Category: Blog Post

  • The Pan African Fest "Raps" Up with K'naan

    MUSIC

    K’naan



    D.E.M.O.’s Twin Cities Pan African Fest goes out with a bang tonight at First Avenue. Toronto-based Somalian rapper K’naan
    will engage the audience with his smooth flows and thoughtful prose for
    an evening of amazing music you won’t soon forget. Raised in Mogadishu, Somalia in the midst of civil war, and descended from a long line of poets, intellectuals and most notably an aunt, Magool,
    who was one of Somalia’s most beloved singers, K’naan was influenced by
    American rappers such as Nas and Rakim well before he immigrated to
    Canada where he created a buzz with his profound spoken word
    performances. Today this artist shines for not only his slick beats,
    but also for poetically blending both English and Somali language into
    his rhymes – bringing intense and thought-provoking tales of life,
    loss, and roots to the ears of many.



    7pm, First Avenue, 701 1st Avenue N, Minneapolis, $16 Advance, $20 Door



    SPECIAL EVENT

    Movies & Music in the Park



    I was once treated to an impromptu acapella performance by Black Audience front woman Jayanthi Kyle while sitting on the crowded patio of a neighborhood bar. Egged on by our mutal friend Susannah,
    Jayanthi went full force into a heartbreakingly soulful number that
    immediately hushed and enraptured the entire patio for the endurance of
    her performance, which was at least five minutes long. Since then,
    Jayanthi has banded together with an impressive lineup of bluesy locals
    to form "Black Audience," an old-timey charm-and-banjo-infused acoustic
    troupe. What I’m getting at here, is if you’re going to go to Movies and Music in the Park this summer, this is the one. 1948 comedy/drama film State of the Union, directed by Frank Capra screens after the performance, so bring a blanky.



    7pm, Loring Park, Hennepin & Oak Grove Street, Minneapolis, Free






    SHOPPING

    ROBOTlove



    Nothing cheers up a dismal Monday more than buying cute things you don’t need! And, although this isn’t an actual
    event, I’ve decided to occasionally drop some Twin Cities shopping
    science on you, just to spice things up a bit. I mean, you don’t always
    want to do something that takes a lot of energy, right? Sometimes you
    just want to indulge your frivolity. Today’s hot tip is designer toy
    mecca ROBOTlove,
    located in the easy-to-find-parking area of Uptown, just off Lyndale
    and 27th. This wistful little shop will delight children and adults
    alike with its array of super-collectible, limited edition art-toys and
    futuristic knick-knacks from all over the world; its small but amazing
    offering of hipper-than-thou threads and accessories by local and
    national designers; and its stellar collection of high-end art mags and
    design books. ROBOTlove is the perfect place to find a totally hip and
    unusual gift for just about anyone, or to maybe kick-off your new
    obsession with Dunny trading. And if you’re hungry after all that shoppin’, head over the the Uptown Bulldog
    a mere block away for some serious deliciousness and maybe even a beer
    – but when you get home don’t forget to order your tix to The Rake’s World Flavors Dinner Party at the Bulldog’s Northeast location by clicking HERE.

    Mon-Sat 11am-7pm, Sunday Noon-6pm, ROBOTlove, 2648 Lyndale Ave. S, Uptown

  • US Olympians Bury China in Hoops Opener

    The opening game for the USA Olympic basketball team was close early–tied even, at 29-29, nearly halfway through the second quarter–almost exclusively because the US were missing their three-pointes while their Chinese opponents were knocking them down. But nobody seriously thought this would be a ballgame, and the 101-70 tally seemed an appropriate gauge of the gap between the two squads.

    It’s been fascinating to watch the way this team has been put together, and in particular, interesting to note that Mike Kryzewski of Duke, along with Jimmy Boeheim of Syracuse, are alloting the minutes. I’ve never partaken of the Coach K Kool-Aid, but there is a certain symmetry in him starting Jason Kidd over Chris Paul and Deron Williams at the point–the overrated coach showing deference to the player I consider the most overrated player in the NBA. Anyone with two eyes can see that Kidd is a distant third in terms of both talent and fit on this squad, and yet he gets the opening minutes instead of two much better, much classier players.

    Even Doug Collins couldn’t help but comment that the Chinese weren’t even bothering to guard Kidd, who not only didn’t shoot in his 13 minutes on the floor, but didn’t drop a single dime and tied for the team lead in turnovers (with Kobe, who played more than twice as many minutes). Throw in aged footwork on defense and the mystery deepens as to why Paul and D-Will hug the pine at the onset.

    In fact, the inability of Dwight Howard to develop a shooting touch around the rim, coupled with the emergence of Chris Bosh (both today and in the preliminary games), and the return to health of Dwyane Wade, makes the USA second unit a better ballclub than its starting five–and that’s with Lebron and Kobe, who both have been marvelous, among that first quintet. Take away Lebron and Kobe and you’ve got an over-the-hill Kidd, a still surprisingly raw Howard, and the always questionable Melo Anthony.

    By contrast, the bench can run out Bosh, who is easily the most active of the USA bigs; the suddenly resurgent Wade, who didn’t miss a shot today, bagging a team-high 19 points on 7 FGs and 5 FTS; either Deron Williams, who played with a fabulous spark today, and/or Chris Paul, who owns the fastest hands of any backcourt defender; and the option of Michael Redd (if you need to stretch opposing defenses) or Tayshaun Prince (if you need a shutdown defender). Keep Lebron or Kobe out there with that group and start engraving the names on the gold medal trophy right now.

    I will say this for K and the NBA elite–they are playing with an appropriately monster emphasis on defense, including the point guards not named Kidd guarding the dribble, the bigs and swingmen deterring penetration (Lebron had three blocks today) and the boxing out to prevent putbacks. China had the 7-6 Yao and the 7 foot Yi (who looked out of shape and often indifferent, and was called out by the announcers as the bad actor in contrast to the wet kisses Yao was slathered with) and still got outrebounded, while compiling an assist-to-turnover ratio of 12/18. Much has been made of the USA adapting to the international style of play, which relies less on low post scoring and more on perimeter treys (the line is nearly three feet closer in than the NBA). But I don’t care so much if the USA can hit the outside jumper, so long as they can defend it properly. Some of that comes from wearing down opponents with their superior depth and transitional quickness–the Chinese were much less accurate from outside in the second half.

    For its part, I thought the USA shot too many treys. They were 7-24 from behind the arc, and 31-36 from two-point land. Got that? To match their scoring efficiency on two-pointers, they would have had to have nailed 20 (and two-thirds of a 21st) out of 36 treys. That 86% from inside the arc came against one of the taller teams in these Olympics to boot. I don’t mind Michael Redd jacking up seven treys (he made 3), but Kobe doesn’t need to shoot 7, not when he can (and did) break down almost any single defender and have a superstar waiting for the dish and an open look.

    Another quibble: the interior passes are too tightly bunched. Don’t try to thread the needle in transition when you are four feet away from each other; take it to the hole or dish it to the perimeter or to midrange jump shooters–especially when Howard and his mediocre footwork and lousy shooting touch are the beneficiaries of pounding it inside. Both Bosh and Carlos Boozer looked better equipped to finish.

    Bottom line, however, is that this is just a fabulous team. People can yelp about the original Dream Team all they want; these guys would give that crew a run for their money. I know, I know–the proof remains to be put in the pudding. But remember, the caliber of international basketball has improved by leaps and bounds since the original Dream Teamers. Watch how this USA squad wears each and every one of its better-quality opponents out in the days ahead, and, hype aside, make your own judgment.

  • Edina Mom. Dead or Alive.

    Last year, I posted a movie on YouTube. It was a candid short film of a Mom sending her kid off to "camp" at a church in Edina. The Mom was wearing a leather Ferrari jacket while burdening her two cherubic children with care packages the size of a Marshall Plan drop. I found the whole vignette ironic, particularly since her kiddies were only going to be gone for three days.

    Today I found myself in the same church lobby, reluctantly sending my own kids off to the same "camp." (I was outvoted, again.)

    There was no Mom to be seen this time. In fact, I counted only two Yukon Denalis (with smallish blondish moms at the wheel, with the air conditioning on and phones at their ears) in the parking lot.

    So you could say that this year a car blogger has little right to comment cynically on a well-heeled woman wearing a jacket that advertises a car she has probably never driven nor could possibly understand.

    If she is still alive. Metaphorically speaking.

    Judging by the sheer lack of uselss Detroit iron in the parking lot this year and far smaller care packages (unless you go to YMCA camps–the only true camps in existence), it may finally be time to bury my unbewitting feminine icon of excess. I am willing to believe that the Edina she symbolizes may well be dead.

    Yet, as a car blogger, I am still troubled.

    Ths "camp," still does its best to "theme" its camp seasons. If your children have played youth sportts in a white suburb you know this means wearables themed in all manners of bad taste. (Buy or die.)

    The camp’s theme this year consisted of logo and color palette appropriated directly from Land Rover. "Roving Far and Wide" it read.

    Edina and commericalism go hand in hand. In spite of my own cynicism, I like the place and live here myself. If it were not for Edina, my two young children would not be fluent in French.

    But Land Rover?

    A church camp in Edina should worship a stronger brand.

     

     

     

     

  • You're No Fun

    After a flamboyantly successful run at the Bedlam Theatre earlier this spring, You’re No Fun has been whittled down for a Fringe staging. The play centers around a present-day hobo who comes back to town, and finds that his ex-girlfriend has written a musical about his life. It is a tale of star-crossed lovers that, like any worthwhile addition to the tragic genre, features dancing dinosaurs. The Rake caught up with Samantha Johns – director of both versions- and Savannah Reich -the original writer – to talk a bit about the incarnation and reincarnation of the show.

    The Rake: Are there any differences between the Fringe version of the show and its original Bedlam staging?

    Samantha: Yes, we had to cut about 20 minutes off it to make it fit the Fringe standard. We cut a beautiful (and complex) barbershop quartet, a few hunks of dialogue are missing, and then I just lit a fire under the actors’ asses and got them moving and talking faster.

    Savannah: I haven’t been involved in the Fringe staging process – although I was pretty involved the first time around (until Sam kicked me out of rehearsal for continually trying to do rewrites).

    The Rake: You’ve stated that this is a show that asks, ‘Why do we do theater?’ Would you riff on that a bit?

    Sam: I honestly couldn’t tell you, and I don’t think there is one single reason; I couldn’t imagine a life without it.

    Sav: I tend to struggle with justifying to myself the idea of doing theatre- especially the kind of theatre I like to do, which is the totally ridiculous kind. That is the hope, anyways. Last fall I was going back to school to finish my degree in theatre arts at the U of M, and I was having this whole internal crisis about what I was doing with my life. I had all these friends who were going on houseboats down the Missisippi, or hopping trains, or moving to India, and it all sounded so much more exciting than staying at home and writing a three to five page paper about Brechtian technique or whatever I was doing. I just wasn’t convinced that art school was the best way to be an artist. I always wondered if I was the only one who still thought it was funny the way everyone is able to take themselves so seriously while wearing yoga pants and practicing different ways of falling down the stairs. On the other hand, I had all my other friends who were going to punk shows and traveling and working in collectives, just as much in their own little bubble as the theatre folks were in theirs. I ended up thinking a lot about how much these two worlds were alike, or at least presented the same problem to me, which is, "Am I wrong to want to spend my adult life in a very serious pursuit of fun?"

    I remember coming home from school one day, where I had practiced trapeze and juggling and then painted plywood to look like pink marble, and talking to this traveling guy that was hanging out on my porch playing harmonica. I lived in a big punk house at the time and we always had some random guy sitting on the porch and playing harmonica. So I was chatting with this guy about how I was worried that I was wasting my life in art school, and he gave me this big lecture about how I should drop out of school and go hop trains. And I said, "Well, I never said I didn’t think you were wasting your life, too."

    The Rake: How did the idea for the show germinate?

    Sav: So the play is about a relationship between this intense experimental theatre type and this anti-civilization hobo guy, and they both take themselves really seriously and each one sort of looks down on the other. They are both trying really hard to find meaning in their lives and their relationship, and meanwhile they are in this really goofy, ridiculous play, with all these corny musical numbers and dumb jokes and dinosaur costumes. So that’s my take on life on earth, apparently.

    The Rake: Given that there are dancing dinosaurs involved, it seems your notion of theater, no matter how serious it may be, is at least to have a little bit of fun, too, no?

    Sam: If we’re not having fun, there is no point. If it becomes painful, and is not helping the show, we stop, take a break, and come back at it a different way.

    Sav: We all have an invisible kickline of dinosaurs behind us and we might as well just stop trying to look cool.

    The Rake: Does it change from performance to performance?

    Sam: Yes, it’s live. Things wobble here and there, but in general, the feel of it always the same. The actors know what they have to hit and where, but in between, there is always room for movement. Beautiful things can happen in those moments, you have to allow the actors to play.

    The Rake: Have Fringe festivals in the past helped you with your larger theater life in Minnesota at all?

    Sam: This is my first Fringe, and before this year I would maybe see one or two Fringe shows a year, so I’m not sure. Seeing any piece of theatre is always helpful in the big scheme of things.

     

    See the Minnesota Fringe Festival website for remaining showtimes.

    To read John Ervin’s Inside the Fringe: Instamment One, click here.

    To read Jill Yablonski’s Inside the Fringe: Instamment Two, click here.

    To read Andrew Newman’s Inside the Fringe: Instamment Three, click here.

    To read Brandon Root’s Inside the Fringe: Instamment Four, click here.

    To read Max Ross’ Inside the Fringe: Instamment Five, click here.

  • SerenTori: Laotian, Vietnamese, Thai and More

    I was by myself the other day when I stopped in for lunch at
    SerenTori restaurant, 5748 34th Ave., Minneapolis, so I could only
    try one dish, which made it kind of a tough choice. The $6.95 lunch specials
    didn’t sound that appealing – they’re mostly Chinese take-out classics like
    Sesame Chicken, Egg Foo Young, and Mongolian Beef (all come with fried rice and
    choice of egg roll or cream cheese wonton).

    But the rest of the menu sounded much more interesting: Thai
    tom yum, Vietnamese Canh Chua soup with pineapple and okra, Nam Pik Pao beef
    salad, Ban Xeo (a Vietnamese pancake stuffed with pork, shrimp and vegetables,
    two for $7.95), pad Thai, and lots more. The American favorites section offers
    burgers, halibut and chips, chicken wing basket, Chicago dog basket, shrimp
    basket and more, served with fries, cole slaw and a can of pop, mostly for
    $8.95 or less.

    I opted for the Lao Gang Som ($7.95 with chicken, $10.95
    with catfish), a mild but very tasty Laotion cousin of Thai tom yum soup,
    flavored with tomato, green onions, kaffir lime leaf, Thai basil and lime
    juice.There’s a lot more on the menu that I would like to try, including the Four Regions Sampler, a chef’s choice of authentic dishes from Laos, Thai,
    Vietnamese and Chinese ($29.95 for four) and the Vientiane Street-Side Meal with beef jerky or roast hen (half), papaya salad and sticky rice ($16.95). (The menu also mentions lunch and dinner buffet, but these are not available during the summer.)

    The chef, Jee Soulisak-Hoang is from Laos, and her husband and co-owner
    Hoa is Vietnamese, which helps explain the multi-cultural menu. I wondered
    whether the restaurant’s name meant something in Lao, but Jee explained that it’s
    the names of her two daughters, Serenity, 4, and Satori, 3.

    SerenTori will have a booth at the Hmong Arts Festival,
    Saturday, August 16, 2008 from 11 a.m. to 7 p.m. at the Western Sculpture Park on
    Marion Street in Saint Paul, serving Pho (Vietnamese beef noodle soup), fried
    rice, beef salad and fresh spring rolls.

    SerenTori Restaurant, 5748 34th Av., Minneapolis, 612-726-9034.

     

     

  • Political Theater Starring a Convicted Felon

    Fool for a Client, Mark Whitney’s politically-tinged
    Fringe show, is The Shawshank Redemption meets The Pursuit of Happyness. And
    not only is the painfully funny show tough to perform, since it chronicles some
    of the roughest periods of Whitney’s life, but it also attempts to examine many
    of the odd conflicts inherent in today’s political landscape – such as how many
    of the politicians and advocates who preach tolerance and mercy are responsible
    for zero tolerance policies.

    The show covers 30 years of Mark’s life – spanning his first
    job out of high school selling vacuums for Electrolux to being convicted on
    fraud charges. Featuring all the learning he did in the prison library and representing
    himself in his federal trial, the show uses inky, nigh-soullessly, black humor to
    make a decidedly tragic story unspeakably funny and make people think about the
    reality behind politics and American culture. Whitney, a socially liberal Libertarian,
    has his own positions on the issues. We explored those positions with him at Keegan’s whilst enduring what had to be
    the worst announcer in the history of mankind’s deeply held fascination with
    pub quizzes.

    The Rake: So what
    do you know about Minnesota politics?

    Whitney: I know
    you elected Jesse Ventura. I know your Republicans don’t know the difference
    between satire and reality
    . I know there are a lot of McCain and Obama signs
    in yards. But Minnesota people are approachable. And when I come here I get both Republicans
    and Democrats at my show. And it works. I can say some things. It’s all
    metaphor at my shows, just questions – no telling, just showing.

    The Rake: Any
    advice for Al Franken these days?

    Whitney: Be
    funny. I don’t know why politicians don’t understand the power of humor. Maybe
    it’s because when you make a joke there’s incredible clarity. And it’s
    extremely honest. And maybe people don’t like honesty. The idea is to get
    elected – not be honest.

    The Rake: Now that Republicans are comparing him to Paris
    Hilton
    , what do you think of Obama?

    Whitney: I liked
    him when he talked about hope, the American Dream, the Constitution. The
    Constitution is really important. I’d like someone to ask Sen. McCain about the
    Constitution – maybe Obama can turn to him during a debate and ask him about
    the due process clauses of the constitution and see what happens. But lately
    he’s seemed to be willing to say anything to be elected. Though I do like the
    global perspective he may bring to the table.

    On the other hand…I think the one way we could have a black
    president of the U.S.
    is if the candidate is Obama and the opponent is McCain.

    The Rake: What
    about McCain? Is the United States
    ready for a geriatric president?

    Whitney: He’s the
    glue horse. I don’t see how McCain could take the stage with Obama and hold his
    own. He’s not that smart. He’s just a warrior, an old school warrior.

    The Rake: What
    about your own party? Libertarians? Are they going to get any more attention
    than the Rastafarians this year?

    Whitney: The Libertarians
    are running Bob Barr, a former federal prosecutor. They think that’ll get them
    from one to two percent. It’s not going to happen. The problem is that the
    current Libertarian leadership makes Bush look liberal, and none of the
    segments within the party are willing to talk to each other or compromise.

    The Rake: What
    about a Congress with a nine
    percent approval rating
    ?

    Whitney: Sounds
    high. At what point does it become a disapproval rating? And at what point do
    people stop voting for them? It’s interesting how almost every single one of
    these people are going to get reelected.

    The Rake: Do you
    think it goes back to all politics being local?

    Whitney: Oh yeah,
    people think everyone in Congress sucks, except their guy. They voted for him.

    The Rake: So are
    we totally screwed on the world stage now that we’ve had eight years of
    Bush/Cheney style international relations?

    Whitney: One of
    the things that’s really been hammered home for me in the last 30 years of
    being an entrepreneur is what an amazing system we have. Everyone says this is
    the best country in the world. And I haven’t been everywhere, so I can’t say it
    directly. Keep in mind I’m a convicted felon. There are a lot of things I can’t
    do, but still, if I put my nose to the grindstone I can do a lot. But Bush and
    Cheney have tarnished and tainted the brand. People don’t feel good about being
    Americans anymore.

    Have you ever searched an archive of Supreme Court cases for
    the phrase "enemy combatant"? There’s nothing in American jurisprudence to
    allow the government to make an American citizen an enemy of the state and
    imprison them without trial or charge. And the next president will use that
    precedent and expand on that. I guarantee that. Bush and Cheney have given a
    clinic on executive power. They scare the crap out of everybody. That’s why
    everyone rolls over. They’re the smartest administration in the history of the
    country. They get everything they want, wherever they want, whenever they want.

    One of the reasons I do this show is to remind people of the
    ideals we’re meant to be about. These ideals are worth treasuring and
    protecting. When we raise our children we raise them to be strong individuals.
    Our society isn’t interested in us being individuals though. They want us to
    participate in groupthink. There’s never been a period of time where people
    participate in groupthink more. They’re scared to death.

    The Rake: So what
    do we have to do?

    Whitney: I have a
    new line that I wrote for my show and tested for the first time on Saturday
    night. I said, "You’ve been a great audience. What I’d like you to do now is to
    return home, marry
    whoever you want
    . Send your artificially inseminated babies to whatever
    school you want. Stockpile weapons. Do whatever you want."

    But the real question is what you should do. And it’s what we’re
    doing now. Blogging. Asking questions. Thinking independently and filtering the
    information you get. Ask more questions. We don’t hold anyone accountable, we
    keep sending the same shitheads back to Congress. And as a result, we have a
    government reflective of the zero tolerance society we’ve become. If I’ve
    learned one thing in my life, it’s that whatever you think it is that’s going
    to get you, it’s probably something else. And it’s probably not going to be too
    much personal freedom. Last century cars took 3,000,000 people. That’s a 9/11
    every month. But we haven’t outlawed cars. People should take that to heart and
    do whatever it is they’re here to do.

    But anyway, everyone is so excited that Bush is going to
    leave. I’m not so sure he’ll follow that part of the Constitution. He hasn’t followed
    any of it to this point, why start now?

  • The Return of the Twins Roundtable

    Those of you familiar with this site may remember the series of roundtables I held last year between myself, steadfast Twins fan, along with Rake and ex-City Pages baseball columnist Brad Zellar, and former Twin Cities Reader sports columnist (and current Minnpost media columnist) David Brauer. Zellar and Brauer are my kind of conversationalists: They’re both modest about their extensive knowledge of the game and extremely good writers.

    I began this conversation early Wednesday, before the Twins salvaged the third of a three-game series with the Mariners.

    Britt Robson: First of all I want to apologize for not inviting you fine gentlemen in earlier to talk about what has been a weirdly but fabulously successful 2008 season by the Twins, relative to the vague rebuilding and stitched together shenanigans that accompanied their off-season. As I write this, the Twins are just a game back of the White Sox (two in the loss column) and have dropped a pair to the lowly Mariners. They have been remarkably resilient with what I believe is inferior talent compared to the White Sox and Tigers, if not the decimated Indians and the ever-buried Royals. As one who, after a fantastic bout of prognostication in ’07, has gotten just about everything wrong in baseball this year (I big-upped the Mariners and Blue Jays, ignored the Rays, called the Cardinals for last place, etc.), I want to begin by deferring to both of you on the central questions of the day.

    How have the Twins been able to remain in contention this season? (You can buttress your points with numbers or just your powers of observation, since I know you both have watched a lot of Twins this year.) How likely is it that they will continue to remain in contention? What surprising trend, either positive or negative, is most likely to be reversed in the last 50 games of the season? And finally, where do you see this ballclub after the dust settles in early October?

    Have at it, and, as always, thanks for participating.

    Brad Zellar: How have the Twins managed to remain in contention this year? Well, shoot, that right there is the million dollar question. There have been a butcher’s handful of moments so far when I’ve turned off the TV or walked away from a game thinking the wheels had finally come off for good: the Neshek injury, the bombarding in Chicago the first week in June, the sweep in Boston in early July, and the miserable series at Yankee Stadium (for which I was, alas, in attendance).

    You mention the "remarkable resilience," and that really has been the hallmark of this team –a short memory and the ability to just keep battling back (not to mention a flukish but nonetheless impressive team batting average with runners in scoring position). Based on my own email and the noxious comment boards all over the net, I didn’t ever expect this to happen, but at some point I’d think people would start to appreciate the job Ron Gardenhire and his staff (particularly Rick Anderson) do year in and year out. I’m not even sure how they do it, or what their magic consists of, but my suspicion is that it has a lot to do with creating and sustaining chemistry and a cohesive team identity. When you look at this team on paper, and compare it to Detroit, Chicago, and Cleveland, there’s just no way in hell they should be where they are right now.

    They got a huge break this season when everybody else in the division stumbled out of the gate. The sustained early mediocrity allowed the Twins to sort of retool on the fly and sort things out. Yahoos can bitch all they want, but Livan Hernandez was a good pick-up; his ten wins and –more importantly– his 140 innings saved their ass in the first half. Other than him, though, it’s hard to point to a single one of their off-season acquisitions as a key to their success thus far. Gomez certainly set a different tone early on, and I think they needed a guy in that clubhouse with his sort of balls-to-the-wall knucklehead enthusiasm, but the truth is he hasn’t been a very productive player. The surprising emergence of guys like Casilla, Buscher, and Span has been crucial (and the Casilla injury is another one of those moments, I guess, where it just seemed like one blow too many for this team to recover from), but they haven’t had any contribution to speak of from Cuddyer, Lamb, Everett, and Monroe have been (pretty much) busts, and the bullpen has been dodging bullets since Neshek went down.

    Yet there they still are, hanging around first place. The young(ish) starting pitchers have all been nothing if not gutty, but my concern at the moment is that this is essentially the first go-round for all of them, and they look like they might be hitting the wall. The Twins aren’t going to get 200 innings out of any of them, which is going to put additional pressure on a bullpen that doesn’t look like it can handle any additional pressure. Liriano is pretty much being forced into the role of staff savior, and it’s going to be interesting and little bit scary to see how he handles that pressure down the stretch.

    All that said, this really is Morneau and Mauer’s team, and if Morneau in particular can keep coming up with big hits, and if they can figure out how to keep from imploding on the road, and if they can somehow dredge up a couple warm bodies for the bullpen and hang around into September when the schedule gives them a little breather, I believe they can win the division. I just don’t have a whole lot of faith in that White Sox team.

    So: this is a team looking at a lot of ifs right now, but it’s been that way since April, and I don’t know anybody who expected them to be where they are at the moment. If they do somehow manage to find their way into the playoffs, of course, I have every expectation that they’ll get smothered in a hurry.

    David Brauer: Here are a few ideas I’ve been playing with:

    1. The Twins have a core – a two-person core, but still – that is producing bigtime. That’s Morneau and Mauer of course. Morneau is just a hair off his MVP BA/OBP/SLG stats, hitting .370 with runners in scoring position, and thus Mauer is scoring about seven runs every 10 games, a full run above his career best. You’re talking two guys in the top 10 for walks-strikeout ratio, so you’re getting a ton of baserunners or productive outs.

    2. The Twins are one run away from being second in the league in runs scored! That’s amazing, and it’s clearly the most surprising positive trend. The team is still over .300 in RISP; Morneau, but Mauer is right on his ass at .356, throw in Buscher (.344), Casilla (.322), Span (.320); even the oft-criticized Young is nearly at .300 (.298). And then there’s Little Nicky Punto! The team leader at .375! I mean, read those names and figures again and you’ll see why NO ONE saw this coming, and why a complete collapse is possible. But while it might just be a stopped watch, doesn’t Joe Vavra deserve a tertiary mention w/Gardy and Anderson, Brad?

    3. Hernandez did great for innings pitched, and it was also time for him for him to go, as I think Britt noted in a previous Rake piece. My unsubstantiated recollection is the young starters have been remarkably consistent going at least 5 innings. Yeah, they’ll probably break down, and I think the pen is the single reason we’d miss the playoffs, but my god, that’s huge. And Nathan. Never forget Nathan.

    4. Saw an old 60 Minutes with Bill James last Sunday and he repeated his claim about players’ primes being 25-29. I realize some of these guys have limited headroom, and some potential talents like Young, Slowey, Span and Casilla are, well, too young (the latter three by just a year), but again look at the tape: Morneau (27), Mauer (25), Buscher (27), Baker (27), Blackburn (27), Perkins (25), Kubel (26), Harris (28), Neshek (27). There’s something there.

    5. This has been stated before, but by all rights the pen (save Nathan) should suck, especially without N
    eshek. Instead, it’s only sucked on the road. That’s half the battle, I guess, but to answer Britt’s question, this is the trend that will be reversed negatively. It beats out the RISP regression to the mean.

    Things that have bummed me out:

    1. Young’s defense in left. People forget he’s making the switch from right, and the Dome has a much bigger expanse in left that folks realize, but still, it’s been the top frustration-maker for me this year, next to Gomez always swinging at the low-and-away pitch.

    2. Gomez always swinging at the low-and-away pitch. It’s be number one, but he’s 22 fer chrissake, and he was rushed.

    3. Cuddyer. He’ll be 30 next year, by the way.

    Where do I see ’em finishing. Fuck the White Sox. Fuck pessimism. First place.

    Britt Robson: Great stuff from both of you, and comprehensive enough that all I can do is counterpunch.

    I can buy Morneau and Mauer. I am particularly enjoying Morneau more than ever this season. He’s got a signature swing–it’s like he doesn’t let go of the bat with either hand on the follow through, so it looks at if he is taking off his shirt or something at the end, and, as often as not, the ball is flying into the left-center field gap. This is both a good and a bad thing, however–his walks and doubles are up, but his dingers are down. His OBP is the best of his career, but his slugging percentage is well off his 2006 MVP peak. In fact both Mauer and Morneau hit for more power in ’06 and consequently both had better OPS numbers two years ago than they do now. So here is my dilemma: The Twins won 96 games in ’06 with Mauer and Morneau each enjoying career years, even taking ’08 into consideration. This season, the Twins are on pace for about 90 wins. So somehow, the supporting cast is close to matching up with the Hunters and Santanas of yore–and that was also the year Cuddyer knocked in 109 runs, and Liriano bagged a dozen wins with an ERA below 2.

    It isn’t the pitching. In 2006, the ERA was an impressive 3.95, and that’s with Carlos Silva throwing 180 innings of 5.94. You can cite Santana, half a year of lights out Liriano, a typically stellar Nathan, and Dennis Reyes was unhittable as the lefty specialist. This year, despite all the heartwarming kids, the ERA has jumped to 4.36, 8th in the league, but behind only the White Sox, whose staff is imploding, in the Central Division. So, that’s part of it I guess–an uneven schedule really helps when the division sucks.

    But it is also the hitting. Despite worse on-base and slugging percentages than in 2006, the Twins are scoring slightly more runs per game, and, as both of you noted, a lot of it has to do with clutch hitting. You’ve covered that territory, so I want to bring up a name that both of you barely mentioned: Jason Kubel. Now I’ve been down on Kubes for awhile now, in part out of perversity because so many die-hard fans kept lauding his potential, but now, surprise surprise, his 16 dingers are only two behind Morneau for the team lead (in 110 fewer at bats), his 57 rbis are likewise second to Morneau, and his slugging percentage is better than Mauer’s and, again, second only to Morneau. I know he doesn’t show up in the clutch hitting category, but the situations wouldn’t be clutch for others if he hadn’t knocked in 57 runs in just 96 games and 321 at-bats.

    Brad mentioned Span and Casilla. A month or so ago, I ridiculed Jim Souhan for suggesting Span be given more playing time, and that Punto supplant Harris at short. Well, both Span and Punto have made him look good. Span’s *slugging percentage* of .469 ranks behind only Morneau and Kubel, by the way.

    David, you mention a disenchantment with Young in left. I reluctantly agree that he is not fleet afoot, a weakness compounded by the slow jumps he gets on the ball off the bat. His arm is great–I’ve seen him gun down runners at second from the left field corner on two occasions live this season. But his range–not very good. Plus the gossip among media members around the team is not positive toward Delmon Young–whether that’s the media talking to themselves or word on the QT from coaches or other inside personnel is unclear. But more than one person with decent relations inside the Twins organization has not been kind in their assessment of Young’s work habits. My position has been that I trust the Twins scouts, and if they thought he was worth Garza, he must be pretty good. But I’m beginning to waver.

    My pet peeve is the defense of Harris. Almost every game there is a ball I became accustomed to seeing the shortstop get to that now eludes Harris’s grasp. Sometimes he knocks it down, as happened the other night in Seattle, but they are never close enough to be errors because Harris’s range doesn’t put him in a position to make an error.

    As I write this, the Twins have beaten the M’s, with Span the hero, robbing Beltre of a homer, plus clearing the bases with a triple down the line. You guys both say they take the division pennant. I say it is the White Sox by default in a very weak division. But I like a team with Gomez, Span and Casilla, a team who should have at least two capable starters among the four kids (and I’m not putting Liriano in that mix). Gardy, Anderson, Vavra, give them all raises. It’s been a hell of a lot of fun, and coming in second or third (I keep waiting, like Godot, for the Tigers) is alright with me.

    [continued Thursday morning]

    In light of Span’s heroics Wednesday night, Gardy says he’s batting leadoff and playing every day, even when Cuddyer gets back. So, who sits? Since Young, Gomez and Cuddyer are all righties, it’s not a platoon situation. You don’t want to revisit the experience of Cuddy at third, even though it would work into a nice platoon with Buscher, do you? The problem is that Young is the only one of the four with left field experience, even if, as David points out, he hasn’t exactly starred in those spacious confines. Having already shifted Span from center to right, do you go with another shift of the kid to left? Because nobody on the roster can play right like Cuddyer, who has a gun for an arm and knows the soft baggie carom by heart. If Cuddy plays and it isn’t at third, it needs to be RF. I don’t think you can sit Gomez except on occasion; the kid’s confidence is too erratic, which is to say fragile. But if you sit Young, you risk messing with a guy who already has questionable makeup, a guy you traded a potential ace for, a guy who turns 23 next month.

    Despite Gardy’s comments, I chicken out and play all four about the same amount. You need Young, Span and Gomez for the future, but I have a lot of faith in Cuddyer’s defense and think he’ll come around at the plate. You can rest some legs and maybe even get some RH at-bats out of the DH position against lefties, although that sits Kubel, whose numbers I’ve already cited. It’s a pleasant problem to have, but still a problem.

    As for the bullpen, I like Guerrier better than Crain, and have actually liked what I’ve seen out of Breslow in short spurts. I can see making Breslow the lefty specialist and trying Reyes for more extended outings, meaning against more righties. I don’t have much faith in Bass, and endorse the rumored notion that he flip places with Bonser and become the blowout early relief guy, giving Boof more chances to make an impact later in the game. And yeah, I’d give Nathan more 8th inning chances, especially do-or-die situations with men on base. He is the best closer in franchise history, and flat-out the best pticher on this ballclub right now. If it means Crain, Guerrier or Reyes has to finish the 9th with a two or three run lead on occasion, fine. Give the ball to Joe when the game in on the line.

    Last, but certainly not least, let’s remember that these meaningful games in August, and hopefully September, are all a bonus, and should not distract from the main mission of building this club for the future. How does that square with playing Cuddyer over the kids and using Natha
    n in the 8th? Good question. My only defense is that I think Cuddyer should be a part of this team’s long-term future–I like his defense and his attitude and believe he will hit. And I don’t think depriving Guerrier or Crain of opportunities to blow ballgames exactly hurts their development; nor do I believe the slightly longer stints will affect Nathan’s arm any. If it does, then he should go back to 9th inning only duties.

    Bottom line, I think the Twins are in an excellent position to wheel and deal at the end of this season. Let’s get those ace scouts together in a room and let them decide whether or not they made a mistake on Young, which of the quintet of young starters has the most limited long-term upside, and what pieces might be pried from other ballclubs in exchange for one of our outfielders, our young starters, or even our high-minors guys (as much as the team likes Jason Pridie, for example, is there any room for him up in Minnesota?).

    So, to toss the baton over to you guys: How do you allocate outfield/DH minutes? How do you align your bullpen duties? And how do you finesse winning now versus building for the future?

    David Brauer: Gents, there is no doubt in my mind someone fast should be playing left, be it Gomez or Span. Given our lack of righty DH, Young can suck up some of those ABs, and frankly, with his gun, should get some time in right, even though Cuddyer is great out there. I’d sit Gomez more, Young more, and Cuddy more to make it work.

    In other words, I agree with Britt.

    Kubel hits righties better than Young (makes sense given Kubel is a lefty and Young isn’t) so you can’t dump Jason to make it work.

    Brad would know the Cuddy-at-third thing better than me – is he permanently that bad? If you’re talking trade, you’re thinking anyone but Span. Go-Go, fan enthusiasm aside, is the most tempting dumpee, since he has value but is the most iffy. Young would fetch something but that would make the Garza trade too loathsome. Cuddy is the obvious choice to go, but poor performance + vets contract makes that hard. That’s why I’d try to find a modified, ¾-time platoon here.

    Don’t trust Breslow as more than a spot guy. Reyes is intriguing – he’s not back to his ’06 form, but he’s improved a lot from ’07. Did you know he pitched 108 innings for KC in ’04 (and had his worst professional season for San Diego the following year)?

    I think the Twins are so appropriately young (see my previous post) that they have wiggle room to go for it. A season like this may not come along next year. But it has to be picking up pen pitching.

    The countervailing view is that this team is appropriately young, no real threat to the Angels and Bosox this year, and MORE of the core will be in the 25-29 honeyspot next year.

    Brad Zellar: The outfield/DH situation with Cuddyer coming back is, as people are fond of saying, a good problem, but, all the same, it’s a problem I’d just as soon the Twins didn’t have, because I don’t see any truly satisfying answer. I’d much rather they had a couple more solid arms for the bullpen, or a true stud at third base.

    Regarding Span, he’s been a refreshing blast to watch, but I’d issue a warning about sample size (143 at bats). There is nothing –not a damn thing– in the guy’s utterly undistinguished minor league record prior to this year that would indicate that he’s capable of sustaining his current level of performance. Remember how excited everybody was about Gomez in the first couple months of the season? Remember that Span was up in April, when he his line was .258, .324, and .258 (that was more in line with his minor league projections). Granted, he did seem to have a breakthrough of sorts when he went back to Rochester and put up some terrific numbers, but still, the previous five seasons were what they were, and they were no where near what we’ve seen in his second stint with the club.

    I think Cuddyer’s a major league hitter. I think he has to play somewhere, and I’m pretty sure that somewhere isn’t third base (or –God forbid– second). The guy’s a right fielder. I also think they need to keep finding ways to get Kubel at bats. It’s time they let him take his rips against both righties and lefties, and find out how good he really is. If I was writing out the lineup cards he’d be my DH 80% of the time the rest of the way.

    I wonder why people don’t cut Delmon Young as much slack as they do Gomez? He’s been frustrating at times (and, yes, too many adventures in left field), but he’s essentially the same age as Carlos, and put up extremely promising numbers last year at Tampa Bay. I don’t know about the rumors regarding his work ethic or manners with the press, but I suspect from what I’ve seen that he’s a pretty good teammate, and my impression is that he’s been pressing and is going through an adjustment. I really believe he’s going to be a terrific player, once he learns to relax and stop listening to so many different people.

    I guess the one thing that sort of surprises me about this discussion in particular, and about the discussions that have swirled around this team all year, is the prevailing attitude about Gomez. People are worried about his confidence? For shit sake, he’s been doing a pretty good job of destroying that without a whole lot of help from anyone else. How high should the confidence be of a guy who’s hitting .257 with a .291 OBP (and 17 walks and 105 Ks)? This team is in a pennant race; you want to build the kid’s confidence, sit him down or send him to Rochester. I’m confident he’s going to be a player, but he’s really not a major league hitter right now. His value even when he was scuffling earlier was his speed, but as the season’s gone along he’s gotten worse (and more tentative) as a base stealer, and worse as a bunter (which is really saying something).

    I don’t know, maybe I’m nuts, but he seems like the plainly obvious choice to lose at bats, at least until Span cools off or somebody else comes up lame.

    I agree with Britt that if they’re going to stay in this thing and keep the bullpen from imploding entirely, they’re going to have to stretch out Reyes, get more innings out of Breslow, be a bit more flexible with Nathan (before his eighth-inning blip in Seattle the other night, I was agitating for them to turn him into Goose Gossage for the last couple months), and flip the roles of Bass and Bonser. I don’t ever want to see Bass come into a game to protect a 7-6 lead again, and I’m really not comfortable seeing him protect any sort of lead. Let him eat innings in blowouts, if need be. And please assure me that we’re going to see a few more warm bodies for the pen come September (at the latest).

    I’m not worked up about Morneau’s homerun falloff, if only because I can tell he’s becoming a better hitter. Teams are pitching him much more carefully, and he’s learning to be patient and take what he can get. He’s working the count and punishing mistakes, and he’s also had some huge hits on what were pretty damn good pitches (he’s gotten good at driving that down-and-away pitch). I think this development bodes well for him becoming one of the truly elite hitters in the game –power, average, on base percentage– and he’s already almost there.

    As for Harris’ defense, I was railing about it from the first series of the season, but at this point I guess we’re going to have to live with it, and he’s at least demonstrated he can hit a little bit.

    I’m standing my ground and predicting that they’re gonna win the Central.

    Maybe.

    Because I want them to.

     

  • Pleasure & Paint: Eric Inkala's Dreamworld Comes To Life


    ART

    Overflow: A Pleasure Trip


    Eric Inkala‘s no
    fool. After a good run of years of painting his coloristic, hazy-dazy,
    arabesque, Little-Engine-that-Could-meets-Pacman murals (this guy is a
    tagger of the most whimsical sort) on walls around town, Inkala’s
    finally been hit by the legitimacy bug. That is, in the manner of
    graffiti artists gone legit–like Keith Haring in the 1980s and, more recently, Barry McGee, whose work was a highlight of the recent Carnegie International–Inkala’s bringing his particular brand of graffiti stylings indoors to show at The Gallery @ Fox Tax. (Note: Fox Tax
    is a tax and financial services company that also has an art gallery.)
    Called "Overflow: A Pleasure Trip" and curated by Emma Berg of mplsart.com, this is being billed as Inkala’s first local solo gallery
    exhibition. How exactly he manages the transition (from outdoors to
    in-; from renegade to law-abider) remains to be seen, but press
    materials promise there will be "smoothly cut whales hanging from the
    ceiling," "bulbous characters" flowing in and out of the background,
    "walking creations of his recurring character," and the sum of these
    parts will form an "abstract diary that represents everything from the
    day-to-day mundane to his travel experiences…" -Michael Fallon



    Friday, 6pm-11pm, The Gallery at Fox Tax, 503 1st Avenue NE, Northeast Minneapolis, Free, Runs through Sept. 6th


    PERFORMANCE
    Le Cirque Rouge 5 Year Anniversary

    I
    am not usually a Burlesque fan, I suppose I’d call myself somewhat
    indifferent when it comes to it. Not for any particular reason, mind
    you, it’s just something that I am relatively "whatevs" to. However,
    when you factor in the ambiance of the totally Parisian alley behind
    Nick & Eddie, and maybe a pre-show Spicy Steak (to die for) in the restaurant, Burlesque suddenly sounds fantastically, decadently amazing. A likely event for lovers, swarthy art-winos and mysterious, red lipstick wearing babes and gun molls on a warm, starry night of the most seductive variety – with be-tasseled pasties of course! Le Cirque Rouge
    has been performing their tawdry, funny and super sexy burlesque show
    all over the Twin Cities and beyond for five whole years, so come on
    down to Loring Park to see what all the fuss is about. Tonight is what
    dreams, memories, (and possibly nipple slips) are made of!

    Friday, 10pm, Loring Alley behind Nick & Eddie, 1612 Harmon, Minneapolis, $6





    FESTIVALS

    Twin Cities Pan African Fest



    Wear your dancing shoes to this vibrant festival spotlighting African music in the Twin Cities presented the Non-Profit musician support organization D.E.M.O.,
    (The Diverse Emerging Music Organization) and co-sponsored by The Rake!
    Friday night will feature the "Hottest Afro-Caribbean Party of the
    Summer" at La Bodega Tapas Bar with festive live African and Caribbean music starting at 10pm. Saturday’s main event on the Nomad World Pub’s
    outdoor stage will feature Ghanaian rapper M.Anifest and KUT Dance with
    an indoor after party to follow with a variety of reggae and hip-hop
    acts including local darling Maria Isa. Sunday is a bit more chill with
    an evening film festival that will include three music documentaries on
    the African hip hop scene, Fela Kuti, and Bob Marley.



    Fri-Sun, Times and locations vary, Click HERE for complete schedule





    FRINGE FESTIVAL

    The Spaceman Chronicles


    With their previous entries into the Minnesota Fringe all selling out by the end of their respective festivals, the Four Humors
    troupe has become something of an August favorite in Minnesota theater.
    This will be their fourth year participating in the Fringe, and the
    group is affiliated with three shows that will be playing around town
    through August 10th. The Spaceman Chronicles is something they’ve been carrying in their pockets since 2006; they developed Mortem Capiendum earlier this year, and have been touring it at various festivals throughout North America; and Shift
    was written in the two months leading up to this summer’s Minnesota
    Fringe. The assortment of plays represents a solid cross-section of
    what the troupe has been producing since joining together, showcasing
    the talent that has prompted critics to say they "offer up such wit and
    hilarity that audience members will be doubled over in their seats" (Star Tribune). The Rake
    had a chat with three of the four artistic directors – Nick Ryan, Jason
    Ballweber, and Brant Miller – to talk a bit about their recent work. Click HERE to read the interview -Max Ross



    Saturday 2:30pm, Sunday 5:30pm, Theatre de la Jeune Lune 105 1st Street North, Minneapolis



    SPECIAL EVENT

    Pizza Luce Block Party



    This annual brouhaha takes over the intersection of 32nd & Lyndale,
    proving yet again that Pizza Luce and rockin’ out are synonymous.
    Mingle with the hipsters while stuffing your face with greasy gourmet
    pizza and/or juicy brats, swiggin’ ice cold beer and boppin’ to a
    stellar lineup of local bands (bonus points if you can do this all at
    the same time without making a mess)! Hosted by king of the
    boozehounds, Ian of Drinking with Ian and featuring a slew of awesome
    local bands such as Charlie Parr, the Brass Kings, Romantica, the
    Evening Rig,
    Rockford Mules, the Hawaii Show, A Night in the Box, Kill the Vultures
    and Crossing Guards.



    Saturday, Noon-10pm, Pizza Luce Uptown, 3200 Lyndale Avenue, Uptown, Free






    MUSIC

    Melissa Etheridge



    Award-winning musician and cancer survivor Melissa Etheridge will rock
    the O’Shaughnessy at the College of St. Catherine on Saturday, August
    9th at 8 pm. Etheridge, whose hits include "Come to My Window," is a
    celebrated gay rights and environmental activist who has two Grammy
    Awards to her credit. She also recently won an Academy Award for the
    song "I Need to Wake Up," which appeared in the 2006 documentary An
    Inconvenient Truth
    . Of her ten studio albums, five have gone platinum
    (including three that have gone multi-platinum) and two gold albums. -Andrew Newman



    Saturday, 8pm, The O’Shaghnessy, St. Kates Campus, 2004 Randolph Ave, St. Paul, $36-$101