Blog

  • Like the Lady Said

    I found Jon Zurn’s recent article on the state of the arts and opportunities for artists in this area very much on-the-mark. There are so many talented persons in the Cities that are not being shown or collected and might be if more of the public would take time for a closer look at what local artists have to offer before going off to buy art in other cities or states (or countries). I salute the efforts of those artists and galleries that have been able to keep their resolve in the face of what can often seem to be a disinterested general public. One venue that comes to mind when thinking about galleries that are dedicated to the promotion and exhibition of local artists—one that takes great risks at times by showing artists working from a wide range of stylistic idioms as well as mediums—is Flatland Gallery. Robyne Robinson has proven, during the two years Flatland has been in existence, her rock-solid commitment to both local artists and local art. The bottom line at Flatland (as with many other small galleries in the Twin Cities) has always been to bring artists to the public’s attention that might not get the opportunity otherwise. The fact that so many local galleries/owners are willing to keep going and stay open in spite of more and more collectors turning to large venues while collecting art should be loudly applauded!

    James Michael Lawrence
    Minneapolis

  • Uncle Clinton?

    Though I agree with Clinton Collins’ main point, that often blacks use the “Uncle Tom” accusation too broadly [Free the Jackson Five!, September], I think his analysis of why it occurs is too crude. Mr. Collins errs greatly by using Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas as an example of someone who was called out by blacks, unfairly, only for thinking differently than us. Our determined shunning of Thomas is more reasonable than that. Though he opposes affirmative action, he accepted the top position held by an African American solely on the basis of his race. Unlike Colin Powell, who is a Republican and supports affirmative action, Thomas is a hypocrite. No intelligent person ever argued that he was the best candidate for that job. He was too young, he had left the EEOC with warehouses of backlogged cases, and his tenure as a judge was unremarkable. Yet, he was black and right-minded, and just what the white right needed to fill the shoes of a black justice. If that isn’t selling out then nothing is. What should concern us most as African Americans is what our people do with the power bestowed upon them. Unfortunately, it’s all too common for some of us to find a source of “enlightenment” that pays us to denounce our own. There is a literary anti-nigger machine that employs countless pundits to detail why black people are wrong about everything. Former liberal David Horowitz is making a killing being a venomous one-trick pony exposing in detail our political ignorance. It’s too bad many of us are following suit: Larry Elder is paid handsomely to constantly chastise us from his vantage point, as is Denver radio host Ken Hamblin, Armstrong Williams, Alan Keyes, and the list could go on. It’s important for blacks to keep tabs on those who constantly detract from our conventional wisdom. People like Justice Thomas are black as a euphemism, but they are paid by our moneyed white opposition for their work detracting and dividing us. Is it a coincidence that most of them find greater comfort in white neighborhoods, white churches, white think tanks, and white work places? Further, what should we make of the weird universal that they all have white wives? Not that there’s anything wrong with that, but… I appreciate Mr. Collins point that we shouldn’t hate on each other as much as we do, that we shouldn’t be so quick to stifle free speech, and that it could be dangerous to carelessly participate in our character assassination. I would just ask that he explain at what point should we call a spade a spade?

    Rev. Christopher Rahelio Soleil
    Minneapolis

  • Kippers Go Down Under

    My grandfather’s grandfather invented kippers. The family tradition is that if he had not sold the patent for his method of making smoked herrings to Woodgers of Newcastle-upon-Tyne in northeastern England for 200 pounds, we might all have been rich beyond the dreams of creosote. Imagine a penny-a-fish royalty on every kipper consumed on the Flying Scotsman by an Agatha Christie hero fleeing northwards, and the ching soon starts to add up.

    Great-great grandfather cut a swathe through the 19th century. There is a daguereotype photo showing him with full set of Victorian whiskers and a long-stemmed “churchwarden” clay pipe. He served on the ship on which Napoleon was carried off to his final exile on the island of Saint Helena, he had a son called Elijah, and his wife is said to have been the first person ever to own a steam trawler.

    All of which probably explains my lifelong predilection for smoked fish. Proper kippers are not easy to get in the Twin Cities, but it is a truth which deserves a wider currency that a certain well-known chain of bagel shops will sell you a side or packet of pretty good smoked salmon for a pretty good price, and they sometimes have specials around Christmas.

    A lifelong taste for smoked fish naturally precipitates a lifelong search for good wine to go with it. The wine must, of course, be white, light enough to allow the taste of the fish to come through, strong enough in the nose to blend with the smoke, and sufficiently acid to cut into the oils which are meant to be so good for you and some say were the secret of the braininess of Jeeves, the perfect gentleman’s personal gentleman.

    Much of the pleasure of such a search comes from trying. When you set out for Ithaca, pray that the way be long, as the Greek poet puts it. But there is one spot on this quest, inexpensive and consistently pleasing, to which I find myself returning regularly. It is Rosemount Chardonnay, all the way from Australia, a fine masculine wine with a powerful flavor, consistent enough to suggest to one lady drinker the persistent charm of honeysuckle. Certainly it has nose enough for the smoky taste of kippers, and strong road-holding qualities on the palate. It is generally available for less than $10 a bottle, and there is not a headache in a hogshead of it.

    Australian wine has come a long way in the last generation. The crimes formerly committed under the label “Australian Burgundy”—once satirized as Chateau Downunder—are a thing of the distant past. Wines like Rosemount Chardonnay taste good. They have to; it is a fact that Australians drink twice as much wine per head as inhabitants of the United States. They also sell well; Rosemount is the largest selling brand of white wine in Australia.

    In England, where it has been popular for nearly 20 years, “strine wine” has a reputation for reliability. California wine-makers penetrated the British market a few years earlier than the Australians, but got off to a poor start by selling there the lesser products of that great state, notable mostly for their fancy carafes and strong aroma of burnt matches. The Aussies must have guessed they would lose money underestimating the taste of the Great British Public; theirs is wine which no one could dislike. I will back Rosemount Chardonnay against kippers and smoked salmon any time. Only those who spend Christmas Eve at Ingebretsen’s on Lake Street will be able to say if it can stand up to lutefisk.

    Oliver Nicholson is a classicist at the University of Minnesota, and former Secretary of the Wine Committee at Wolfson College, Oxford.

  • Between the Lines

    Let’s begin at the beginning, even if it’s a little obvious. The classic road movie almost always involves a road trip—that is, a journey by highway. That’s where the word “road” fits into the name, y’know. The road movie is also deeply concerned with freedom—how people die inside without it, but risk getting killed trying to get it. This is a fairly simple blueprint, to be sure, but it allows everything from the earnest social-justice drama The Grapes of Wrath (screening in the series Oct. 27) to Russ Meyer’s deliriously perverse Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill! (Oct. 19). You have to love a genre that does that.

    The road trip epic has roots in some of the world’s oldest literature—the Odyssey , the Exodus, “Gilgamesh” are all obvious precursors. Spanish picaresques like Don Quixote were episodic stories of wandering rogues, and they anticipated our latterday obsession with antiheroes. Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Finn brought that motif to the great highway of his time, the Mississippi, and nailed down the basic form that road movies would later adopt—two wayward people make an illegal flight from a corrupt society, and find emancipation (literally, in this case) on the open road.

    Social criticism is a vital element here. Contrast that with Westerns, which grow out of the American myth of manifest destiny. You know, taming and colonizing the wide-open spaces. But that’s an essentially optimistic genre. Consider the classic Western hero: the sheriff who brings peace and imposes order on the lawless frontier town. The hero of a road story, on the other hand, is often the guy the sheriff arrests. He rejects society, if it hasn’t already rejected him.

    These darker, more cynical tales flourish in the worst of times. The 1930s were especially fertile days, and the road movie evolved into its modern form then, in the midst of socialist grumblings, massive population movement, and a little thing we like to call the Great Depression. It was also when the Western’s central premise/promise failed, in a tectonic cultural shift that divided the Old West from the modern age—the rise of the national highway system. That’s the moment when, spiritually speaking, we ran out of frontier. (Until the Space Race, of course, but that’s another chapter.) By the time highways connected everything, American civilization had achieved a decisive domination over the New World wilderness. The American dream of endless expansion wasn’t endless anymore. The teeming masses yearning to breathe free, who used to just pick up and move when times got bad, were more mobile than ever, but with nowhere left to run and hide. The road movie was what happened when the desperate refugees in The Grapes of Wrath followed the tried-and-true advice to Go West and discovered, with a rude shock, that California was already full of Californians.

    We should say here, too, that there is also an inherent connection between the road movie and the coming-of-age story, with its themes of finding one’s true nature and place in life. It’s the common ground between, say, The Catcher in the Rye and Easy Rider (Oct. 28-29). And the road movie often shares film noir’s most defining aspects: the deep pessimism and paranoia, the anti-authority complex, the realistic depiction of violent crime, and the creeping sympathy for the outlaw and the derelict. The road movie is the most anarchistic of genres, embracing rebellion for its own sake.

    The Joads in The Grapes of Wrath go through five flavors of hell before they find their promised land, but they get there more or less intact. Most road-movie protagonists have a rougher time, especially at the hands of people who are jealous of their autonomy, or fear their long hair. Hippie-hating townies have murderous contempt for the Easy Rider trio simply because they exist. On the flip side, Robert Blake’s careerist cop in Electra Glide in Blue (Oct. 28-29) finds that corrupt authority is just as soul-corrosive even when you’re on the “right” side of the law. Of course, even when you know the characters are hurtling toward certain, bloody destruction, the trip is often exhilarating; it’s that whole live fast, die young thing.

    There’s an unusual subtype that pops up with surprising regularity: the pair of lovers who go hell-bent on a violent cross-country crime spree. The French, with their effete way of inventing a foreign phrase to describe every little thing, call this subgenre amour fou . It first shows up in road movies’ first wave during the 1940s in movies like Gun Crazy (Oct. 21-22), and They Live By Night (Oct. 30-31), and reaches its zenith in Arthur Penn’s 1967 masterpiece Bonnie and Clyde (Oct. 14 and 17), rocketing Faye Dunaway and Warren Beatty on a wild bender of bank robberies across the Depression-era Great Plains. Later, the amour fou incorporated psychos and serial killers with Terence Malick’s Badlands (Oct. 14 and 17), and, more recently, Kalifornia and Natural Born Killers .

    The divisive chaos around the Vietnam War fueled a renaissance for the road movie—this time typified not by Robert Mitchum’s felonious bootlegger in Thunder Road (Oct. 21-22) but by the Merry Pranksters’ acid tests and day-glo psychedelic school bus. It captured the widespread distrust of authority, and the new tribalism that flowered at Woodstock. Jack Kerouac and his countercultural heirs were big believers in the open highway as a means of rejecting the old society and creating a new one—it’s integral to Beat literature and all that followed it. That’s why the disaster-fated motorcycle trip in Easy Rider works so well in exploring how the innocent dreams of the hippies had, by 1969, gone bad. It is also the quintessential example of the form. When I say “road movie,” you think of Peter Fonda roaring down a desert highway as Steppenwolf erupts from the soundtrack. Despite its disjointed plot and 60s indulgences (like the tiresome LSD sequence) it’s probably the most incisive critique of American culture the genre’s given us since Henry Fonda, Peter’s dad, took his turn as Tom Joad.

    That second heyday faded by the end of the 1970s, though the form has never died away completely. New subspecies have developed, like offbeat send-ups such as Pee-Wee’s Big Adventure (Oct. 25-26) and Raising Arizona (Oct. 18-20), and the nightmare surrealism of David Lynch’s Lost Highway (Oct. 18-20).

    In these days when creeping authoritarianism is (allegedly) the less distasteful alternative to terrorism, and the new information culture trades the car in for the modem as a vehicle for journeying into self-discovery, the road movie is mutating again. But it will never lose its relevance. It too perfectly encapsulates that ornery American belief in the primacy of personal freedom—and that spiritual place where the rubber hits the road.

    “Road Reels” screens at Oak Street Cinema, October 11-31.

    Christopher Bahn is a contributing editor at The Rake.

  • What makes a house a home?

    When I bought a house in Prospect Park four years ago, I chose the area for the beautiful trees, stately homes, winding streets, and The Loft. Only after the papers were signed did I discover that The Loft was relocating from its long-time home in the beautiful old Pratt school building to a swanky new space on Washington Avenue under the auspices of a complete literary community center to be known as The Open Book. The slap of disappointment I felt passed pretty quickly, because, after all, it was still a great house in a lovely neighborhood, and anyway, it turned out that the materialization of a vision as ambitious as the one behind The Open Book—home also to the Minnesota Center for Book Arts and Ruminator Books—was symbolic of all the reasons this is a great town for writers.

    Minnesota is readily acknowledged as an extremely fertile environment for writing, but not so many realize that we’re also home to a healthy handful of acclaimed literary presses whose lists have garnered the attention of critics nationally, and whose freedom to take risks and publish daring work for its own merit rather than for the bottom line has attracted writers with the muscle to interest any number of New York houses. Arguably some of the best new work in the most difficult to publish genres—poetry and short fiction, as well as the novel and memoir—is finding a home (or at least a house) right here in fly-over country.

    Holy Cow, New Rivers, Graywolf, Ruminator, Milkweed, Coffee House… these are not trendy herbal teas. They’re six impressive literary presses among a growing number of Minnesota book publishers whose reputations have begun to make this a destination of significant literary interest. But the Minnesota publishing scene is not limited to the literati, either. There are over 60 publishers here, churning out everything from manuals and scientific tomes to school texts. Lerner Publishing is actually one of the largest independent scholastic publishers in the country. And our market boasts a cadre of self-helpers and some impressive liturgical presses, as well as Llewellyn Worldwide—the largest new age publisher in the world, conjuring up an average of 100 titles per year.

    “We’re the third largest center for publishing in the country,” says Brad Vogt, board member of the Minnesota Book Publishers Roundtable, an organization that’s been promoting and networking the industry for more than 30 years. “We have over 70 members in the group and some really passionate and respected people,” says Vogt. “You go to other places beyond New York and San Francisco and there’s nothing like what we have here.” Vogt recalls his own brief encounter with celebrity at a national book expo last year. “I was walking around a corner and suddenly there was this big picture of Fiona [McCrae, publisher of Graywolf]. She’s really known in the industry.” Now if you’re not on a first-name basis with Fiona and wouldn’t recognize her picture if it were on a box of Wheaties, you might have to stretch a bit to appreciate the point Vogt is making. But in a business where, unless you get chosen by Oprah, you work steadily along in relative obscurity regardless of whatever success you achieve, Vogt’s anecdote is worth something.

    Margaret McConaghay, chair of Graywolf’s board, concurs with Vogt. “We’re probably better known in Boston and New York, but among people who really know literature, our attention is international. We have lots of people writing and we get submissions from all over the world. We’re publishing an Iraqi poet this fall. We think it’s an important role to bring new voices from all over.” That philosophy, exercised at a rate of about seven books a year, makes Graywolf Press an industry powerhouse. But it doesn’t come easy.

    These local presses, like most artistic endeavors, have largely been brought to life by a solo visionary who chugged quietly—but doggedly—along for years, sniffing out talent and frequently publishing first works, nurturing authors, creating a catalog, cultivating a vision and a readership… and frequently accumulating award after award along the way.

    Milkweed Editions, a unique collaboration between artist Randy Scholes and writer Emilie Buchwald, published its first book in 1984. That same year, Allan Kornblum opened the doors of Coffee House Press. He started out with a homemade poetry magazine in the 70s, a “rite of passage that everybody did,” and turned his endeavor into Coffee House. That same year, Graywolf, which had been around since 1974 in Port Townsend, Washington, moved to the friendlier funding waters of Minneapolis. Between the three of them they represent a catalog of over 500 books. “People on the coasts know we’re here, that’s certain,” says Kornblum. “There’s a real community that’s evolved.” Fiona McCrae says, “We have a sort of critical mass together. People realize across the nation that there’s something unique here.”

    “Other presses around the country are jealous,” says Lisa Bullard, a writer who’s worked on and off for a number of local publishers for many years. “The fact that there’s more than one press gives us a forum to talk and get together, to figure out overlap and ways we can work together. Open Book grew out of that kind of talking.” Creative energy of this sort is crucial in a vocation as solitary as writing. “I come from New York, but being here is terrific,” says Kornblum. “I love having first-rate peers at Milkweed and Graywolf. I have the highest respect for Buchwald and McCrae. I really value giving them a call, exchanging info, bitching a little. It’s a pleasure being in a town with The Loft, the Center for the Book, Ruminator. It’s great to be a part of it.”

    Lisa Bullard explains the niche these publishers have carved out for themselves as similar to baseball’s “farm leagues.” New York publishers can’t take the risk on new authors, but their pragmatism leaves a void for others to experiment. This often becomes apparent at big trade shows. “New York editors would come to our booth and practically weep, saying, ‘Oh you get to do that, you get to publish real books!’” says Bullard. “These are people who love books too, but their concerns are mostly commercial. They have to rely on us to find the raw talent and take a risk. They can’t nurture someone’s career. Editors are moving constantly, and nurturing an author is not a long-term prospect anymore.”

    Even at the best small presses, the commitment to cultivate talent over time is no small task. But slowly, against the tide of chain stores, return contracts, and limited advertising budgets, rewards can eventually emerge. After 18 years of effort, Emilie Buchwald received in September the McKnight Foundation’s annual Distinguished Artist Award, which recognizes “those individuals who, individually and collectively, laid the foundation for the rich cultural life Minnesota enjoys today.” Buchwald says, “It’s quite wonderful. They do it simply to make the point that in different areas of the arts there are contributions that call attention to many art forms. This award is something that brings Milkweed into prominence, but it also shines a light on all literary publishing activity. I’m delighted to be the first in local publishing and also the first woman to receive the award.” We can surely expect similar things from the local coterie of true literati.

    On a related note, RainTaxi’s “Twin Cities Book Festival” takes place October 12 at International Market Square in Minneapolis.

    Jeannine Ouellette is the associate editor of The Rake.

  • The Fruit of Knowledge

    Forget baseball, it’s just a bunch of millionaires running around in a circle. Hot dogs are full of toxic elements. And the bald eagle, while a majestic site indeed, is actually a bit of a scavenger and bully. There is one symbol that all Americans can embrace, one icon that is known and loved by millions. It is that most democratic of fruit: I give you the apple.

    Think about it. Unlike the flag, no one is campaigning to pass legislation on whether you can burn an apple or not. In fact, setting the apple to flame may be one of the highest compliments you can pay to the luscious fruit, bringing out the sugars which meld beautifully with cinnamon. The apple is as diverse as the country itself. At last count, there were more than 7,500 varieties, and new varieties are being cross-pollinated every year. Many of us learned our first lessons in capitalism as we tried, usually in vain, to swap the apples in our lunches for something better down the table. And maybe we learned a little bit about politics, too, as we shined them and gingerly set them on the teacher’s desk.

    Where would our country be without the Big Apple? One theory is that the nickname was coined by jazz greats like Charlie Parker because Manhattan was known for having “lots of apples on the tree,” that is, lots of jumping jazz joints. Our affection for apple pie is legendary and timeless, but during the Depression, to save money and stretch ingredients, hard-pressed Americans would make it with just a bottom crust. Only more affluent families could afford apple pies with an “upper crust.” And does anybody not know how to “keep the doctor away”? The apple’s lofty place in our culture is well preserved in the language, too—from “the apple of your eye” to a certain personal computer with a cultish and loyal following.

    In a pie, sauce, or fritter, peeled or unpeeled, smothered with caramel or left fresh, crisp and clean, we all have our apple preferences. In fact, last year the average American consumed 16 pounds of fresh apples and 29 pounds of processed apples (juices, ciders, apple products, and so on). Grown in every state in the continental United States, most apple orchards are in Washington, New York, and Michigan. We rank second only to China among the top apple-producing countries of the world. Last year, our total apple production was about 230 million cartons, valued at around $1.5 billion. Of that crop, 25 percent of the total fresh-market crop was exported to countries like Mexico, Canada, Taiwan, and Indonesia.

    Like most things American, the roots of the original apple tree lie elsewhere. Some believe the apple is as old as temptation itself, owing to the story of the Garden of Eden. Most agree that the apple originated somewhere in the Caucasus region between the Black and Caspian seas, today known as Kazakhstan, where 300-year-old, 50-foot trees still bloom. This area was a well known stop on the silk trade route, and it’s likely that travelers filched wild apples and traded the seeds. Eventually, the domesticated apple evolved, and was subsequently spread through the world by the Romans. A few varieties and practices were lost with the fall of the Romans, but many more were saved, thanks to the orcharding customs of Christian monks. Further east, Muslims, too, preserved the traditions of cultivation through the tenets of Islam, which explicitly encourage botany.

    As the apple came to the New World with the settlers, new legends and traditions sprang up. The simple and good-hearted apple farmer John Chapman of Leominster, Massachusetts became famous in the 1800s for distributing apple seeds and trees to settlers in budding frontier territories like Ohio, Indiana, and beyond. The myth—and the Disney portrayal—has Johnny Appleseed roaming the sunny countryside wearing ragged clothes and, oddly, a tin pot as a hat. A true American hero.

    Whatever region you travel to in this country, you’re sure to find different varieties you’ve never seen before. The Ginger Gold, currently cultivated in Virginia, owes its existence to hurricane Camille, the 1969 storm that destroyed much of the orchard of Clyde and Ginger Harvey. Many years later, they discovered a tree grown from a seed that had been blown into the orchard from somewhere else, a tree unlike they had seen before. By the early 80s the tree had born fruit, and they realized they had a unique and delicious new variety on their hands. They promptly named it after the lady of the house.

    Ginger Gold is known as an up-and-comer, as is the locally created Honeycrisp. Minnesota orchards are known for a distinctive assortment of apples that are rare or absent from the rest of the country, apples like the Fireside, Wealthy, Prairie Spy, Haralson, Red Baron, and Honeygold to name a few. Haralson, with its crisp tartness, is probably our most popular, but Honeycrisp is creating a buzz both locally and internationally. In fact, it’s probably the most talked about variety in the country at the moment. Introduced in 1991 by a University of Minnesota research team, it’s a cross of Macoun and Honeygold varieties. Crisp and very flavorful, Honeycrisps usually ripen around the end of September or the beginning of October.

    The other thing Minnesota orchards are known for is good old Midwestern fun. The absolute best way to spend a bright fall day is to haul the family out to one of the locally owned orchards. It’s almost impossible to find one that doesn’t have hayrides, ciderfests, jumping goats, pick-your-own, and—of course—a corn maze. (If you can get to Aamodt’s, in particular, they have a killer ciderbrat with an onion/apple relish that is sweet and tart—an inimitable autumn treat.) It’s good to sit under the autumn sky, cider in one hand, an apple-brat in the other, supporting your local farmers and being a red-blooded American.

    Local Orchards near
    the metro area
    North: Pine tree Apple Orchard
    White Bear Lake
    (651) 429-7202

    South: Appleside Orchard
    Highway 3
    Farmington
    (651) 463-2505

    East: Aamodt’s Apple Farm
    Hwy 36 & Manning Ave (Cty 15)
    Stillwater
    (651) 439-3127

    West: Apple Jack Orchards, Inc.
    4875 37th St SE
    Delano
    (612) 972-6673

    Stephanie March is a regular contributor to The Rake.

  • Legends of the Fall

    Photos by Richard Hamilton Smith

    The maples of Hillside Cemetery down the road from my house in Center City are aflame with color. October is their fiery month, when the sedate trees that shade the headstones transform from green to gold. My daily walks now skirt the cemetery so I can stand in the presence of their radiance, drink in their brilliance.

    A cemetery may seem too gloomy to entertain such a riot of color. Ten miles east, in Taylors Falls, the mood is considerably lighter. In that little town beside the St. Croix river, residents are in the midst of their annual Leaf Spectacular. Legions of visitors from the Twin Cities flock to the valley each year for its glorious fall color. They visit Interstate Park by the thousands, then they walk across Highway 8 to downtown Taylors Falls. It’s by far the busiest time of year for the sleepy village of 700. It puts on its best face to greet the tourists. Round pumpkins and rustling corn stalks adorn lamp posts and street corners, scarecrows peer from shop windows and ruby-kernelled Indian corn dangles from doorways. Shopkeepers run sales and the Rocky River Bakery turns out great quantities of fresh apple pie and hot soup to satisfy appetites whetted by the cool weather.

    All of this hubbub, just for the changing colors of autumn. Of course, many festivals around the planet have their roots in the fall harvest, traditionally a time of plenty and an anticipated rest from the labors of farming. By October, farmers have cut and threshed the grain, baled the last hay, and begun to fill the cribs with orange ears of corn. These days, only the gardeners among us are still intimate with the natural rhythms of the farm. Our food—green beans, sweet corn, reasonable facsimiles of tomatoes, the fresh produce by which city people once remarked the harvest—shows less and less seasonality, as the United States imports more fruits and vegetables from southern hemisphere temperate-zone countries like Chile. In the autumn, we still have the impulse to acknowledge earth’s bounty. But we focus less on food (until Thanksgiving, that is), and our excitement attaches to the abundance of color in the maples, aspen, elm, and oak.

    It’s a paradox that our merrymaking has come to focus on the changing leaves. We are not a people who typically glorify death, but that’s precisely what we’re doing when we celebrate the reds and rusts of fall. Perhaps a cemetery is the proper place to contemplate the changing leaves. It’s biology, after all.

    When the verdure of summer begins to drain away, and the leaves start to fall, it represents a type of death for broad-leaved deciduous trees and for the wide spectrum of seasonally green plants. Hillside Cemetery’s maples respond to the fall equinox by shutting down, their metabolism slowing eventually to a standstill. The trigger for the onset of dormancy may be one of several environmental cues, but the most reliable—the one that doesn’t change from year to year, or place to place—is the decreasing daylight. The shorter photoperiod sets in motion physiological changes in the leaf. Most important, cells at the base of the leaf stalk begin to change and die. When they die, they close off the transport of raw materials to and from the leaf. Chlorophyll, which lends its color to the leaves through the spring and summer, breaks down and isn’t replenished. Photosynthesis is less and less possible.

    With the disintegration of chlorophyll, yellow and orange pigments that had been masked by green begin to reveal their stunning color. These carotenoids were present but unseen all summer. They too play a role in photosynthesis, extending the range of sunlight a plant can use. In its miraculous process of making sugars from light, chlorophyll uses violet, blue, and red lightwaves efficiently. But not green, yellow, or orange. Carotenoids absorb wavelengths that chlorophyll cannot.

  • No Ghosts, Buster!

    Frankly, the lady of the house is tired of talking about the ghosts. She doesn’t believe in them. But with wry resignation, she informed The Rake that she would tell us what she knows, and even invited us over to see for ourselves. She’s used to being pestered like this. Making time for writers seeking a solid ghost angle for their annual Halloween stories is the price one pays for living in St. Paul’s most notorious haunted house.

    The building is a Romanesque brick mansion on Summit Avenue, built in 1882 by grocery and timber magnate Chauncey Wright Griggs. The massive stonework turrets are striking. It looks like it should be haunted. And so, inevitably, people claimed it was.

    At least seven different spirits are said to inhabit the house. These include a maid who purportedly hanged herself over an unhappy love affair in 1915; she made numerous appearances on the staircase. In 1959, residents reported seeing the disembodied, floating heads of a child and a grown man. In the early 50s, a Dr. Delmar Kolb claimed he’d had two bedside encounters with a black-clad figure in a top hat who touched him with “two dead fingers on my forehead.” This ghost was reported so often in later years that residents wound up naming him “George.”

    Between 1939 and 1964, the mansion was home to the St. Paul School of Arts, and ghost sightings were just whispers and rumors told after class. Then it was bought by Carl Weschcke, owner of Llewellyn Publishing, the legendary local publisher of occult books and magazines. Naturally, he spread the word with enthusiasm.

    In 1969, Weschcke invited St. Paul Pioneer Press reporters Don Giese and Bill Farmer to spend the night in the room next to the spectral maid’s stairwell. They heard footstep-like noises on the landing, and had “a ‘feeling’ that ‘something’ was on those stairs.” By 4 a.m., rattled and unnerved, they fled. “There is no prize on Earth that could get us to spend a single night alone in that great stone house that seems to speak in sounds we cannot explain or understand,” they wrote. The Rake caught up the other day with Bill Farmer, now an editor for MSP Airport News. With the healing passage of time, he laughed about it. Farmer said what really unnerved him was Weschcke’s decor, which included “kinky witchy stuff” such as leather masks and a coffin. “To spend the night there was enough to give anyone a chill across the spine,” he said. “But phantasmagorical? No.”

    The 1985 book Haunted Heartland added a juicy new anecdote to the legend. On a cold February night in 1965, it says, police found a hysterical, near-naked young man staring at a pentagram painted on the basement floor. Over and over he screamed, “I have seen death!” When we conjured Weschcke on the telephone to ask about this incident, he denied knowledge of it. A practicing Wiccan, he did hold rituals in the house. But nothing so dramatic took place there, he said. (St. Paul police records only go back to 1967. It’s not implausible. This was the 60s, after all.)

    Weschcke sold the house more than 20 years ago, and the notoriety has dimmed. Nevertheless, it’s a recurring nuisance for the current owners, who asked The Rake not to reveal their identities or the address, and also to discourage uninvited visitors. (You are hereby warned: Stay away!) We can report, though, that the mansion’s current caretakers do have a healthy sense of humor: They keep an “emergency kit” inside the foyer, stocked with anti-vampire wooden stakes, garlic, holy water, and a silver cross. Just so, they’ve never felt anything unearthly in the house, and they fear that encouraging these ghost stories demeans an architecturally significant, historic home.

    Presently, the undead do not pose a problem, but reporters and thrillseekers continue to haunt the current owners. When strangers call, they ask about ghosts, and people still drive by and gawk whenever a new story’s published. (Repeat: Stay away, if you know what’s good for you!) On Halloween, the mansion is an irresistible destination. “Last year we had 700 kids. I think they bus them in,” said the householder. “I never have enough candy. And I always buy a lot.”

    There is one thing Weschcke and the current owners agree on—that the ghosts, if they ever existed, are probably gone. “Most such manifestations and hauntings, poltergeists and so forth, much of it is a matter of psychic recordings,” said Weschcke, with a nifty post-modern take on the matter. “And like anything else, as time goes by, the media deteriorates.” The current owners said the house was recently given the all-clear by a “supersensitive” visiting clairvoyant. “She was telling me that she feels no vibrations,” said the lady of the house. One of her eyebrows levitated. “Whatever vibrations are.”

  • Moor’s the Pity

    For 23 years, Rick Lindsey has lived aboard a renovated World War II warship that he salvaged himself. Previous owners had stripped the ship of everything of value, including the deck planking and pilothouse. Eventually, it was abandoned in the St. Croix River. There the wooden hull lay, half submerged, until Lindsey found it one day while fishing. He bought the salvage rights to it, and, with the help of two Caterpillar tractors, hauled it from the river in 1976. “At least I think it was ’76—it’s getting a little hazy,” he joked, noting that the ship’s previous owners all are long dead.

    With the help of some friends, Lindsey rebuilt the vessel on the banks of the St. Croix. It took three years. When they relaunched it in 1979, there was much fanfare; all three national TV networks covered the maiden voyage. Taking into account several feet of additions Lindsey built, the ship now measures 116 feet. It is bedecked with huge solar panels, wind generators, a DirecTV dish, and a small derrick in the stern.

    Since 1984, Lindsey has moored the ship on the Mississippi at the Island Station Marina across from Lilydale Regional Park, about a mile downstream from downtown St. Paul. Built in 1942 in Texas as a subchaser-class warship, USS SC 1342 participated in the D-Day invasion in Normandy, Lindsey said. Although their numbers dwindle each year, veterans who served on similar ships in World War II occasionally visit, and they recognize many of the components still present on the hull, such as the depth-charge mounts in the stern, the engine room, and the bedrooms.

    When The Rake met Lindsey the other day, he was busy rebuilding an aging motorhome on the riverbank near his ship. A DeSoto and several Chryslers in various states of resurrection also occupied the yard. Rick is a wiry 50-something, with owlish glasses and long black hair. The grease-stained dress-shirt he wore had obviously seen the undercarriage of many an automobile. Although he hasn’t moved his ship in several years, he said its two diesel engines are still operational. Between Lindsey’s various car projects, his carpet wholesaling business, his role as caretaker at the marina, and his intense interest in the Internet, though, USS SC 1342 doesn’t get around much anymore. “I used to cruise a lot, but I’m just too busy these days, you know?” Lindsey said.

    Lindsey’s reliance on solar power is more inspired by practicality than any bright-eyed environmental notions. He began installing his solar panels—he claimed to have the second largest array of panels in the state—a couple years ago, after the city cut off power to the dozen or so people living in boats at the marina. “People say to me, ‘That’s so great that you’re conserving energy.’ Bullshit! It’s free power,” he said. Six forklift batteries are charged by the solar panels each day. They provide Lindsey with 150 amps of electricity, easily enough power to run his big-screen TV, computer, stereo, air conditioner, and hot water heater.

    Lindsey stays in the boat year-round. He said the river ice remains slush during the winter, and, aside from a few logs that get snared in his rigging, the spring floods are mostly uneventful. “You’ve got to keep an eye on your cables, though,” he said, casting a watchful gaze at the steel lines that anchor him to shore.

  • Letter from China: A Picture is Worth a Hundred Characters

    I’m sitting on the dusty steps of a Kodak camera shop on Bai Se Road, just down the street from my apartment, looking through some black and white photographs. They’re the first pictures I’ve taken in China and I’m so excited to see them that I can’t be bothered with getting on my bike and making the five-minute trip back home.

    After a couple minutes, a shadow passes over me. I look up and I’m face to face with a woman in her mid-30s, barefoot, dressed in a short yellow skirt. She mutters something in Mandarin and positions herself behind me to look over my shoulder at the photographs. Her eyes are glowing with fascination—a look I’ve seen many times before, mostly from disbelief that blue-eyed Americans exist and are walking around suburban Shanghai.

    In a gesture of modesty, I shuffle through the rest of the photographs and put them in my backpack. The woman steps down to the street and leans even closer, like she wants to kiss me. I can taste her breath and her short hair brushes my face. A barrage of Mandarin emanates from her mouth, like she’s trying to feed the words to me, and I can’t seem to slow them down, no matter how many times I fill the spaces in between her sentences with “Wo bu dong” (I don’t understand). For the moment, I can’t say anything to her that she’ll understand, and I can’t look her in the eye because she’s only a few inches from my face.

    Once she determines her one-sided conversation is leading nowhere, she takes a pen out of my hand and begins writing Chinese characters all over my hands. Once she’s filled up the space on my skin, she tears a few scraps from a newspaper and continues to write. I gather as many of these scribbles as I can carry, stuff them into my backpack, silently excuse myself, and make my escape down Bai Se Road in the direction of my apartment.

    Half an hour later, I walk into the office of my friend Arnold and show him my hands. At first, he can’t read the sloppy characters, but slowly a smile of recognition crosses his face and a story emerges. The sentences on my hands are mostly questions: “Do you speak Chinese?” “Are you married?” And then, the most mysterious, an invitation: “When you’re happy, come over to my house.” Finally, an address—not enough information for me to determine whether or not I was just propositioned for sex.

    Most Chinese women tend to be much more modest with their body language, because they live in a predominantly non-touching culture, where couples are the only people permitted to hug each other in public. (Try to hug a casual female friend in China and you’ll get a cold, stiff-bodied response as though you’re an incestuous uncle instead of a friend.) Moreover, prostitution, while considered a perfectly acceptable profession in China, is nevertheless officially illegal. Consequently, brothels must thinly disguise their true purpose by fronting as “hair salons,” to avoid occasional visits from police arbitrarily enforcing the law.

    Joel Hanson