Category: Blog Post

  • Gone to the Gowns

    If there was one resolution made during last night’s Academy Awards viewing, it was this: I resolve to go see The Queen. I missed it, thinking it looked tearfully boring at the time of its release. Plus, I generally try to avoid biopics–unless, that is, they have something to do with Truman Capote. But in an evening wrought with political handouts and unflattering eveningwear, Helen Mirren was the class-act standout. For one, she wore her dress, by Christian Lacroix, better than anyone else wore theirs–kudos to her to her for daring to wear something so low cut. And at her age!!

    (Here’s my parenthetic thoughts on last night’s dresses: Penelope Cruz’s Versace was the best dress, in my humble opinion. I also liked Nicole Kidman’s red Balenciaga number with the big shoulder bow, although her plasticized forehead did nothing for the overall look. Cameron Diaz’s white, origami-inspired Valentino was also nice; this is something I’d actually want to wear! But aside from that, I’m not diggin’ the futuristic metallics, which can make even a starlet look paunchy. Jennifer Hudson, I love you ‘n all, but get rid of that Oscar de la Renta rag–and fast!!)

    In any case, for those, like me, who still haven’t seen The Queen, it’s playing at The Heights this evening through Thursday.

  • Conversations Real and Imagined: Scorsese's Acceptance Speech

    At the mention of his name, and with a look of profound relief and that usual squirrel-spark in his eyes, Martin Scorsese nods to himself, rises from his chair and makes his way to the stage. Steven Spielberg, George Lucas, Francis Ford Coppola and that tall brunette, whose presence speaks of sold souls, waits to hand Martin his Oscar. Hugs are exchanged. Martin admires the little gold fellow. He steps to the mike, and begins.

    Thank you, thank you everybody. Academy members, Steven, Francis, George, boy, this is an honor, thank you so much. I have so many people to thank, I barely know where to begin.

    I guess I’ll begin by offering my gratitude to Paul Greengrass, Alfonso Cuaron, Pedro Almodovar, Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck, Guillermo del Toro, and any other director this year who made powerful and original films, much better than my own. It feels strange being up here, looking down at these directors, remembering when I was beaten by films like Rocky and Ordinary People and Dances With Wolves, a trio of perhaps the most embarrassing Oscar wins in its admittedly weak history. I know what it feels like, boys, to think about the little masterpiece you made and watch that big-budget, heavily-marketed, lugubrious film pass you by. Or the award for the guy who gets it just because he’s paid his dues.

    See, I paid my dues. I know The Departed is far from my best, ignores so many of the things that made my other films great, and is such a bald-faced attempt at winning the little gold man that it’s nearly embarrassing. But it worked. Now I can move on and make the movies you want me to make.

    See, for the longest time I did exactly what I wanted to do, and look at my success–money, popularity, films that are not only acclaimed by critics but the public as well. Good god, you’d be surprised how many people will see me on the streets and go, “You lookin’ at me?” or “You think I’m funny? Funny how? Funny like a clown?” or even that guy at the deli who calls himself Rupert Pupkin, claims that he even had his name changed legally. Well that’s great. It’s wonderful. People know me, they love me. But my best work–just like the best work of the directors I just thanked–didn’t get me one of these.

    Now you may ask yourself: why the heck do I care if I get an Oscar, when so many great directors never won the gold? Good question. In fact, a friend of mine–he’s a sommelier at this great little restaurant in wine country–pointed out how similar my career was to Hitchcock’s. Critical and popular. Thrillers that meant more, so much more. Old Hitch’s immortal, just as I will be regardless of whether I ever win one of these. Well, my friend’s right. I don’t know what to say except that these little gold statues are an addiction, I think. I don’t know.

    A girl no longer in my employ also pointed out that, for a man who directed the life of the Dalai Lama, I sure seem to have jettisoned my Buddhist belief in rejecting attachment. Again, I have to say she’s right.

    The Oscars are a funny thing, aren’t they? I mean, so many people watch them, and tomorrow the sales for The Departed are going to skyrocket. And that’s great. If you’re going to make it in Hollywood, really you have to sell your soul at least a little bit, and if you want one of these, you have to sell your soul a lot. The statue is a way of showing, to a world of people who might want to live a good and decent life, the sacrifices we make when we want to give you Taxi Driver or GoodFellas. I mean, I try to have it both ways, making those little PBS movies about Dylan and the Blues, but really I can’t. I had to hurt or kill a very important part of myself to win an Academy Award, and I did it because… well, I’m still not sure. Right now I’m just giddy to be up here, spilling my guts.

    The thing that scares me is this: that same woman who wondered about my Buddhist beliefs also wondered, once I’ve given myself over to making the kind of movies that will win me an Oscar, if I can ever go back. If I can ever be edgy again. Pure. Or if I’m stuck casting guys like DiCaprio and Nicholson, instead of talented, hungry newcomers. If I’ll be able to make the cinema charged with electricity, the way guys like Cuaron and Lynch and Tarantino still do. Guys who don’t give a shit about Oscars.

    The answer is that I don’t know.

    Well, at least I’ve got my Oscar. That’s out of the way. Francis, you’ve got yours. Stephen, you’ve got yours. Hmm. But I remember, Francis, looking at the your Godfather statuettes, behind that thick glass at your vineyard. I was surprised: yours were almost black. They tarnish so easily, don’t they?

  • Less Hannity. More Lewis.

    To the surprise of no one who can read a ratings book, my former employers at KTLK have at long last spared Twin Cities radio listeners a third hour of Sean Hannity. The downside of course is that that same audience will get a third hour of Jason Lewis. … Oh, come on. That’s a joke.

    As has been reported previously, based on the most recent Arbitron ratings, Clear Channel’s expensive, heavily promoted experiment with FM talk in the Twin Cities has not been going well. Explanations for the station’s brutal under-performance all fall under the heading of, “Your guess is as good as mine.”

    The Top Three: (1). On Day One the idiots put Lambert on the air. (2). The underlying psychology of right-wing talk is heavily dependent on associations with a “winning team”. Team Conservative has badly screwed the pooch over the past six years, and as a consequence fewer and fewer listeners are eager for its’ company. (3). The KTLK line-up was monotonous. The same talking points at the same pitch hour after hour.

    The “Hannity factor” plays big in that last one. No one cares if I call Hannity a dim bulb. But, to put it kindly, the guy brings nothing new to the table. Ever. Worse, he really is a performer who appears to have no concern at all for the accuracy of his “information”. Nevertheless, Clear Channel and KTLK were stuck with him via his syndication deal. (They made Hannity and Hannity’s people big promises to run him both live and at full length when they yanked him away from KSTP-AM.)

    Like most businesses radio runs on leverage, so the assumption is that Hannity’s godawful performance meant leverage slipped from him to KTLK’s management, and in turn they felt brave enough to screw him.

    It is known that Lewis has been campaigning for that third hour, the 4 to 5 p.m. slot — a warm-up before prime-time drive-time. Now, beginning March 5, he has it.

  • Driving

    yellowstone river-2.jpg

    I’m got the car loaded with music, my dog, and blankets, and am headed west into the teeth of a blizzard. I’m preparing to be erased by the endless range and big sky. Wish me luck. I’ll be back in a week, and if I figure out how to use the technology I might post from the road.

    If you feel like it, send me some poems, stories, or reading suggestions while I’m gone. I’m in a serious inspiration drought.

    Please be well.

  • How Theater, Music, and a Little Love Toppled the Empire

    livesofothers1.gif

    Das Leben der Anderen (The Lives of Others)
    , 2006. Written and Directed by Florian Hanckel von Donnersmarck. Starring Ulrich Muhe, Sebastian Koch, Christa-Maria Sieland, Ulrich Tukur, Thomas Thieme, Hans-Uew Bauer, and Volkmar Kleinert.

    Now showing exclusively at the Uptown Theatre.

    Legend has it that Lenin, upon encountering Beethoven’s Appassionata Sonata, claimed that he could not bear to hear it anymore, for it made him want to stroke the heads of men… as opposed to smashing them in, which is what he felt he needed to do to get his revolution off the ground. Filmmaker Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck wondered to himself, “Was it possible to construct a situation in whcih Lenin would be forced to listen to the Appasionata?” In the Lives of Others a man, a functionary who has submerged all of his humanity in pursuit of a perfect state, is forced to listen. And he becomes real.

    The Lives of Others begins in an interrogation room, with a poor man accused of… something. We are never sure what, and what doesn’t matter. What are sure of, however, is that this is a paranoid country, East Germany, and the Stasi, the secret police of said country, is powerful. The man is shoved into a chair, told to place his hands beneath his thighs, and the questioning begins.

    This guy has no chance, as the state has men like Gerd Weisler (the great Ulrich Muhe) working diligently for them. This opening is brilliant–told in flashback, as Weisler is teaching other young hopefuls the art of wrecking the spirit of their countrymen. Weisler is perfect at his job, betraying only the slightest pride in a job well done, making notes to watch the student who wonders about the morality of some of his techniques. Weisler is almost a machine–he has the patience of a metronome ticking away through a long evening. He will do what it takes to make his prisoners confess, never questioning their guilt. For if they are in the chair in front of him, there can be no question.

    His former classmate and now superior, the merrily ambitious Grubitz (Ulrich Tukur), asks his pal Weisler to come to a night of theater. Grubitz is interested in his friend’s opinion of the playwright, Georg Dreyman (Sebastien Koch). Dreyman is the darling of the state, and a man who truly believes in the cause of the GDP. It’s not enough–we know, deep down, that it is never enough. “I would watch him,” Weisler says. And so the man too good to be spied up is spied upon.

    Of course, it is Weisler who will spy on Dreyman, and to the snoop’s surprise, he will begin to fall in love. Not with Dreyman’s lover, the actress Christa-Maria (Martina Gedek), not with Georg, but with the ideas of love and art and honesty. By listening to the lives of others, Weisler comes to understand that they are quite alike.

    Weisler’s fall, if you can call it that, begins slowly. He is punctual and not to be undone by emotion. But as he listens, he is forced to hear the sounds of two people truly in love, people in love with their plays, with Bertolt Brecht, with their friends, and, in the case of Georg, in love with the idea of the state. This is the film’s great conceit: Weisler and Georg are two halves of the same coin–passionate for what they do, ideal citizens, taking to heart what the country is supposed to mean–brotherhood and all its trimmings. Weisler comes to understand that they are more alike, in fact, than his superiors, one of whom is fucking Christa-Maria because he knows a secret that would get her kicked off the stage forever–she is a drug user. Weisler’s soon discovers, too, that his friend is simply a pencil-pushing beaurocrat who only wants to move up in the world–he has no qualms ruining the life of a young man simply telling a joke, or ignoring warnings of sabotage if it will hurt his career. Weisler comes to see that it is his subjects who are true to the state, not the party functionaries.

    Slowly we come to care for this Weisler, who steals a copy of Brecht, who listens to the music emanating from the apartment below, and who eavesdrops on their lovemaking not as a peeping tom in search of a cheap thrill, but as a poet in search of inspiration, hoping to find love in his own dark heart.

    So Weisler intervenes, hiding information and trying to protect his charges, which leads to disastrous results. The Lives of Others is a remarkable film, for its tension, which locks upon you like a vice, forcing you at times to root for the wrong people (such as when Weisler has to bug Georg’s building), and its nearly unbearable emotional charge. The film is funny in spots, humane, its plot, worthy of Hitchcock, never getting in the way of rich character development. We come to know every one of these people, and even the tiniest character is shown ground up by the state–and later freed, when the wall comes down.

    The jokes in the film offer welcome relief of an almost unbearable tension, but also drive home what this whole world is about, and how disastrous and dehumanizing it was. At one point, Weisler elicits the services of a prositute who, in one of the films many damning jokes, is as much on a schedule as he is in his spy work. Life in the GDP is too comparmentalized to allow for love.

    The Lives of Others has two endings. The first is expected, not predictable, but we know good things will not happen. And then the director surprises us, and time moves on, the wall comes down, and there is a brief moment of justice. After years of paranoia, of devouring souls and wrecking lives, the state is broken, and the individual is allowed to flourish. Left nearly broken, our hero, Wiesler, will grab at the small taste of love, poetry, and freedom.

    livesofothers2.gif

  • Cinnalove

    roll2.JPG

    It’s my Megan’s day to bring breakfast treats for her 1st hour English class. Is there something wrong with me that I can’t settle for the donuts at SuperAmerica? Krispy Kremes are too predictable, and over-rated besides, and bringing cereal and milk would feel like a sad surrender.

    Of course we hauled our keesters to Isles Bun & Coffee this morning for what is arguably the greatest breakfast treat in the known universe: the Isles cinnamon bun. Roughly the size of a dodge ball, the warm buns are all doughy-love on the inside and flaky buttery cinna-swirl on the outside. Slathered with gooey white icing, it is the perfect sweet bomb for a class of high-school juniors.

    It might have been cheaper to buy 30 pastries from Lunds, and it definitely would have been easier not driving all the way to Uptown and back by 7:30am. But how many of those stuck-in-the-suburbs kids have ever seen an Isles bun? How many even understand the wonders that exist beyond Toaster Struedel? When I moved 20+ minutes out of the city, I adopted a mantra: good food is always worth the drive.

    I think of it as community service, expanding young minds and palates through artful cinnamon.

  • Good Job. Now Tell Us Who Advises Cheney.

    Interesting piece today from former Rake writer Al Eisele on The Huffington Post.

    He’s entirely correct in citing another terrific piece of work by the upper echelon of mainstream journalism. But do keep on reading, as Eisele’s readers rip HIM for giving the MSM a nano-second’s break from the hellstorm over their far more egregious failures. Common theme: A cut-’em-a-new-a**hole story on something like the treatment of returning vets should NOT feel like an exception that proves the rule.

    And do check out this link to a chat between PBS’ “Frontline’s”: Lowell Bergman and Steve Talbott on issues related to their excellent, four-part … MSM … series, “News War”. Part 3 premieres next Tuesday.

  • Based on Nothing

    This is what I’m doing tonight. And tomorrow, since I’m taking the day off, I’ll toss off my agenda in advance: After all this time, I’m finally going to a rock ‘n’ roll show–The Alarmists (along with Melismatics and Friends Like These) at the T-Rock, just after the boyfriend and I take his grandma out to dinner.

    Other mentionables: The Spark festival at the Southern and closing weekend for that Jon Ferguson show.

  • This Weekend: Gallic Alternatives in Downtown

    theson1.gif

    Le Fils (The Son), 2002. Written and directed by the Dardenne brothers. Starring Olivier Gourmet and Morgan Marinne. Showing Friday night at 7pm.

    and for the children:

    Les Contes de la Rue Broca. Directed by Pierre Gripari. Showing Sunday afternoon at 2pm.

    Both films are being shown downtown at the Alliance Francaise de Minneapolis/St. Paul.

    Sick of the Oscars? By now we’ve had nearly a month of ‘controversies’, a month of wandering past those bright yellow Little Miss Sunshine boxes at the video store, of hearing the film pundits bark about Dreamgirls. Yeah, you could go and see The Departed or Babel if you really want to, or you could see a movie downtown. And not at Block E. No, you could visit the Alliance Francaise in the heart of the lovely warehouse district, where you can catch, this Friday, the Dardenne Brothers’ Le Fils. You could even enjoy the snow they predict will be falling, as you wander out of some fancy restaurant and walk through the romance to the Alliance. In fact, you ought to get some romantic mileage just saying “Alliance Francaise” over dinner–it just sounds sweet, doesn’t it?

    I do have to say, however, that Le Fils is not exactly an upbeat movie. But it is beautiful, a simple and yet compelling treatise on forgiveness. A week after Valentines Day, maybe you’re back to fighting and need some of that. Le Fils is the story of a broken man, Olivier, a shop teacher at a school for wayward boys, who becomes obsessed about one of his charges. That is all you will get from me, for the story unfolds patiently, and when it reveals its secrets, it is devastating.

    More importantly, though, is the Alliance’s Sunday children’s show. It appears that the AF is going to screen children’s features, aimed at the very young (under 7, please), the last Sunday of every month, at least through April. I say ‘most importantly’ because alternative children’s films are scarce. Kids have it rough: where adults can take in Norbit or highbrow fare like Volver, what do kids have? Nothing but third-rate cartoons and CGI on the big screen.

    In fact, I would argue that Le Fils would be good fare for the wayward teen. A great night out even if they aren’t wayward. But I digress…

    Frankly, I couldn’t find much on Les Contes de la Rue Broca, except that it seems to be based on a popular French storybook about North African immigrants. The film will be in French (of course) without subtitles. So it looks to be not only a great afternoon treat for your kids in French immersion classes, but a really nifty story about a side of Paris we might not have ever thought about. Which is just what you want from a kids film!

    Both features will have light refreshments (popcorn, pop, water–no wine, as this is Minneapolis, not Cannes), and a suggested donation of $5. For directions, visit the Alliance Francaise website.

  • SATELLITE RADIO? I'D SAY, "YES">

    I don’t currently subscribe to either XM or Sirius satellite radio. But there have been times I would have sold my mother to the Arabs, (to quote Woody Allen), for anything that offered relief from the unmitigated crap that qualifies as “local broadcasting” across huge swaths of the continental USA. I mean, westbound out of Minnesota you can get maybe as far as Pierre S.D. before the “charm” of the voices of colloquial America have you pounding your head on the steering wheel.

    One big reason is that “local broadcasting” in the heavily-consolidated, Clear Channel-take all, post-TeleCom Act of 1996 age means there are very few actual locals on “local radio”. Instead you get a hell of a lot of Rush Limbaugh, regional Rush Limbaugh-wannabes and syndicated Christian/bigot preachers inveighing against homosexuals and the U.N. All that and soulless, whitebread “radio-country” crap. (Would it kill these alleged country stations to play Hank Williams and Lucinda Williams? The Drive By Truckers? Come on!)

    The long-predicted announcement that XM and Sirius are planning to merge gives Congress an opportunity to right a few of the big time wrongs that followed the TeleCom ’96 Act. As Cong. Ed Markey, chairman of the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet, told the Wall Street Journal yesterday, “In light of the dramatic consolidation of radio ownership in the U.S. terrestial radio marketplace in the wake of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, I believe the merger of the only two satellite radio companies must be assessed with an eye toward ensuring that it does not have a similar deleterious effect on diversity on the dial and localism in radio coverage and reporting.”

    “Deleterious effect” Well, amen to that, Congressman. Markey is probably just blowing brave smoke, but he seems to understand the bland, monopolized and, I dare say, politicized mess that 11 years of unchecked consolidation has brought. More to the point, what with the new, Democratic-controlled Congress having oversight over approval of this proposed merger, it is possible to re-think 21st century radio.

    The trick, it seems to me is creating a legal template that assures true(r) diversity — not just different call letters for programming that all comes out of some New York or San Antonio studio. The best way, it seems to me is by finding a way to keep satellite subscriptions low-to-non-existent, and using that competition to force stagnated, ad-choked terrestial radio to clean up its act.

    One proposal worth exploring seriously is a la carte programming. As in, let me pick 20 satellite channels for a buck, or 50 for $5, or something like that, instead of insisting on $13 for everything, and see what happens. Like many of you, I’m maxed out on monthly subscription fees. But ask yourself, wouldn’t you pop for satellite radio if it only cost you the price of a couple espressos a month?

    The other is squeezing local stations onto the one big satellite system. Don’t get me started on the way Congress and the FCC never get tough with terrestial broadcasters — WHO PAY NO MONEY, EVER, FOR THEIR LICENSES. I think it’d being amusing to watch {the parent companies) of big local stations, like, say, WCCO, KSTP or KFAN, bidding for a priority spot on a satellite, if each Top 50 metro area was only going to get one, or two. (Clear Channel of course owns a fat chunk of XM).

    Since terrestial broadcasters haven’t paid Dime One for the right to print money from the public airwaves, maybe they could pay cash straight to the government kitty for spots on a bird — required of XM/Sirius as a condition of approval.

    I haven’t bought into satellite to this point because, A: I’m a cheap bastard. B: It hasn’t been portable enough, yet. (but its getting there.) C: I’ve got hundreds of CDs that’ll get me from here to there just fine, and without 30 minutes of commercials every hour, and finally, D: Some of the best hours of road-tripping I’ve ever enjoyed came with a serenade no more expensive than a sunroof open to the whistling wind.