Author: Max Ross

  • In Defense of Hipster Literature

    I like McSweeney‘s.

    This may come as a surprise, because I don’t wear tight jeans. And even though I have thick-framed glasses, it’s because I’m near-legally-blind, so if I had puny little wire-frames the lenses would stick out like half an inch, and I’d be all self-conscious about it. You can call my tortoiseshell frames trendy, even pretentious, but the fact is I need them, and that they look so good on me is purely incidental, a symptom of my otherwise-already-fantastic features. (I’ve been led to believe, maybe because of the movie Juno, that McSweeney’s readers are prone to tight denim and unnecessarily thick spectacle frames. Greasy hair and a moth-eaten scarf might round out the picture. A plaid wool skirt over the tight jeans, for the ladies. Hipsters, if you will. Dirty, dirty hipsters.)

    I like Mcsweeney’s. More so than my sartorial infractions, this may surprise you because I also like n + 1.

    For the uninitiated, n +1 is a powerful little literary/sociological journal printed twice yearly, updated online frequently. Occasionally its editors will get some attention for, among other things, doing a little bash work on McSwy’s.

    The latest barb came in last Sunday’s New York Times, in an article about Keith Gessen, whose book All the Sad Young Literary Men just came out. It was a paraphrase, and only half a sentence long, but biting nonetheless:

    "As a founding editor of n +1… Mr. Gessen and his colleagues have assailed other publications they believe have squandered their eminence, or never merited it (McSweeney’s and anything else associated with the writer Dave Eggers)."

    Here is a bit of extrapolation, taken from an interview Keith Gessen did with the New York Inquirer:

    "When [n +1] launched, it seemed like [McSwy’s] were the ideal representatives of a certain kind of literary position, which states that 1) reading, in any form, is good, that writing is good, that literature is good; 2) all these things are imperiled, and therefore 3) that anything done in the service of these things is good. We disagree with all three parts of that, even #2. And we’ve said so a number of times."

    And finally, an excerpt from the piece that started it all, from a July 2004 post in n + 1.

    "As far as content goes, though, the innovation of the Eggersards [followers of Dave Eggers] was their creation of a regressive avant-garde. The first regression was ethical. Eggersards returned to the claims of childhood. Transcendence would not figure in their thought. Intellect did not interest them, but kids did. Childhood is still their leitmotif.
    … Eggers’s subject reflected the Eggersards’ obsession with childhood as a way of life. From raising a child as the treasure house of one’s own moral genius (A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius), to the editorship of anthologies for teens (Best American Nonrequired Reading), to a writing-tutor program (826 Valencia) — this is the substitute for transcendence in the Eggersard world."

    I’m not sure I’m smart enough to dismantle everything above…

    But here goes:

    Attacking the first attack — that McSwy’s doesn’t deserve literary merit — I’m just going to list some of their contributors:

    Denis Johnson
    Joyce Carol Oates
    Nathan Englander
    TC Boyle
    Ann Beattie
    Chris Adrian
    Michael Chabon
    Javier Marias
    Sarah Vowell
    David Foster Wallace
    (And more!)

    There are a couple  of Pulitzers in there, among other awards. Not that prizes automatically entail merit, but there are legitimate critics out there who will argue on behalf of everyone on that list. (And I will too.)

    I think the worst you can say is that at times McSwy’s seems more concerned with form than with content. Some of the story structures are a little too cute, but really you get that with any lit mag.

    Second:

    Gessen’s arguments from the Inquirer interview appear to make a lot of assumptions about McSwy’s intentions. I’m looking for a mission statement on the McSwy’s website, but can’t find one. All I know is that the 826 programs, which are set up to tutor English and writing to under-funded and inner-city youth, are good. One might attack 826 on philosophical and psychological terms, but at the end of the day, it’s a damn good organization doing damn good things.

    Finally:

    At root, it seems n + 1 is arguing that the McSwy’s crew is not serious enough about their writing, because they look to their childhoods for substance and content instead of culling meaning from the world we live in presently.

    Gessen and others are assertive, and even persuasive. I, too, believe that the best literature out there is more expansive than a fictionalized memoir — the characters of Tolstoy and Fitzgerald and Flaubert are all products of the societies they inhabit; their novels aren’t about personal stories, but about whole cultures.

    But, sentimental as it may be, to say that A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius didn’t get inside of the Generation X-Y culture is, I think, a bit shortsighted. "Eggers’ subject reflected the Eggersards’ obsession with childhood as a way of life" — I think Gessen is making the Eggersards a bit too niche.

    I would argue that, to an extent, everyone these days has an obsession with childhood as a way of life. Which would therefore bring AHWOSG into the realm of ‘serious’ literature, indicative of the larger world. Just like every reviewer said it was when it came out eight years ago.

    On a personal level, for whatever reason — for various reasons — probably a dozen of my friends’ parents have gotten divorced in the last five years. And with each break-up, it really seems sometimes, from my unsophisticated vantage point, that upon divorce some adults immediately revert to their childhood selves. One friend’s mom moved to New York and began dating twenty-four-year-olds (after a twenty-eight-year-long marriage). One friend’s dad has started going regularly to eighteen-plus shows at First Ave, and frequenting the college bars he went to as a student at the U. Really I could give a thousand examples, but what they all indicate is a societal obsession with childhood. I’m not going to get into the media’s infatuation with youth culture and all that, but it’s there.

    Eggers’ novel is a personal story, but his own character is a function of his encapsulating society.

    Benjamin Kunkel, another founding editor of n + 1, published his first novel a couple years ago — Indecision. Its protagonist, the delightful Dwight Wilmerding, isn’t very different from Dave Eggers’ character in AHWOSG. Wilmerding is petty, childish, and irresponsible. Maybe the only difference from Eggers is his belief in transcendence, his belief that he’s better than his circumstances — but when he actually tries to escape his life, that’s when the book is at its least convincing, even bordering on manifesto.

    A medley:

    How about some Important books based on loose childhood biography? Death in the Family, by James Agee; Call it Sleep, by Henry Roth; The Catcher in the Rye; Swann’s Way; A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man.

    Am I missing somet
    hing here? I must be missing something here. I’m not saying Eggers is on the level of Proust or Joyce, but if they’re allowed to examine their childhoods, why can’t Mr. Eggers? Is it a matter of intellectual analysis? Of storytelling?

    If nothing else, Eggers and his pals are making literature enjoyable for the non-reader. One can pick up an issue of McSweeney’s and not have to have read hundreds of other books to catch the references therein. n + 1 has some ambitious goals for its fiction, but the fact is they need publications like McSwy’s just to establish some ground-level interest in reading, to make n + 1 accessible — possibly even relevant — at all.

    Squash the beef!

  • Canoeing With the Cree, too

    A half-post:

    In this morning’s Star Tribune, Nick Coleman writes about two high school students from Chaska who just set off to reenact Eric Sevareid’s epic canoe trip from the Minnesota River to Hudson Bay, recounted in Sevareid’s book Canoeing With the Cree.

    As much as we might learn about chasing dreams and fulfilling goals and living vicariously from a couple eighteen-year-olds, I thought it apt to mention Jon Lurie’s heartfelt account of the same trip, which he undertook with a nineteen-year-old delinquent who’d been mixed up with a sawed-off shotgun and had to lay low for the summer. It appeared in the July 2007 issue of The Rake.

  • Cold Poem for a Cold Monday

    Employing a tactic I’m pretty sure I’ve picked up from the current presidential administration, I’ve decided to take a new approach to truth. Namely, I’m going to make it up. And make it up in such a way that justifies every decision I decide(d), and in such a way that makes me feel better about my life, and the enveloping society thereof.

    So here goes: Everyone is reading.

    And because everyone is reading, there is a high demand for poetry.
    And because there is a high demand for poetry, once a week, possibly on Mondays, but certainly not limited to Mondays, I’m going to try really hard to post a Poem Worth Reading on this blog.

    I know I know I know, this is supposed to be a blog about books, and probably shouldn’t contain any actual literature, unless it’s hyper-linked. Nevertheless, poems are great. They’re (often) short, and powerful, and sometimes they even rhyme, which makes you feel happy for reasons you probably can’t define very well. And people should read more of them. More, even, than they already are. Which is lots. Because everybody is reading. Obviously.

    This week’s Poem Worth Reading is by Allen Ginsberg, from his collection Kaddish and Other Poems, which came out sometime ago (1961).

    Read it. Everyone else is. There’s self-deprecation involved. And cats. God, it’s honest-seeming. Parts are omitted. If you want them in, let me know and I’ll add them. A little dark, but it’s cold outside.

    "Mescaline"

    Rotting Ginsberg, I stared in the mirror naked today
    I noticed the old skull, I’m getting balder
    my pate gleams in the kitchen light under thin hair
    like the skull of some monk in old catacombs lighted by a guard with flashlight
    followed by a mob of tourists
    so there is death
    my kitten mews, and looks into the closet
    Boito sings on the phonograph tonight his ancient song of
    angels
    Beato Angelico’s universe
    The cat’s gone mad and scraowls around the floor

    Yes, I should be good, I should get married
    find out what it’s all about
    but I can’t stand these women all over me
    smell of Naomi
    erk, I’m stuck with this familiar rotting ginsberg
    can’t stand boys even anymore
    can’t stand
    can’t stand
    and who wants to get fucked up the ass, really/
    Immense seas passing over
    the flow of time
    and who wants to be famous and sign autographs like a movie star

    I want to know
    I want I want ridiculous to know to know WHAT rotting ginsberg
    I want to know what happens after I rot
    because I’m already rotting
    my hair’s falling out I’ve got a belly I’m sick of sex
    my ass drags in the universe I know too much
    and not enough
    I want to know what happens after I die
    well I’ll find out soon enough
    do I really need to know now?
    is that any use at all use use use
    death death death death death
    god god god god god god god the Lone Ranger
    the rhythm of the typewriter

    What can I do to Heavy by pounding on Typewriter
    I’m stuck change the record Gregory ah excellent he’s doing just that
    and I am too conscious of a million ears
    at present creepy ears, making commerce
    too many pictures in the newspapers
    faded yellowed press clippings
    I’m going away from the poem to be a drak contemplative

    trash of the mind
    trash of the world
    man is half trash
    all trash in the grave

    What can Williams be thinking in Paterson, death so much on him
    so soon so soon
    Williams, what is death?
    Do you fact the great question now each moment
    or do you forget at breakfast looking at your old ugly love in the face
    are you prepared to be reborn
    to give release to this world to enter a heaven
    or give release, give release
    and all be done – and see a lifetime -all eternity – gone over
    into naught, a trick question proposed by the moon to the answerless earth
    No Glory for man! No Glory for Man! No glory for me! No me!

    No point writing when the spirit doth not lead

    NY, 1959

  • Look Who's Coming to Seder

    This week is Passover. Christians everywhere are saying, "Great, I love Passover! Matzoh’s so fun!" Meanwhile Jews lament eight days of indigestion.

    What’s kind of interesting, if you’re into this sort of thing, is that more than any other (Jewish) holiday, Passover is based on a narrative. If one were to try and place the narrative in a genre – other than "Religious studies" – it would be a pretty difficult task. The story has the literary elements of an epic saga, magical realism, an immigrant tale, and contains the best car chase in (fictive) history.

    But the Seder isn’t simply about re-telling the book of Exodus. It’s an analysis of and an embellishment on it. We don’t use the Old Testament to guide ourselves through the evening, rather the story is transplanted into our Haggadot, or prayer books. This distancing of the text from its primary source immediately opens the story up to interpretation. If you search for Haggadot on Amazon, there are over one hundred different entries — one hundred different interpretations of the same story.

    The old joke is, if there are two Jews having a conversation, then most likely there are three opinions. Not to stereotype my own religion, but it seems we take and make our theologic meanings by letting our separate sentiments disperse and then converge, rather than everyone working from the same origin.

    A few years back, my father found this fairly esoteric haggadah compiled by Gérard Garouste and Marc-Alain Ouaknin, and we’ve been referring to it on-and-off at our recent Seders. Perusing it last week, I found this kind of incredible passage on the meaning of re-telling the exodus story, which I think has ramifications for writing and reading in general (N.B. – the portion of the Seder specifically designated for relating Exodus is called the maggid):

    "Maggid" means, "he tells." Maggid is the most important part, at least qualitatively, of the Haggadah. It is the account of the Exodus from Egypt, an anthology compiled from texts chosen by the Sages of the Talmud.

    Maggid is preceded by the breaking of matzoh. The words of the telling emerge from that break, from the empty place left between the two pieces of matzah. That breaking is an invitation to the reader to enter the text to say his own word there. That is why the following part is called maggid, "he tells," rather than "the account." The two pieces of matzah indicate that there must be two in order for the text to exist – the author and the reader. The reader of the Haggadah is not merely the keeper of the text, but also its co-author. The break thus comes to draw the readers out of passivity to make them enter the play of writing, to give them access to the enchantments of writing. The reader is not the dazzled or bored spectator of a story made elsewhere, with which he or she has only a distant relationship. The text speaks to us, about us, and about our own history.

    This duality thus becomes that of the text and its commentary. To read is always to comment.

    "To read is always to comment." — Isn’t that great stuff? I feel like they’ve nailed down the magic of reading a great book — those moments when you feel a bit more connected to the text, as if you’d predicted what would happen before you read it, as if it was something you’d wanted to say, that a particular author happened to say for you.
    Speaking of — to take this post in another direction, I thought I’d just mention a couple books that have come out of Seder literature. First of all, the character of Merry Levov in Philip Roth’s American Pastoral re-enacts the Exodus. During the Vietnam War, she bombs a post office to protest U.S. Policy, much as Moses was protesting Egyptian policy when he murdered a harsh slave driver. Soon thereafter, Merry goes into underground exile, just like Moses, to hide from her would-be punishers. I’m making it sound a bit blatant, but Roth, as per usual, establishes this subtly and beautifully.

    Second, though I won’t expound on it, I’m pretty sure Saul Bellow’s epic The Adventures of Augie March can be read as an Exodus journey.

    Lastly, Beckett’s Waiting for Godot could be said to come out of the tradition. At Seder, we are commanded to set an extra place for Elijah, the prophet, whose coming signals the coming of the Messiah. We leave our front doors open (neighborhood depending), and fill the extra plate with those symbols so central to the holiday. But he never comes. Obviously.

    Unless you happen to be in my family. Around sundown on the first night of Passover, we are visited by Elijah, who happens to be four-foot-ten, maybe ninety pounds. He sports a cotton-ball beard, and a caftan my grandparents picked up on an elder hostel to Morocco about a decade ago. He brings wishes of peace and brotherhood, and then disappears into the bathroom from where, five minutes hence, Superman-like, my grandmother emerges.

  • Hip Hop at the Fitz

    first published on realbuzz.com

    The crowd did not want to sit.
    I think it’s safe to say that, for the most part, these were the Converse-and-thick-glasses-wearing
    underground hip-hop fans more accustomed to the open floor space of
    First Avenue than to the rigidly rowed seating chart of the Fitzgerald
    Theater. So when Brother Ali came out to play his first set — "Truth
    Is" and "Uncle Sam Goddamn" (the latter dedicated to Reverend
    Wright) — grooving torsos mashed awkwardly against seat backs. Pretty
    soon everyone stood up.

    Intricate
    and articulate, Brother Ali performed his typically political songs
    to a sympathetic (that is, democratic) crowd. What’s nice about the
    Fitzgerald is its acoustics are much better than most other venues,
    and Ali’s lyrics tonight were especially fluent and clear. Several
    times, BK-One, his dj, would stop the beat and just let Ali go a capella,
    with no loss of musical richness.

    Then
    came Chuck D. (Of seminal rap group Public Enemy, for those who
    don’t know.) The crowd sat down quickly, just so they could give him
    a standing ovation. Which he quickly patted away, and then sat on the
    black leather couch on stage discuss, with a local radio dj, his life
    and career and car (a vintage ’95 that his daughter hates).

    As
    this is a review, I suppose I should to some extent critique Chuck D’s
    performance. If he’d been rapping, I would say that he ‘rocked the
    crowd.’ But as his portion of the night was limited to discourse,
    all I can really say is that he was incredibly engaging, and enthusiastic.
    ("This is better than anything on TV," he kept saying, as much observer
    as participant.)

    "What
    I always tried to do on tour," he said "was learn something about
    the places I was playing. And not just before the show — it didn’t
    stop there. I mean really talking with the people. So many rappers get
    bummed out when they have to go places. They’ll say something like,
    ‘Aw man, I have to play this show in Topeka, Kansas.’ And that’s
    the wrong attitude. You can’t act like you’re better than your fans.
    People in Topeka know damn well they’re in Topeka. And they don’t
    care you’re from New York, they just want you to put on a damn good
    show."

    Living
    up to his credo, Mr. D made the evening incredibly personal, seasoning
    his speech with Minnesota sports references. (On the current NBA playoffs:
    "You guys should have no sympathy for the LA Lakers. They left you
    a long-ass time ago." [They were originally the Minneapolis Lakers,
    way back when.]) There were no notecards, or even any stuttering;
    meaning, there was no feeling that Chuck D. was trying to pander. His
    tone the entire night was genuine. At intermission he got off the couch,
    and sat with his legs hanging off the lip of the stage, signing autographs
    and posing for pictures.

    After
    the break, Slug, of Atmosphere, came onstage and played an acoustic
    set from his new album, If Life Gives You Lemons, Paint That Shit
    Gold
    , which comes out this week. (For the uninitiated, Slug basically
    has hero status in Minneapolis.) His performance was basically ‘Slug
    Unplugged.’ I’ve seen him concert probably ten or so times, maybe
    more, and this is the first time I’ve ever heard him sing. His choruses
    consisted of melodic scat, and Slug, a bit surprisingly, nailed them.

    It
    was also the first time I’ve seen him with a little bit of stage fright.
    A notorious egomaniac (sorry, sir), there was a catch in his voice to
    whole night, as when a 7th grade boy calls the girl he has
    a crush on for the first time, and ends up having to talk to her parents.
    In fact, Brother Ali was the same way. It seems the presence of a pioneer
    like Chuck D injected a bit of humility into the rappers who brag so
    often of sleeping with your girlfriend.

    And maybe because of this timidity, Slug’s performance suffered a
    little. His posture was slouched (he was sitting down, which is unusual),
    his hand gestures were nervous. Strange, but he sounded best when he
    was humming-or-whatever the choruses, as opposed to rapping, which on
    any other night would be his strength. (Maybe it had nothing to do with
    Chuck D. Maybe it’s because this was on the first night of the Jewish
    holiday Passover, which asks, "Why is this night different from all
    other nights?" The answer this evening being, ego gave way to introspection.)

    Another
    discussion session with Chuck D and Slug ensued, equally entertaining
    as the first. What may sum it up best is to say that Chuck D, front
    man of Public Enemy, political activist, dour Knicks fan, at several
    moments of the show, leaned back and giggled.

    5 stars*****

  • When Life Gives You Lemons, You Paint That Shit Gold

    first published on realbuzz.com

    It’s hard to believe that
    this is the same group that released Overcast a decade ago. Back
    then they were a minimalist trio, with pared-down beats that, because
    of their easily discarded rhythms, put emphasis on the lyricism of the
    their lead MC, Slug. (Quickly thereafter, Spawn, their other MC, left
    the group.) On When Life Gives You Lemons, You Paint That Shit Gold,
    Atmosphere’s very design seems to have flipped.

    Ant,
    their producer, has come a long, long way from his barebones snare drum
    tic-tic-boom beats that underscored that first full release. On every
    ensuing album he’s become progressively more complex, and here we
    find some downright delightful, surprising rhythms. The tracks are varied,
    from the perhaps-slightly-over-produced "Can’t Break," to the
    guitar-only "Guarantees." But Ant’s at his best mid-track, where
    sometimes he will freshen up a song, for just a measure or two, with
    a brand new riff seemingly from out of nowhere.

    Slug,
    meanwhile, has gotten much more simple. You won’t find any of the
    lyrical ingenuity like the "Multiples Reprise" on Overcast,
    where he went through and danced with every letter of the alphabet.
    It’s still rap, and so it still rhymes, but the lyrics are much more
    naked than anything Slug’s put out before. As rappers age, the ones
    that stay in the game seem to place less emphasis on wordplay, and work
    harder to come up with narratives. Ghostface Killah and Jay-Z are just
    a couple artists that come to mind, who have undergone this type of
    metamorphosis. It’s an attempt at candidness, at honesty, it seems.
    Not to say Slug’s ever been gimmicky – or more so than any other
    rapper – but this is kind of like taking away the smoke and mirrors,
    and yet there’s still a magical quality.

    Their
    talents converge on "Yesterday," a meditation on Slug’s deceased
    father. Musically, it’s a deconstruction of M.O.P.’s "World Famous."
    Ant has hit those piano chords with a baseball bat, turning them into
    arpeggios that happily glide up and down the track. Probably it’s
    one of the most up-tempo songs on the album; probably it’s one of
    the most up-tempo songs Slug has ever rhymed over. Lyrically, it’s
    a welcome entry to the book of father-son relationships, as Slug laments
    the rocky past he and his father shared, and yet wishes his dad was
    still around. "But who am I joking with/There’s no way you and I
    will ever re-open it." It’s a call for reparations, though the son
    knows it’s too late. Not overly intricate or psychological, to be
    sure, but it’s honest.

    And again and again on this album, honesty plays well. Songs like "Me,"
    "The Waitress," and "Like the Rest of Us," all have a genuine
    quality about them, because they feel lived, and therefore they feel
    true.

    But
    I’m not sure his meditations on society are so convincing. There’s
    a fair amount of bemoaning the unfortunate state of the union, with
    licks about blue-collar workers and single parents. It’s ambitious,
    to be sure. It’s almost as if Slug is taking a Norman Rockwell approach
    to his work, making it his mission to analyze his city. But songs like
    "Guarantees" and "Dreamer" just don’t come as naturally to
    Atmosphere’s aesthetic.

    For
    the most part, though, Slug sticks to his trademarked brand of introspection.
    Even though they release something every one or two years, it seems
    like every album Atmosphere has put out lately is a comeback album.
    Maybe because of the sped-up cycles induced by the internet. But there
    always seems to be a lot of backlash against Atmosphere about two months
    after their CDs drop. When Life Gives You Lemons is simply another
    affirmation that Slug and Ant are still on top of their games, and even
    getting better.

  • Pandas in Prose Poems

    Employing a tactic I’m pretty sure I’ve picked up from the current presidential administration, I’ve decided to take a new approach to truth. Namely, I’m going to make it up. And make it up in such a way that justifies every decision I decide(r), and in such a way that makes me feel better about my life, and the enveloping society thereof.

    So here goes: Everyone is reading.
    And because everyone is reading, there is a high demand for poetry.
    And because there is a high demand for poetry, once a week, possibly on Mondays, but certainly not limited to Mondays, I’m going to try really hard to post a Poem Worth Reading on this blog.

    I know I know I know, this is supposed to be a blog about books, and probably shouldn’t contain any actual literature, unless it’s hyperlinked. Nevertheless, poems are great. They’re (often) short, and powerful, and sometimes they even rhyme, which makes you feel happy for reasons you probably can’t define very well. And people should read more of them. More, even, than they already are. Which is lots. Because everybody is reading. Obviously.

    Oh yeah, I’m probably not allowed to print some of these unless it’s part of a review, and the excerpted text is part of the criticism. So, this week’s Poem Worth Reading is by James Tate, from his collection The Ghost Soldiers, which came out earlier this month. The collection is really, really good. (Like, really good.) He does things with words. The pages are immaculate. The typeface is crisp. Buy it, and so on.

    And then read it. Everyone else is. There are panda bears involved. Promise. (And yes, despite the prose form, it is a poem. I’m pretty sure.)

    “Terminix”

    I sat in my study working on some problems. They are far beyond my comprehension, so I just move figures around, making columns look real neat, clipping off loose ends. I have almost hypnotized myself; in fact, I’m downright drowsy. Why I haven’t been fired I’ll never know. Everything about this job baffles and annoys me. Mr. Haggerty thinks I’m a genius, that I’m somehow beyond the everyday mundane workings of the business. I let him think that. Why not? It provides cover for my incomprehension. Kerry is Mr. Haggerty’s private secretary. She’s not supposed to talk to us. But one day I was alone with her in the office and I said, “Kerry, I don’t even know what we’re doing here. Surely you know something. Can you give me a hint?” “We’re not supposed to know, Mr. Seymour. It’s all set up so you can do your job without knowing. You’re supposed to enjoy the mystery of it. I know I do. It’s very satisfying to me at the end of the day to know I’ve helped out without knowing anything. You have so much less baggage to carry home with you,” she said. “Does it have anything to do with panda bears?” I said. “She laughed. “Not that I know of. Why do you ask?” she said. “I thought I was a very large order for bamboo plants one day and it just entered my mind that some pandas might be involved. Just grasping for straws I guess,” I said. “Frankly, I always assumed it was something more in the line of missiles,” she said. “I guess it’s best not to know. Missiles would just depress me,” I said. “I shouldn’t be talking to you, you know. I could get into an awful lot of trouble,” she said. “You’re very nice, Kerry. I promise I won’t say a word,” I said. After Mr. Haggerty came back, he came to my office. “What did you and Kerry talk about while I was gone?” he demanded. “We didn’t talk, sir,” I said. “Yes, you did. I could see it on her face. She’s no good at lying. What did you talk about?” he said. “We talked about panda bears, sir,” I said. “Panda bears? Why in the world would you talk about panda bears?” he said. “Well, I’m very fond of them and I asked her if she was, too. That’s all, sir. Very innocent, as you can see,” I said. “I’m not so sure about that. I suspect you’ve broken a code and it could cost us millions of dollars, not that you’re not worth it, but I advise you to stop snooping around if you know what’s good for yourself,” he said, and left my office. I didn’t know anything about codes or breaking codes. I took a briefcaseful of files home that night. I moved figures around, straightened out columns until slowly it was beginning to dawn on my that we were in charge of the whole world, who would die and who would live, who would move here and who would move there, who would starve and who would have plenty to eat, and which wars would be fought and who would win. I felt sick, nauseous, and I threw up. I was cold, shivering, so I crawled in bed and pulled the covers up. I fell asleep and dreamed I was a nematode eating the roots of a beautiful flower. When I woke I was late. I dressed and rushed to work without shaving or bathing. Mr. Haggerty came into my office shortly after I arrived. “Looks like you had a rough night. Out with the boys, no doubt. Well, I just wanted to straighten you out on one thing: the panda isn’t a bear at all. It’s a member of the raccoon family. Isn’t that a kicker? Oh, and I realized you didn’t crack any codes, so you’re not going to cost us any money. Our operation will go on as before, completely in the dark, run by helpless innocents, doing our good deeds for the public weal,” he said. “But I know everything,” I said. “Impossible! There is nothing to know,” he said.

  • Identity Crises… Literary Edition

    When she was in second grade, my girlfriend was informed by her teacher that E.B. White was a woman. Ostensibly, she was using the initials ‘E.B.’ to hide this fact, because books written by women, of course, didn’t sell as well as those by men.

    "No," I said, fifteen years after the fact. "You’re wrong, like usual. Or rather, your teacher was wrong, but I’m putting it on you."

    After a quick Google search, we found that E.B. (author of Charlotte’s Web, the book they were reading) was short for Elwyn Brooks, and even though that’s still somewhat androgynous, the pronoun ‘he’ was being used in all instances. And there was a picture of a man, which was fairly incriminating, smooth cheeks notwithstanding.

    "This changes everything," my very sweet, feminine girlfriend said. "But you shouldn’t have told me I was wrong. I still love you though."

    This changes everything. Why do we form such set ideas about the authors whose books we read? To the point that, if we learn an unusual fact about them, our opinions change about their work? Like when I heard Roald Dahl was an anti-Semite, or Wallace Stevens was American (I’d thought Irish – I don’t know why), or Shel Silverstein is maybe the most terrifying person ever: All of a sudden I felt I had to reexamine their stories and poems, as if these personal tidbits might unlock some secrets hidden in their texts.

    But it’s unfair of us. Especially in the realm of fiction, where the entire premise of a story is that it doesn’t have to be real. (They have to be honest, they have to be sincere, but certainly not real.) I imagine the very reason writers like J.D. Salinger become reclusive is so that their biographies don’t get intertwined with their work. Still, I’ll re-read Catcher in the Rye or Franny and Zooey and think to myself, ‘This was written by a man who totally took himself away from society. What does that mean?’ And I suspect that thinking about this gives the narrators of these books, in my head, certain desolate, lonely voices that may not have been intended. That is to say, we mar fiction by involving its authors in their work.

    In the last year or two, the already-ailing literary world has been getting a ton of bad publicity due to some identity fraud. The most notorious example, of course, is James Frey’s admission that he exaggerated some facts in his Oprah-loved memoir, A Million Little Pieces. More recently, Margaret Jones confessed that she wasn’t actually a half-Native American raised by a black family in LA, as she posited in her memoir, Love and Consequences; and Misha Defonseca, author of the Holocaust memoir Misha, admitted she wasn’t raised by wolves in the forests of Europe during the war. (Is this new news? No — this isn’t new news.)

    Memoirs are supposed to be true, and these writers deserved to get called out. Apparently Mr. Frey was considering publishing his as fiction…and then didn’t. My theory? It’s because he can’t write a sentence. An excerpt? An excerpt:

    "I see my attendant friend and I raise a hand.
    Are you okay?
    No.
    What’s wrong?
    I can’t really walk.
    If you can make it to the door I can get you a chair.
    How far is the door?
    Not far.
    I stand. I wobble. I sit back down. I stare at the floor and take a deep breath."

    If we all go back to late high school/early college and take out our differential calculus text books, and decide to apply mathematic principles to literature, one might say that Frey’s prose is a derivative of Cormac McCarthy’s prose (aptly ridiculed here), which is a derivative of Hemingway’s prose, which is sometimes perfect but still sparse.
    Hem’s answer to what might be the best intellectual training for the would-be writer, taken from his interview with The Paris Review:
    "Let’s say he should go out and hang himself because he finds that writing well is impossibly difficult. Then he should be cut down without mercy and forced by his own self to write as well as he can for the rest of his life. At least he will have the story of the hanging to commence with."

    Frey had a good story (in minor need of embellishment, I guess), but not a lot more. Still, in the current climate of the literary industry, if you’ve got a good story, and it’s mostly true, it can still sell well in spite of shoddy craftsmanship.

    Rachel Donadio puts it well in Papercuts.

    The real damage, though, has been inflicted upon the fiction industry. Take a look at JT Leroy. Among other books, he wrote a short story collection entitled The Heart is Deceitful Above All Things (2001). It was met with ridiculous amounts of praise, and deserved every blurb. Then, in 2006, it was revealed that JT Leroy didn’t exist — he was actually an alternate personality for one Laura Albert, a middle-aged woman in California. (‘Alternate personality’ meaning, this was no mere pseudonym. Check this out.)

    Unqualified rage ensued. Pretty soon thereafter, the likes of Ian McEwan (Saturday, Atonement) was getting harangued for not citing his sources in his novels. Even though he did cite them.

    The point being, Leroy/Albert’s writings were published as fiction, which gives the author, in my view, the liberty to slap whatever they want to inside – or outside – a book’s covers. Albert never claimed the writings were autobiographical, rather it was assumed. And to make something imagined so personal that people believe it’s real, well that’s just good writing. (I’m not going to get into the battle over film rights, which does incriminate Albert just a little bit…or a lot.) Really, though, this is no different than Mary Ann Evans writing as George Eliot, or Amandine Dupin writing as George Sand…or E.B. White the woman writing as E.B. White the man.

  • No One Is Reading, and Our Libraries Are Closing

    Creative Commons photo by Zachary Korb

    A couple weeks ago, a very quiet takeover of Downtown Minneapolis was staged. Thousands of librarians from around the nation — purse-lipped and padded-soled — convened for their annual convention. (Were it not for the laminated PLA badges that hung on yarn around their necks, they would have looked like any non-Target-employed resident of the city — that is, poorly but warmly dressed, and vaguely literary.)

    During their three-day conference, they would discuss new database software, innovative shelving systems, and learn how to market their respective branches. "It used to be that a library was a library and that was that. People would just show up," said Sylvia Schulman, a librarian from Connecticut. "Now you have to advertise."

    So it goes. The AP announced last August the results of a poll that showed 27% of their respondents hadn’t read a single book in the previous year. A 2004 poll conducted by the National Endowment for the Arts found that 43% of Americans hadn’t read a book in the twelve months prior to the survey. You can read Ursula K Le Guin’s somewhat optimistic analysis of these data here.

    So wouldn’t one expect libraries to be ailing a bit, too? Apparently they’re not. Over dinner at The News Room, Helen Crosson, director of the Cold Spring Harbor Library in Long Island, boasted of one thousand new cardholders in her district over the last year. One of her dining partners, a librarian from Queens, spoke of how they were continually trying to build more libraries; currently they have sixty facilities to accommodate over two million people, which just isn’t enough. "We’re a minority-heavy area," she said, "and libraries act as a real hub for those communities. They’re a place where you can get on the internet for free, and you have unlimited access to pretty much any book you need if you’re trying to learn English." (She sipped from her drink, put it down and said, "Everyone in this restaurant is so white." Which was <sigh> true.)

    When quoted the statistics from the NEA and AP surveys, Ms. Schulman from Connecticut shook her head and said, "I don’t know. You’d be surprised" — and then conceded that she worked in an affluent zone with many residents predisposed to reading.

    I guess the question is, why are the Minneapolis libraries ailing so? Here we have testimonies from employees of both upper-middle-class/suburban and lower-middle-class/inner-city libraries that say their facilities are doing fine, if not thriving. Meanwhile, according to this article published on MPR’s website in 2007, the Minneapolis Public Library had "cut one third of its staff, sharply reduced library hours, and closed three neighborhood branches." (Since then, with the merger of the Minneapolis Public Library and Hennepin County Library, those three branches have re-opened…but still.) Are we just not advertising enough? Are we too white? (Minneapolis as a whole, I would argue, is not quite inner-city in the way of Queens, not quite white-collar in the way of New Haven. I’m reminded of Barack Obama feeling wrongly accused of being not white enough and not black enough. No wonder he got two-thirds of our caucus delegates. This is a long, unnecessary parenthetical.)

    Even with the opening of the new Minneapolis Central Library on Nicollet Mall last year, things are a bit lackluster — I’ve heard more about its architecture than its community benefits. Taking a quick glance at hours of operation is a little disheartening too. At first, it seems normal not to have the Walker or the MCL open on Sundays. But if you think about the foot traffic in Uptown and Downtown on the weekends, it seems Sundays should be one of the higher-traffic days of the week. On two of the five days it’s open, the Walker Library, on the corner of Hennepin and Lagoon, one of the busiest intersections in the city, doesn’t open until noon. To say nothing of Osseo’s library, which is open a grand total of eighteen hours a week.

    If there were a decrease in demand it would be one thing, but according to this Star Tribune report our check-out rates are more than 2.5 times the national average. So either those librarians I talked to were lying through their teeth (and pursed lips, yes, haha, it was funny the first time, too), or really there’s just not enough money to support what has been one of society’s strongest infrastructures since fires, and then campfires, were invented.

    Finally, here is one of the lamest photo tours of the skyway ever to have been compiled.

     

  • Walk It Off

    first published at www.realbuzz.com

    Tapes ‘n Tapes
    Walk It Off

    As disgruntled as Tapes ‘n Tapes
    may try to sound — stretching their voices, writing somber lyrics,
    going heavy on guitars — the songs on Walk It Off, their second
    full-length album, easily remain within the realm of pop music. This is
    a good thing, I think. And, because of their geography, it was
    unavoidable all along. It seems Tapes ‘n Tapes is the latest in the
    line of music acts from Minnesota (Soul Asylum, then Semisonic, then
    Mason Jennings) to sound happy and gain popularity, despite
    themselves.

    And so, the quartet went on to infiltrate the blogosphere, garnering
    the respect of those whose opinions are Truth to hipsters everywhere.
    They even got a mention on MTV’s Human Giant show, which is something
    of a mainstream cult phenomenon (no longer an oxymoron). The rest is
    what’s happening right now.

    The big difference between Walk It Off and all their previous releases
    (an album and a couple EPs) is the production. Their first CD was
    recorded, reportedly, in a fairly primitive cabin in Wisconsin, and
    indeed many of the tracks sound a bit grainy and raw. For Walk, they
    enlisted producer David Fridmann,
    who’s worked with many of the bands to which Tapes ‘n Tapes are often
    compared, such as Weezer, Phantom Planet, and Clap Your Hands Say Yeah.
    Really the sound is much cleaner, putting the correct emphases now on
    the vocals, now on the instrumentation.

    Their style can be described, I think, as ambient alternative rock.
    All the musical elements seem to hug each other — the guitars and drums
    and lyrics all sort of intertwine and mold to each other — making for
    songs that are atmospheric in their impact.

    Lead singer Josh Grier does that British garage band thing with his
    voice, making it sort of whine and yawn at the same time. This is best
    exemplified on "Conquest," a Latin-tinged track ripe with lyrics about
    solitude. "When you’re next to me, the feeling’s cold," Grier croons,
    but kind of happily. These are songs about heartbreak, sung with
    something like rapture. And when they stick to this aesthetic, as they
    do on "Le Ruse," "Headshock," and many of the songs on Walk
    It Off
    , it totally works.

    But on other tracks, they can get a bit too experimental. "Blunt" gets
    blunted when it dissolves into a pile of noisy dissonance. And "The
    Dirty Dirty," an ’80s-infused piece, ultimately tries too hard to sound
    un-like the rest of the album. I’m not saying that a band should find
    one sound they do well and just stick to it for the rest of their
    careers, but change has to come naturally, and here it seems a bit
    forced.

    For the most part, though, their songs maintain an
    upbeat-but-downtrodden character that makes for complex, satisfying
    listening. Walk it Off should help build the group’s reputation, and be
    ample fodder for the next round of blog posts.

    Tapes ‘n Tapes will be playing this evening, April 10th, at First Avenue.