Author: Max Ross

  • Barnes & Ignoble

    For summer reading, Barnes & Noble recommends The Diary of Anne Frank. So here’s the presumed scenario: The sun is out, you’re under your candy striped umbrella at the beach, children in the near distance are making sandcastles on the shore, and you are immersing yourself in the magical world of WWII-era Amsterdam, through the eyes of a 13-year-old Jewish girl whose family was forced into hiding, and who later perishes in a concentration camp. If this is a bit light for you, Barnes & Noble suggests Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales as a summertime alternative, so you can brush up on your Middle English, like you’ve been meaning to. Or if Objectivist philosophy is your thing, an anthology of Ayn Rand’s previously unpublished writings – The Early Ayn Rand (only 508 pages)- is a welcome member of the B & N "Summer Reading" display.

    Really?

    By now it’s old news, if it was ever news at all, but in this year’s edition of City Pages‘ "Best of the Twin Cities," Barnes & Noble Booksellers took "Best Bookstore (New)" in the reader’s poll. In a city with as many funky community bookstores as ours, this was a bit surprising to me, because in terms of customer experience, I’ve always found B & N a bit lacking.

    I don’t want to rant about how B & N is bad for the universe and promotes global warming and cannibalism and pedophilia. We’ve all heard it all before. So I’m going to try and make a good, old-fashioned pro/con list consisting of the chain’s merits (which it certainly has) and demerits, and see if maybe one outweighs the other.

    I assume there might be some crossover in readership between City Pages and The Rake – possibly even some with this blog – so I invite anyone and everyone to comment with why they like (or don’t like) Barnes & Noble, and to educate me as to what I may have missed – probably a substantial amount.

    So here goes:

    PROS

    Squatter’s Rights – You can sit in a Barnes & Noble for as long as you want, without feeling guilty. (I tend to start feeling guilty after about fifteen minutes in Magers & Quinn if I don’t find anything I want.) It’s kind of like a library, but with newer, better smelling books.

    Bathrooms – I’m pretty sure that most B & Ns have bathrooms that are functionally, if not explicitly, open to the public.

    Author Events – Probably the biggest benefit B & N brings to its communities is their ability to get big-name authors in otherwise-skipped-over towns. The branches Downtown and in the Galleria are especially good at getting some writers of note to Minneapolis and St. Paul. To name a recent few: Keith Gessen, Darin Strauss, and, thank God, Mario Lopez.

    Discounts – When it comes to the bottom line, B & N is the best on giving us fairly significant price cuts on our favorite magazines and books.

    Kids’ Sections – I suspect this may have had a lot to do with its City Pages ranking. Maybe the one thing that many indy bookstores lack is a decent children’s section (though check out Birchbark Books in Kenwood). It seems B & N caters as much to youngsters as to any other demographic, fully aware that they still have imaginations to be stoked and exploited.

    Har Mar – More than any other B & N I know of, the branch by Har Mar mall serves as a neighborhood hub. They have one of the corporation’s rare ‘used’ sections, and are willing to host a Chinese conversation group. Also, I’ve heard it’s a good spot for singles to meet.

    And the CONS.

    Before I start, I want to say that I’m going to try and keep the cons to problems encountered within the actual bookstores. Whatever B & N‘s global ramifications may be, the CP poll was about user experience, not where we shop with the cleanest conscience, or where we shop because everywhere else has been mysteriously put out of business.

    More Discounts – No, I don’t want to save another ten per cent today by signing up for a new credit card. Nor give you my zip code in order to buy a magazine.

    Selection – It’s often hard to find the book I’m looking for. Despite their vast shelving space, B & N‘s management mandates that branches constantly cycle through their shelves, weeding out the books that don’t sell as well as they’re supposed to. Because of this, it’s difficult to come across older books. A lot of the time they’ll have an author’s best-seller, but none of the rest of that particular author’s output. Perusing the Calhoun Village branch, I was unable to find any books by Celine or Bernard Malamud, and they had only one book each of Chekhov, Grace Paley, and Proust. The poetry section is even more barren – a sort of Blockbuster video approach to stocking. Only one collection each by local heavyweights Robert Bly and Louis Jenkins, and several omissions (There were, however, several copies of the poetry collections by Jewel and Ani DiFranco.)

    Books, but not Reading – This is my biggest beef: B & N promotes books, and the selling of materials bound in traditional book form, but only minimally and incidentally promote any actual reading. Their ‘Summer Reading’ display, for example, is simply preposterous, and shows the company’s complete lack of attention to their readers.
    As is now well-documented, the books that appear up front and on the chain’s various ‘favorites’ tables aren’t selected by staff; publishers pay to have their books in those spots. This means that advertisers determine what we see, not people that care about what we’re actually reading.
    Because of this, some mismatching authors appear linked together. I especially liked how the new cardboard Ernest Hemingway display is next to the display with Mary Higgins Clark and James Patterson’s books. It’s kind of like putting Skittles next to the organic fruits.
    Call me condescending. But I assure you there is no way in Hell I’m more condescending than the Barnes & Noble executive who commands that there be a rack for "Magazines America Loves" in his stores.

    I think that’s all I’ve got. It seems the list is weighted toward the pros, though I have to say the last two cons are really the clinchers for me (I don’t live anywhere near Har Mar, nor do much shopping for kids, which effectively mangles my personal pros). Again, we here at The Rake are all about opinions, we thrive on them, so if you’ve got one, or many, throw it out there, yo.

  • Beat your ploughshares into pens

    Employing a tactic I’m pretty sure I’ve picked up from the current presidential administration, I’ve decided to take a new approach to truth. Namely, I’m going to make it up. And make it up in such a way that justifies every decision I decide(r), and in such a way that makes me feel better about my life, and the enveloping society thereof.
    So here goes: Everyone is reading.

    And because everyone is reading, there is a high demand for poetry.
    And because there is a high demand for poetry, once a week, possibly on Mondays, but certainly not limited to Mondays, I’m going to try really hard to post a Poem Worth Reading on this blog.

    I know I know I know, this is supposed to be a blog about books, and probably shouldn’t contain any actual literature, unless it’s hyper-linked. Nevertheless, poems are great. They’re (often) short, and powerful, and sometimes they even rhyme, which makes you feel happy for reasons you probably can’t define very well. And people should read more of them. More, even, than they already are. Which is lots. Because everybody is reading. Obviously.

    This week’s Poem Worth Reading is by Marie Vogel Gery. It’s part of a collection entitled Penchant – an anthology comprised of poems written by women from Northfield, Minnesota. Though I can’t quite put my finger on it, there is definitely a quality that unites the verses of these poets. "The eleven writers gathered here show an easy abundance," notes Scott King in his introduction. And I think that’s as close to a definition as one can get – a vague yet precise "easy abundance" – a lovely ability to meander, paired with the certain (Minnesotan) simplicity that underlies each stanza

    Read it. Everyone else is.

    "Sleepover"

    My son and I battle weekly over whether he can sleepover there
    or they can sleepover here, he has a lust for places
    filled with smells other than my cooking
    for rooms without his stepfather’s voice
    even for places without his brother’s scent
    still soft like his, like their cheeks when I kiss them goodnight

    He longs for that future when the telephone is his
    the refrigerator, the stove, the car, the front door
    when he can have makko boards on all the walls
    and Samurai swords in place of umbrellas

    He longs for staying up all night at a party
    where something wonderful happens and everyone knows
    he is grown up and popular and everyone wants him to sleepover
    be their best friend and they’ll live on pizza and Mountain Dew

    He wants that freedom not to get lonesome
    as the dark comes in through the house
    things he doesn’t want to think about
    slide down the chimney and hiss in the rooms
    fear, like a cat, comes and sits near him
    follows him into his room, plays under the bed

    Each week by Wednesday we screech in tangled logic
    magic and hope that he will sleepover there this time
    or they will sleepover here for a whole weekend
    and something wonderful will happen

  • Still 80s After All These Years

    Originally written for Realbuzz

    Never has an entire decade of music been so thoroughly consolidated within the confines of a single album. Because we’re talking about the 1980s here — or more precisely, 1983-1993 — this can be viewed as either a good or bad thing, depending very much on your personal taste. If you didn’t like hair metal (and, just as importantly, hair ballads) the first time around, you won’t now. Regardless, and this is sort of amazing: Def Leppard’s aesthetic has by no means been softened by the two decades of safe-pop-rock that has infiltrated the mainstream since their 1987 hit "Pour Some Sugar on Me." Or rather, it has softened – their last album, X, was derided for ‘not having much kick to [its] rhythms’ — and now re-calcified. Abrasive, spasmodic, at times just plain noisy, Songs from the Sparkle Lounge is, for better or worse, a return to a lost era.

    If you miss shaking your perm’d mullet to power chords, or if you were too young in the ‘80s to appreciate the charm-less allure of bands such as this, there is presently cause to rejoice.

    The worst one can say about Sparkle Lounge is that it’s put together like a comeback effort. Despite the fact that Def Leppard has been releasing albums fairly regularly, this one in particular cycles through so many sub-genres that it does, regrettably, feel a bit like a cry for attention. That said, the group attacks each style – rock ballad, thunder metal, New Wave metal – with such sincerity, and even mastery, that when you’re listening to it you really feel as if you’re in a different (louder) era.

    Though it may attract the same fan base, this isn’t the campy, half-ironic rock of artists like Andrew W.K. who capitalized on the resurgence of ‘80s culture; this is the real stuff, the prima materia. "Gotta Let it Go," for example, would be a pretty good match for a movie montage. Again – not the satirical sequences of Wet Hot American Summer or Team America: World Police; this is suitable for Top Gun, or even Rocky IV. There’s really fast, meandering electric guitar work that serves as filler, but its strength is a never-ending chorus, with the mantra "Gotta let it go!" shouted over and over, reinforced by some heavy chords and drums.

    "Love," then, serves as a nice counterpoint, as the hair ballad is, after all, the inverse of the rock anthem. I think even Meat Loaf might tip his hat to this one. After a bastardization of the introductory licks to "Stairway to Heaven," lead singer Joe Elliot comes in crooning, "Love! Love! Why do I keep searching high and low?" One imagines candelabras and white poofy shirts, just like twenty years ago.

    The rest all falls within the spectrum of leather jackets with lots of zippers, professional wrestling, patriotic bandanas, and the straightforward punchlines of Andrew Dice Clay. "Bad Actress," "C’mon C’mon," and "Go" all hold the elements of an oversized culture. That Def Leppard is British in origin seems incidental to me; I would say this is a profoundly American album. "Nine Lives," the single featuring Tim McGraw, has just enough twang to sound a bit like recent commercials for Ford Trucks. To show their versatility within the U.S. canon, they’ve even thrown in "Tomorrow," which sticks its nose into the mid-90s, emulating a bit of the Boy Band pastiche. Even this, though, is pulled off with the blunt confidence of the rest of the album. If there are a few adjectives that can be used describe every song, here they are: Loud, bold, and impossible to ignore.

    Track listing:

    1. Go
    2. Nine Lives
    3. C’mon C’mon
    4. Love
    5. Tomorrow
    6. Cruise Control
    7. Hallucinate
    8. Only the Good Die Young
    9. Bad Actress
    10. Come Undone
    11. Gotta Let It Go
    12. Love

  • American Idle – Achin' Aiken – [Insert Pun]

    Originally written for Realbuzz 

    There’s something deliciously lame about Clay Aiken’s new album, On My Way Here. On all his previous outputs, Aiken’s milked his boyish, Pee-Wee-esque persona, happy to satisfy both the teenie-boppers and their wannabe moms. On this release, though, young Clayton is trying to mature. Sadly, it seems he’s playing dress-up in his father’s clothes, without realizing he’s just playing.

    On songs like "Ashes," Aiken is full of angst, sadness, and remorse (lately this has become the standard emotional cocktail for young, disgruntled pop artists…perhaps it’s always been that way). Maybe it’s an unfortunate condition of having come up knowing nothing but the interior of the industry, but whatever emotions he has can only be expressed through the most commonplace clichés.

    "Someone told me what doesn’t kill you only makes you stronger," he leads off. Which sets him up for the reprise, "Now I can rise above the ashes."

    But "Ashes" presents us only with general, widely relatable emotions. It’s not until the introspective "The Real Me" that Aiken really gets into his groove.

    "Foolish heart/looks like we’re here again
    the same old game of plastic smile/don’t let anybody in
    hidin’ my heartache/will this glass house break?"

    I haven’t done the investigation, but there’s no way this wasn’t ripped from the journal Aiken kept in junior high. Unless maybe Jewel helped him with his songwriting. The Chorus:

    "You see the real me/hidin’ in my skin/broken from within"

    Apparently The Real Him is a fourteen-year-old boy whose date to the spring dance has just rejected him. Now he’s looking in the mirror, of course.

    Underlying each track is a predictably undulating progression: When the songs are loud and over-produced (which is often), Aiken is defiant and/or angry and/or triumphant; when the instrumentation dies away and we’re left with only his voice (which is also often), Aiken is morose and/or contemplative.

    The guitars have been filtered through so many computers they sound like electrical currents; the drums have been softened and tweaked so they sound like guitars. Sure, Aiken’s got a good voice. But it’s so obviously manipulated that even this, which should be his strength, gets ruined. The term for magazine models is airbrushed; I’m not sure what it is for musical artists.

    I guess what it comes down to is, Aiken is now professing sincerity, and yet his music hasn’t really changed at all. Before, at least, he was (outwardly) content to be a poster boy for the industry. Now it seems he wants to break away and become independent – if we’re to take his lyrics seriously at all, this is the message he’s sending – and yet, he is completely without the faculties to do so.

  • The Defenestrating of Josef K

    It could have been so good.

    That was the biggest disappointment – not how bad it was, but the discrepancy between its actual and potential levels of quality. I’m speaking (writing) of The Ballad of Josef K, a puppeted interpretation of Franz Kafka’s The Trial, on stage now at the Illusion Theater.

    When reviewing (or just viewing) a movie or play that’s been adapted from a novel I’ve read, I do the best I can to separate the text from the performance (Bard notwithstanding). It’s important to judge works of art on their independent merit, but when you’re talking about an iteration of The Trial, at least for me the comparisons between subject and spin-off are inevitable. What a theater troupe is able to do with a novel as elusive as this one is almost more interesting than the liberties they’ll take with it.

    And puppets, it seems to me, could actually have been the perfect medium for this specific book.

    As I understand it, The Trial (the novel) is largely about power. We meet Josef K on his thirtieth birthday, when he is apprehended for no particular reason. "Someone must have been telling lies about Josef K.," it begins. "He knew he had done nothing wrong but, one morning, he was arrested." (K, the protagonist of The Trial, The Castle, and a couple shorter pieces, is Kafka’s fictionalized personality- the writer’s middle name was Josef; later on in The Trial one of the arresting officers is revealed to have the name Franz…take it as thou wilt.) For the rest of the story, Josef tries to figure out what charges are being leveled against him, and by whom. His investigation takes him up through a government hierarchy – servants, secretaries, lawyers, judges, priests – and he’s never quite able to get to the top tier.

    Or, in other words, he’s never quite able to find out who’s pulling the strings. (What an awful pun, I know, I know.) In all seriousness, though, what better way than puppets to act this drama out? Puppets – with or without strings – are bodies controlled by forces that, by the very nature of puppetry, are meant to be both anonymous and omnipotent.

    The notion of fate, and the extent to which we manage it, is the main theme of Kafka’s work (The Trial and otherwise), and there’s a fairly obvious correlation to a puppet and its master.

    Which the Milwaukee Mask and Puppet Theatre left untouched. While their dummies were impressively rendered (fans of puppet theater might be impressed), and at times expertly controlled, they let alone any issues dealing with pre-determined fate. The relationship between the actors and their puppets was not mysterious – it was simply incidental.

    Even when he was writing the book, it seems the author felt the tug of some supernatural power he was unable to control. An entry from his journal:

    August 30. Cold and empty. I feel only too strongly the limits of my abilities, narrow limits, doubtless, unless I am completely inspired. And I believe that even in the grip of inspiration I am swept along only within these narrow limits, which, however, I then no longer feel because I am being swept along.

    There is implicit reference to some force that ‘limits’ his abilities, and the apparent opposite of that force, inspiration, is just another god whose whim Kafka has to endure. (Explicitly, Kafka could, then, be considered a puppet, controlled by Inspiration and its opposite, which I think he would have named ‘Doubt.’) Not to acknowledge this in a performance, if not irresponsible, is at the very least passing up a terrific chance to further Kafka’s explorations.

    Rather than sticking to Josef’s story – that of K’s relation to the governing forces of his soul – the production literalized Kafka’s novel, in order to show the dangers of our current political climate. From the playbill: "Today the news reveals hidden worlds of torture, terror, and mistaken identity…The Trial [bears] an amazingly contemporary resonance [with this]." (Sadly, when the plot did follow K’s investigations, it was at its most compelling.)

    I would argue that, on the scale of human experience, politics are at least one hierarchical step below religion (see Spinoza’s Ethics); therefore, I would argue that this troupe was attacking Kafka’s story at a level lower than it’s meant to be understood. (Though maybe this doesn’t apply anymore; we’re living in a world where it’s difficult to say the word ‘soul’ and be taken seriously, whereas politics have become ubiquitous and all-important and seemingly infinite…kind of like God’s supposed to be. Maybe it’s actually impossible to relate Kafka’s novel to the modern world and stay true to his intentions.)

    The physical torture depicted in the novel – scenes of rape and electrocution – were the most vivid aspects of the performance. On stage there was more puppet intercourse than Team America: World Police (and less funny); an apt title could very well have been The Hyper-Sexualizaton of Josef K. But I really believe Kafka intended these aspects to be metaphor. To grossly oversimplify: in the book, I think, the sexual perversity was a sort of rape of the soul; in the play, though, it signified the corruption of government. To go a step further: In the book, the corruption of government stood for the corruption of the soul; in the play, the corruption of government stood for the corruption of government.

    So I suppose the question comes down to intent. Maybe director Rob Goodman loved the novel for the same reasons I did, but also saw potential to make The Trial into a modern parable for Abu Ghraib. That’s fine. But I would still call it dangerously un-ambitious. Why lessen the novel’s meaning for the purposes of manifesto? Why make it so mundane? So earthly? Whatever its merits (which I’ll leave to the theater blogger), there was a roughness to this performance akin to an unfinished jigsaw puzzle – all the pieces may have been there, but there was minimal effort to assemble them correctly.

  • A Precise Poem

    Employing a tactic I’m pretty sure I’ve picked up from the current presidential administration, I’ve decided to take a new approach to truth. Namely, I’m going to make it up. And make it up in such a way that justifies every decision I decide(r), and in such a way that makes me feel better about my life, and the enveloping society thereof.
    So here goes: Everyone is reading.

    And because everyone is reading, there is a high demand for poetry.
    And because there is a high demand for poetry, once a week, possibly on Mondays, but certainly not limited to Mondays, I’m going to try really hard to post a Poem Worth Reading on this blog.

    I know I know I know, this is supposed to be a blog about books, and probably shouldn’t contain any actual literature, unless it’s hyper-linked. Nevertheless, poems are great. They’re (often) short, and powerful, and sometimes they even rhyme, which makes you feel happy for reasons you probably can’t define very well. And people should read more of them. More, even, than they already are. Which is lots. Because everybody is reading. Obviously.

    This week’s Poem Worth Reading is by Yehuda Amichai. Usually he tends toward the political, and is scarily good at it. However, though one could probably read some Israel-Palestine into this, it’s mostly just sexy. I figured it’s spring, so why not get a little racy.

    Read it. Everyone else is.

    A Precise Woman

    A precise woman with a short haircut brings order
    to my thoughts and my dresser drawers,
    moves feelings around like furniture
    into a new arrangement.
    A woman whose body is cinched at the waist and firmly divided
    into upper and lower,
    with weather-forecast eyes
    of shatterproof glass.
    Even her cries of passion follow a certain order,
    one after the other:
    tame dove, then wild dove,
    then peacock, wounded peacock, peacock, peacock,
    the wild dove, tame dove, dove dove
    thrush, thrush, thrush.

    A precise woman: on the bedroom carpet
    her shoes always point away from the bed.
    (My own shoes point toward it.)

    Translated by Chana Bloch

     

  • A Minimalist, Light Approach to Shakespeare

    There are two things that need to be done, I think, when adapting a Shakespeare play. First, respects must be paid to the language — the actors must own their lines, the director must choose the emphases that suit his/her interpretation best. And second, the cast must act as translators, using their bodies to re-interpret the script and make it relatable for the modern audience, so that thumb-biting, say, can actually be perceived as an offense. For the most part, Four Humors Theater’s staging of Romeo and Juliet, showing this weekend and next at the Bedlam Theater, accomplishes these tasks.

    It’s a minimal production. Romeo (Jason Bohon) wears jeans and a hoodie; Juliet (Elise Langer) is in a jersey dress. (Both sport ergonomically designed Puma sneakers.) Aside from a tire swing and a couple moveable screen doors, the set is mostly bare, which is nice — there’s no gimmickry.

    Director Jason Ballweber has taken obvious pains to make this an intimate performance. When Romeo wanders into the crowd and begins to direct his speech to audience members, there’s a genuine feel to it; it seems he’s actually speaking to the theatergoers, not just reciting his lines in one’s personal space. Throughout, Bohon sustains his role well. He plays a thoughtful Romeo, humanizing the character’s rather absurd (rather pubescent) passions and moods — he’s gloomy, sure, but never becomes melodramatically morose.

    Likewise, Langer adds a good bit of levity to Juliet’s character. She delivers her speeches like a fourteen-year-old girl talking to her friend on the phone — a sort of rapid-fire, valley-esque style that makes one believe she has butterflies fluttering in her head. At first it’s a bit hard to get used to — she’s rushing through the lines and it’s difficult to catch the meaning of the bard’s words — but after a scene or two, when the audience is able to settle in, it’s actually delightful. Impressive, even.

    Finally, Kimberly Richardson turns out a fantastic performance as Juliet’s nurse. Ballweber has invested a particular amount of weight in this role, turning the nurse into one of Shakespeare’s ‘fool’ characters, as from Twelfth Night or Puck from A Midsummer Night’s Dream. Dressed something like Mrs. Doubtfire, she’s the wise old lady with her fingers in everyone’s business, her ward’s interests closest to her heart. Maybe the most effective scene of the play is late in the second act when Juliet and her nurse meet in the Capulets’ orchard. The nurse has just come from the friar’s with news of Juliet’s wedding, and Juliet has to wring it out from her. The nurse paces up and down the bowling-lane-like stage, feigning woe, avoiding Juliet’s questions, causing her to go into something like hysteria. And then, just as the audience is beginning to wonder how serious she is, Richardson flashes a quick smile to the crowd, letting us in on her joke, before she goes on tormenting the young lover.

    It’s a good, light approach to the play — typical of the Four Humors style that has won them so much praise in the last few years. When the minstrels begin to sing a medieval rendition of "Gin and Juice," one is reminded of the 4HT production of Bards, wherein the chorus de-modified the Wu-Tang Clan’s "C.R.E.A.M."

    At times, though — especially in the first few acts — the staging sacrifices feeling for humor. The balcony scene is where we first get a real look at Juliet’s flighty character, and here she seems a bit too concerned with making sure the audience knows how cute she is than with her connection to Romeo. Also, though a Shakespeare play isn’t a Shakespeare play without a little cross-dressing, casting choices make the exchanges between Mercutio and Benvolio often seem ripped from an episode of Will and Grace.

    That said, the airy first half makes the darkness of the second half that much more clear. When the tragedy begins to unfold, we haven’t been so bogged down by melancholy that we can’t stomach anymore. Rather, we’re ready for the sadness when it comes, and as tragicomedies go,
    it is all the more poignant.

  • Nabokov's Attempted Murder

    Kill your darlings.

    This is the command given young writers when they’re learning to edit their stories and poems. (It usually comes directly after the first piece of advice for novice authors: Quit now.)

    Kill ‘em dead. The line is attributed variously now to Faulkner, now to Hemingway. Extrapolated, it’s something like, ‘take your best sentences, and get rid of them. Chances are, if you’re impressed with your own writing, you’re being too cute.’ Really it’s just another injunction highlighting the masochistic aspects of this practice. Editing is peeling away dead skin, but there’s some pain involved.

    Vladimir Nabokov compares a first draft to a loogey you’ve coughed into a tissue – it’s this ugly thing that you don’t want to show anyone, but also it came from deep inside you. At the end of his life, it seems the author of Lolita and Pale Fire took the editorial call to arms a step further than most.

    Nabokov died in 1977, leaving behind 138 index cards with a draft of his last novel, The Original of Laura, scribbled on them, and instructions that the cards should be destroyed. (In terms of darling killing, this is something like being an accomplice to murder, I think.) Last week, Dmitri Nabokov – Vladimir’s son – announced he was publishing the manuscript.

    I’m reminded of a scene from Don Quixote, when the beautiful Marcela comes down from the hills and confronts a group of travelers. Anyone who looks upon Marcela, it’s said, will immediately fall in love with her. She’s here to tell them not to look:

    "Heaven made me, as all of you say, so beautiful that you cannot resist my beauty and are compelled to love me…But until now heaven has not ordained that I love, and to think that I shall love of my own accord is to think the impossible…The limits of my desires are these mountains, and if they go beyond here, it is to contemplate the beauty of heaven and the steps whereby the soul travels to its first home."

    And, having said this, and not waiting to hear any response, Marcela turned her back and entered the densest part of a nearby forest, leaving all those present filled with admiration as much for her intelligence as for her beauty. And some…gave indications of wishing to follow her, disregarding the patent discouragement they had heard.

    What always bugged me about this episode was that, if Marcela doesn’t want people to see her, she shouldn’t come out of hiding. I suspect that deep down, like everyone else, she likes to be doted on from time to time.

    I have the same suspicion of Nabokov’s feelings toward his ‘lost’ novel – if he wanted it destroyed, he would have destroyed it. Dmitri, at least, insinuates as much in an interview with The New York Times. "I also recalled," he said, "that when my father was asked, not very long before his death, what three books he considered indispensable, he named them in climactic order, concluding with The Original of Laura – could he have ever seriously contemplated its destruction?"

    The same thing happened about eighty years ago, when Max Brod decided to publish the manuscripts that his good friend, Franz Kafka, had left behind – despite the fact that Kafka wanted his texts destroyed, as well:

    Dearest Max,

    My last request: Everything I leave behind me (in my bookcase, linen-cupboard, and my desk both at home and in the office, or anywhere else where anything may have got to and meets your eye), in the way of diaries, manuscripts, letters (my own and others’), sketches, and so on, to be burned unread; also all writings and sketches which you or others may possess; and ask those others for them in my name. Letters which they do not want to hand over to you, they should t least promise faithfully to burn themselves.

    Yours,
    Franz Kafka

    As Dmitri doubted his father’s intentions, so too did Brod doubt Kafka’s:

    Franz should have appointed another executor if he had been absolutely and finally determined that his instructions should stand.

    I am far from grateful to him for having precipitated me into this difficult conflict of conscience, which he must have foreseen, for he knew with what fanatical veneration I listened to his every word…I never once threw away the smallest scrap of paper that came from him, no, not even a post card.

    Coming to the end of this blog post, I’m finding that I don’t really have a point to make. These are just things that happened. I’m not here to reprimand the authors for attempting -genuinely or not – to destroy their works. Rather I find comfort in the fact that, even on their deathbeds, these writers were still playing head games with those they held dearest. And, of course, I’m thankful to Brod and Dmitri Nabokov for not being the literal-minded readers that might actually have fulfilled their respective authors’ (faux) requests.

     

  • Yes, This is a Contemporary Blog Post

    Employing a tactic I’m pretty sure I’ve picked up from the current presidential administration, I’ve decided to take a new approach to truth. Namely, I’m going to make it up. And make it up in such a way that justifies every decision I decide(r), and in such a way that makes me feel better about my life, and the enveloping society thereof.

    So here goes: Everyone is reading.

    And because everyone is reading, there is a high demand for poetry.
    And because there is a high demand for poetry, once a week, possibly on Mondays, but certainly not limited to Mondays, I’m going to try really hard to post a Poem Worth Reading on this blog.

    I know I know I know, this is supposed to be a blog about books, and probably shouldn’t contain any actual literature, unless it’s hyper-linked. Nevertheless, poems are great. They’re (often) short, and powerful, and sometimes they even rhyme, which makes you feel happy for reasons you probably can’t define very well. And people should read more of them. More, even, than they already are. Which is lots. Because everybody is reading. Obviously.

    This week’s Poem Worth Reading is by Ron Padgett, from his collection You Never Know, which came out in 2001 from Coffee House Press. Notice the yeses, maybe.

    Read it. Everyone else is.

    The Drink

    I am always interested in the people in films who have just had a drink thrown in their faces. Sometimes they react with uncontrollable rage, but sometimes -my favorites- they do not change their expressions at all. Instead they raise a handkerchief or napkin and calmly dab at the offending liquid, as the hurler jumps to her feet and storms away. The other people at the table are understandably uncomfortable. A woman leans over and places her hand on the sleeve of the man’s jacket and says, "David, you know she didn’t mean it." David answers, "Yes," but in an ambiguous tone – the perfect adult response. But now the orchestra has resumed its amiable and lively dance music, and the room is set in motion as before. Out in the parking lot, however, Elizabeth is setting fire to David’s car. Yes, this is a contemporary film.

     

  • Rising Down

    Originally published on Realbuzz.com

    In 1999, The Roots came out
    with a double-disc live album, The Roots Come Alive, with songs
    culled from performances in Switzerland, New York, and various other
    locations. Rising Down, the group’s tenth album — second
    since Jay-Z brought them over to Def Jam Records — is in many ways
    more live than that release. Throughout, we are treated to a number
    of interludes, speeches, and instrumental shifts reminiscent of a Roots
    concert. A somewhat grungy tone pervades, as if the band went in, played
    their instruments, and the tracks made it to the album without too much
    tinkering (that’s what it sounds like, though I doubt it’s true…).
    The result is something somehow personal, as if we are witnessing the
    album, instead of just listening to it.

    The usual cast of cameos makes
    its appearances — Common, Dice Raw, Mos Def, Talib Kweli, among others.
    But really, as all Roots fans know, Black Thought emerges as the most
    impressive. The only other rapper I can think of that has a flow as
    natural and entertaining as Black Thought’s is Ghostface Killah. I’m
    not sure if it’s a function of their having been MCs for so long,
    or if they’ve always been able to rap this way, but it really seems
    as if they’re just talking, and what they’re saying happens to rhyme.
    Nowhere is Black Thought more impressive than on "75 Bars (Black’s
    Reconstruction)": "Show me a puppet without a puppeteer/I’m in
    the fields with a shield and a spear/I’m in your girl with her heels
    in the air." It’s a free-association track on African American
    identity that rivals Beck for Rorschach-like complexity.

    Because The Roots play their
    own instruments, instead of relying on samples and looped beats, their
    sound is often much fuller and more organic than most other rap music.
    It’s not without its jarring qualities – sometimes it’s strange
    to hear that rock-style electric guitar cutting through a rhythm. But
    the band members, led by visionary drummer ?uestlove, by now have developed
    such chemistry that at times it really seems they can do anything with
    their respective instruments. (Last time I saw them in concert, they
    reproduced Mims’ "This Is Why I’m Hot.")

    Though much of their ouvre
    is phenomenal, very little of it is actually marketable. Usually, though,
    The Roots will deign to reserve four minutes of each album for a radio-friendly
    song. On Phrenology we got "Break You Off"; The Tipping
    Point
    gave us "Star" and "Don’t Say Nuthin’"; and
    Game Theory
    brought the shoulda-been-huge "Don’t Feel Right."
    (And of course, "You Got Me" from Things Fall Apart sort
    of defined their careers- but that entire album is so classic I prefer
    not to single out any song as better than the others.) Likewise, on
    Rising Down
    , The Roots have given us "Rising Up."

    It begins with some soft female
    vocals:

    "Yesterday I saw a B-Girl
    crying, and I walked up and asked ‘what’s wrong?’

    She said the radio’s been
    playing the same song all day long.

    I told her I got something
    you been waiting for

    I got something you been waiting
    for!"

    Then Black Thought jumps in
    with his non-stop spit-fire lyrics, delivering exactly what the song
    promises – something different from anything else out there, but still
    incredibly exciting. Beneath the vocals, there’s an ocean of drums
    that sounds like the guys in Washington Square Park banging on upside-down
    paint cans — a sound that, for whatever reason, never fails to elicit
    adrenaline.

    By no means is Rising Down
    the easiest or prettiest album to listen to. The Roots demand some attention,
    and even some thought, from their fans. But they have a mission, namely
    to make music that they want to make, unadulterated by others’ interests,
    and the craftsmanship they put into their tunes is visceral, and worthy
    of our time.