his waist, calling to see
    if everything’s all right. Everything isn’t.

  • The world is full of downers…which is maybe why Gonzo took so many uppers

    This is one of those rare mornings where The New York Times‘ homepage isn’t dominated by a picture of Obama or McCain. So I figured I might as well bring the election back into forefront…of this blog about books…oy. The real reason I’m posting this can be found after the poem.

    The following is lifted from Fear and Loathing: On the Campaign Trail ’72, which is Hunter S. Thompson’s take on the 1972 presidential election, written for Rolling Stone.

    What’s striking to me is how many parallels there seem to be between the 1972 cycle and this year’s. The first chapters of Fear and Loathing focus intently on the youth vote, the minority vote, the need for change, and the need for hope. Spooooooooky…

    Just an additional quote fro the book that I liked:
    "The nut of the problem," Thompson wrote, "is that covering this presidential campaign is so fucking dull that it’s just barely tolerable…and the only thing worse than going out on the campaign trail and getting hauled around in a booze-frenzy from one speech to another is having to come back to Washington and write about it."

    Anyway, here’s the semi-poem.

    "28 newspapers"

    This world is full of downers, but where is the word to describe
    the feeling you get when you come back tired and crazy from a week on the road
    to find twenty-eight fat newspapers on the desk:
    seven Washington Posts, seven Washington Stars,
    seven New York Times, six Wall Street Journals,
    and one Suck
    to be read, marked, clipped, filed, correlated…
    and then chopped, burned, mashed, and finally hurled out in the street
    to freak the neighbors.

    After two or three weeks of this madness,
    you begin to feel As One
    with the man who said, "No news is good news."
    In twenty-eight papers, only the rarest kind of luck
    will turn up more than two or three articles of any interests…
    but even then the interest items are usually buried deep
    around paragraph 16 on the jump (or "Cont. on…") page….

    The Post will have a story about Muskie making a speech in Iowa.
    The Star will say the same thing,
    and the Journal will say nothing at all.
    But the Times might have enough room on the jump page to include a line or so that says something like:
    "When he finished his speech, Muskie burst into tears and seized his campaing manager by the side of the neck. They grappled briefly, but the struggle was kicked apart by and oriental woman who seemed to be in control."

    Now that’s good journalism.
    Totally objective; very active and straight to the point.
    But we need to know more.
    Who was that woman?
    Why did they fight?
    Where was Muskie Taken?
    What was he saying when the microphone broke?

    If Colin Covert is allowed to write a 700+-word ‘review’ about Gonzo:The Life and Work of Dr. Hunter S. Thompson, the documentary now showing at the Lagoon, which has less than fifty words of criticism in it (and therefore about 650 words of obvious biography and navel-gazing), then I figured I’m allowed to take a minute and post one of Thompson’s poems.

    And yes, I take most of my journalistic cues from Strib movie reviewer Colin Covert.

    Covert writes: "Thompson burst onto the national scene at 26 with "Hell’s Angels," [sic] his account of a year spent on the road with the outlaw motorcycle gang. It was vivid traditional reporting and became a bestseller, winning the young author a spot on ‘What’s My Line?’ But it was his invention of ‘gonzo journalism,’ mixing solid factual research and epic flights of fantasy, that won him a place in pop culture history. His writing was daring and adventurous; it took big chances and made important arguments in relentlessly funny ways."

    But he never tells us whether the film is effective in depicting this or not. We’re told that it’s a ‘celebratory documentary,’ and that because of his ‘comfort in the spotlight, [Thompson] made great pictures.’ But that’s all.

    It’s really more like an essay that’s occasioned by the film, except the essay has nothing to say about Thompson that even casual readers can’t figure out by reading one sentence from the guy.

    For those interested, here’s a more comprehensive point-by-point review of the flick.

     

  • An Insatiable Lover

    We’ve been having some pretty ridiculously great weather lately. If I had a real job (sorry, Mom), I probably would have played hooky last week to go and hang out by one of the lakes. Instead I just read a bit by Calhoun, but without the sense of freedom (or guilt) of having emancipated myself from a necktie.

    Anyway. The poetic equivalent to our early summer comes, I think, in the verses of former U.S. poet laureate Billy Collins. Whenever I finish one of his poems, I just feel so damn pleasant afterwards.

    Maybe here’s why (from an interview with Collins conducted by The Cortland Review):

    Collins: Most of the devices used in poetry-meter and rhyme and assonance and the other kinds of tropes or effects-are really meant to give the ear pleasure in a way that prose does not. Poetry also appeals to the ear because poetry is an interruption of silence. A poem should be preceded by silence and followed by silence. A poem for me displaces silence the way your body displaces water.

    Or maybe here’s why (from an interview with Collins conducted by Terra Incognita):

    Collins: I am extremely reader-conscious, perhaps because I am tired of reading poems that seem to ignore the reader. I feel that I am talking to a reader/listener as I write, so that a good deal of my effort is just to make the poem clear. To get things in the right sequence so that the poem is easy to follow. Not just easy, but easy to follow because the poem is going somewhere, and I want the reader along to share whatever surprises the journey may hold. I try to begin the poem on a common ground, which is a way of assembling a little group around the campfire of the poem. Scoutmaster Collins will then tell some scary stories.

    Or maybe here’s why (from an interview with Collins conducted by Guernica):

    Collins: There’s a great pleasure in-I wouldn’t say ease, but maybe kind of a fascinated ease that accompanies the actual writing of the poem. I find it very difficult to get started. There are just long gaps where I can’t find a point of insertion, I can’t find a good opening line, I can’t find a mood that I want to write into. But once I do, once a line falls out of the air, or I get a little inkling of a subject and I recognize that, it’s like the sense that a game has started. Part of writing is discovering the rules of the game and then deciding whether to follow the rules or to break them. The great thing about the game of poetry is that it’s always your turn-I guess that goes back to my being an only child. So once it’s under way, there is a sense of flow.

    And now one of his poems. This is from his Nine Horses collection. (Click the link to buy it…)

    Aimless Love

    This morning as I walked along the lakeshore,
    I fell in love with a wren
    and later in the day with a mouse
    the cat had dropped under the dining room table.

    In the shadows of an autumn evening,
    I fell for a seamstress
    still at her machine in the tailor’s window,
    and later for a bowl of broth,
    steam rising like smoke from a naval battle.

    This is the best kind of love, I thought,
    without recompense, without gifts,
    or unkind words, without suspicion,
    or silence on the telephone.

    The love of the chestnut,
    the jazz cap and one hand on the wheel.

    No lust, no slam of the door –
    the love of the miniature orange tree,
    the clean white shirt, the hot evening shower,
    the highway that cuts across Florida.

    No waiting, no huffiness, or rancor –
    just a twinge every now and then

    for the wren who had built her nest
    on a low branch overhanging the water
    and for the dead mouse,
    still dressed in its light brown suit.

    But my heart is always propped up
    in a field on its tripod,
    ready for the next arrow.

    After I carried the mouse by the tail
    to a pile of leaves in the woods,
    I found myself standing at the bathroom sink
    gazing down affectionately at the soap,

    so patient and soluble,
    so at home in its pale green soap dish.
    I could feel myself falling again
    as I felt its turning in my wet hands
    and caught the scent of lavender and stone.

  • Words like Bombs

    The introduction to this week’s Poem Worth Reading is taken from Bart Schneider’s forthcoming novel, the highly Minneapolized The Man in the Blizzard:

    "Sometimes I wonder why Americans are as afraid of poetry as they are of al-Qaeda. Screw the ones who’ve decided that poetry’s an effete enterprise. Let ‘em party with the homophobes. It’s the others who concern me, the folks who claim they don’t get it, who think they’re too dumb to read poetry. Thing is, they’re not willing to be dumb enough. That’s their problem. If you want to get inside a poem, you need to dumb down your senses. That’s where the receptors are. You need to accept that you don’t know. Why should you know? What’s the matter with a little mystery? They think the poem’s a theorem. If they can’t solve it, if they can’t control it, then they’re afraid of it. It’s so American to want it all or nothing. If you can’t conquer it, what good is it? Americans have become so frozen with fear, they’ve lost their sense of play. It’s time to lighten up and lower our expectations. It’s time to rediscover our basic fluency. If a man’s not fluent, if he ain’t got flow, what chance does he have to converse with his soul?"

    Isn’t that kind of great?

    And now the actual poem. This week’s Poem Worth Reading is by Mohja Kahf, whose stuff I recently accidentally came across in a back issue of The Paris Review. The brief bio goes: She’s Syrian-American, and kicks the ass of any stereotype that might be affixed to her. This one’s from her latest collection, E-Mails from Scheherazad. She also has a novel, The Girl in the Tangerine Scarf, which is probably worth checking out. Bladao.

    "Hijab Scene #7"

    No, I’m not bald under the scarf
    No, I’m not from that country
    where women can’t drive cars
    No, I would not like to defect
    I’m already American
    But thank you for offering
    What else do you need to know
    relevant to my buying insurance,
    opening a bank account,
    reserving a seat on a flight?
    Yes, I speak English
    Yes, I carry explosives
    They’re called words
    And if you don’t get up
    Off your assumptions
    They’re going to blow you away

  • Borges on Bloom

    The introduction to this week’s Poem Worth Reading is taken from Bart Schneider’s forthcoming novel, the highly Minneapolized The Man in the Blizzard:

    "Sometimes I wonder why Americans are as afraid of poetry as they are of al-Qaeda. Screw the ones who’ve decided that poetry’s an effete enterprise. Let ‘em party with the homophobes. It’s the others who concern me, the folks who claim they don’t get it, who think they’re too dumb to read poetry. Thing is, they’re not willing to be dumb enough. That’s their problem. If you want to get inside a poem, you need to dumb down your senses. That’s where the receptors are. You need to accept that you don’t know. Why should you know? What’s the matter with a little mystery? They think the poem’s a theorem. If they can’t solve it, if they can’t control it, then they’re afraid of it. It’s so American to want it all or nothing. If you can’t conquer it, what good is it? Americans have become so frozen with fear, they’ve lost their sense of play. It’s time to lighten up and lower our expectations. It’s time to rediscover our basic fluency. If a man’s not fluent, if he ain’t got flow, what chance does he have to converse with his soul?"

    Isn’t that kind of great?

    And now the actual poem. In honor of Bloomsday, which celebrates James Joyce’s Ulysses every June 16 (the date of the book’s action), I’m posting a piece by Jorge Luis Borges dedicated to Joyce. Here goes:

    Invocation to Joyce

    Scattered over scattered cities,
    alone and many
    we played at being that Adam
    who gave names to all living things.
    Down the long slopes of night
    that border on the dawn,
    we sought (I still remember) words
    for the moon, for death, for the morning,
    and for man’s other habits.
    We were imagism, cubism,
    the conventicles and sects
    respected now by credulous universities.
    We invented the omission of punctuation
    and capital letters,
    stanzas in the shape of a dove
    from the libraries of Alexandria.
    Ashes, the labor of our hands,
    and a burning fire our faith.
    You, all the while,
    in cities of exile,
    in that exile that was
    your detested and chosen instrument,
    the weapon of your craft,
    erected your pathless labyrinths,
    infinitesmal and infinite,
    wondrously paltry,
    more populous than history.
    We shall die without sighting
    the twofold beast or the rose
    that are the center of your maze,
    but memory holds the talismans,
    its echoes of Virgil,
    and so in the streets of night
    your splendid hells survive,
    so many of your cadences and metaphors,
    the treasures of your darkness.
    What does our cowardice matter if on this earth
    there is one brave man,
    what does sadness matter if in time past
    somebody thought himself happy,
    what does my lost generation matter,
    that dim mirror,
    if your books justify us?
    I am the others. I am those
    who have been rescued by your pains and care.
    I am those unknown to you and saved by you.

    Translated by Norman Thomas di Giovanni

     

  • Not actually an actual poem, per se

    The introduction to this week’s Poem Worth Reading is taken from Bart Schneider’s forthcoming novel, the highly Minneapolized The Man in the Blizzard:

    "Sometimes I wonder why Americans are as afraid of poetry as they are of al-Qaeda. Screw the ones who’ve decided that poetry’s an effete enterprise. Let ‘em party with the homophobes. It’s the others who concern me, the folks who claim they don’t get it, who think they’re too dumb to read poetry. Thing is, they’re not willing to be dumb enough. That’s their problem. If you want to get inside a poem, you need to dumb down your senses. That’s where the receptors are. You need to accept that you don’t know. Why should you know? What’s the matter with a little mystery? They think the poem’s a theorem. If they can’t solve it, if they can’t control it, then they’re afraid of it. It’s so American to want it all or nothing. If you can’t conquer it, what good is it? Americans have become so frozen with fear, they’ve lost their sense of play. It’s time to lighten up and lower our expectations. It’s time to rediscover our basic fluency. If a man’s not fluent, if he ain’t got flow, what chance does he have to converse with his soul?"

    Isn’t that kind of great?

    And now the actual poem. Or actually, this week it’s not an actual poem. Rather, this is a segment from the beginning of Jonathan Franzen’s The Corrections, whose language and progression I found to be somewhat poetic. Originally it was in paragraph form, but it broke down fairly easily into stanzas.

    "The Seniors in St. Jude"

    Nobody laughed at seniors in St. Jude.

    Whole economies, whole cohorts, depended on them.
    The installers and maintainers of home security systems,
    The wielders of feather dusters and complicated vacuums,
    The actuaries and fund managers, the brokers and tellers
    The sellers of sphagnum moss and nonfat cottage cheese and nonalcoholic beer
    And aluminum stools for sitting in the bathtub with

    The suppliers of chicken cordon bleu or veal Parmesan
    And salad and dessert in a fluorescently lit function room at $13.95 a head for Saturday night bridge clubs

    The sitters who knitted while their charges dozed under afghans,
    The muscular LPNs who changed diapers in the night,
    The social workers who recommended the hiring of the LPNs,
    The statisticians who collated data on prostate cancer and memory and aging,
    The orthopedists and cardiologists and oncologists and their nurses
    Receptionists and bloodworkers,
    The pharmacists and opticians,
    The performers of routine maintenance on American-made sedans with inconceivably low odometer readings

    The blue-uniformed carriers of Colonial-handicrafts catalogues and pension checks,
    The bookers of tours and cruises and flights to Florida,
    The projectionists of PG-rated movies at theaters with Twilight Specials,
    The drafters of wills and the executors of irrevocable trusts,
    The radio patrolmen who responded to home-security false alarms and wrote tickets for violating minimum-speed postings on expressways,

    The elected state officials who resisted property-tax reassessment,
    The elected national representatives who kept the entitlements flowing

    The clergy who moved down corridors saying prayers at bedsides,
    The embalmers and cremators,
    The organists and florists,
    The drivers of ambulances and hearses,
    The engravers of marble markers

    and the operators of gas-powered Weed Whackers who swept across the cemeteries in their pollen masks and protective goggles and who once in a long while suffered third degree burns over half their bodies when the motors strapped to their backs caught fire.

  • Max Ross: Published Poet

    Welcome to a possibly special edition of Poem Worth Reading. The very title of this Cracking Spines segment — that is, Poem Worth Reading — is jeopardized with today’s entry. But because this is a blog, and should thereby not be held to any qualitative standards (self-imposed or otherwise), and because I got the go-ahead from my editor, who said I could post "basically anything…," I’ve decided to go ahead and put up some of my own scribblings. I figure it’s Memorial Day, so maybe there’s less readership, anyway.

    The back-story (feel free to skip): My grandparents own a cabin not far from the Twin Cities, and I was up there this weekend to celebrate the holiday, incidentally by myself (there was leftover pizza, there was beer, there was NBA basketball [if you know my family, you know they don’t know what a tent is, let alone a cabin…yes there’s cable here, but I don’t have it in my regular home, and that’s how I justify watching it]).

    On Sunday, at about five o’clock in the evening, my aunt called, waking me up from my nap. Naturally I was pissed. She said thunderstorms were headed my way. Though normally rain has a soporific effect on me, the ringer of the cabin phone is kind of like a dog whistle for humans, and I couldn’t get back to sleep. So I said, “Screw it” — sadly, I said it out loud — and went out onto the screened-in porch to watch the gathering storm.

    I may appreciate a poem from time to time, but I don’t write ‘em. Nevertheless, immersed as deeply in the woods as a member of my family can hope to get (there’s no Wi-Fi here, at least, and my cell phone is on ‘roam’), watching the boats on the lake return in unison to their docks, then watching the rain fall from a strangely low sky, I realized there was a pen in front of me, and a blank piece of paper.

    "Haikus," I thought (thankfully silently). I don’t mean to take anything away from the Japanese poets that have mastered brevity, nor imply that my haikus are as meaningful or worthwhile as theirs (sadly, a couple of mine tend toward Yoda-esque syntax and conjugation). But let’s face it: As far as poetry goes, the haiku is a fairly accessible form — concise, quick-striking, sometimes poignant. They’re kind of like puns (except sometimes poignant). So really, though Freud may say otherwise, the ultimate goal of this post isn’t necessarily to get more exposure for my writing and launch a new career. Rather, I hope it’s a sort of call-to-arms for all the would-be poets out there, too intimidated by meter and rhyme to grab their journals and head for their various solitudes.

    And I invite all you fearless readers (I really do love puns) to post your own haikus in the ‘comments’ section. (Though please refrain from the likes of "Max Ross: Egomaniac/ where’s Whitman? Or Eliot?/They’re better than you" and so on. Unless you have one that’s really, really good.)

    Also, for those interested, I found the header illustration here.

    So here goes:

    Fat green leaves beaten
    by rain. I’d have picked them from
    their twigs, anyway

    At least the pontoon
    has a canopy. Thank God
    our boat won’t get wet.

    In grade school I learned
    to make rain sounds with clapped hands;
    microwaved popcorn.

    Glass door is open,
    screen door is shut; sound of rain –
    but no rain – enters.

    Something literary
    about rain: its ambition
    to rise back up

    Polaroid lightning
    to remember later how
    hard it really rained.

    I stand here wearing
    my grandfather’s sweatpants, and
    write about the storm.

  • Beat your ploughshares into pens

    Employing a tactic I’m pretty sure I’ve picked up from the current presidential administration, I’ve decided to take a new approach to truth. Namely, I’m going to make it up. And make it up in such a way that justifies every decision I decide(r), and in such a way that makes me feel better about my life, and the enveloping society thereof.
    So here goes: Everyone is reading.

    And because everyone is reading, there is a high demand for poetry.
    And because there is a high demand for poetry, once a week, possibly on Mondays, but certainly not limited to Mondays, I’m going to try really hard to post a Poem Worth Reading on this blog.

    I know I know I know, this is supposed to be a blog about books, and probably shouldn’t contain any actual literature, unless it’s hyper-linked. Nevertheless, poems are great. They’re (often) short, and powerful, and sometimes they even rhyme, which makes you feel happy for reasons you probably can’t define very well. And people should read more of them. More, even, than they already are. Which is lots. Because everybody is reading. Obviously.

    This week’s Poem Worth Reading is by Marie Vogel Gery. It’s part of a collection entitled Penchant – an anthology comprised of poems written by women from Northfield, Minnesota. Though I can’t quite put my finger on it, there is definitely a quality that unites the verses of these poets. "The eleven writers gathered here show an easy abundance," notes Scott King in his introduction. And I think that’s as close to a definition as one can get – a vague yet precise "easy abundance" – a lovely ability to meander, paired with the certain (Minnesotan) simplicity that underlies each stanza

    Read it. Everyone else is.

    "Sleepover"

    My son and I battle weekly over whether he can sleepover there
    or they can sleepover here, he has a lust for places
    filled with smells other than my cooking
    for rooms without his stepfather’s voice
    even for places without his brother’s scent
    still soft like his, like their cheeks when I kiss them goodnight

    He longs for that future when the telephone is his
    the refrigerator, the stove, the car, the front door
    when he can have makko boards on all the walls
    and Samurai swords in place of umbrellas

    He longs for staying up all night at a party
    where something wonderful happens and everyone knows
    he is grown up and popular and everyone wants him to sleepover
    be their best friend and they’ll live on pizza and Mountain Dew

    He wants that freedom not to get lonesome
    as the dark comes in through the house
    things he doesn’t want to think about
    slide down the chimney and hiss in the rooms
    fear, like a cat, comes and sits near him
    follows him into his room, plays under the bed

    Each week by Wednesday we screech in tangled logic
    magic and hope that he will sleepover there this time
    or they will sleepover here for a whole weekend
    and something wonderful will happen