Year: 2005

  • Heart Medicine

    Whenever my blood pressure feels like it’s getting dangerously low, there are two things I like to do. Eat more anchovies, and watch Bill O’Reilly on Fox. Both anchovies and O’Reilly share the same four virtues: bony, salty, fishy, and strong. I like anchovies a lot more than I like Bill O’Reilly, but both appeal to the latent masochist in me.

    If you like your O’Reilly in pure, unadltuerated form, you watch his “Talking Points Memo,” which is the way Bill O’Reilly likes himself best, too, I assume–that is, without any intereference even from the most psycophantic, lying, Fox-enriched lickspittle. O’Reilly unfiltered and on-point, baby. Anyway, yesterday’s TPM featured our hero considering the story of Cindy Sheehan, begrieved mother of a slain U.S. soldier. SHeehan has set up shop outside President Bush’s brush-cutting photo-shoot at Crawford, Texas, the better to protest the Iraq misadventure that took the life of her son.

    I don’t normally like to waste a lot of time parsing O’Reilly, but it was a slow day around the office. O’Reilly decribed the situation. First, he very graciously agreed that “everyone is certainly entitled to his or her own opinion, and no one should gainsay the grief of a mother in mourning.” (Conservatives frequently offer this sort of consolation, as if it is something they are normally in the habit of witholding.) Then O’Reilly ran a clip of Sheehan wherein she says President Bush did not offer any kind of earnest sympathy, though he hosted her in the Oval Office for a dilatory handshaking, tear-dabbing moment of personal and national pride. She was felt repelled rather than comforted, which I will assume is also her right.

    Then came an interesting leap. O’Reilly’s main point seemed to be that since “radical activists” like Michael Moore and Sam Husseini oppose the war, and since Sheehan opposes the war, she is in league with raving, behorned anti-Americans, and is “being used by them, whether she realizes it or not.” Bill’s final talking point? A fair and balanced moment: “A majority of Americans now oppose the war, but we hope that will change when things start going better.”

  • Do The World A Huge Favor

    donkey-pig.jpg

    When I was a kid, there was this store out at the mall that sold cheese from all over the world. The place reeked. They must have had hundreds of different kinds of cheese. I like cheese as much as the next guy, but you wouldn’t think there would be any real need for so many different types of the stuff. I wouldn’t, anyway. I mean, why would anyone spend so much time dicking around with cheese? It seemed to me that there couldn’t have been much difference between some of the varieties, and a lot of them looked pretty much the same.

    I never understood the place, to be honest with you, never understood how the hell it managed to stay open year after year. I guess maybe lots of people bought cheese for Christmas presents, although that doesn’t exactly make sense to me either.

    Pretty much the only thing they sold was cheese. Well, pickles. They sold pickles as well, those great big pickles in giant jars, but I think those were mostly a point-of-sale novelty item to break up the monotony of all that fucking cheese. I don’t have any idea why anybody would go to a mall to buy a humongous pickle, unless, of course, they’re just completely bored out of their minds, which lots of people clearly are.

    We used to drive around and get stoned and then go out to the mall to play Ski-Ball. We’d always walk down to the cheese shop because every day they gave away free samples of different kinds of cheese. They had a display out front with little cubes of cheese with toothpicks stuck in them, and they were never really dicks about it if you took more than you should or kept coming back.

    The guy who ran the place always wore one of those big cheese hats made out of foam.

    I once asked this guy if he could tell the difference between all the different kinds of cheese.

    “Of course,” he said.

    “Let’s see you prove it,” I said.

    “Do the world a huge favor and don’t be such a smartass,” he said.

    That pretty much became our favorite catch phrase all the way through high school, and in the right situation I still find it comes in handy now and again.

    cowboy-flag 3.jpg

  • Dimming Of The Day/Night Comes In/Bundle Of Hiss: My Sanity Is An Unknown Room

    gorilla girl.jpg

    The day had been hot, and it was apparent that the night would bring little relief. There was no wind, nothing but the humidity and the stillness and the swelling sleigh bells of the cicadas from the trees. Up and down the block people were sitting out on the stoops of the apartment houses and duplexes, murmuring quietly and waiting for the darkness.

    He was sweating profusely, and he was not a man who liked to sweat. It was a clammy sweat, sticky, persistent, difficult to make peace with. He knew he should find something to eat, but he had no appetite. He did not feel like eating.

    It seemed to him that men had no business blasting themselves into space time and again when there was so much puzzling emptiness yet to be explored on the planet that was their home.

    He lived with the regular intrusion of sirens, erupting at all hours. They mostly bored him, even as they served as a constant reminder of the seemingly limitless ways in which human behavior, and the human body, could be tragic and disappointing.

    His wife now lived in the country.

    His mother had come to look after his two daughters, who were spending a few days with him. He loved his daughters very much, he supposed, but they were better off in the country with their mother.

    He was in the half-finished attic bedroom over the second-floor apartment that he had rented many years ago with his wife. It was hot up there, but his mother and the girls had taken over the bedrooms downstairs.

    The attic room had a window that allowed him to stare out into the street while he listened to the radio. His mother had given him some money, and he was drinking a beer imported from Germany, a foolish indulgence. The beer would be warm before he could get halfway through a bottle, and he was trying to drink fast.

    Outside the window he saw his youngest daughter struggling along the sidewalk with a strange cat dangling from her arms. She had the cat by the underarms (if cats can be said to have underarms) and it was hanging almost to the little girl’s feet.

    Someplace out in the neighborhood an ice cream truck crawled tinkling through the dusk and the unmoving shadows of the condemned elms that were splayed in the streets. The sky to the west looked like it was bringing in some rain. That would be fine with him.

    He was trying to think seriously about a photograph he had looked at many times in a book his wife had left behind. The photograph showed a Vietnamese monk seated calmly on a sidewalk, ablaze. There were other people in the photo as well, spectators, watching the monk burn. There were two men and a young girl. They all appeared to be leaning slightly away, as if they could feel the heat from the fire or were afraid the monk would explode.

    The girl was holding a purse –or perhaps it was a book bag– and it was this girl he was trying to think about. He was wondering about the girl, as he had before from time to time, wondering what she was thinking and feeling there as she watched that man burn for some apparent principle she was likely too young to understand. He was wondering what had become of the girl, frozen there for all time, trapped in that image, and he was curious about what effect that moment had on her as she grew older and went out into the world on her own. He wondered what had happened in her life since that day.

    He also, of course, wondered about his daughters.

    And then he thought about the monk.

    wheelchair.jpg

    I read Nightwood again early this morning. There’s still nothing else like it.

    Here’s something I wrote about that weird and beautiful little book the last time I picked it up and got literally lost in its pages:

    Last night I sat down and blur-paddled my way through Djuna Barnes’ Nightwood, a book I read –or try to read– every couple years, and which I love like few other books I’ve ever read or tried to read. I love this book differently than any other book I can think of, love its fuzzed weirdness and thickets of the barely explicable; I love the sense I have in every line of an eccentric and fascinating mind goading words across the page. I think it’s the only novel I’ve ever stumbled across that literally leaves me mind-boggled every time I pick it up.

    It seems impossible that Nightwood could have been published in 1936, and I don’t know of another book that’s been published since that has accomplished its almost impossible combination of precise, vivid imagery and utter elusiveness, without ever quite abdicating its responsibility to tell a story.

    I have been recommending Nightwood to friends for years, but few people seem to be able to finish the book, and I fully understand why. Djuna Barnes was likely crazy, and this is a crazy novel. The title couldn’t be more perfect –every time I finish it I feel exactly like I’ve been stumbling around in a dark, crowded place in the middle of the night, and my memories of the book inevitably begin to evaporate the moment the first murk of daylight begins to creep across the walls. I am, however, always left with scads of strange sentences and fragments that I’ve scrawled on index cards, and these words are the bread crumbs that keep leading me back to Nightwood time and again:

    …but think of the stories that do not amount to much!

    …I knew all at once that the tragedy of the beast can be two legs more awful than a man’s.

    I have been made so miserable by what you are keeping hushed.

    Were she a soldier she would define defeat with the sentence: ‘The enemy took the war away.’

    …down the grim path of ‘We know not’ to ‘We can’t guess why.’

    One’s life is peculiarly one’s own when one has invented it.

    We do not climb to heights, we are eaten away to them….

    The excess of his sensibilities may preclude his mind. His sanity is an unknown room.

    Only the scorned and the ridiculous make good stories….

  • Another Failed Transmission From A Lost Satellite

    Would you have believed —could you have believed– a mere four months ago that we would be sitting where we are today?

    “We” in this instance, of course, meaning you, me, the Minnesota Twins, etc.

    I do not think we could or would have believed that, no.

    I still can’t believe it, quite honestly, even though these sorts of unexpected things –disappointments, breakdowns, utter collapses, extended patches of abject futility, etc.– happen all the time in baseball and in life.

    Still, it smarts. It’s an unnecessary reminder of what a misguided and misplaced waste of hope a silly little game can be, which in turn is an unnecessary reminder of the misery of childhood, when a complete lack of perspective results in the conversion of so much misguided and misplaced hope in silly little things into traumatic disappointment and psychological scars that can last a lifetime.

    The Twins really should establish a 24-hour crisis intervention hotline at the Metrodome, so that despairing fans can hear a friendly and reassuring voice in those dark, lonely hours that follow the conclusion of West Coast games.

    There are, of course, a great many people out there in Twins Territory this morning who are suffering, and for a disproportionate number of them a public apology to Kyle Lohse might go a long ways toward assuaging some of their despair and a bit of the guilt they must surely be feeling as they ponder all the ways in which they have been complicit in the collapse of this team.

    A lot of teams, I’m sure, would be thrilled to have Lohse right now, and some other team should have him. But he is ours for the moment, and for the foreseeable future, and he is unquestionably not our problem.

    Good Lord, people, the young man –so often lambasted through the early months of this season– is now 7-11 with a 4.21 earned run average (Which would be, by the way, the lowest ERA of his five-year career). His ERA since the All-Star break is 3.68, despite which he is 0-4. He was almost masterful last night against the Mariners. Some might even go so far as to say that Lohse was masterful last night. I’ll leave that to others to decide, but I will go out on a limb and say that he was pretty damn good, and certainly good enough to win.

    Carlos Silva is now 0-3 with a 3.08 ERA since the break, and the entire staff has a post-break ERA of 3.71.

    Someone please explain to me how a team can have a 3.71 ERA and a 9-18 record.

    Someone please explain.

    Someone, please.

    Please.

    Someone.

    Explain this to me.

    Our trained counselors are standing by.

  • Cross References: Christians, Drugs & the Dead Edition

    Interesting to consider that the Christian Right may begin to use its powers for good–by lobbying President Bush not just for wicked ends like prayer in the schools, but for causes that someone on the port side of the boat can get behind. The New York Times reports today about an exhibit at a Christian rock festival down in Texas designed to put pressure on the Powers That Be to make more demands on North Korea when it comes to human rights. Of course, there are some sorta questionable motives behind such efforts and provocations; one wonders if Texas Christians would be as riled if it were Buddhists or Jews or even Catholics that were suffering under the yoke of oppression under Kim Il Sung. (We doubt whether it’s just evangelical protestant Christians, though they do insist on singling themselves out in so many ways.) And are we the only ones who think conservative Christians seem to take a little too much visceral pleasure in images of genocide, suicide, and homicide–a sort of parallel to the perennial best-selling images of late-term abortion? (Check that last link–not for the squeamish, but read the URLs before and after the jumps.) Anyway, it may be a rare opportunity for left and right to agree on a cause for social justice–though the moment passes, probably, as soon as the discussion reaches the usual fork in the road to diplomacy–blockade or invasion? Carrot or stick?

    Splitting the difference is getting to be such a rare art that we hardly recognize it anymore. Following on Jack Shafer’s riff about overplayed media coverage on methamphetamine, John Tiernay today takes a related but slightly more humane tack in the opinion pages of the Times. Rather than argue the Malthusian line that there is no real epidemic until there are countable toe-tags, Tiernay makes the perfectly reasonable argument that hyping the case also tends to artificially inflate the plan. The Drug War, he says, has become a terrible addiction in itself among law makers and enforcers. Of course, this is dangerous, libertarian territory, sidling up to an open flirtation with a policy of legalizing all these drugs that, after all, pale in comparison as public health meance to tobacco, and the whitest whale of all, alcohol. We can all agree that humans seem to require the basic right to medicate, intoxicate, and stupefy as life dictates. But the moment you attempt the moral math to try to impugn some drugs and redeem others, let’s say Kat is bad, but caffeine is fine–you’ve entered an impossible biomedical ring-toss.

    Interesting, too, then to consider this interesting piece about the thriving afterlife of Jerry Garcia, who robbed the world of his fifty-three-year-old-self largely by regular and repeated use of the needle. We happened this morning to be reading Elsa Wald’s highly informative profile of Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid in this week’s New Yorker (great issue, by the way–wish all double issues were this relentlessly hard to put down), and learned that Reid’s father was a lifelong alcoholic, who after he gave up the bottle, shortly thereafter took a shotgun to his own head. Reid says,”We always joke that Dad sobered up and killed himself.” It is an open question as to which way would have been the better, less painful route to self-destruction.

  • Let Me Try To Explain Why I Seldom Leave The House

    window-aurora.jpg

    I was sitting in this hotel bar in Sacramento one night a few months ago. It was early in the evening and the place was empty. Some friends of mine were out on a golf course somewhere and I was bored out of my mind and wished like hell I’d never agreed to come along on what was supposed to be a little weekend getaway for a bunch of old buddies who’d all gone to chiropractic school together. I never went to chiropractic school, and I don’t play golf, but a guy I knew from work had put this package trip together and had a late cancellation so he’d talked me into tagging along.

    I thought I’d gotten a good deal, but it wasn’t looking like such a good deal after all. The night before we’d had tickets to see Abe Vigoda and Marion Ross in “Gin Game” at some cheesy dinner theater.

    At any rate, I was sitting there in this bar and I haven’t had a drink in years, so I was just nursing an iced tea and watching college basketball on the TV. The bartender was this wired little character who was behaving almost like an imposter. He was pacing back and forth behind the bar and aggressively snapping a towel, and then he started lighting matches and flinging them in the air.

    Finally he comes over to refill my iced tea and says, shaking his head, “I’ll tell you what, you hear some interesting stories in this line of work.”

    “I’ll bet you do,” I said.

    “Just this morning I had this guy come in here and sit right down at the bar and commence to telling me about an exerience he had recently in Thailand. You ever been there?”

    “I haven’t,” I said.

    “Beautiful country,” he said. “Nice looking ladies. I’ve spent some time there myself. Anyway, it seems this fella was doing some hiking in Khao Wang, which is some sort of national park, and he stumbled across a bunch of workers who were castrating tranquilized monkeys on picnic tables. He said there were dozens of these poor insensate monkeys piled about, and these characters had them splayed right there on the picnic tables and they were sawing the little nuts right off the damn things, one right after the other. The guy said they had a big boombox and were blasting a Van Halen CD. Up to their elbows in blood and gore and monkey testicles, and there they were, he said, laughing and smoking and listening to Van Halen like they were having themselves a party.”

    “I can’t imagine it,” I said, and I was telling the God’s honest truth.

    The bartender claimed there was someplace on the Internet where a guy could see all the footage he wanted of monkeys being castrated.

    I told him I didn’t doubt it for a minute.

    “That’s where I get all my prescription drugs and fishing gear,” he said.

    “I’m sorry?” I said.

    “The Internet,” he said, and slapped the surface of the bar with an almost frightening burst of enthusiasm. “Damn straight, mister. We’re living in an incredible age. Don’t let anybody tell you any different.”

    dark theater.jpg

  • Any Old Business?

    clown shoes 14.jpg

    He asked Emilie to leave the curtains by this window undrawn at night, in order that, when people were asleep, the fish might look at the moon.

    Isak Dinesen, “The Dreaming Child”

    What is the theme? he shouted at me.

    I’m sorry? I said.

    Your point! he bellowed. What is your point?

    Things are slippery? I offered.

    Ah, yes, he said, nodding his head, calming down. Meaning is elusive. Meanings. Answers.

    I mean things, literally, I said, stammering, starting to wave my arms around like I always did. I mean objects. I try to pick things up and they fall right through my hands. I lose my footing; all the surfaces seem so slick and shiny.

    He sat nodding his head and stroking his beard. That might at least make a decent enough metaphoric entry to your theme, he said. Please go on.

    But that’s all there is, I told him. It’s not a theme; it’s the way things are.

    I left the inquisitor’s office and wandered the streets for hours. I was puzzled by the way the world looked, and had to admit that I sort of liked it that way. I liked losing my way, enjoyed the feeling of being wholly lost in a big city, stunned by an odd angle or a furtive, impressionistic detail in the ceaseless shadow tide of the peripheries, noticing the things that never moved absorbing the things that did. Also, big things, slowly, almost imperceptibly, absorbing the darkness, just as in the morning the light would rise in all of them again.

    The faces of the people I passed were slack with preoccupation; they’d pulled down their shadows around themselves, and looked right through me in a sort of empirical blackout. I didn’t mind feeling invisible. It made it easier to stare into things.

    I didn’t want anyone to give anything away, to show me the way into a single idea. Poets, writers, artists, musicians: I liked them best when they were at their most mysterious, when they drove me deep into the unexplored scrub country of my skull. The really great ones would kick all sorts of stuff loose in my head –images, luminous dust, sparks, bursts of static electricity, a fragment by which a story, a secret, even an entire lost civilization might be inferred. Words would suddenly explode from dark pockets in my head like startled birds fleeing a bush.

    I’d ultimately fall down flight after flight of stairs, a bass line beating in my head like hail on a tin roof, or, a moment later, quieter, like rain at the windows.

    Just open the door a crack, that’s all I ask, or allow me a brief glimpse of the whole howling universe in the sliver of moonlight where the curtains flutter momentarily free of the window frame.

    Put it in my reach, not in my lap, as someone –I think Wendell Berry– once said.

    Let me imagine my own world, my own poem, my own story, inside yours.

    Just let me imagine.

    That’s all I’m asking.

    clown shoes 5.jpg

  • A flat world for flat heads

    galileo (Custom).jpg
    I was just thinking we haven’t had a good excommunication since Galileo

    The only reliable bit about the Star Tribune, other than Katherine Kersten will provide some laughs to anyone who can think, is the cartoons of editorial cartoonist Steve Sack. This guy has gone too long without a Pulitzer prize.

    Today’s cartoon does the best job of sending up the “intelligent design” idiots I’ve seen in a long time.

    My favorite columnist Paul Krugman follows on in today’s NY Times. Krugman makes some great points: that the purveyers of the pseudo science of “intelligent design” are motivated by the same goals as the “economists” who have given us Supply Side Economics. Those guys, along with the conservative-funded think tanks who claim that global warming is a myth, are just two sides of the same coin.

    And what’s on the faces of that coin? Greed and political gain, baby. Heads they win, tails we lose.

    Intellectual honesty is under constant attack, and the bad guys are winning. Pretty soon, we won’t even have to have peer reviewed science experiments or economists with actual data to tell us what’s what in the world.

    Never mind the university libraries full of all those stuffy academic journals, all we’ll need is a subsciption to the Wall Street Journal.

    It will be the the repository for the best science all those coins can buy.

  • There's A Kind Of Hush (All Over Twins Territory)

    open all night.jpg

    If we ain’t bums, we’ll certainly do ’til some real bums come along.

    –Bugs Baer

    If a tree falls in the woods….

    What is the sound of one hand clapping?

    If you can’t say nothin’ nice….

    God only knows….

    Words seriously fail me, but I’m going to try to thrash a few out of the brush this morning regardless.

    I’m going to attempt to explain what I think went wrong with this Twins team this season, and I think it’s pretty simple, really, when you look at it closely and objectively enough.

    I think it’s just this simple: uncharacteristically for this organization, the Twins started pushing the panic button too early. After committing to Jason Bartlett as the opening day shortstop coming out of spring training, and going into a season of the highest expectations, Minnesota’s coaching staff seemed fidgety from the get-go, and the players clearly picked up on that negative energy.

    The Twins sent Bartlett packing to Rochester after barely six weeks, which was a trial that was ridiculously brief considering how much rope they’ve been willing to extend to equal or lesser players in recent years. It was also ridiculous when you realize that the Twins were 24-16 at the time. Since they sent Bartlett back to Triple A on May 20th they’ve gone 31-37.

    This isn’t all about Bartlett, of course, but it’s about the message the Twins sent went they made the move so early. To a lesser extent they’ve also spent the whole season jerking around other players like Michael Cuddyer, Luis Rivas, and Justin Morneau, and they’ve just flat out done too much tinkering –with the line-up, the batting order, the infield rotation.

    What happened to Ron Gardenhire’s old mantra about backing his guys and having faith in the players he throws out there? There have been precious few expressions of that faith this year, as evidenced most glaringly when the Twins manager refused to put out the little brush fire that Torii Hunter started in the clubhouse by questioning the toughness of unnamed –but clearly recognizable– young players on the team. Not only did Gardy make no attempt to extinguish that fire, he actually fanned it with his own comments, which created an obxious cold war situation –at the very least– in the clubhouse.

    You can bitch all you want about Terry Ryan failing to make a move to help the team at the trade deadline, but let’s be realistic; there wasn’t a move out there that represented an acceptable risk/reward ratio.

    And you can bemoan the loss of Corey Koskie, or even –God forbid– Cristian Guzman and Doug Mientkiewicz. That argument, even allowing for such bunk as clubhouse intangibles, doesn’t wash either. None of those guys has done a damn thing this year. Koskie has been –big surprise– injury prone, and I’d don’t recall anyone mentioning that he suffered his most serious injury (against the Twins) on one of the stupidest baserunning plays I’ve ever seen, attempting to advance from first to second on a routine fly ball to Torii Hunter. To date Koskie’s had just 189 at-bats for Toronto, with a .249 batting average, seven homeruns, and eighteen RBI. I’m sure you’ve had a chance to see what Guzman and Mientkiewicz have done.

    If you really want to look at this thing in a cold, clear-eyed manner, you’d see that this year’s version, at least on paper, is unquestionable improved at catcher, first base, and second base. I’d call shortstop and third a wash, although the entire team defense has been noticeably sloppier than any time in recent memory.

    As I pointed out earlier, Justin Morneau as a bust has been pretty damn good so far as busts go. Barring injury he will, as I also predicted, lead the team in homeruns, RBI, and slugging percentage. He hasn’t been Roger Maris, but neither has he been Mientkiewicz.

    If you really want culprits –and culpability– for the failures of this season to date you have to look at the team’s core of veteran players, the guys who were deemed so solid that the team could afford to gamble a bit on the unproven players in the line-up. That would be Hunter, Jacque Jones, and Shannon Stewart, most prominently, who have been merely adequate, if not mediocre, at the plate, and have, at least from the available evidence, provided negligible leadership in the clubhouse.

    Johan Santana has not come close to being the Santana of 2004, but he, and most of the rest of the pitchers, have more than held up their end of the deal, give or take some of the creaky rollercoaster cars in the bullpen. You could argue pretty convincingly that one-through-five this is the most consistent Twins rotation in the last four years, despite which they have one win among them since the All-Star break. Yesterday Kyle Lohse –who now has a 4.38 ERA– pitched the team’s fifth straight quality start in a stretch in which the Twins are 1-4.

    This was a team that was deemed good enough to win the World Series by all manner of experts and idiots, and the responsibilities for its failure lie exclusively behind the clubhouse doors. It’s been unseemly the way some of these guys have publicly begged Ryan to go out and get them some help, as if this were the 1998 version of the Twins rather than a team that had won three straight Central Division titles.

    Note to the Chicago White Sox: the Twins want their DNA back.

  • In Death All Are Equal

    Over at Slate’s media desk, Jack Shafer has developed a little sub-speciality in debunking investigative stories about various social diseases. It’s wicked, thankless work. Shafer got into a very nasty little donnybrook with New York Times magazine after he nitpicked an extensive story by Peter Landesman on a covert sex-slave ring in New Jersey. Shafer’s typical MO is to argue the numbers in such stories–when the numbers of victims are vague or insufficient or impeachable, he usually disimisses the story as a sensationalistic over-reach of a trend-obsessed media. It’s a fine thing to decry sensationalism, but Shafer could pick easier and more deserving targets; the Times magazine is not really the wall to which that sloppy pasta is going to stick.

    Maybe Newsweek magazine is more worthy of Shafer’s rapier. This week, Jack argues that Newsweek’s current cover story on methamphatamine use in the US has a) identified a trend embarrassingly late, and b) overstated the seriousness of the meth problem. Shafer would apparently prefer not to have it written about at all, or maybe as a light , how-to trend story in a bleeding-edge magazine like Vice. If there is not a body count, it is not a serious crisis. Thus it feels like a down week in Shafer’s world, but with yesterday’s massive bombing in Iraq, we’re sure he’ll perk up again by his next deadline.

    This reminds us, somewhat ironically, of the contrarian story in the Times magazine a few weeks ago about how “necessary” child safety seats are in cars. That alarming article, written by Dubner and Levitt (the new Freakonomics columnists poached from the world of hardcovers), suggested that a child is no safer in a car seat than out of one. The article used just one standard: mortality. Death. Those of us with children do not measure safety in such a cruel, absolute way. We tend to try to keep our children from the least harm, the better to never have to consider the ultimate heartbreak. Likewise, the fact that two million other children are using crystal meth, and whether or not that constitutes a true “crisis” in the mind of a journalist in Washington, D.C., neither consoles nor excites the soul-sick parent of a meth-addicted teenager.