Category: Blog Post

  • Making Hay in the Winter

    There’s going to be another inquiry into why the bridge
    fell. On top of the NTSB, the Legislative Auditor, and the Governor Pawlenty-hired
    consultants, we’re going to have the Minneapolis
    law firm of Gray Plant Mooty looking into things on behalf of a bi-partisan
    State House-Senate committee.

    One wonders why we need another such investigation. But it’s not
    too hard to figure out if you read the comments of the politicians who oppose
    its formation. One needs to look only as far as our head politician for the
    answer. Governor Pawlenty said that the
    purpose of the investigation was "to make political hay out of a tragic
    situation."

    I agree whole heartedly with the governor, but not because
    it’s wrong to make political hay here, but because it would be wrong not to.
    Here’s why: the bridge didn’t fall because we didn’t know that it needed
    repair. The bridge fell because we knew it needed repair and someone made a
    political, or, to be generous, a budgetary, decision not to make the repairs.
    That’s what I’d like to find out: who made that decision to play dice with the
    chances with the lives of the thousands of people who drove over that bridge
    every day?

    Applying Occam’s Razor (which is a principle of
    investigation which states, in essence, that the simplest possible solution to
    a problem is most often the correct one) I’m going with Pawlenty’s appointment
    of Carol Molnau, an anti-transportation, anti-tax ideologue, as transportation
    commissioner as the proximate cause.

    That political decision trumped all the engineering and
    maintenance recommendations that might have saved the bridge. And that’s hay
    that should be cut, baled and stacked for all of us to see every time we drive
    over a Minnesota
    bridge.

  • Abbreviated Trey: Still Going Down

    Game #24, Home Game #12: Golden State 111, Minnesota 98

    Season Record: 3-21

    First, a confession: An interview for another story I’m working on lasted much longer than anticipated, and as it turned out, I walked into Target Center at halftime, with the Wolves holding an 8-point lead. Thus, I only saw the collapse and don’t feel it fair to rip into performances without the context of what was apparently some inspired play, particularly from the recently maligned Rashad McCants, who got off for 13 in the first period and then four dimes and another six points in the second. Yeah, he was going up against Golden State and Nellyball, but those numbers seem to (at least temporarily) rebut my contention that McCants can’t score within the flow of the team’s offense.

    I don’t imagine me missing the first half is what Kelly Dwyer was hoping the future of sportswriting would be like. I don’t know Mr. Dwyer but was incredibly flattered by his generous praise in a column he wrote earlier today, and wish to publicly thank him. Before we drop the subject so it doesn’t go any further to my head, I just want to repeat that it is the quality of the comments on this blog and the knowledge that smart people are reading me that provides much of the enthusiasm that people enjoy in my work.

    1. Wittman Raises The Ante

    Randy Wittman angrily called out his team in the postgame press conference, essentially calling them spineless, and chokers. The coach again invoked the fighting analogy, claiming that when the team gets hit in the mouth it doesn’t fight back, and going so far as to say the team "would not allow people to do that to them in the parking lot." Earlier he had pretty much hollared, "At some point we have to man up, stand up and say `Enough is enough!’" The coach further added that when he called time out with 8:34 to go in the third, "their body language said it all to me…their heads were down." He noted it was something the team "had been fighting all year," specifically citing the 8 point halftime lead tonight, the six point halftime lead Monday in Miami, and the 15 point first quarter lead last week at home against Seattle–all for naught in three losses.

    I understand Witt is competitive, and increasingly frustrated. These losses are like water drips from a faucet when you’re trying to sleep–they’ll drive you temporarily crazy. But calling out a team is the coaching equivalent of firing a bullet–there are only so many chambers in that gun, and he needs to use them wisely. The season is 24 games old–58 to go–and the Wolves were without Foye, Ratliff, Walker, Jaric (felled by the flu) and Buckner tonight, while Craig Smith and Corey Brewer were both reportedly feeling ill.

    Now consider what Wittman is quoted as saying in today’s Strib. First, on Corey Brewer’s shooting woes: "He’s putting himself in trouble, driving the ball into trouble…He’s [taking] bad shots because he’s turning down an open 18-footer and dribbling in for a worse shot." In the next graph, the Strib reported that Witt talked to Jaric after Tuesday’s practice–about regaining his aggressiveness. "He needs to get it back. I don’t know why it left…It is hard for a coach to call on a guy when he’s showing no aggression."

    Got that? Corey Brewer needs to stop driving to the hoop and pull up for 18 footers but if you’re not aggressive, it is going to be hard for you to get in the game. I know Brewer and Jaric are two very different players and he was addressing them separately. But a day after being told to be more aggressive, Jaric is probably cradling the toilet–do you remember how you feel about yourself during that process? Like a baby. Meanwhile, Brewer shot 4-12 FG, which actually boosts his season FG%. Half his shots, but alas, only one of his makes, were from outside the paint.

    Leaving aside the timing of Wittman’s diatribe, he is at least half-right in questioning the gumption and self-confidence of his ballclub as it spits up leads. No matter how young or untalented an NBA is, when it yields 15 baskets in 20 shots, as the Wolves did during the third period tonight, it is a half-assed effort. But shoddy defense wasn’t Minnesota’s only undoing–once again, turnovers played a major role, and contributed to easy transition baskets that made the D look worse. After turning the ball over just twice in the entire first half, the Wolves coughed it up 7 times in a 6:15 span early in the third–and 5 different players were the culprits. I’m not sure questioning a team’s manhood and daring a squad to stand up and say "enough is enough" is going to reduce turnovers. The defense, on the other hand, could use a little of that macho swagger, as well as better cohesion.

    Wittman vowed to figure out how to fix things, which inevitably brings us back to the fact that he is the coach of a team that constantly blows leads and otherwise fails to take advantage of eminently winnable games. On the one hand, what can legitimately be expected of a ballclub without Foye and Ratliff, starting two guys–Brewer and Telfair– who are legitimately suspect shooters who must prove they have to be guarded; an undersized center and power forward if Jefferson and Smith are the tandem, and a mercurial shooting guard? On the other hand, is the aforementioned lineup, plus the likes of Jaric, Gomes, Richard and Walker off the bench, more likely to respond to the carrot or the stick. On this question, I’m a vegetarian.

    Bottom line, the Timberwolves won’t fire Wittman until the end of the year at the earliest–otherwise that is three coaches dumped during the regular season three of the last four years, which would be a loud and damning indictment of front office incompetence in at least two or three different ways. But with a mark of 2-19 to go with last year’s 12-30, Wittman needs to watch how loudly he yells "Enough is enough."

    2. Another Gerald Green Sighting

    Gerald Green had a relatively lovely stat line: 18 points on 6-13 FG, including 4-8 from beyond the arc, and 8 rebounds in 30:10. But I am forced to repeat that the kid is lost on defense. Seventeen seconds after he entered in the third quarter, Stephen Jackson had him swatting at air while executing a layup. Rare were the occasions when Green was properly face up on a man; much more often he was running at the shooter, caught in mid-leap to commit the foul or enable the penetration, or dashing over to the bench to ask what the hell to do when the Wolves went into what looked like a matchup zone. Again, the cavaet is that I didn’t see the 16:04 GG played in the first half, when he knocked in 10 points and grabbed five boards.

    3. Quick Hits

    When I saw Craig Smith gasping for air with 8:12 remaining in the third, I scrawled an angry note about his conditioning and not being ready for Golden State’s pace, only to later learn he is probably ill.

    Al Harrington had a monster night, getting 14 in the third on 5-5 FG and finishing with a game-best plus +27 in 30:43. Just for grins, it would be nice to see if Chris Richard could handle a guy like Harrington, who goes 6-9 250 but can play on the perimeter. Smith is too slow, Brewer too light, making Ryan Gomes the best bet. But Richard, who got only 4:52 all night anyway, might have been a good experiment.

    So, McCants only went 2-6 FG with one rebound and 2 assists in 21:11 of the second half and I still thought he played well, especially as the main defender on Baron Davis. Anyone want to rave about that first half?

    Bassy Telfair played the entire second half against Golden State’s murderous pace with predictible results: 1-9 FG, four turnovers.

  • The Princess and the Whoopee Spot

    MUSIC
    Morrison’s Down in the Hallow

    Precious time is slipping away for a chance to see classic rock icon Van Morrison
    perform. On the heels of the release of his greatest hits album he is
    back in the cities for one night only to play a show at Northrop
    Auditorium. —Kate McDonald

    7:30 p.m., Northrop Auditorium, 84 Church St. S.E., Minneapolis; 612-624-2345; $86-$211.

    MUSIC
    A Whoopee Spot Where the Gin Is Cold but the Piano Is Hot

    If the Van Morrison prices are a little too hard on your pocket, and Northrop is just a little too bright, we have an even groovier option for you tonight. Although
    the days of the mobster speakeasy inside a cave have ended, swing
    dancing to the jazz hits of the ’20s is still in full gear at the
    Wabasha Street Caves with the sweet retro-jazz-singer
    stylings of Christine Rosholt. Slick your hair, and wear your buckle shoes… and all that jazz. And come down to the cave tonight for a gin and a song or two. —Kate McDonald

    7 p.m., Wabasha Street Caves, 215 Wabasha St. S., St. Paul; 651-224-1191; $7.

     

    THEATER & PERORMANCE
    Support the Arts and Diana Princess of Whales Memorial Fund

    Take America’s obsession with Princess Diana, mix in some Mother Teresa action, and you’ve got yourself a fool-proof recipe for a tearjerker. Local theater company Urban Samurai has cooked this one up in their current production, The Diana Story — and they’ve managed to keep it smart. The play explores the unlikely friendship between the two powerful women as they work on the same cause to eliminate land minds. Your support will do some good, too, for one dollar of each ticket will be donated to the Diana Princess of Wales Memorial Fund. —Kate McDonald

    7:30 p.m., The Lowry Labs, 350 St. Peter St., St Paul; $15.

    SHOPPING
    First-ever Men’s Shopping Event at the Guthrie

    While they’re marketing it for men — as if only women enjoy the theater — no one is excluded from this first-ever Guthrie shopping event. Still have some last-minute gifts to pick up? Avoid the mall terror, and do your shopping in luxury — gifts first, happy hour after. That’s my kind of shopping! Choose from four special gift packages: The Jane Eyre Gift Package ($80, a $160 value) includes two show tickets, a poster, a T-shirt, and a CD with all of the original music from the show. The Dinner and a Show Gift Package ($150, a $218 value) includes a memorable prix fixe dinner for two at the award-winning Cue restaurant, followed by a pair of Guthrie tickets to the show of their choice. The Ultimate Season Ticket Package ($110, a $240 value) contains 4 ticket vouchers that can be given to one person or split amount several recipients. And the Guthrie Classes Gift Packages include either five ($65, an $80 value) or 10 classes ($105, a $155 value). Stop in during event hours and enjoy free gift wrapping, happy hour specials at Cue, and an eclectic mix of unique gift ideas.

    5 – 8 p.m. (Sunday from 3 to 6 p.m.), Guthrie Theater, 818 S. 2nd St., Minneapolis; 612-377-2224; $65-$155.

  • A Yo Ivanhoe Holiday Tradition

    Let’s suppose you –the hypothetical, perhaps wholly imagined You– stumble in here to Yo Ivanhoe on an occasional, one-time, or even purely accidental basis (one of those Google mishaps, say), completely unaware that this little futility closet is in fact a mere, very minor adjunct to a giant media empire (Rake Media Worldwide), which produces a print magazine in whose employ I –Brad Zellar– presently find myself, however tenuously.

    Rake Media Worldwide also operates a website, where Yo Ivanhoe enjoys sidebar status as a barely-tolerated exercise in pathetic self indulgence. You –the hypothetical, perhaps wholly imagined You– may not know any of this. And so you may not know that if you go to the Rake website and poke around a bit you can find (and watch) a video of me –Brad Zellar– reading, from the relative comfort of my modest home, a traditional Christmas story, complete with a live infant, a dog, a roaring fire, and an inebriate. I would post the thing right here but I don’t have the slightest idea how to do any such thing, so I will provide you with a link that will take you there.

    In doing this –a rare act of loathsome self promotion– I am motivated solely by the spirit of the season and a sort of pathological generosity. I hope that you will thank me for it, even as I feel the need to apologize for wasting your time.

  • Did Hillary Clinton Choose Her Fanny Over Her Face?

    Don’t think all the Hillary Clinton hullabaloo has gone
    unnoticed by the likes of me. Truth be told, I’ve been very busy at work this
    work, whereas my inner life has been consumed by a rage caused, for one,
    by the MPD’s horrific, paramilitary-style antics, but also by the revelation that certain
    political conservatives hate older women.

    OK, that’s not entirely true. In a way, I’m happy Rush et
    al. so freely expressed their misogyny (and forgive me for failing to link to their rubbish). Now, I can forward their screeds to all
    my female relatives, thereby turning them into life-long Democrats. 

    You see, I don’t think
    an ugly snapshot has necessarily ended Clinton’s
    presidential bid. (Urg, how irritating that I just had to fight an urge to refer
    to her by first name!) Rather, I think aging-and being criticized for your
    physical characteristics-is something that profoundly affects each and
    every woman. Most of us were held under the microscope at an early age. In my
    case, the tormentors fixed on my massive head of unruly, frizzy hair. The offshoot
    is that I, and almost every other woman alive, have a particular sensitivity
    about my appearance. In fact, I spend an embarrassing amount of time in front
    of the bathroom mirror most mornings, just staring at the constellation of
    wrinkles that increasingly lines my face. But no matter how much we
    women preen, pluck, or otherwise tend to our looks, we’re fully aware that these
    are essentially shallow pursuits. Being hot won’t make us happy. It won’t make us smart. Sure, we miss our beauty as it fades, but we don’t necessarily miss
    all the catcalls a walk down the street would inspire when we were in our teens
    and early twenties. Looks aren’t everything, guys! Pfft!!

     

    Anyhoo, much as we women like attracting (and deflecting)
    positive male attention, we’re also extremely sensitive to their mean-spirited
    attacks on our appearances. Look, Clinton
    looks a whole lot better than most of us look, or will look, at sixty years of
    age. Most women can only hope to look half this beautiful. Remember
    the way you reacted when your high-school boyfriend remarked that Winona Ryder
    looked sort of chubby in Heathers? Realizing she was, like, wa-ay thinner than you were, you
    then turned to him, clicked your tongue, and screamed at the top of your lungs: "That’s just a roundabout way of calling me fat!" OK, so maybe that was just me … But the point is this: An attack
    on one (of our faces) is an attack on all (of our faces). Heck, the way I see
    it, all those conservative blowhards just inspired a boatload of empathy from the
    2008 presidential campaign’s most important voting block: WOMEN!

    P.S. Here’s a thoughtful piece on the matter from Salon.com.

  • Big Hands in His Heart: An Interview with The Kite Runner's Homayoun Ershadi

    In The Kite Runner (opening Friday in area theaters), actor Homayoun Ershadi plays Baba, an Afghani intellectual and father of the child Amir, whose friendship and eventual betrayal from the servant boy Hassan forms the crux of the story. Ershadi is a graceful actor, whose intelligence and dignity shines in this movie. Originally an architecht, he was literally plucked from his car to play a role in the Iranian film A Taste of Cherry. Mr. Ershadi was kind enough to speak to me on behalf of the film, based on the bestselling novel by Khaled Hossein.

    Rake: What brought you to this project? I know you enjoyed the novel…

    Ershadi: I had finished reading The Kite Runner three months before they called me. Kate Dowd, the casting manager based in London, called to say that Mark Forster (the director) had seen my first film, A Taste of Cherry, and wanted to meet me. So I went to Kabul to see Forster and audition.

    Rake: For the sake of authenticity, the characters speak Dari. Did you speak that language yourself?

    Ershadi: No, but it’s very close to our language, to Iranian Farsi. The accents are different. Khalid Abdalla, who plays the older Amir, didn’t know one word of Dari so he stayed one month in Kabul and he learned. Now he speaks better than me and some people there. Before shooting we had a teacher who helped us learn Dari.

    Rake: What was it like working with the children? You had a great rapport with both Zekeria Ebrahimi and Ahmad Khan Mahmidzada [who play the younger Amir and Hassan, respectively]. Not only were they children, but totally untrained as actors.

    Ershadi: I had the experience before. I had a television show in Iran where I was a schoolteacher and had to work with kids. But these two kids—I can’t explain, I don’t have the words. They are so fantastic, so talented, diligent. They didn’t speak a word of English when they came to Beijing [where some of the production began]. It was very easy working with them.

    Rake: Had you ever been to pre-invasion Kabul?

    Ershadi: Never. This was my first time in Kabul.

    Rake: What was it about The Kite Runner that especially intrigued you? Is your relationship with Iran similar to the relationship that Baba has to Afghanistan?

    Ershadi: Yes, you can tell that. There’s some similarity to the story of Baba. I left Iran and went to Canada and returned in 1991. But you’re asking me why this book made me want to be part of the movie? When I read the book I couldn’t even imagine being a part of the movie. I was very proud when they called me. And I hope this brings out more Iranian actors. We have lots of talented actors and actresses. I hope this is a start for the movie industry in Iran.

    But The Kite Runner is a story about friendship, guilt, forgiveness, redemption. These are the terms that people connect with. It is not just for Afghan people, it is very human, it crosses religion, culture, background. The story’s human.

    Rake: What were some of the more interesting challenges filming The Kite Runner?

    Ershadi: We never had a problem. Everything was very smooth. There was teamwork—everyone helped one another. It was a big crew, 200-300 people. I never worked with such a crew, but we all worked together.

    Rake: The kite scenes were interesting. Did the kids actually fly the kites?

    Ershadi: Yes! They knew, but had to learn a little bit before they came to Beijing. Kite flying, you know, is a part of their culture in Afghanistan. Still you go to Kabul you’ll see kites in the sky. But as you know, they can’t afford to buy kites, they make them from plastic bags you get for garbage or from stores.

    Rake: You don’t physically resemble the character you play in The Kite Runner. He’s described as big, as someone who could wrestle a bear. But the director, Mark Forster, noticed that you "acted from the inside". What does that mean?

    Ershadi: When they called me to go to Kabul I was surprised. Baba in the book is 6′ 8", big hands, etc. I saw Mark and I said, "Are you sure I’m the right person?" He asked why. I explained our differences, and he said, "Don’t worry about that. Read your lines." After that I realized that he saw the 6′ 8" and the big hands in my heart and my face and the way I read my lines. It was a big risk to cast a small guy as Baba.

    Rake: Are you still in touch with a number of the actors?

    Ershadi: Before The Kite Runner I had one son and one daughter. But with Khalid Abdalla, who plays the older Amir, I realized that I had two sons and one daughter. He became my son, too. Our relationship grows. Even now we talk every night on the phone, asking about each other’s day. The other actors I email and call.

    Rake: Your performance is very touching, very impressive.

    Ershadi: It was not acting. [Touches heart] It comes from here.

  • The End Is Nigh!

    In the lean years that will
    soon follow, survivors will look back upon December 19, 2007 with pain
    and sorrow in their haunted eyes — for this day marked the beginning
    of the end. The Seventh Seal will soon be open, for the passage of the first increase in
    CAFÉ standards in more than 30 years

    can be naught but a signal that the End Times are upon us.

    Now, the "Energy Independence,
    Clean Air, and Climate Security Act of 2007
    "
    is fairly atypical for a piece of compromise legislation in that it
    actually accomplishes something. That is, something beyond giving the honorable
    representative from Alaska

    some pork to sustain him through long cold nights spent dreaming of
    the day when Josh Hartnett
    will save him

    from the vampires that so often stalk Yukon towns. And to be sure, Rep.
    Don Young, even the legendary Hartnett, whose superhuman charms kept
    the ravenous hunger of Scarlett Johansson sated for longer than any
    normal man could ever hope for, cannot save you from the pending apocalypse
    signaled by the passage of a bill that calls for increased fuel consumption
    standards in passenger cars and light trucks. By 2020, no longer
    will Hummers be able to tool along I-94, secure in their superior ability
    to carry Viagra users from one tarmac covered area to another whilst
    fueling their unholy internal combustion with the most beautiful virgins
    in the land. And believe me – virgins do not make for efficient combustion.
    No, in just 13 short years, assuming the sun does not suddenly collapse
    into a neutron star when our fearless leader puts pen to paper on an
    environmentally friendly piece of legislation, the average fuel economy
    of every automaker’s fleet will be bumped to 35 miles per gallon.

     

    Of course, if one were not
    paying attention, it might be difficult to understand why this seemingly
    positive change signals a pending holocaust. I, however, am uniquely
    qualified to read these dire portents. Allow me to break it down for
    all y’all. While the phenomenon of congressional leaders finally summoning
    the intestinal fortitude to turn down the 72 virgin party offered by
    automakers and oil-producing countries may induce some to think the
    Rapture is coming, I have a much more simple theory. The passage of
    this bill may signal the Four Horseman simply because most experts for
    the last 30 years believed a hermaphrodite would make a run for the
    presidency before any elected official would make changes to those standards.
    Turns out they were right. And for the first time since the
    energy crisis of the 70s, no filibusters were held in protest of this
    assault on America’s big iron. No one listened to the feeble cries
    of American automakers screaming at the prospect of being forced to
    innovate, rather than offer U.S. consumers the chance to buy the umpteenth iteration
    of the Ford Taurus
    .
    To be fair, the Taurus does not burn virgins for fuel. But it won’t
    get you in the back seat with one either. Of course, neither will most of today’s
    greenest cars
    .

    Which brings us back to the
    apocalypse – an apocalypse that saves us nearly three million barrels
    of oil a day in 2020 and takes care of nearly a quarter of the U.S.’
    greenhouse emissions targets. Even more astounding, and quite possibly
    referenced in the Book of Revelations, is the addition of the Clean
    Power Act of 2007 – requiring the EPA to issue reduction targets in
    emissions from various and sundry power plants. Not to mention the ultra
    nifty perk for Minnesota that will have farmers from Redwood Falls to
    Ely twitching with subsidy-inspired incontinence – required U.S. biofuel
    production of 36 billion gallons by 2022. That’s a whole lot of corn
    – spelling millions upon millions of dollars for Minnesota farmers
    (which will get a virgin in the back seat of a Taurus).

    Just don’t expect to have
    long to enjoy it. Make your peace with your maker, horde foodstuffs,
    firearms, and neighborhood women, and convert your vehicle to run on
    vegetable oil, for today’s CAFÉ standards mark the beginning of Ragnarok.
    The great fire giant Surtr will soon cross the Rainbow Bridge with his
    ravening hordes and cleanse the world of late model Fords, sparing only
    Priuses and other Al Gore approved means of transportation. Like I said
    a couple days ago – we’re boned.

  • Chuck Huck

    I heard that Mike Huckabee is pals with Chuck Norris and that the "Huck and Chuck" show plays well in Iowa. Apparently the former preacher also takes alot of fitness breaks because he doesn’t want to slip and fall on the black prairie ice.

    And this guy is pals with Chuck?

    That sucks.

    I would like to suggest a few vehicles to spirit his formerly large rear end outside to spew a few more aphorisms to the faithful.

    (Photo: Mike taking some time off on a treadmill. Notice the oh-mi-gawd paunch he has developed by indulging his passion for ding-dongs. I pray their human counterparts don’t vote often.)

    I’ve already blogged about the 2008 Suzuki XL-7. It might be a good choice for a surging, underfunded campaign.

    He could also save some money with a stylish new 2008 Saturn Vue Green Line (the hottest new mid-sized SUV on the market).

    I am also told my buddy Andy GG (of Pontiac Aztek fame) is unloading his beloved Lunar Rover on E-Bay.

    With its over-the-top interior it’s man enough for Chuck.

    I can’t speak for Huck.

    P.S. And remember that "there is no theory of evolution, just a list of creatures CN allows to live". This from chucknorrisisgod.com.

    Seasons Greetings.

     

     

  • Aloof and Expensive, But I Like It

    Maybe it’s an Edina thing. You step inside the city limits and suddenly you rather like a restaurant server who eyes you suspiciously for several minutes, then approaches sniffily to ask what you want.

    You don’t mind paying 20 percent more for a loaf of bread with goat cheese and olive tapenade than you would, say, in Powderhorn Park. Or half again as much for a tiny appetizer-style hamburger as you would downtown. I don’t know what it is. . . .All I do know is, I’m typically a bear about service and price, yet I keep going back to Beaujo’s Wine Bar & Bistro because — and I don’t have any better explanation than this — I just like it there.

    In all fairness, a lot of it is quality. When you get that loaf of bread it comes with three really generous pots of the various spreads and a set of crackers, too, in case you’re feeling less carb-consumptive than usual. When you order the Wasabi Ginger Salmon Salad you pay a hefty $14.50, but the greens are absolutely fresh and the julienned snow peas are crisp and the dressing has the most pleasing bite.

    What’s more, there’s really not a bad table in the place (and I find this is very rare. . . .). There are a couple high four-tops in the front window that I particularly like. And all the others are against walls, so you’re never sitting stranded in the middle of a room with servers brushing by you and carrying trays overhead.

    Recently, Beaujo’s made a couple changes. They’ve freshened up their wine list, adding some really excellent ones, like the Chateau du Trignon Cotes de Rhone, a Saint Pierre Sancerre, and the Alamos Torrentes from Argentina. Every wine they serve is offered by the glass, the half glass, or the bottle (which I LOVE because often, when I’m driving, 1-1/2 glasses is just right but two is excessive). They’ve added flexible wine flights to the menu: basically three half-pours for a set price. And they’re now open on Sundays, starting at 3 p.m.

    Personally, I’m very happy about this last bit of news. Because there’s nothing I like more on a Sunday than a cheap matinee at the Edina Theater followed by a glass of wine. And no matter whom I’ve met at Beaujo’s, they’ve been happy there: whether dining on salads or sandwiches or biscotti and tea.

    The one thing, truthfully, that I still cannot figure out is the service. I have been ignored at this place for long stretches of time — never in a hostile way, but I get the feeling that the women who man the bar (an odd phrase, I know. . . .but in this case, it’s fitting) simply don’t care if I stay and take off my coat or get tired of waiting and slip away. No matter how many times I visit, no matter how familiar I become, they approach in the same way: warily, as if I’m taking up their valuable time. Sometimes it makes me angry.

    Then the wine arrives at a pitch-perfect temperature and the salad comes pretty and fresh and clean. And I forgive them. Again.

  • So Nice To Be Naughty

    MUSIC
    Bustin’ Beats from Belfast

    In preparation for the real Van the Man show tomorrow night, jam to the tunes of one of his most popular tribute bands The Belfast Cowboys. They’ll be playing all the Van Morrison greats this evening — for a fraction of his concert prices. Whether or not they’ll actually play anything off his new album is highly debatable, but let’s face it — we’re all suckers for "Moondance" and "Brown Eyed Girl" anyhow. —Kate McDonald

    8 p.m., First Avenue, 701 1st Ave. N., Minneapolis; 612-332-1775; $6-$8.

    THEATER
    Matthew Ashford and Other Favorite Things

    Apparently, someone took the expression "break a leg" a little too seriously. But even a broken leg is not enough to stop Maria — the legendary Maria — you know the one. The show much go on, and the hills are still alive with the Sound of Music, now playing at the Ordway. Come sing along to the well known tunes of one of Rodgers and Hammerstein’s most popular musicals. Although this show does not feature the incomparable musical stylings of Julie Andrews, it does cast Days of Our Lives soap opera star Matthew Ashford as Captain von Trapp to make up for it. —Kate McDonald

    8 p.m., Ordway Center, 345 Washington St., St. Paul; 651-224-4222; $45-$75.

    PERFORMANCE
    Naughty Nutcrackers Like Beyonce

    The classic Nutcracker might seem like a perfectly harmless childhood fairytale: snowflakes and sugar plum fairies, parties, presents and trees. But let’s face it — bon bons, toy soldiers, cherubs, and giant phalli are all a bit on the campy side, no? Toss in a few Beyonce tunes (don’t forget the dancing wooden doll), and you’ve got a seriously naughty Nutcracker. Leave it to the Ballet of the Dolls! Their Nutcracker?! (not so) Suite features a dancing Barbie and Ken, and classic Bing Crosby show tunes that will leave you wondering… why be nice when you can be so naughty? —Kate McDonald

    8 p.m., The Ritz, 345 13th Ave. N.E., Minneapolis; 612-436-1129; $15.