Category: Blog Post

  • Gone Baby Gone: A Tragedy in 3 Acts

    It seems Dennis Lehane is our era’s Raymond Chandler, creating dark, brooding, atmospheric crime dramas. Only instead of the damp glitz of southern California, his working-class Boston — namely Dorchester — is like the Dublin of James Joyce and Jonathan Swift: a maelstrom of the poor and the poorer, people scrabbling for power, for dignity, and for an ethical stake in a world where there is no right.

    Lehane’s Mystic River, brought to film by Clint Eastwood in 2003, was set in a Boston as blue and inky as Gotham, with a slightly muddled storyline and an over-the-top performance by Sean Penn — an actor whom I typically revere. Mystic River was good. This year’s Gone Baby Gone is extraordinary. It’s a classic tragedy staged in three acts, starring superb actors such as Ed Harris, Amy Madigan, and Morgan Freeman, and adapted and directed — unbelievably — by Ben Affleck.

    That such a goofball of a performer had the talent to execute this lucid, well-paced script is a one-in-a-million surprise (though, come to think of it, Clint Eastwood had been kissing monkeys before Unforgiven). But this is a movie that seems to unfurl, organically, its story ascending in complexity: from simple crime drama to character sketch to morality play.

    The plot focuses on the disappearance of a 4-year-old girl, her slatternly cokehead of a mother, and the P.I. (Casey Affleck, Ben’s brother, and an actor with 20 times the skill) who was brought in by her aunt (Amy Madigan, who has aged with grace and fortitude) to find her. What happens from here is too delicate for me to describe: the film depends upon its viewers shifting allegiances to make its final point. But I will say that in the end, Affleck’s character must make a choice between two evils. And the agony in this is so well-drawn, so real, it leaves viewers conflicted and cowed.

    See Gone Baby Gone because it will generate discussion, because it will make you doubt your principles, and because it is a joy to immerse oneself in a story so whole. But watch, too, because the scenes of Dorchester are gritty and almost documentary-like: obese women walking with effort, former gangbangers in wheelchairs, children on bicycles, barflys with harelips, women with chipped fingernail polish and cheaply dyed hair. Yet, there is community in this. A shattered, desperate aunt; a cop from the ‘hood with a diagonal scar across his face; a heroic drug dealer who risks his business trying to save a kid.

    "You have to take a side and live with the consequences," Remy (Ed Harris) says at a pivotal point in the movie. "If you take little kids, if you beat little kids, you are not on my side." This is the core of the film, this absolute truth. And yet, questions about right and wrong remain.

  • Wolves Preseason Plus/Minus

    Courtesy of Wolves stat guru Paul Swanson, here are the plus/minus total for the Wolves this exhibition season.

    2007-08 Minnesota Timberwolves
    Preseason Plus/Minus Report (Final)
    Raw Minutes Team Opp Minutes Team Opp Net
    Player Plus/Minus On Floor Pts/48 Pts/48 On Bench Pts/48 Pts/48 Plus/Minus
    Telfair, Sebastian +25 74.3 101.4 85.2 319.7 88.4 97.9 +25.6
    Ratliff, Theo +17 102.4 102.2 94.2 291.6 86.9 96.0 +17.0
    McCants, Rashad +18 144.6 98.9 92.9 249.4 86.2 97.0 +16.8
    Jefferson, Al -6 247.1 96.5 97.7 146.9 81.4 91.8 +9.3
    Foye, Randy +3 51.7 87.3 84.5 342.3 91.4 97.2 +8.5
    Buckner, Greg 0 130.6 87.1 87.1 263.4 92.8 99.7 +6.9
    Davis, Ricky -10 208.2 95.0 97.3 185.8 86.3 93.5 +4.9
    Smith, Craig -9 161.0 93.3 96.0 233.0 89.2 95.2 +3.3
    Gomes, Ryan -13 119.0 88.7 94.0 275.0 91.8 96.2 -0.9
    Richard, Chris -12 98.8 81.6 87.5 295.2 94.0 98.2 -1.6
    Howard, Juwan -12 69.5 87.0 95.3 324.5 91.7 95.6 -4.4
    Jaric, Marko -45 169.9 95.2 107.9 224.1 87.6 86.1 -14.2
    Brewer, Corey -49 195.8 86.5 98.5 198.2 95.2 92.5 -14.7
    Blount, Mark -32 73.1 74.3 95.3 321.0 94.7 95.6 -20.1
    Green, Gerald -60 117.1 73.8 98.4 276.9 98.1 94.3 -28.4
    Edwards, John -5 6.9 48.7 83.5 387.1 91.6 95.7 -30.7

    I apologize for the density of the text–it came through in the email a lot more clearly, but I’m pretty incompetent when it comes to transferrals. Those who just want the most general sense should read it as a list of players with the best-to-worst net plus/minus totals per 48 minutes.

    But if you can parse the bunched up categories, there are interesting things to consider. For example, the Wolves really did suffer from not having Telfair and (to a lesser extent) Foye running the point, especially on defense. In the 169.9 minutes Jaric was on the court, the Wolves ceded an average of 107.9 points per 48 minutes to their opponents, versus the 85.2 points per 48 allowed during the 74.3 minutes Telfair played. And during the 51.7 minutes Foye played, the D gave up just 84.5 points per 48. Offensively, the Wolves produced 101.4 points per 48 during Telfair’s stints, 95.2 under Jaric, and 87.3 with Foye.

    Now the disclaimers. This is preseason, it is a very very small sample, the lineups were in a constant state of flux, and it all don’t mean a damn thing come the opening tip on Friday. Duly noted? Okay, back to the figures…

    Aside from John Edwards, who played less than six minutes and won’t make the traveling squad, the plus/minus goat is clearly Gerald Green, who logs a gross minus-60 in his 117.1 minutes of action (next worst is Corey Brewer’s gross minus-49 in 195.8 minutes), and has a net minus-28.4 per 48 minutes (aside from Edwards, next worst is the departed Mark Blount with a net minus-20.4 per 48 over 73.1 minutes). And Rashad McCants had a very nice preseason, finishing with a net plus 16.8 per 48 minutes, which was not only third on the team behind Telfair’s net plus 25.6 per 48 and Theo Ratliff’s net plus 17.0 per 48, but is a more substantial stat because Shaddy logged 144.6 total minutes, sixth on the team and more than both Telfair (74.3) and Theo (102.4).

    For those into tea leaves reading, Al Jefferson was far and away the leader in minutes played with 247.1, followed by the departed Ricky Davis with 208.2. Brewer was third 195.8–a sign of how much the Wolves want to develop him as well as his rare, on this team, good health–and Jaric, unfortunately for him, was 4th, making his bad defensive stats that much more damning.

    Again, it is only preseason. But there you go.

  • The Office Monkey Continues

    I’m guessing this doesn’t look like your day at work.

  • Nau: Commerce Meets Conservation

    The website for Nau, a new-fangled “green” clothing company, is winning all sorts of awards. And some of their practices — such as small-footprint stores and discounts on orders shipped directly from their warehouse — seem right. But can ecologically-aware rhetoric explain the $40 sailor’s cap?

  • Now at Schiek's: Grade A Meat

    True story.

    Back in the mid-90’s, my friend M. got married. I didn’t much like the guy — he was shifty and weird — and for his bachelor party, his "friends" took him to a club downtown, where an exotic dancer slid her way across the bar, presented her spangled G-string to accept his $100 bill, and whispered in his ear that he was the hottest guy there (I assure you, he was not). Why do I know this? Because he was so proud he told everyone, including his wife-to-be.

    A year later, M. noticed money was disappearing from their joint accounts. I mean pouring out. At first, she thought her husband had a drug habit. No. He was back at that joint where the dancer — Trudy, he knew her quite well by now — would tell him almost nightly what a studly man he was. It helped him feel confident, he explained to M. The attention he received from Trudy was good for their married sex life, he insisted.

    Now, imagine if he’d been able to say, "Honey, I’m only going for the food — this place has the most amazing steaks. Why don’t you come with me next time? You’ll love their Cobb Salad." M. and her husband might still be married today!

    Someone finally caught on to this; the day when you can get a lap dance along with a juicy sirloin has arrived. Just as Playboy runs breakthrough interviews and short stories by the likes of Joyce Carol Oates among the cheesecake photos of women touching one another in forbidden places, savvy upscale adult entertainment purveyors, such as the Penthouse in Manhattan, are incorporating haute cuisine. Locally, Schiek’s Palace Royale — easily the classiest, most upscale strip club in town — is opening a high-end restaurant called The Kitchen, where restaurant owner Mike Stone promises to serve steaks on par with Manny’s and seafood akin to that at Oceanaire.

    "Our clientele is upper middle-class and higher," Stone says. "They’re spending $15 on a single cocktail. Weekdays, we get mostly business travelers with corporate American Express cards. These are people who can afford really good food."

    For years, Schiek’s has allowed customers to bring food in from downtown restaurants, then charged $20 to $50 (depending, Vegas-style, on how "good" the customer who was asking) to heat and plate it. But when new owners took over recently — VCG Holdings, a group out of Denver that has more than 20 high-end gentlemen’s clubs throughout the U.S. — they decided it made more sense to keep, um, satisfied patrons right on-site. So they approached Stone, the man behind Stone’s Restaurant and Lounge in Stillwater, and asked him to be their Minneapolis partner.

    Stone recruited chef Stephanie Hedrick, formerly of The Independent and Pi Bar and Restaurant, to oversee the kitchen. And what a smart move! Because according to stats compiled by Schiek’s, FORTY PERCENT of their customer base is made up of couples. And not just curiosity-seekers; these are men and women who return, together, over and over again.

    Hedrick has put together a menu of upscale American classics, with a heavy focus on steak (a 42-ounce Porterhouse, Kobe beef hamburgers, thick-cut pork chops), grilled fish and seafood, hefty dinner salads, and big shareable desserts. Something for everyone.

    "Look, I have no delusions," Stone says. "We’re never going to be a great destination restaurant that happens to have adult entertainment. We’re always going to be a premier gentlemen’s club that serves dinner. But the food component has many elements, and one of them is enablement. If someone really wants to go to the strip club and check it out, they can say, ‘Hey, I read about this goofy restaurant at Schiek’s that’s supposed to have great steaks. Let’s give it a try.’"

    The Kitchen will open for business November 2. Call 612-341-0054 for a reservation.

  • Spouting Prelude to Open Thread: Wolves Best the Bucks

    The balmy weather and the impending denoument of my favorite season sent me up to Ely and then on to the Superior Hiking Trail for a little fresh air the past two days and I thus wasn’t able to make it back for the Wolves-Bucks tilt. Here are my questions and observations simply from gleaning the recap and box score from nba.com. Anyone who can respond–or if you want to chime in with second-hand observations and questions of your own–are welcome to do so. After all, we now have less than a week of wankery before everything counts and we take hoops (but hopefully not ourselves) seriously.

    * The four starters aside from Randy Foye shot 80 percent from the field (28-35)?! McCants was perfect in 8 attempts, Jefferson 9-12, Gomes 5-7 with 2-3 from trey, and Ratliff 6-8…is Milwaukee’s D really that horrible? And does this look like the sensible starting lineup on opening day even before that little shooting explosion?

    * Did anyone else read Sports Illustrated’s NBA season preview issue, especially the Timberwolves page, especially the anonymous scout’s take? Especially the part where the scout ripped Al Jefferson and gave huge ups to Gerald Green? What is a customarily fine mag like SI doing quoting obvious idiots as experts, and where was at least one editor with a smidgen of hoops knowledge to spot this bullshit and demand either a new scout, another interview, or one of those laughing heads to clue people in that the whole thing was a weird joke? Witt should throw the thing up on the bulletin board, as the mag also picked Minnesota to finish 15 out of 15 Western Conference teams. I’ll bet you Mike Bibby’s torn thumb ligament they finish ahead of Sacramento, and probably the Clips. BTW, Gerald Green had 5 turnovers in 8:53 tonight, which is probably why he was able to squeeze off only two missed shots.

    * Green was only the most egregious turnover-er. For those who saw the game, how many of Craig Smith’s seven miscues were charges or travels? And how many of those were questionable calls? And what is the world coming to when Theo Ratliff not only has as many assists as his rebounds and blocks combined, but only commits one turnovers versus his four dimes and chips in a couple of steals?

    * Is Sebastian Telfair just healthier than Randy Foye right now or more adept as spreading the ball around? Six assists, two turnovers and only six shots (three of them makes, including his only trey) in 26:54 are blessed numbers for Telfair. Foye played ten fewer minutes, had as many missed FGA and personal fouls, doled out one assist and looks inert, box score-wise? True?

    * I know he was a DNP, but is Antoine Walker out of shape? In street clothes or his uni? Smiling or sourpuss?

    * Was the Wolves winning by 21 enough to overcome a preseason basketball game featuring 57 turnovers between the two teams? And was it a coincidence that every one of the four Wolves DNPs were at least 30 years old, or are we saying goodbye to a couple of them soon?

  • Rectangle Receipt

    Good news! The locally owned and operated Rectangle Designs just launched its online store. Check it out if you care to purchase T-shirts, dresses, and totes in flora-themed prints. This is the one that I purchased recently. The picture at left doesn’t exactly do the shirt justice (the problem with these longer tees is that you’ve got to pair them with fitted, flat-front pants – thus the proliferation of leggings), but it is quite flattering in real life. Also, it’s the only shirt stitched by Sarah Nassif, the brains behind these Rectangle operations. All the others are printed on American Apparel garments, which run quite small, if you ask me.

  • Fairytales: Who gives a damn?

    Thanks to Jezebel for steering me toward this gem: Wherein Josephine Cox, the 64-year-old British author of Atonement (among other things), wonders whether she harmed a generation of young women by perpetuating the myth of malehood. To which I respond: Hell, yes, you did! Although, for me, my notion of prince charming was shaped more by the movies than books. In fact, just last night, I asked the boyfriend (hunky, bluecollar, and a filthy mouth to boot) to fulfill one of my fantasies by pretending to be Humphrey Bogart. Anyhoo …

    Unlike Cox, I think the problem lies more in “finishing” than it does in looks. All our lives, women have been fielding messages, subtle or not so much, about social climbing via our mates (to marry a doctor!). Just last week I asked a girlfriend (mid 30s, attractive, climbing the corporate ladder at a global insurance company), about her “type.” Her response was that she is looking for a man who is SMARTER than she is. To which I responded: But there aren’t very many PEOPLE who are smarter than you. You’re pretty fuckin smart. And accomplished. So, here is what I think: As women become more and more fabulous (and compensated, educated, etc.) we’ve got to make peace with “dating down.” Of course, this shatters any hopes we might have about being devoted, stay-at-home mothers one day. With any luck, however, our ineloquent, uneducated, underemployed partners will at least help with the dishes.

    As for the teeth that Cox refers to in her piece: I suspect that they, too, were seen as a reflection of socioeconomic status – just another clue that this guy is a plebe.

  • "War of the Worlds" at the Fitz: Fear Factor

    It was purely coincidental. I got an e-mail as I was surfing through cable coverage of the California wildfires and caught … Fox News … asking the rhetorical and self-serving question: Might “terrorism” be behind the multiple infernos?

    They had no evidence of course. No more reason to shout “terrorism!?” than I do for that flat tire I had the other morning. But when you’re in the fear business like Fox News is, when promoting fear is a fundamental factor of your business plan, you never want to miss a chance to goose your coverage just a wee bit, on the off chance that tinder dry conditions, 70 mph winds and the presence of 19 million people living in a desert environment — i.e. “reality” — isn’t scary enough.

    Keith Olbermann took his shot at Fox News’ cynicism here.

    Anyway, as I’m watching this I get an e-mail from the publicist for WNYC’s “Radio Lab Live!” promoting tomorrow’s show sat the Fitzgerald in St. Paul, titled, “Decoding the ‘War of the Worlds’.” Prior to reading the attached copy all I knew was that NPR science correspondent Robert Krulwich, who I always enjoy, was going to be doing something with the classic Orson Welles’ Mercury Theater Martian invasion broadcast that spooked a chunk of the population back in 1938.

    As I read through the copy I came across this line, “[Producer Jad] Abumrad and Krulwich will hear from eyewitnesses, scientists, and master storytellers to investigate the nature of belief and skepticism, uncovering the neurological differences between those who believed and those who did not.

    Bingo. If you’re in the business of following the media, you’re also in the business of trying to understand why X% of the population appears to have such stunted abilities for critical thinking and why they are so damned susceptible to fakery and bullshit.

    I arranged an interview with producer Abumrad and caught him just before his lunch was about to arrive Thursday afternoon.

    He said that that “neurological” separation business was what intrigued him most about this particular episode. (Abumrad and Krulwich began by producing five “Radio Lab” episodes a year, now distributed through 170 public radio affiliates, but “we’re now ramping up to do ten.”)

    Abumrad said a Princeton scientist, (“War of the Worlds” was set in New Jersey), did a survey immediately after the hysteria died down, looking to see what characteristics defined those who believed and those who properly sorted through the available clues and accepted it as fiction. The survey asked questions testing respondents’ levels of insecurity, phobias, their church-going tendencies and levels of personal confidence.

    What the scientist did and didn’t find out is part of Krulwich and Abumrad’s production, so I won’t ruin anyone’s enjoyment. (Tickets are still available. 8 p.m. Saturday. Only $15. mpr.org/events.)

    I had never heard that re-stagings of Welles’ broadcast — years later — had inspired similar hysteria. Abumrad says a 1949 Spanish language re-staging – in Ecuador — ended with 15 people dead. (Most after a mob, angry at being duped by the hoax, attacked and torched a radio station.)

    “There are so many factors to examine in why some people accept or default to what is called ‘magical thinking’,” said Abumrad. “There was an interesting study out of Israel which looked at the effect the stress of the Scud missile attacks during the first Gulf War had on some people. Frankly, after you look at these studies the question you start asking yourself is, ‘Why didn’t everyone believe?’”

    The only semi-concrete percentage of the morbidly credulous, as I like to think of them, is the Princeton study’s estimate that 12 million people heard the Welles’ broadcast live and somewhere around a million “ran out of town screaming”, as Abumrad puts it, with a little comic hyperbole. That’s not great science, but a little over 8% is roughly the combined audience share for cable news these days.

    I didn’t push Abumrad on my Fox News obsession, but he freely offered that TV news in general operates on a fear format to hold and build audiences, and a shrewd impresario like Orson Welles, (already writing the script for “Citizen Kane”), certainly understood that “fear works”.

    Abumrad and Krulwich’s “Radio Lab” 90-minute show will take audiences through the psychology, historical context and showmanship of the Welles broadcast. There will be a Q & A. And a podcast will be up, “in December or January”.

    In another related bit of coincidence, the news this morning includes this sadly surprise-free survey of Americans’ belief in haunted houses, ghosts and assorted bogeymen. (Note that more liberals than conservatives claim to have seen a ghost. Maybe the Ghost of Critical Thinking.)

  • The Not-So-Friendly Skies

    The subhead on this looks like it was written by someone’s 8-year-old. But as someone who was on standby yesterday for something like 95 hours. . . .I couldn’t help but read.